|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Relating Virtual Particles With Black Holes???
My mass density theory relates them only with photons,and gravitrons.
All the complex different densities of a star that falls into a BH collapse into one density. Reality is this is the only way it can be. Black holes can only have one type of mass,and it is the only type. What is this type???????? I will from this day forward call it BH mass. BH has little or no energy untill hitting its critical mass density. When rotation stops and it becomes a perfect sphere it has to explode. My idea is all mass inside a BH we can not relate with real mass,but could relate with "virtual particles" Will add this If an electon lost its spin it would no longer be an electron If a BH lost its spin it has to explode. Here is another one of my thoughts If a BH varied I would have big problems coming into these ideas. They are simple. Their size depends only on their mass+ speed of rotation. BHs in back of galaxies and ideed in the core of galaxies creates red light,and that can be usefull and harmful in our thinking Go figure TreBert |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Relating Virtual Particles With Black Holes???
YOU REALLY ARE ****ED IN THE HEAD!
Saul Levy On Mon, 15 Oct 2012 08:01:41 -0700 (PDT), "G=EMC^2" wrote: My mass density theory relates them only with photons,and gravitrons. All the complex different densities of a star that falls into a BH collapse into one density. Reality is this is the only way it can be. Black holes can only have one type of mass,and it is the only type. What is this type???????? I will from this day forward call it BH mass. BH has little or no energy untill hitting its critical mass density. When rotation stops and it becomes a perfect sphere it has to explode. My idea is all mass inside a BH we can not relate with real mass,but could relate with "virtual particles" Will add this If an electon lost its spin it would no longer be an electron If a BH lost its spin it has to explode. Here is another one of my thoughts If a BH varied I would have big problems coming into these ideas. They are simple. Their size depends only on their mass+ speed of rotation. BHs in back of galaxies and ideed in the core of galaxies creates red light,and that can be usefull and harmful in our thinking Go figure TreBert |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Relating Virtual Particles With Black Holes???
On Oct 15, 8:01*am, "G=EMC^2" wrote:
My mass density theory relates them only with photons,and gravitrons. All the complex different densities of a star that falls into a BH collapse into one density. Reality is this is the only way it can be. Black holes can only have one type of mass,and it is the only type. What is this type???????? * I will from this day forward call it BH mass. BH has little or no energy untill hitting its critical mass density. *When rotation stops and it becomes a perfect sphere it has to explode. *My idea is all mass inside a BH we can not relate with real mass,but could relate with "virtual particles" *Will add this *If an electon lost its spin it would no longer be an electron *If a BH lost its spin it has to explode. * *Here is another one of my thoughts If a BH varied I would have big problems coming into these ideas. They are simple. Their size depends only on their mass+ speed of rotation. * *BHs in back of galaxies and ideed in the core of galaxies creates red light,and that can be usefull and harmful in our thinking * *Go figure *TreBert Aether is most likely a 2D quantum of dark/clear substance made almost entirely of photons and gravitons (aka zero Hz photons). |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Relating Virtual Particles With Black Holes???
On Oct 15, 12:39*pm, Brad Guth wrote:
On Oct 15, 8:01*am, "G=EMC^2" wrote: My mass density theory relates them only with photons,and gravitrons. All the complex different densities of a star that falls into a BH collapse into one density. Reality is this is the only way it can be. Black holes can only have one type of mass,and it is the only type. What is this type???????? * I will from this day forward call it BH mass. BH has little or no energy untill hitting its critical mass density. *When rotation stops and it becomes a perfect sphere it has to explode. *My idea is all mass inside a BH we can not relate with real mass,but could relate with "virtual particles" *Will add this *If an electon lost its spin it would no longer be an electron *If a BH lost its spin it has to explode. * *Here is another one of my thoughts If a BH varied I would have big problems coming into these ideas. They are simple. Their size depends only on their mass+ speed of rotation. * *BHs in back of galaxies and ideed in the core of galaxies creates red light,and that can be usefull and harmful in our thinking * *Go figure *TreBert Aether is most likely a 2D quantum of dark/clear substance made almost entirely of photons and gravitons (aka zero Hz photons). Brad take a look how fast the 3 brainless low wit wonders of the universe jump on people that can think. I call them **** heads. TreBert |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Relating Virtual Particles With Black Holes???
