|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Blackholes Don't Tilt
I keep playing with my old gyroscope and a theory comes to mind.
Blackholes spinning close to "C" are perfectly vertical relative to the inertia force(Much's theory) of the universe. There is no force in nature that can tilt a fast spinning blackhole. A blackhole is nature"s great gyroscope,and its vertical axis will be used someday as a reference frame to show north and south,for it will be a constant. Bert oc part comes from your posting |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Blackholes Don't Tilt
Bert wrote,
There is no force in nature that can tilt a fast spinning blackhole. A blackhole is nature"s great gyroscope,and its vertical axis will be used someday as a reference frame to show north and south,for it will be a constant. To which BV responded, But what is up and what is down in the Universe? The bipolar Primal Particle at the core of the universe (under the CBB model, that is). It is the only point in the universe so fixed. oc |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Blackholes Don't Tilt
Hi oc I almost jumped without thinking.Man uses a gyrocompass as I type.
Planes and ships ar sea. Interesting a magnetic compass points to the earth's magnetic pole,which is away from true north.(man has to make a correction for that) Because gyrocompasses don't use magnetism they always point to true north. Bert |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Blackholes Don't Tilt
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Blackholes Don't Tilt
G=EMC^2 Glazier wrote:
I keep playing with my old gyroscope and a theory comes to mind. Blackholes spinning close to "C" are perfectly vertical relative to the inertia force(Much's theory) of the universe. There is no force in nature that can tilt a fast spinning blackhole. A blackhole is nature"s great gyroscope,and its vertical axis will be used someday as a reference frame to show north and south,for it will be a constant. Bert oc part comes from your posting So, is this inertial force random in direction? The rotation of stars seems to be as is the orientation of galaxies containing those stars. This implies that black holes should have axes of rotation random in direction relative to each other. So...? |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Blackholes Don't Tilt
Hi Scott You ended your post with "so ?" Like pendulums
at the true north pole of the earth align their swing with the stars,blackholes align their axis also to the stars. Do you like this theory? Like you would say Scott "go prove it" "Show me some math" How come its not in a science journal. The reason is Scott I only thought of it 48 hours ago,and I only print my thoughts out to you,and those that read my news groups post all over the world. Bert PS Scott someday it will only be the brain(thoughts) of man that will be able to probe out trillions and trillions and one more trillion to the horizon of our universe. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Blackholes Don't Tilt
"BenignVanilla" wrote...
in message ... "G=EMC^2 Glazier" wrote in message ... I keep playing with my old gyroscope and a theory comes to mind. Blackholes spinning close to "C" are perfectly vertical relative to the inertia force(Much's theory) of the universe. There is no force in nature that can tilt a fast spinning blackhole. A blackhole is nature"s great gyroscope,and its vertical axis will be used someday as a reference frame to show north and south,for it will be a constant. Bert oc part comes from your posting But what is up and what is down in the Universe? BV. Not so mysterious, BV... here on Earth, as on any mass, "down" would be in the direction of the flow of gravity. And "up" is the opposite direction. And on an even *more* arbitrary note, astronomers like to view the Solar System as having a "top" and "bottom." If viewed with the planets revolving around the Sun in a counter-clockwise direction, we are viewing the "tops" of the planets (in most cases) and their North poles. So in this case, if one looks out into the cosmos from, say, Antarctica, then one is looking "down." If in space there is still a gravitic flow, then these arbitrary terms can still apply. It will be interesting if Bert's premise turns out to be correct. The problem i see with it is that if gravity actually does flow, and if it is the foundation of the energy density of the vacuum of space, then "up" and "down" may turn out to be far more complicated than the black 'n white definitions that we use here on Earth... Up and down may take on curvature and wavy natures! And yet i imagine that a pineapple upside-down cake will still taste the same. happy days and... starry starry nights! -- Life without love is A lamp without oil, Love without prejudice A world without soil, Tool without toil. Paine Ellsworth |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Blackholes Don't Tilt
"Bill Sheppard" wrote in message...
... Bert wrote, There is no force in nature that can tilt a fast spinning blackhole. A blackhole is nature"s great gyroscope,and its vertical axis will be used someday as a reference frame to show north and south,for it will be a constant. To which BV responded, But what is up and what is down in the Universe? The bipolar Primal Particle at the core of the universe (under the CBB model, that is). It is the only point in the universe so fixed. oc So if Bert is right, then black holes *will* tilt with the curvature of the toroidal structure. If we can find a relationship between a black hole's distance from us and the angle of tilt, could we get some idea of the nature of the Universe outside of our light- horizon? happy days and... starry starry nights! -- Life without love is A lamp without oil, Love without prejudice A world without soil, Tool without toil. Paine Ellsworth |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Blackholes Don't Tilt
"J. Scott Miller" wrote...
in message ... G=EMC^2 Glazier wrote: I keep playing with my old gyroscope and a theory comes to mind. Blackholes spinning close to "C" are perfectly vertical relative to the inertia force(Much's theory) of the universe. There is no force in nature that can tilt a fast spinning blackhole. A blackhole is nature"s great gyroscope,and its vertical axis will be used someday as a reference frame to show north and south,for it will be a constant. Bert oc part comes from your posting So, is this inertial force random in direction? The rotation of stars seems to be as is the orientation of galaxies containing those stars. This implies that black holes should have axes of rotation random in direction relative to each other. So...? 'Lo Scott -- The uniform rotation of stars with the orientation of galaxies containing those stars would suggest an even larger scale of uniformity? So perhaps while a black hole's axis of rotation remains fixed to a non-random inertial force, its surrounding galaxy disk oscillates much like a dish spinning on its edge on a table. The stable black hole would tend to dampen these galactic disk oscillations. When these oscillations finally cease, then perhaps the galaxy takes on a different shape? maybe going from a spiral to an irregular or some other shape? If a relationship can be found between a black hole's distance from us and its angle of tilt relative to Earth, then this might give us some idea as to the shape of the Universe? happy days and... starry starry nights! -- Life without love is A lamp without oil, Love without prejudice A world without soil, Tool without toil. Paine Ellsworth |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Blackholes Don't Tilt
Hi Painius You have posted very good thoughts that fit in so well. I
could add that the singularity at the exact center (Core) of a spinning blackhole does not rotate. In the future when man can detect blackholes that are free in space(no stars around it) he will use them to be his stepping stones to travel through space.(sling shot) and the first space ship using this method will be called "David" Bert "No matter which way the waves of space try to take his tiny spaceship man will set his own gyrocompass." Poetry for Sally |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
NOVA's "Magnetic Storm" and CellWell1 & CellWell2 | Archimedes Plutonium | Astronomy Misc | 12 | November 24th 03 03:45 AM |
sundial & Earth's tilt questions | Benoit Morrissette | Astronomy Misc | 22 | September 1st 03 08:55 AM |
Planetary Tilt Not A Spoiler For Habitation (Forwarded) | Andrew Yee | Astronomy Misc | 1 | August 25th 03 05:42 PM |
Planetary Tilt Not A Spoiler For Habitation | Ron Baalke | Science | 0 | August 25th 03 04:46 PM |
blackholes existing within close proximity? | Joseph Devaney | Science | 4 | August 22nd 03 05:25 AM |