|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Proof that Einstein is a LYING IDIOT 15 years AFTER his first relativity paper.
In sci.math Darwin123 wrote:
On Jan 7, 11:28?am, PD wrote: Androcles claims to be a devout believer in Newtonian mechanics and yet this kind of crap comes out of his mind. Androcles really doesn't know the first thing about Newtonian physics. .... Sure doesn't seem to think much of Kepler. -- [Full metal rebuttal:] Not true. -- John Stafford , 08 Dec 2010 10:16:59 -0600 |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Proof that Einstein is a LYING IDIOT 15 years AFTER his firstrelativity paper.
On 7 يناير, 22:15, wrote:
In sci.math Darwin123 wrote: On Jan 7, 11:28?am, PD wrote: Androcles claims to be a devout believer in Newtonian mechanics and yet this kind of crap comes out of his mind. Â* Â* Androcles really doesn't know the first thing about Newtonian physics. ... Sure doesn't seem to think much of Kepler. -- [Full metal rebuttal:] Not true. Â* -- John Stafford , 08 Dec 2010 10:16:59 -0600 .. .. Viva.. the great hero of science Androcles . Viva… Viva… Viva Androcles footwear superior than the head of Einstein hordes , which they became a laughing stock all the time. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Proof that Einstein is a LYING IDIOT 15 years AFTER his firstrelativity paper.
On 7 يناير, 22:18, Blissfull wrote:
On 7 يناير, 22:15, wrote: In sci.math Darwin123 wrote: On Jan 7, 11:28?am, PD wrote: Androcles claims to be a devout believer in Newtonian mechanics and yet this kind of crap comes out of his mind. Â* Â* Androcles really doesn't know the first thing about Newtonian physics. ... Sure doesn't seem to think much of Kepler. -- [Full metal rebuttal:] Not true. Â* -- John Stafford , 08 Dec 2010 10:16:59 -0600 . . Viva.. the great hero of science Androcles Â* . Viva… Viva… Viva Androcles footwear superior than the head of Einstein hordes , which they became a laughing stock all the time. - |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Proof that Einstein is a LYING IDIOT 15 years AFTER his firstrelativity paper.
Andrex is a common troll. He will say and do anything which gains him
attention. Look at his recent behaviour where he interupted thread after thread to dangle his bait. (Kelleher style) Now he has your attention he can argue any nonsense which come into his head, Which is most of the time. Default defence, when cornered is the foul-mouthed infant act. He is the screaming kid, rolling on the floor at the supermarket, while his sham parent is sorting 24 x 7 verbal garbage on their cell phone. He is no different from Kelleher, Retch and all the other desperate inadequates of this world. They can't stand not being in the limelight. Attention deficiency order by proxy. His pedantic acolytes have the same problem as Oriel's. They suffer from rabid naivety. By all means take the **** out of him but for god's sake don't take the bait! It wouldn't surprise me, in the least, to discover that Kelleher, Hanson and Andrex are one and the same. The playground teaser who never grew up. One completely unrecognised clot claiming superiority to Einstein, Newton and Napoleon combined? And you respond in serious debate? Would you discuss Relativity outside the bus station with a raving bag lady? Perhaps you would? |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Proof that Einstein is a LYING IDIOT 15 years AFTER his firstrelativity paper.
On 2011-01-07, Androcles wrote:
"An observer who is sitting eccentrically on the disc K' is sensible of a force which acts outwards in a radial direction" -- Nobody is ever thrown off a roundabout radially. So do you care to explain how the observer may simultaneously be on the roundabout and not on the roundabout after having been thrown off? -- Andrew Smallshaw |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Proof that Einstein is a LYING IDIOT 15 years AFTER his first relativity paper.
"Andrew Smallshaw" wrote in message .. . | On 2011-01-07, Androcles wrote: | | "An observer who is sitting eccentrically on the disc | K' is sensible of a force which acts outwards in a radial direction" -- | | Nobody is ever thrown off a roundabout radially. | | So do you care to explain how the observer may simultaneously be | on the roundabout and not on the roundabout after having been thrown | off? | Would you care to explain why you snip the attribution? Or even why you snip text at all? Is it to deliberately confuse others or just because you are an idiot? "An observer who is sitting eccentrically on the disc K' is sensible of a force which acts outwards in a radial direction" -- Andrew Smallshaw. Is this ball on the roundabout? http://ww2010.atmos.uiuc.edu/(Gh)/guides/mtr/fw/gifs/coriolis.mov What sensible force does it experience? |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Proof that Einstein is a LYING IDIOT 15 years AFTER his firstrelativity paper.
On Jan 7, 5:32*am, "Androcles"
wrote: http://www.bartleby.com/173/23.html Albert Einstein (1879-1955). *Relativity: The Special and General Theory. 1920. *"An observer who is sitting eccentrically on the disc K' is sensible of a force which acts outwards in a radial direction" -- Einstein http://mcaaron.files.wordpress.com/2008/03/schleich_catapult.jpg Notice the cup is pointing tangentially. Nobody is ever thrown off a roundabout radially. An observer who is sitting eccentrically on a disc is sensible of a force which acts in a tangential direction. NEWTON'S FIRST LAW. Every body perseveres in its state of rest, or of uniform motion in a right line, unless it is compelled to change that state by forces impressed thereon. The lying idiot Einstein doesn't know the meaning of radial. Proven by experiment! Proven by peer review! Acceleration and velocity vectors are not required to be collinear. It would be a very boring world if they were. Jerry |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Proof that Einstein is a LYING IDIOT 15 years AFTER his firstrelativity paper.
