A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Space Science » Space Station
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Great missions STS-122 & Expedition 16



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #61  
Old February 25th 08, 01:04 AM posted to sci.space.shuttle,sci.space.history,sci.space.policy,sci.space.station
columbiaaccidentinvestigation
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,344
Default Great missions STS-122 & Expedition 16

On Feb 24, 3:38 pm, BradGuth wrote:
On Feb 24, 2:30 pm, columbiaaccidentinvestigation





wrote:
On Feb 24, 2:08 pm, BradGuth wrote:


On Feb 24, 8:05 am, columbiaaccidentinvestigation


wrote:
On Feb 24, 7:27 am, BradGuth wrote:" Oddly, NASA/
Apollo moon was extensively 0.65~0.75 albedo reflective, because
those moon suits were worth an albedo of 0.85, and everything getting
xenon lamp spectrum illuminated to boot, because there's nothing
bluish about our NASA/Apollo unfiltered Kodak moments, and strangely
Venus is never anywhere in sight. Why are you so unable or unwilling
to deal with the truth of whatever's off-world? There's so much more
to space than mere eye candy. There's actual
science that's easily peer replicated, of photographic science telling
us about the given geology and mineralogy of places and of interesting
things other than Earth."


Laughing, you just posted the same old trash, but in a slightly
repackaged form, but the problem is you have not shown any reduction
of you idiocy, or ignorance. In order for you to analyze the images
like you have, you need to not just know film type and speed, but the
lens used, and the f/stop, and resulting exposure time all of which
determine how white an astronauts space suit is compared to the back
round, midtones etc. Once again regurgitating numbers from what
"should have been" seen does not address the image itself, and so you
keep looking for things, but you clearly do not have an understanding
of what you are looking at, or how the image was produced. Now the
same principles that I have stated apply to the analysis of all
images, so your diatribes into what im not addressing are a joke, and
your demands for me to answer your loaded questions are an even bigger
joke, thanks for the Sunday morning laugh brad.... And no im not
"unwilling to deal with the truth of whatever's off-world" as you just
stated, but I do love to learn about earth, including from the unique
view the astronauts have aboard the ISS.


http://spaceflight.nasa.gov/gallery/...-16/html/iss01...
International Space Station Imagery
"ISS016-E-008436 (26 Oct. 2007) --- Beirut Metropolitan Area, Lebanon
is featured in this image photographed by an Expedition 16 crewmember
on the International Space Station. The capital of Lebanon, Beirut is
located along the southeastern shoreline of the Mediterranean Sea.
According to geologists, the metropolitan area is built on a small
peninsula composed mainly of sedimentary rock deposited over the past
100 million years or so. The growth of the city eastwards is bounded
by foothills of the more mountainous interior of Lebanon (sparsely
settled greenish brown region visible at upper right). While this
sedimentary platform is stable, the country of Lebanon is located
along a major transform fault zone, or region where the African and
Arabian tectonic plates are moving laterally in relation to (and
against) each other. This active tectonism creates an earthquake
hazard for the country. The Roum Fault, one of the fault strands that
is part of the transform boundary, is located directly to the south of
the Beirut metropolitan area. Other distinctive features visible in
this image include the Rafic Hariri Airport at lower right, the city
sports arena at center, and several areas of green and open space
(such a large golf course at center). Also visible in the image are
several plumes of sediment along the coastline -- the most striking of
which are located near the airport. The general lack of vegetation in
the airport may promote higher degrees of soil transport by surface
water runoff or wind."


If that's what makes our Earth-only mindset puppet-masters like
yourself happy campers, then so be it. No wonder we're headed for
WWIII, $10/gallon and $1/kwhr just as fast as you folks and fellow
rusemasters of the Old Testament thumping kind can manage.


Keep pretending that all off-world matters simply do not matter, as
well as naysaying as to the ongoing demise of our frail environment at
the same time. After all, it's what your God(s) would appreciate more
than anything else.


BTW, did you go to your pretend atheists sunday school, and teach
those unfortunate kids how to lie their infomercial spewing little
butts off, by way of avoiding the truth via excluding science or
banishing related evidence that could otherwise rock your mainstream
status quo boat?
. - Brad Guth- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


so what you just admitted is that your argument in this thread (and
your image analysis skills for that matter) has been completely
reduced down to you making illogical attacks on me, that's pathetic
brad....


