Einsteinians Destroy Human Rationality: Is It Profitable?

Neil deGrasse Tyson: "One of the towering great achievements of the human mind in our understanding of the universe is Einstein's theories of relativity. It makes only two assumptions: That the speed of light in a vacuum is constant no matter who is doing the measurement and no matter in what direction you are moving or how fast. You always get the same measurement for the speed of light. That's Assumption 1 which by the way the experiment has shown to be true. Assumption 2: The laws of physics are the same for all observers in uniform motion relative to one another. Those are the only two tenets that you have to buy into. Given those two tenets, extraordinary spooky phenomena derive from them. For example: As you travel faster, time ticks more slowly for you than it does for other people who are not. The traveling twin when he comes back is only 5 years older, we have aged 110 years."
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n2s1-RHuljo

Note the statement

"As you travel faster, time ticks more slowly for you".

This is an exceptionally pernicious lie. Actually special relativity predicts the opposite:

As you travel faster, time ticks FASTER for you.

The special relativity's prediction is wrong of course but at least it VALIDLY follows from Einstein's 1905 postulates. Neil deGrasse Tyson's statement is non sequitur - its presence makes any rational analysis of the twin paradox virtually impossible.

Brian Greene and Brian Cox teach the same pernicious lie:

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=QnmnLmwBmfE
Brian Greene: "If you're moving relative to somebody else, time for you slows down."

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-O8lBIcHre0
Brian Cox (2:25) : "Moving clocks run slowly"

Is it profitable to destroy human rationality so mercilessly? Yes it is:

Neil deGrasse Tyson is an American astrophysicist, author, and science communicator who has a net worth of $2 million dollars. https://www.celebritynetworth.com/ri...son-net-worth/

Brian Greene is an American theoretical physicist and string theorist who has a net worth of $2 million. https://www.celebritynetworth.com/ri...ene-net-worth/

TV Scientist Brian Cox has seen profits in his company rocket to almost £2 million. https://www.thesun.co.uk/tvandshowbi...most-2million/

The hymn of rich victorious Einsteinians:

"Now, listen carefully. The faster you move, the heavier you get. Light travels at the same speed no matter how you look at it. No matter how I move relative to you light travels at the same speed. No matter who is doing the measurement and no matter what direction you are moving the speed of light is the same. The speed of light is the same no matter what direction or how fast... As you travel faster time slows down. Everything slows down. Everything slows down. Time slows down when you move. Time passes at a different rate. Clocks run slow. It's a monumental shift in how we see the world. It's a beautiful piece of science. It's a beautifully elegant theory. It's a beautiful piece of science. It's a beautiful piece..."
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BuxFXHircaI

Pentcho Valev

LIGO conspirators:

http://dreamheron.files.wordpress.co...fraud_take.jpg

Kip Thorne deserves much more money because he is one of the most blatant liars in Einsteiniana. Here he teaches that Newton's theory predicts no deflection as starlight passes near the sun:

Kip Thorne: "A second crucial proof of the breakdown in Newtonian gravity was the relativistic bending of light. Einstein's theory predicted that starlight passing near the limb of the sun should be deflected by 1.75 seconds of arc, whereas NEWTON'S LAW PREDICTED NO DEFLECTION. Observations during the 1919 eclipse of the sun in Brazil, carried out by Sir Arthur Eddington and his British colleagues, brilliantly confirmed Einstein's prediction to an accuracy of about 20 percent. This dealt the final death blow to Newton's law and to most other relativistic theories of gravity."
http://commons.erau.edu/cgi/viewcont...ss-proceedings

Brothers Einsteinians don't rebuke Kip Thorne - they admire his breathtaking dishonesty and will give him the Nobel prize this year.

Pentcho Valev

In Einstein's schizophrenic world the silliest Einsteinian is the richest one:

Michio Kaku is an American futurist and theoretical physicist who has a net worth of $5 million. https://www.celebritynetworth.com/ri...aku-net-worth/

Kaku is so disgustingly stupid that brothers Einsteinians sometimes forget the rules of the brotherhood and expose his stupidity in public:

JOHN NORTON: "Finally, in an apparent eagerness to provide a seamless account, an author may end up misstating the physics. Kaku (2004, p. 45) relates how Einstein found that his aversion to frozen light was vindicated when he later learned Maxwell's theory." MICHIO KAKU: "When Einstein finally learned Maxwell's equations, he could answer the question that was continually on his mind. As he suspected, he found that there were no solutions of Maxwell's equations in which light was frozen in time. But then he discovered more. To his surprise, he found that in Maxwell's theory, light beams always traveled at the same velocity, no matter how fast you moved." JOHN NORTON AGAIN: "This is supposedly what Einstein learned as a student at the Zurich Polytechnic, where he completed his studies in 1900, well before the formulation of the special theory of relativity. Yet the results described are precisely what is not to be found in the ether based Maxwell theory Einstein would then have learned. That theory allows light to slow and be frozen in the frame of reference of a sufficiently rapidly moving observer." http://www.pitt.edu/~jdnorton/papers/Chasing.pdf

As far as imbecility is concerned, Michio Kaku is the champion of the champions in Einstein's schizophrenic world:

"World renown scientist says he has found proof of God! We may be living the the 'Matrix'. Michio Kaku believes he has found evidence for God in his work. Kaku is a well respected scientist, who has helped pioneer String Theory of the universe, the idea that the universe is formed by many different dimensions of space and time. String Theory is very complex and requires a significant background in physics to explain, but it is favored by many scientists because it succinctly answers many of the questions they have about the universe. [...] While working on String Theory, Kaku, discovered what he sees as evidence that the universe is created by an intelligence, rather than merely formed by random forces. He suggests he can explain it by what he calls, "primitive semi-radius tachyons." We do not yet have a succinct explanation of this idea from Kaku, other than he's referring to tachyons, which are theoretical particles that unbind particles from one another. Without getting into physics itself, Kaku concludes that we live in a Matrix-style universe, created by an intelligence. "I have concluded that we are in a world made by rules created by an intelligence", he said. "Believe me, everything that we call chance today won't make sense anymore. To me it is clear that we exists in a plan which is governed by rules that were created, shaped by a universal intelligence and not by chance." http://www.catholic.org/news/technol...y.php?id=69335

Pentcho Valev

Brian Cox wouldn't be millionaire if he was unable to lie as blatantly as this:

Brian Cox, Jeff Forshaw, Why Does E=mc2?: (And Why Should We Care?), p. 91: "...Maxwell's brilliant synthesis of the experimental results of Faraday and others strongly suggested that the speed of light should be the same for all observers. This conclusion was supported by the experimental result of Michelson and Morley, and taken at face value by Einstein."
https://www.amazon.com/Why-Does-mc2-.../dp/0306818760

These are the two fundamental lies on which the teaching of Einstein's relativity is based:

1. Maxwell's 19th century theory showed that the speed of light is the same for all observers.

2. The Michelson-Morley experiment showed that the speed of light is the same for all observers.

Ninety-nine percent of the Einsteinians teach those lies. Yet the truth does show up sometimes, even though this remains unnoticed in the post-truth world:

"That [Maxwell's] theory allows light to slow and be frozen in the frame of reference of a sufficiently rapidly moving observer." http://www.pitt.edu/~jdnorton/papers/Chasing.pdf

"To it, we should add that the null result of the Michelson-Morley experiment was unhelpful and possibly counter-productive in Einstein's investigations of an emission theory of light, for the null result is predicted by an emission theory." http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/1228..._Discover..pdf

"Emission theory, also called emitter theory or ballistic theory of light, was a competing theory for the special theory of relativity, explaining the results of the Michelson–Morley experiment of 1887. [...] The name most often associated with emission theory is Isaac Newton. In his corpuscular theory Newton visualized light "corpuscles" being thrown off from hot bodies at a nominal speed of c with respect to the emitting object, and obeying the usual laws of Newtonian mechanics, and we then expect light to be moving towards us with a speed that is offset by the speed of the distant emitter (c ± v)." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emission_theory

"The Michelson-Morley experiment is fully compatible with an emission theory of light that CONTRADICTS THE LIGHT POSTULATE." http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/1743/2/Norton.pdf

Pentcho Valev

Michio Kaku is not the richest Einsteinian - Stephen Hawking is:

Stephen Hawking has an estimated net worth of $20 million. http://www.therichest.com/celebnetwo...ing-net-worth/

I don't know why Hawking has been given so much money - he is not exceptionally good at lying and his lies are the standard ones in Einstein cult. For instance, he fraudulently teaches that the Michelson-Morley experiment has confirmed the constancy of the speed of light, but the lie is universally taught:

Stephen Hawking, A Brief History of Time, Chapter 2: "The special theory of relativity was very successful in explaining that the speed of light appears the same to all observers (as shown by the Michelson-Morley experiment) and in describing what happens when things move at speeds close to the speed of light." http://www.amazon.com/Brief-History-.../dp/0553380168

Perhaps John Horgan could explain why Hawking is such a successful profiteer:

John Horgan: Cosmic Clowning: Stephen Hawking's "new" theory of everything is the same old CRAP https://blogs.scientificamerican.com...same-old-crap/

Pentcho Valev

Neil deGrasse Tyson making money: Here he informs the gullible world that, according to relativity, time ticks more slowly for the traveler (actually relativity predicts the opposite) and draws idiotic conclusions from the fraudulent assertion:

Neil deGrasse Tyson on Photons and Relativity https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5ELA3ReWQJY

The truth: According to relativity, time ticks FASTER for the traveler:

http://www.people.fas.harvard.edu/~djmorin/chap11.pdf
David Morin, Introduction to Classical Mechanics With Problems and Solutions, Chapter 11, p. 14: "Twin A stays on the earth, while twin B flies quickly to a distant star and back. [...] For the entire outward and return parts of the trip, B does observe A's clock running slow..."

http://topquark.hubpages.com/hub/Twin-Paradox
"The situation is that a man sets off in a rocket travelling at high speed away from Earth, whilst his twin brother stays on Earth. [...] ...the twin in the spaceship considers himself to be the stationary twin, and therefore as he looks back towards Earth he sees his brother ageing more slowly than himself."

Pentcho Valev