On 2011-01-08, Androcles wrote:
"Andrew Smallshaw" wrote in message .. . | On 2011-01-07, Androcles wrote: | | "An observer who is sitting eccentrically on the disc | K' is sensible of a force which acts outwards in a radial direction" -- | | Nobody is ever thrown off a roundabout radially. | Would you care to explain why you snip the attribution? Or even why you snip text at all? Is it to deliberately confuse others or just because you are an idiot? Try reading any guide on netiquette. No one needs to read the same stuff over and over, particuarly when it is half baked rubbish such as this. Now, do you have a substantive reply or are your ad hominem arguments an admission you don't have one. For that matter, try explaining the difference between an overly simplistic mathematical model which point masses with a more thorough treatment that handles the forces within realistic, non-point masses. Those are the forces the observer directly feels and is what Einsteind was getting at. -- Andrew Smallshaw |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Proof that Einstein is a LYING IDIOT 15 years AFTER his first relativity paper.
Poor drunken drocels will spend the rest of his pathtic life trying to disprove the smartest minds of our time becuase he sees him self as a wannabe Einstein. Drunken drocles will never amount to **** and can't admit he's just an average idiot. "Androcles" wrote in message ... http://www.bartleby.com/173/23.html Albert Einstein (1879-1955). Relativity: The Special and General Theory. 1920. "An observer who is sitting eccentrically on the disc K' is sensible of a force which acts outwards in a radial direction" -- Einstein http://mcaaron.files.wordpress.com/2008/03/schleich_catapult.jpg Notice the cup is pointing tangentially. Nobody is ever thrown off a roundabout radially. An observer who is sitting eccentrically on a disc is sensible of a force which acts in a tangential direction. NEWTON'S FIRST LAW. Every body perseveres in its state of rest, or of uniform motion in a right line, unless it is compelled to change that state by forces impressed thereon. The lying idiot Einstein doesn't know the meaning of radial. Proven by experiment! Proven by peer review! |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Proof that Einstein is a LYING IDIOT 15 years AFTER his first relativity paper.
"Andrew Smallshaw" wrote in message .. . | On 2011-01-08, Androcles wrote: | | "Andrew Smallshaw" wrote in message | .. . | | On 2011-01-07, Androcles wrote: | | | | "An observer who is sitting eccentrically on the disc | | K' is sensible of a force which acts outwards in a radial direction" -- | | | | Nobody is ever thrown off a roundabout radially. | | | Would you care to explain why you snip the attribution? | Or even why you snip text at all? | Is it to deliberately confuse others or just because you are an idiot? | | Try reading I can read. Obviously you cannot, you ****ing snipping imbecile. -- *plonk* Do not reply to this generic message, it was automatically generated; you have been kill-filed, either for being boringly stupid, repetitive, unfunny, ineducable, repeatedly posting politics, religion or off-topic subjects to a sci. newsgroup, attempting cheapskate free advertising for profit, because you are a troll, because you responded to George Hammond the complete fruit cake, simply insane or any combination or permutation of the aforementioned reasons; any reply will go unread. Boringly stupid is the most common cause of kill-filing, but because this message is generic the other reasons have been included. You are left to decide which is most applicable to you. There is no appeal, I have despotic power over whom I will electronically admit into my home and you do not qualify as a reasonable person I would wish to converse with or even poke fun at. Some weirdoes are not kill- filed, they amuse me and I retain them for their entertainment value as I would any chicken with two heads, either one of which enables the dumb bird to scratch dirt, step back, look down, step forward to the same spot and repeat the process eternally. This should not trouble you, many of those plonked find it a blessing that they are not required to think and can persist in their bigotry or crackpot theories without challenge. You have the right to free speech, I have the right not to listen. The kill-file will be cleared annually with spring cleaning or whenever I purchase a new computer or hard drive. Update: the last clearance was 19/08/10. Some individuals have been restored to the list. I'm fully aware that you may be so stupid as to reply, but the purpose of this message is to encourage others to kill-file ****wits like you. I hope you find this explanation is satisfactory but even if you don't, damnly my frank, I don't give a dear. Have a nice day and **** off. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Ignorant lying Roberts should STUDY relativity. | Androcles[_22_] | Astronomy Misc | 3 | October 23rd 09 08:18 PM |
Debunked by Proof: Einstein's Relativity Theory Is Wrong! - PROOF #1 | qbit | Astronomy Misc | 6 | August 9th 07 04:04 PM |
THE ALBERT EINSTEIN OF OUR GENERATION IS LYING AGAIN | Pentcho Valev | Astronomy Misc | 21 | May 30th 07 08:51 AM |
Einstein was an atheist. ACTUALLY EINSTEIN WAS AN IDIOT | 46erjoe | Misc | 964 | March 10th 07 06:10 AM |
elsewhere brian a m stuckless wrote: alt.local.village.idiot,alt.mo-rons,sci.physics.relativity | brian a m stuckless | Policy | 0 | October 15th 05 04:26 PM |