"http://spaceflight.nasa.gov/gallery/images/station/crew-16/html/
iss016e021564.html
International Space Station Imagery
ISS016-E-021564 (7 Jan. 2008) --- Paris, France is featured in this
image photographed by an Expedition 16 crewmember on the International
Space Station. A crisp, clear winter day over France provided a
detailed view of the city of Paris. This image shows the recognizable
street pattern of the city - and some of the world's most notable
landmarks - along the Seine River. One of the main avenues radiating
like spokes from the Arc de Triomphe (lower right) is the Avenue des
Champs-Elysees running southeast to the Garden of Tuileries (Jardin
des Tuileries). The garden -- recognizable by its light green color
relative to the surrounding built materials -- was originally
commissioned by Catherine de Medici in 1559, and is now bounded by the
Place de la Concorde to the northeast and the Louvre museum along the
Seine River at the southeast end. Other, similarly colored parks and
greenspaces are visible throughout the image. Farther south on the
Seine is the Ile de la Cite, location of the famous Notre Dame
cathedral. Perhaps most prominent is the characteristic "A" profile of
the Eiffel Tower west of the Jardin des Tuileries, highlighted by
morning sunlight"


There's nothing pathetic about sharing the whole truth and nothing but
the truth. Apparently you've got a big problem with that, as much as
you can't tolerate honestly deductive thinking unless it's Old
Testament certified.

BTW, if Venus along with its unlimited local energy cache to burn
(sort of speak) isn't ET doable (including on behalf of us), then
perhaps no other planet in the universe is worthy of a viable habitat
or as a mineral resource. With all the MRSA, Stauff and numerous
hybrid forms of humanly lethal pestilence running amuck, not to
mention animal/plant extinctions and of even hybrid plant rot taking
place and mother nature going GW postal as we prepare ourselves for
WWIII, as such Earth is not exactly ET worthy, especially after
humanity has so terribly pillaged, raped and mostly burned off its
fossil fuels with no apparent regard for the future of having far less
dry land for 1e10 souls to survive upon.

Just for those of you that either can't or wouldn't dare think
independently within the box, much less deductively think outside,
here's a little something that's quite interesting, as getting the
peer reviewed benefit of the doubt.

Alex Collier / By Michael Salla, PhDhttp://www.exopolitics.orghttp://www.rense.com/general54/zlecx.htmhttp://utenti.lycos.it/paolaharris/acollier_eng.htmhttp://www.exopolitics.org/Exo-Comment-66.htm
plus many other links worth getting our undivided attention.

For those of you hell bent upon sticking with your terrestrial limited
God(s), never mind because, no matters what the evidence or physics
backing up the best available science, there's simply no hope for
those in charge of snookering humanity for all it's worth, or
otherwise simply self dumbfounded past the point of no return. In
other words, there's not much sense in beating a dead horse to death.
. - Brad Guth- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


Laughing, yeah yeah, you like to imply that you are something special
and belong on some self elevated pedestal based on your opinions. So
in essence buried in your weak attempts at insults, is you stating
your opinion, which is that you think your opinions are correct, and
not a surprise at all based on the ego you have presented on usenet,
but that does not make them valid or correct, nor does it make your
loaded questions relevant... laughing even more....

http://spaceflight.nasa.gov/gallery/...16e005121.html
"International Space Station Imagery
ISS016-E-005121 (21 Oct. 2007) --- Wellington, New Zealand is featured
in this image photographed by an Expedition 16 crewmember on the
International Space Station. New Zealand's capital of Wellington is
located at the southwestern tip of North Island near the Cook Strait.
The city is the second largest in New Zealand (after Auckland), and at
41 degrees south latitude, it is the southernmost capital city of the
world. The North and South Islands of New Zealand are located along
the active Australian-Pacific tectonic plate boundary -- the Islands
are only a small part of a larger submerged fragment of continental
crust. The glancing collision of these two tectonic plates results in
uplift of the land surface, expressed as low hills on North Island and
the Southern Alps on South Island. Local topography visible in this
view is a result of these tectonic forces and weathering processes,
which have exerted a strong influence on the morphology of the city.
Tightly clustered white rooftops and high building density of the
central business district are visible to the south of the Westpac
Stadium between vegetated (green) northeast-southwest trending ridges.
Lower density development (gray gridded regions with scattered white
rooftops) has spread eastwards along the Miramar Peninsula. Five major
faults that run through the Wellington metropolitan area; the largest
magnitude earthquake recorded in New Zealand (approximately 8.2 on the
Richter Scale) occurred in 1855 on one of these (the Wairarapa Fault).
Recognition of the potential seismic hazard in the metropolitan area
has led to adoption of building codes to maximize structural
resistance to earthquake damage."
  #62  
Old February 25th 08, 01:55 AM posted to sci.space.shuttle,sci.space.history,sci.space.policy,sci.space.station
BradGuth
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 21,544
Default Great missions STS-122 & Expedition 16

