A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Astronomy and Astrophysics » Astronomy Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

gray hematite found Coal layer in Mars strata found by robots



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old January 31st 04, 09:56 PM
Archimedes Plutonium
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default gray hematite found Coal layer in Mars strata found by robots

Gray hematite which is mostly a water sediment deposit is found on
much of Mars (funny how Mars could not be Mar but has to have an "s"
at the end of it-- I suppose like Paris)

Anyway, I wonder if this robot on Mars can detect tiny amounts of coal
dust that was scattered by a bolide impact over much of Mars?

I wonder if the Gray Hematite is a nice outline of where the Mars
Oceans used to exist when Mars was in a Earth orbit around the Sun and
when Earth was in Venus's place which lasted for about 2 billion
years.

I do not know how capable is this robot in detection of coal powder or
coal specks or coal signatures. Perhaps if these robots are so capable
of detection of gray-hematite then they are capable of detecting coal
dust.

Now, is there a hematite mineral that has coal impurities? Is there a
sedimentary rock that can have coal dust impurities?

Other than the robots luckily visiting a site where a lump of coal or
a coal seam is exposed, the best chance of running into coal is from
the meteor bolide impacts of coal seams that thrust the fine powder
over much of the surface.

Archimedes Plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom where dots
of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies
  #2  
Old February 1st 04, 12:40 AM
Robert Ehrlich
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default gray hematite found Coal layer in Mars strata found by robots

With all due respect. Grey hematite is simply a form of iron oxide
Fe2O3 . It can form from water but it also can occur in volcanic rocks,
metamorphic rocks. It is not "mostly" formed in the presence of water.
Does anyone have a lit. reference of the geochemistry and kinetics for
the formation of hematite as masses of large crystals? Maybe the USGS
would be kind enough to provide one.

Now that one lander has identified one rock ("Adirondak") as an
olivine basalt, olivine has been detected locally in the soil and also
from orbiter. That rock is very anguylar and doesn't appear to polished
to a high luster by wind driven material.

With the presence of ubiquitous olivine and unweathered basalt, it is
unlikely that liquid water (as opposed to ice and vapor) has occurred on
the surface of mars for a long long time. Absent water, absent water
based life, and so no coal. The geomorphology of mars need not be
sculpted by water. Dry debris flows and avalanches can be just as
effective given time.

Before the Apollo program, NASA went through intricate gyrations to
"prove" (aided and abetted by the USGS) that most of the lunar craters
were of volcanic origin--a concept not seriously entertained since the
time of Barrelle. And NASA now still has an low level of imagination
being guided by the Geological Survey.


The mossbauer spec and other instruments shoud be able to detect
carbon. If coal dust covered the surface it should have been
detected. I know of no reason to suspect coal on mars. If it did, we
should have to radically revise our theories of the formation of the
planets. IMHO it would be more likely to find carbon dust on the
surface in the form of micro-diamonds.

Archimedes Plutonium wrote:

Gray hematite which is mostly a water sediment deposit is found on
much of Mars (funny how Mars could not be Mar but has to have an "s"
at the end of it-- I suppose like Paris)

Anyway, I wonder if this robot on Mars can detect tiny amounts of coal
dust that was scattered by a bolide impact over much of Mars?

I wonder if the Gray Hematite is a nice outline of where the Mars
Oceans used to exist when Mars was in a Earth orbit around the Sun and
when Earth was in Venus's place which lasted for about 2 billion
years.

I do not know how capable is this robot in detection of coal powder or
coal specks or coal signatures. Perhaps if these robots are so capable
of detection of gray-hematite then they are capable of detecting coal
dust.

Now, is there a hematite mineral that has coal impurities? Is there a
sedimentary rock that can have coal dust impurities?

Other than the robots luckily visiting a site where a lump of coal or
a coal seam is exposed, the best chance of running into coal is from
the meteor bolide impacts of coal seams that thrust the fine powder
over much of the surface.

Archimedes Plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom where dots
of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies



  #3  
Old February 1st 04, 08:11 AM
Archimedes Plutonium
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default meteor diamonds formed from coal & Manganese Nodules gray hematite found Coal layer in Mars strata found by robots

Robert Ehrlich wrote in message news:X1XSb.194076$I06.2142739@attbi_s01...
With all due respect. Grey hematite is simply a form of iron oxide
Fe2O3 . It can form from water but it also can occur in volcanic rocks,
metamorphic rocks. It is not "mostly" formed in the presence of water.
Does anyone have a lit. reference of the geochemistry and kinetics for
the formation of hematite as masses of large crystals? Maybe the USGS
would be kind enough to provide one.

Now that one lander has identified one rock ("Adirondak") as an
olivine basalt, olivine has been detected locally in the soil and also
from orbiter. That rock is very anguylar and doesn't appear to polished
to a high luster by wind driven material.

With the presence of ubiquitous olivine and unweathered basalt, it is
unlikely that liquid water (as opposed to ice and vapor) has occurred on
the surface of mars for a long long time. Absent water, absent water
based life, and so no coal. The geomorphology of mars need not be
sculpted by water. Dry debris flows and avalanches can be just as
effective given time.

Before the Apollo program, NASA went through intricate gyrations to
"prove" (aided and abetted by the USGS) that most of the lunar craters
were of volcanic origin--a concept not seriously entertained since the
time of Barrelle. And NASA now still has an low level of imagination
being guided by the Geological Survey.