On Oct 15, 8:01*am, "G=EMC^2" wrote:
My mass density theory relates them only with photons,and gravitrons. All the complex different densities of a star that falls into a BH collapse into one density. Reality is this is the only way it can be. Black holes can only have one type of mass,and it is the only type. What is this type???????? * I will from this day forward call it BH mass. BH has little or no energy untill hitting its critical mass density. *When rotation stops and it becomes a perfect sphere it has to explode. *My idea is all mass inside a BH we can not relate with real mass,but could relate with "virtual particles" *Will add this *If an electon lost its spin it would no longer be an electron *If a BH lost its spin it has to explode. * *Here is another one of my thoughts If a BH varied I would have big problems coming into these ideas. They are simple. Their size depends only on their mass+ speed of rotation. * *BHs in back of galaxies and ideed in the core of galaxies creates red light,and that can be usefull and harmful in our thinking * *Go figure *TreBert I don't thing they even spin. Time stands still. Why wouldn't their energy of spin just become part of their mass. One type of mass, you said. Double-A |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Relating Virtual Particles With Black Holes???
On Oct 15, 10:25*am, "G=EMC^2" wrote:
On Oct 15, 12:39*pm, Brad Guth wrote: On Oct 15, 8:01*am, "G=EMC^2" wrote: My mass density theory relates them only with photons,and gravitrons. All the complex different densities of a star that falls into a BH collapse into one density. Reality is this is the only way it can be. Black holes can only have one type of mass,and it is the only type. What is this type???????? * I will from this day forward call it BH mass. BH has little or no energy untill hitting its critical mass density. *When rotation stops and it becomes a perfect sphere it has to explode. *My idea is all mass inside a BH we can not relate with real mass,but could relate with "virtual particles" *Will add this *If an electon lost its spin it would no longer be an electron *If a BH lost its spin it has to explode. * *Here is another one of my thoughts If a BH varied I would have big problems coming into these ideas. They are simple. Their size depends only on their mass+ speed of rotation. * *BHs in back of galaxies and ideed in the core of galaxies creates red light,and that can be usefull and harmful in our thinking * *Go figure *TreBert Aether is most likely a 2D quantum of dark/clear substance made almost entirely of photons and gravitons (aka zero Hz photons). Brad take a look how fast the 3 brainless low wit wonders of the universe jump on people that can think. *I call them **** heads. TreBert Yes indeed, and there's actually a lot more than just 3 "**** heads" that seldom if ever contribute anything original or even the least bit outside of their redneck mainstream status-quo box. These brown-nosed clowns and parrots are the true FUD-masters that they are. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Relating Virtual Particles With Black Holes???
On Oct 15, 10:07*pm, Brad Guth wrote:
On Oct 15, 10:25*am, "G=EMC^2" wrote: On Oct 15, 12:39*pm, Brad Guth wrote: On Oct 15, 8:01*am, "G=EMC^2" wrote: My mass density theory relates them only with photons,and gravitrons. All the complex different densities of a star that falls into a BH collapse into one density. Reality is this is the only way it can be. Black holes can only have one type of mass,and it is the only type. What is this type???????? * I will from this day forward call it BH mass. BH has little or no energy untill hitting its critical mass density. *When rotation stops and it becomes a perfect sphere it has to explode. *My idea is all mass inside a BH we can not relate with real mass,but could relate with "virtual particles" *Will add this *If an electon lost its spin it would no longer be an electron *If a BH lost its spin it has to explode. * *Here is another one of my thoughts If a BH varied I would have big problems coming into these ideas. They are simple. Their size depends only on their mass+ speed of rotation. * *BHs in back of galaxies and ideed in the core of galaxies creates red light,and that can be usefull and harmful in our thinking * *Go figure *TreBert Aether is most likely a 2D quantum of dark/clear substance made almost entirely of photons and gravitons (aka zero Hz photons). Brad take a look how fast the 3 brainless low wit wonders of the universe jump on people that can think. *I call them **** heads. TreBert Yes indeed, and there's actually a lot more than just 3 "**** heads" that seldom if ever contribute anything original or even the least bit outside of their redneck mainstream status-quo box. *These brown-nosed clowns and parrots are the true FUD-masters that they are. Brad I think their posts are showing they need help. Its to bad they are neglected They could hurt themselves or others. We must show them we care TeBet |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Relating Virtual Particles With Black Holes???