On Feb 24, 4:04 pm, columbiaaccidentinvestigation
wrote:
On Feb 24, 3:38 pm, BradGuth wrote:



On Feb 24, 2:30 pm, columbiaaccidentinvestigation


wrote:
On Feb 24, 2:08 pm, BradGuth wrote:


On Feb 24, 8:05 am, columbiaaccidentinvestigation


wrote:
On Feb 24, 7:27 am, BradGuth wrote:" Oddly, NASA/
Apollo moon was extensively 0.65~0.75 albedo reflective, because
those moon suits were worth an albedo of 0.85, and everything getting
xenon lamp spectrum illuminated to boot, because there's nothing
bluish about our NASA/Apollo unfiltered Kodak moments, and strangely
Venus is never anywhere in sight. Why are you so unable or unwilling
to deal with the truth of whatever's off-world? There's so much more
to space than mere eye candy. There's actual
science that's easily peer replicated, of photographic science telling
us about the given geology and mineralogy of places and of interesting
things other than Earth."


Laughing, you just posted the same old trash, but in a slightly
repackaged form, but the problem is you have not shown any reduction
of you idiocy, or ignorance. In order for you to analyze the images
like you have, you need to not just know film type and speed, but the
lens used, and the f/stop, and resulting exposure time all of which
determine how white an astronauts space suit is compared to the back
round, midtones etc. Once again regurgitating numbers from what
"should have been" seen does not address the image itself, and so you
keep looking for things, but you clearly do not have an understanding
of what you are looking at, or how the image was produced. Now the
same principles that I have stated apply to the analysis of all
images, so your diatribes into what im not addressing are a joke, and
your demands for me to answer your loaded questions are an even bigger
joke, thanks for the Sunday morning laugh brad.... And no im not
"unwilling to deal with the truth of whatever's off-world" as you just
stated, but I do love to learn about earth, including from the unique
view the astronauts have aboard the ISS.


http://spaceflight.nasa.gov/gallery/...-16/html/iss01...
International Space Station Imagery
"ISS016-E-008436 (26 Oct. 2007) --- Beirut Metropolitan Area, Lebanon
is featured in this image photographed by an Expedition 16 crewmember
on the International Space Station. The capital of Lebanon, Beirut is
located along the southeastern shoreline of the Mediterranean Sea.
According to geologists, the metropolitan area is built on a small
peninsula composed mainly of sedimentary rock deposited over the past
100 million years or so. The growth of the city eastwards is bounded
by foothills of the more mountainous interior of Lebanon (sparsely
settled greenish brown region visible at upper right). While this
sedimentary platform is stable, the country of Lebanon is located
along a major transform fault zone, or region where the African and
Arabian tectonic plates are moving laterally in relation to (and
against) each other. This active tectonism creates an earthquake
hazard for the country. The Roum Fault, one of the fault strands that
is part of the transform boundary, is located directly to the south of
the Beirut metropolitan area. Other distinctive features visible in
this image include the Rafic Hariri Airport at lower right, the city
sports arena at center, and several areas of green and open space
(such a large golf course at center). Also visible in the image are
several plumes of sediment along the coastline -- the most striking of
which are located near the airport. The general lack of vegetation in
the airport may promote higher degrees of soil transport by surface
water runoff or wind."


If that's what makes our Earth-only mindset puppet-masters like
yourself happy campers, then so be it. No wonder we're headed for
WWIII, $10/gallon and $1/kwhr just as fast as you folks and fellow
rusemasters of the Old Testament thumping kind can manage.


Keep pretending that all off-world matters simply do not matter, as
well as naysaying as to the ongoing demise of our frail environment at
the same time. After all, it's what your God(s) would appreciate more
than anything else.