The mossbauer spec and other instruments shoud be able to detect
carbon. If coal dust covered the surface it should have been
detected. I know of no reason to suspect coal on mars. If it did, we
should have to radically revise our theories of the formation of the
planets. IMHO it would be more likely to find carbon dust on the
surface in the form of micro-diamonds.

(snip what I wrote)

Robert, I wonder if diamonds can be formed from a meteor or bolide
striking Mars from Nonbio-carbon such as limestone. I guess I would
also need to know how much connected is limestone to that of
biological matter. So, would the Moon have tiny diamonds from all of
its formed craters even if it is lifeless. I need to know whether
diamond creation occurs on all planets that have meteor impacts?

And if meteor impacts create diamonds regardless of whether the planet
has life or has no life, whether there is some distinguishing
characteristics between diamonds formed from meteor impacts upon
biological-carbon or nonbio-carbon.
I recall the Arizona meteor crater had thousands of very tiny diamonds
and that Arizona was rich in biocarbon lifeforms when the meteor
struck. But that a meteor impact in Africa created some of the largest
and finest diamonds because it was lush in bio-life at the moment of
impact.

So I need to get some data on meteor created diamonds and whether
diamonds can be formed from meteors impacting coal seams and whether
those diamonds have a unique signature as per the coal origin.

Also I am wondering whether Manganese Nodules would have formed on
Mars if Mars had vast Oceans some 6 to 8 billion years ago. I suspect
if manganese nodules are found would be proof of vast oceans and also
we would be able to give parameters of those oceans because Manganese
Nodules have a means of dating their accretions.

Archimedes Plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom where dots
of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies
  #5  
Old February 14th 04, 11:05 PM
Mr. 4X
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default meteor diamonds formed from coal & Manganese Nodules gray hematite found Coal layer in Mars strata found by robots

(Archimedes Plutonium) wrote in message
om:

Robert Ehrlich wrote in message

news:X1XSb.194076$I06.2142739@attbi_s01...
With all due respect. Grey hematite is simply a form of iron oxide
Fe2O3 . It can form from water but it also can occur in volcanic rocks,
metamorphic rocks. It is not "mostly" formed in the presence of water.
Does anyone have a lit. reference of the geochemistry and kinetics for
the formation of hematite as masses of large crystals? Maybe the USGS
would be kind enough to provide one.

Now that one lander has identified one rock ("Adirondak") as an
olivine basalt, olivine has been detected locally in the soil and also
from orbiter. That rock is very anguylar and doesn't appear to polished
to a high luster by wind driven material.

With the presence of ubiquitous olivine and unweathered basalt, it is
unlikely that liquid water (as opposed to ice and vapor) has occurred on
the surface of mars for a long long time. Absent water, absent water
based life, and so no coal. The geomorphology of mars need not be
sculpted by water. Dry debris flows and avalanches can be just as
effective given time.

Before the Apollo program, NASA went through intricate gyrations to
"prove" (aided and abetted by the USGS) that most of the lunar craters
were of volcanic origin--a concept not seriously entertained since the
time of Barrelle. And NASA now still has an low level of imagination
being guided by the Geological Survey.


The mossbauer spec and other instruments shoud be able to detect
carbon. If coal dust covered the surface it should have been
detected. I know of no reason to suspect coal on mars. If it did, we
should have to radically revise our theories of the formation of the
planets. IMHO it would be more likely to find carbon dust on the
surface in the form of micro-diamonds.

(snip what I wrote)

Robert, I wonder if diamonds can be formed from a meteor or bolide
striking Mars from Nonbio-carbon such as limestone.


Limestone is CaCO3, not concentrated carbon, you idiot.

I guess I would
also need to know how much connected is limestone to that of
biological matter. So, would the Moon have tiny diamonds from all of
its formed craters even if it is lifeless. I need to know whether
diamond creation occurs on all planets that have meteor impacts?

And if meteor impacts create diamonds regardless of whether the planet
has life or has no life, whether there is some distinguishing
characteristics between diamonds formed from meteor impacts upon
biological-carbon or nonbio-carbon.
I recall the Arizona meteor crater had thousands of very tiny diamonds
and that Arizona was rich in biocarbon lifeforms when the meteor
struck. But that a meteor impact in Africa created some of the largest
and finest diamonds because it was lush in bio-life at the moment of
impact.

So I need to get some data on meteor created diamonds and whether
diamonds can be formed from meteors impacting coal seams and whether
those diamonds have a unique signature as per the coal origin.

Also I am wondering whether Manganese Nodules would have formed on
Mars if Mars had vast Oceans some 6 to 8 billion years ago. I suspect
if manganese nodules are found would be proof of vast oceans and also
we would be able to give parameters of those oceans because Manganese
Nodules have a means of dating their accretions.

Archimedes Plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom where dots
of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Earth Has 'Blueberries' Like Mars (Forwarded) Peter Fairbrother Policy 10 June 20th 04 08:17 PM
Space Calendar - October 24, 2003 Ron Baalke Astronomy Misc 0 October 24th 03 04:38 PM
Holy Shit! MAN AS OLD AS COAL Ed Conrad History 10 July 21st 03 07:48 PM
CATACLYSM the Evidence -- MAN AS OLD AS COAL Ed Conrad Astronomy Misc 1 July 6th 03 12:06 AM
Space Calendar - June 27, 2003 Ron Baalke Astronomy Misc 3 June 28th 03 05:36 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:52 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.