On Oct 16, 4:54*am, "G=EMC^2" wrote:
On Oct 15, 10:07*pm, Brad Guth wrote: On Oct 15, 10:25*am, "G=EMC^2" wrote: On Oct 15, 12:39*pm, Brad Guth wrote: On Oct 15, 8:01*am, "G=EMC^2" wrote: My mass density theory relates them only with photons,and gravitrons. All the complex different densities of a star that falls into a BH collapse into one density. Reality is this is the only way it can be. Black holes can only have one type of mass,and it is the only type. What is this type???????? * I will from this day forward call it BH mass. BH has little or no energy untill hitting its critical mass density. *When rotation stops and it becomes a perfect sphere it has to explode. *My idea is all mass inside a BH we can not relate with real mass,but could relate with "virtual particles" *Will add this *If an electon lost its spin it would no longer be an electron *If a BH lost its spin it has to explode. * *Here is another one of my thoughts If a BH varied I would have big problems coming into these ideas. They are simple. Their size depends only on their mass+ speed of rotation. * *BHs in back of galaxies and ideed in the core of galaxies creates red light,and that can be usefull and harmful in our thinking * *Go figure *TreBert Aether is most likely a 2D quantum of dark/clear substance made almost entirely of photons and gravitons (aka zero Hz photons). Brad take a look how fast the 3 brainless low wit wonders of the universe jump on people that can think. *I call them **** heads. TreBert Yes indeed, and there's actually a lot more than just 3 "**** heads" that seldom if ever contribute anything original or even the least bit outside of their redneck mainstream status-quo box. *These brown-nosed clowns and parrots are the true FUD-masters that they are. Brad I think their posts are showing they need help. Its to bad they are neglected * * * * * * They could hurt themselves or others. *We must show them we care * *TeBet They already have hurt themselves and many generations of K12s that can no longer deductively think for themselves, and to a great extent it's why we have bogus or proxy wars which we and future generations get to suffer through and pay for. Perhaps we care too much about everyone and everything, whereas they get to care about nothing unless it directly improves and/or further insures their own quality of life that's usually public funded and/or faith-based protected, from ever having any remorse about anything they've screwed up. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Relating Virtual Particles With Black Holes???
SINCE THE PIG IS DEAD, YOU ARE THE BIGGEST ****HEAD HERE,
BEERTbrainMORONIDIOT! NO DOUBT ABOUT IT EITHER! BUT WE DO STILL HAVE PEENUSINTHEASSKOOK! Saul Levy On Mon, 15 Oct 2012 10:25:15 -0700 (PDT), "G=EMC^2" wrote: On Oct 15, 12:39*pm, Brad Guth wrote: On Oct 15, 8:01*am, "G=EMC^2" wrote: My mass density theory relates them only with photons,and gravitrons. All the complex different densities of a star that falls into a BH collapse into one density. Reality is this is the only way it can be. Black holes can only have one type of mass,and it is the only type. What is this type???????? * I will from this day forward call it BH mass. BH has little or no energy untill hitting its critical mass density. *When rotation stops and it becomes a perfect sphere it has to explode. *My idea is all mass inside a BH we can not relate with real mass,but could relate with "virtual particles" *Will add this *If an electon lost its spin it would no longer be an electron *If a BH lost its spin it has to explode. * *Here is another one of my thoughts If a BH varied I would have big problems coming into these ideas. They are simple. Their size depends only on their mass+ speed of rotation. * *BHs in back of galaxies and ideed in the core of galaxies creates red light,and that can be usefull and harmful in our thinking * *Go figure *TreBert Aether is most likely a 2D quantum of dark/clear substance made almost entirely of photons and gravitons (aka zero Hz photons). Brad take a look how fast the 3 brainless low wit wonders of the universe jump on people that can think. I call them **** heads. TreBert |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Virtual Particles | G=EMC^2[_2_] | Misc | 1 | October 1st 11 06:54 PM |
Vacuum and virtual particles. | socratus[_2_] | Misc | 3 | June 18th 09 01:47 PM |
Black holes: Saddam holes | [email protected] | Astronomy Misc | 7 | May 14th 06 05:10 AM |
virtual particles are quite confusing | Greysky | Misc | 4 | January 12th 05 11:49 AM |
Why do charged particles behave strangely near black holes? | Joseph Lazio | Astronomy Misc | 3 | September 18th 04 12:25 AM |