BTW, did you go to your pretend atheists sunday school, and teach
those unfortunate kids how to lie their infomercial spewing little
butts off, by way of avoiding the truth via excluding science or
banishing related evidence that could otherwise rock your mainstream
status quo boat?
. - Brad Guth- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


so what you just admitted is that your argument in this thread (and
your image analysis skills for that matter) has been completely
reduced down to you making illogical attacks on me, that's pathetic
brad....


"http://spaceflight.nasa.gov/gallery/images/station/crew-16/html/
iss016e021564.html
International Space Station Imagery
ISS016-E-021564 (7 Jan. 2008) --- Paris, France is featured in this
image photographed by an Expedition 16 crewmember on the International
Space Station. A crisp, clear winter day over France provided a
detailed view of the city of Paris. This image shows the recognizable
street pattern of the city - and some of the world's most notable
landmarks - along the Seine River. One of the main avenues radiating
like spokes from the Arc de Triomphe (lower right) is the Avenue des
Champs-Elysees running southeast to the Garden of Tuileries (Jardin
des Tuileries). The garden -- recognizable by its light green color
relative to the surrounding built materials -- was originally
commissioned by Catherine de Medici in 1559, and is now bounded by the
Place de la Concorde to the northeast and the Louvre museum along the
Seine River at the southeast end. Other, similarly colored parks and
greenspaces are visible throughout the image. Farther south on the
Seine is the Ile de la Cite, location of the famous Notre Dame
cathedral. Perhaps most prominent is the characteristic "A" profile of
the Eiffel Tower west of the Jardin des Tuileries, highlighted by
morning sunlight"


There's nothing pathetic about sharing the whole truth and nothing but
the truth. Apparently you've got a big problem with that, as much as
you can't tolerate honestly deductive thinking unless it's Old
Testament certified.


BTW, if Venus along with its unlimited local energy cache to burn
(sort of speak) isn't ET doable (including on behalf of us), then
perhaps no other planet in the universe is worthy of a viable habitat
or as a mineral resource. With all the MRSA, Stauff and numerous
hybrid forms of humanly lethal pestilence running amuck, not to
mention animal/plant extinctions and of even hybrid plant rot taking
place and mother nature going GW postal as we prepare ourselves for
WWIII, as such Earth is not exactly ET worthy, especially after
humanity has so terribly pillaged, raped and mostly burned off its
fossil fuels with no apparent regard for the future of having far less
dry land for 1e10 souls to survive upon.


Just for those of you that either can't or wouldn't dare think
independently within the box, much less deductively think outside,
here's a little something that's quite interesting, as getting the
peer reviewed benefit of the doubt.


Alex Collier / By Michael Salla, PhDhttp://www.exopolitics.orghttp://www..rense.com/general54/zlecx.htmhtt...
plus many other links worth getting our undivided attention.


For those of you hell bent upon sticking with your terrestrial limited
God(s), never mind because, no matters what the evidence or physics
backing up the best available science, there's simply no hope for
those in charge of snookering humanity for all it's worth, or
otherwise simply self dumbfounded past the point of no return. In
other words, there's not much sense in beating a dead horse to death.
. - Brad Guth- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


Laughing, yeah yeah, you like to imply that you are something special
and belong on some self elevated pedestal based on your opinions. So
in essence buried in your weak attempts at insults, is you stating
your opinion, which is that you think your opinions are correct, and
not a surprise at all based on the ego you have presented on usenet,
but that does not make them valid or correct, nor does it make your
loaded questions relevant... laughing even more....

http://spaceflight.nasa.gov/gallery/...-16/html/iss01...
"International Space Station Imagery
ISS016-E-005121 (21 Oct. 2007) --- Wellington, New Zealand is featured
in this image photographed by an Expedition 16 crewmember on the
International Space Station. New Zealand's capital of Wellington is
located at the southwestern tip of North Island near the Cook Strait.
The city is the second largest in New Zealand (after Auckland), and at
41 degrees south latitude, it is the southernmost capital city of the
world. The North and South Islands of New Zealand are located along
the active Australian-Pacific tectonic plate boundary -- the Islands
are only a small part of a larger submerged fragment of continental
crust. The glancing collision of these two tectonic plates results in ...

read more »


Where exactly are those brown-nosed minions of yours?

You seem so entirely alone, and otherwise intellectually limited as to
whatever your mainstream status quo permits your kind to spew, and
otherwise just a tidbit sad because of not being allowed to
deductively interpret squat, of which explains why you simply can't
answer those pesky questions pertaining to Mercury, Venus or even
those of our physically dark and anticathode/reactive moon as recorded
science relates to Kodak film or CCD imaging.
. - Brad Guth
  #63  
Old February 25th 08, 08:14 AM posted to sci.space.shuttle,sci.space.history,sci.space.policy,sci.space.station
columbiaaccidentinvestigation
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,344
Default Great missions STS-122 & Expedition 16

On Feb 24, 4:55 pm, BradGuth wrote"...which
explains why you simply can't
answer those pesky questions..."

na don't need to, or want to....



http://spaceflight.nasa.gov/gallery/...16e011999.html
International Space Station Imagery
"ISS016-E-011999 (22 Nov. 2007) --- Sao Simao Reservoir, Brazil is
featured in this image photographed by an Expedition 16 crewmember on
the International Space Station (ISS). The Sao Simao reservoir, near
the confluence of the Rio Paranaiba and Rio Verde in Brazil, is the
featured subject in a milestone image of Earth. This colorful,
patchwork image is the 300,000th image of Earth downlinked from the
space station. There are now over 745,000 images of Earth taken by
astronaut crews, beginning with the Mercury missions in 1961 and
continuing to the present day on the ISS. The Sao Simao reservoir is
located on the border between the states of Goias and Minas Gerais
(near the geographic coordinates of 18.7S 50.4W). Though the town of
Sao Simao was founded around 1935, major growth occurred when the
hydroelectric power plant and dam were built - forming the reservoir
-- in 1975. The reservoir is part of a major navigation link that
allows transport of goods and commerce between central Brazil, the
Prata River and the South Atlantic. With 600,000 square kilometers of
surface area, the reservoir also serves as a tourist destination for
fishing, swimming and boating. In addition to hydroelectric power
production, the economy of the region is based in agribusiness. The
image highlights agricultural fields of various kinds and in different
stages of cultivation. The major commodities include corn, soybeans,
sesame seeds, sugarcane, beans, manioc, coffee and meat production."
  #64  
Old February 25th 08, 02:14 PM posted to sci.space.shuttle,sci.space.history,sci.space.policy,sci.space.station
BradGuth
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 21,544
Default Great missions STS-122 & Expedition 16

On Feb 24, 11:14 pm, columbiaaccidentinvestigation
wrote:
On Feb 24, 4:55 pm, BradGuth wrote"...which
explains why you simply can't
answer those pesky questions..."

na don't need to, or want to....


You know, it's really hard to miss the matter of fact, that for
someone as all-knowing and mainstream status quo as yourself, you've
got such a minion gap to go along with your balls.

Perhaps your boss Hitler and of his replacements were entirely right
about most everything. As such, we simply don't need any stinking
remorse, especially when the past of whatever puts a smile or a smirk
on your face never accounts for anything that can ever get revised.

Don't need any stinking truths when we've got the cloak and dagger
likes of columbiaaccidentinvestigation telling us everything we ever
needed to know, that is unless there's some other reasons as to why
you Skull and Bones kind of folks wouldn't dare author anything under
your real names, just like in those good old Semitic Third Reich
days.
.. - Brad Guth
  #65  
Old February 25th 08, 03:23 PM posted to sci.space.shuttle,sci.space.history,sci.space.policy,sci.space.station
columbiaaccidentinvestigation
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,344
Default Great missions STS-122 & Expedition 16

On Feb 25, 5:14 am, BradGuth wrote:" whatever
puts a smile ... on your face"

Laughing, well brad, I started this thread off describing a moment the
sts-122 and expedition 16 crews had right after the press conference
in the Columbus module, and like many others I laughed and enjoyed the
fun they were having, that's what makes me smile, brad.....

http://spaceflight.nasa.gov/gallery/...16e029873.html

"STS-122 Shuttle Mission Imagery
ISS016-E-029873 (16 Feb. 2008) --- STS-122 and Expedition 16
crewmembers pose for a group photo following a joint news conference
in the Columbus laboratory of the International Space Station while
Space Shuttle Atlantis is docked with the station. From the left
(bottom) are NASA astronaut Steve Frick, STS-122 commander; and Peggy
Whitson, Expedition 16 commander. From the left (middle row) are NASA
astronaut Daniel Tani, STS-122 mission specialist; European Space
Agency (ESA) astronaut Leopold Eyharts, Expedition 16 flight engineer;
and cosmonaut Yuri Malenchenko, Expedition 16 flight engineer
representing Russia's Federal Space Agency. From the left (top row)
are NASA astronaut Stanley Love, ESA astronaut Hans Schlegel, NASA
astronauts Leland Melvin, Rex Walheim, all STS-122 mission
specialists; and Alan Poindexter, STS-122 pilot. Tani, who joined the
station's Expedition 16 crew in October, is being replaced by Eyharts,
who arrived at the station with the STS-122 crew."
  #66  
Old February 25th 08, 06:15 PM posted to sci.space.shuttle,sci.space.history,sci.space.policy,sci.space.station
BradGuth
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 21,544
Default Great missions STS-122 & Expedition 16

On Feb 25, 6:23 am, columbiaaccidentinvestigation
wrote:
On Feb 25, 5:14 am, BradGuth wrote:" whatever
puts a smile ... on your face"

Laughing, well brad, I started this thread off describing a moment the
sts-122 and expedition 16 crews had right after the press conference
in the Columbus module, and like many others I laughed and enjoyed the
fun they were having, that's what makes me smile, brad.....


Where are your brown-nosed minions?

Why are they not coming to your rescue?

You do seem to smile most of the time, much like our resident LLPOF
warlord(GW Bush) smirked uncontrollably before getting those facial
Botoxin injections.

I guess as long as it's our hard earned loot getting spent, our best
talents getting wasted, decades going down the toilet, mother nature
going GW postal and WWIII on its way is what makes you smile, perhaps
in much the same manner that always put that smile on Hitler's face
whenever his semitic Third Reich accomplished such a terrific job that
only his smart physics, science and banking wizards could have done.
.. - Brad Guth
  #67  
Old February 26th 08, 07:55 AM posted to sci.space.shuttle,sci.space.history,sci.space.policy,sci.space.station
columbiaaccidentinvestigation
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,344
Default Great missions STS-122 & Expedition 16

On Feb 25, 9:15 am, BradGuth wrote:" Where are
your brown-nosed minions?
Why are they not coming to your rescue?"

Laughing, i just schooled you on dynamic range, human color
perception, cielab space, zone system, image bit size etc all of which
you ignored, which is not a function of me, but of you fighting to
cling to your own ignorance, so na, don't need anybody else....

http://spaceflight.nasa.gov/gallery/...16e012047.html

International Space Station Imagery
"ISS016-E-012047 (22 Nov. 2007) --- Tyndall Glacier, located in the
Torres del Paine National Park in Chile, is featured in this image
photographed by an Expedition 16 crewmember on the International Space
Station. This glacier, which has a measured total area of 331 square
kilometers and length of 32 kilometers (1996 measurements), begins in
the Patagonian Andes Mountains to the west and terminates in Lago
Geikie. A medial moraine is visible in the center of the glacier,
extending along its length (center left). These accumulations of soil
and rock debris form along the edges of a glacier as it flows downhill
across the landscape (much like a snowplow builds ridges of snow along
the roadside). Glaciers flowing downslope through adjacent feeder
valleys merge when they encounter each other, and debris entrained
along their sides becomes concentrated in the central portion of the
new combined ice mass -- much as small streams join to form a river.
Crevasse fields are also visible in the image. The crevasses -- small,
but potentially quite deep fissures -- form as a result of stress
between slower- and faster-moving ice within the glacier. Crevasse
fields on Tyndall Glacier are most evident near rock promontories
extending into the glacier -- causing the ice to slow as it flows
around the obstruction"
  #68  
Old February 26th 08, 07:23 PM posted to sci.space.shuttle,sci.space.history,sci.space.policy,sci.space.station
BradGuth
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 21,544
Default Great missions STS-122 & Expedition 16

On Feb 25, 10:55 pm, columbiaaccidentinvestigation
wrote:
On Feb 25, 9:15 am, BradGuth wrote:" Where are
your brown-nosed minions?
Why are they not coming to your rescue?"

Laughing, i just schooled you on dynamic range, human color
perception, cielab space, zone system, image bit size etc all of which
you ignored, which is not a function of me, but of you fighting to
cling to your own ignorance, so na, don't need anybody else....


Hmmm. Still no sign of any of your fellow brown-nosed minions coming
to your side of this butt-sucking rant of yours.

Obviously the likes of yourself and Willie.Moo are two of a kind that
couldn't possibly agree on anything, as well as either of you folks
couldn't possibly contribute squat on behalf of actually
constructively benefiting the greater good of humanity or that of
salvaging any part of our badly failing environment. That's being
very Exxon/ENRON of yourself.

I think that was a good part of the same problem Hitler was running
into, and now our resident LLPOF warlord(GW Bush) is sort of stuck
with a similar self inflicted global energy fiasco that's only taking
us and of others tied to our energy domination agenda into the nearest
toilet.

If continued eye-candy w/o science of honestly deductive
interpretations allowed outside of your Old Testament Quran is what
makes you a happy status quo camper, then so be it.
.. - Brad Guth
  #69  
Old February 26th 08, 08:29 PM posted to sci.space.shuttle,sci.space.history,sci.space.policy,sci.space.station
columbiaaccidentinvestigation
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,344
Default Great missions STS-122 & Expedition 16

On Feb 26, 10:23 am, BradGuth wrote:" Hmmm.
Still no sign of any of your fellow brown-nosed minions coming to
your side of this butt-sucking rant of yours.- Brad Guth"

Of course you are upset, and I know you want to pout, but that does
not make you any better at analyzing images, much less composing a
logical thought. And I told you before I never thought this identity
would win me any popularity contests, but I noticed how you attempted
to shift the insults to me, and not the valid sources that I cited
which demonstrated how ignorant you are with respect to image
analysis, and how bad you chunked thousands of posts stating what
should have be imaged, or what was allegedly manipulated, set up, or
taken of out of images. So don't be so quick to insult me, for if
have shown you to be completely ignorant of color science,
psychophysics, image capture and processing, which proves you don't
know as much as you claim, or you'd like to think, and now your above
post clearly demonstrates your oversized ego cannot handle the concept
that you are wrong....


http://spaceflight.nasa.gov/gallery/...22e006247.html
STS-122 Shuttle Mission Imagery
S122-E-006247 (8 Feb. 2008) --- A colorful view of airglow layers at
Earth's horizon is featured in this image photographed by a STS-122
crewmember on the Space Shuttle Atlantis
  #70  
Old February 27th 08, 12:15 AM posted to sci.space.shuttle,sci.space.history,sci.space.policy,sci.space.station
BradGuth
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 21,544
Default Great missions STS-122 & Expedition 16

On Feb 26, 11:29 am, columbiaaccidentinvestigation
wrote:
On Feb 26, 10:23 am, BradGuth wrote:" Hmmm.
Still no sign of any of your fellow brown-nosed minions coming to
your side of this butt-sucking rant of yours.- Brad Guth"

Of course you are upset, and I know you want to pout, but that does
not make you any better at analyzing images, much less composing a
logical thought. And I told you before I never thought this identity
would win me any popularity contests, but I noticed how you attempted
to shift the insults to me, and not the valid sources that I cited
which demonstrated how ignorant you are with respect to image
analysis, and how bad you chunked thousands of posts stating what
should have be imaged, or what was allegedly manipulated, set up, or
taken of out of images. So don't be so quick to insult me, for if
have shown you to be completely ignorant of color science,
psychophysics, image capture and processing, which proves you don't
know as much as you claim, or you'd like to think, and now your above
post clearly demonstrates your oversized ego cannot handle the concept
that you are wrong....

My goodness, you still got nothing?

At least everything I've got to offer functions entirely within the
regular laws of physic, and can be peer replicated to your little
black heart's content.

BTW, unlike yourself, I do not know all there is to know. What's your
all-knowing excuse for having all of that brown-nosed stuff on your
face?
.. - Brad Guth
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Great missions STS-122 & Expedition 16 columbiaaccidentinvestigation Space Shuttle 191 March 11th 08 11:39 PM
Expedition 14/Expedition 13/Ansari Farewells and Hatch Closure John Space Station 0 September 28th 06 09:58 PM
Expedition 13/ Pontes/ Expedition 12 Joint Crew News Conference John Space Station 0 April 4th 06 03:42 PM
Expedition 13/ Pontes/ Expedition 12 Joint Crew News Conference John Space Station 0 April 3rd 06 10:05 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:46 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.