A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Astronomy and Astrophysics » Astronomy Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

GR begets gravity begot from Newton's 1st Law is false, whereas gravity



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old March 25th 05, 10:31 AM
Archimedes Plutonium
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default GR begets gravity begot from Newton's 1st Law is false, whereas gravity

I am rather bemused and ashamed simultaneously of myself. But I suppose
all good scientists have these sort of brain lapses of clear thinking.
What I am talking about is why in the world did I ever need Knot theory
to clear my mind as to what gravity is? Why could not my mind simple
take the next step of seeing what gravity is, since I accepted the Atom
Totality theory and that the Sun, planets and stars and galaxies were
all tiny fragments of the last 6 electrons of 231Pu. And since galaxies
and stars and planets are pieces of the mass of 6 electrons of 231Pu
that the protons and electrons create a highly bent space which anyone
can look up the geometry of electron orbitals. So pieces of electrons
move in this bent space. And thus, there is no force of gravity because
the electrons are moving in a bent space carved out by the Coulomb
force.

So why in the world did I need the crutches of Knot theory to make that
clear in my mind? Perhaps Knot theory was a half step closer to getting
me to see that clearer picture.

So what was phony and false with past physics history on gravity? It
means Einstein's General Relativity is phony and false because he
ultimately relies upon a false foundation of Newton's first-law, the law
of inertia, and that a body at rest remains at rest but if the body is
in motion moves at a constant velocity in a straight line.

Poor Einstein never had the Atom Totality theory and so all he could do
is use this false idea of Newton's 1st Law.

In an Atom Totality there is no such thing as constant motion in a
straight line. There is no Law of Inertia. The Sun, planets, stars,
galaxies are all tiny chunks of the 94 electrons of the Atom Totality.
None of those pieces of the electrons moves in a straight line with
constant velocity.

So gravity is a ficticious force.

There is no force of gravity of electrons to protons. Perhaps our modern
measurement equipement is not delicate enough in any experiment to prove
that no force of gravity exists inside of atoms, or even perhaps
molecules or small objects.

The force of gravity in an Atom Totality occurs or arises because the
Coulomb Law is a force of attraction between protons and electrons. This
bends the space where electrons and their fragmented pieces of mass
reside and they follow that geometry in motion. So it is not what Newton
or Einstein would come to think that mass attracts mass or that mass
bends space and the motion of mass is in that bent space. No, those are
false perceptions. The entire Cosmos is the bent space due to the
Coulomb force of 94 protons on 94 electrons of 231Pu. And the planet
Earth goes around the Sun because the Sun is a bigger particle of the
94th electron than is the Earth. And so the 94Protons in the nucleus of
231Pu bend the space around the Sun more than around EArth and thus
EArth revolves around the Sun.

I am disappointed that I needed the posts of Knot theory yesterday to
the Internet for me to see that picture clearly. Disappointed because I
pride myself with a highly logical mind and should have been able to
envision that without Knot theory.

I should have been able to see that Newton's 1st Law was wrong and that
Einstein who based his GR on Newton's 1st Law was also gone astray into
falsehood.

You see, the Atom Totality makes the force of gravity as excess baggage.
Ironic that Einstein dispelled Ether in Special Relativity as excess
baggage, made the ether null and void. Funny how the Atom Totality makes
gravity null and void. Makes gravity as just a Coulomb consequence.

So there is a proof to the above, but whether modern physics is refined
enough to carry out the task is a different matter. The test is that
there is no force of gravity in the level of the inside of atoms and no
force of gravity for small objects. Because gravity is simply the
bending of space due to the 94 electrons and 94 protons of the 231Pu
Atom Totality. The only reason mass plays a role in gravity is because
every mass we check out is a piece of the 94th electron of 5f6.

Disappointed because I should have made a post like this circa 1994 or
thereabouts and not here in 2005.

So what is next? Do I beat-up on Newton's 3rd law also, after
vanquishing his 1st and 2nd laws? I doubt it because, strangely or
mystically, Newton's third law is EM based-- every action has an equal
and opposite reaction. It is part of Maxwell theory and has its root
foundation in the idea that proton to proton repel and electron to
electron repel.

Newtons 1st law and 2nd law have no connection to Maxwell theory and
history would eventually find them falsehoods. But his 3rd law was
rooted in EM Maxwell theory and would thus survive forever. Because
Maxwell theory is theory of Atomic Physics which is Quantum theory and
which is the Atom Totality.

Still disappointed that I needed that extra half a step to see the
picture more clearly.

Archimedes Plutonium
www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom where dots
of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies

Ads
  #2  
Old March 25th 05, 08:44 PM
Archimedes Plutonium
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Fri, 25 Mar 2005 04:31:46 -0600 Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
(most snipped)


So there is a proof to the above, but whether modern physics is refined
enough to carry out the task is a different matter. The test is that
there is no force of gravity in the level of the inside of atoms and no
force of gravity for small objects. Because gravity is simply the
bending of space due to the 94 electrons and 94 protons of the 231Pu
Atom Totality. The only reason mass plays a role in gravity is because
every mass we check out is a piece of the 94th electron of 5f6.


Let me outline several other proofs:

Gravity is about 10^40 weaker than Coulomb force. That would mean the mass
in the Cosmos is no more than the mass of 10^40 protons. So there would be
a direct correlation of observable mass density to the mass density of
electrons inside a plutonium atom. That means if the electrons inside a
plutonium atom were shattered and turned into tiny particles of "electron
fragments" it would match the density of mass of our observable Universe.
So the mathematics of mass of electrons inside a plutonium atom would match
the mathematics of mass density of galaxies and stars and planets.

Thirdly, because the lobes of the 5f6 are highly curved with distance would
bring an illusion, an optical illusion, of an acceleration. But it is not
an acceleration it is simply that the lobes are too curved with greater
distance and so we would think it was a spot of acceleration or
"antigravity".

Fourthly, the shape of electrons in orbit is mostly caused by the 94
protons coulombic force on the 94 electrons. However, there should be
evidence of electron coulomb force of repel on other electrons.

Fifthly, the insides of atoms often have nodes and 231Pu has alot of nodes,
point nodes, planar nodes and should we observe a region of the night sky
devoid of everything implies we are looking at a node of the 231Pu
Universe.

Sixthly, perhaps the easiest proof of the AtomTotality is that of variable
increase of mass to astro bodies. Example is Jupiter which is increasing
faster every day than any other body in our Solar System. That is because
in an Atom Totality the growth of a body is caused mainly by the daily
accretion of cosmic-rays of great energy such as 10^9 MeV and as high as
10^14 MeV. These particles come from the Nucleus of the AtomTotality. It
means that at some antipodal point of the AtomTotality is a Jupiter
look-alike planet that is growing in mass to become a twin star of an
anti-Sun and atoms have to hold their symmetry so that our Jupiter has to
increase in tandem. So once we get science projects focused on how fast
Jupiter is increasing its mass relative to all the other bodies of our
Solar System is a proof of the Atom Totality theory.

Archimedes Plutonium
www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom where dots
of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies

  #3  
Old March 25th 05, 09:18 PM
Mike
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

What about the PU-238 Explosive Space Modulator?

And how well would it fit in with your computations?


"Archimedes Plutonium" wrote in message
...
Fri, 25 Mar 2005 04:31:46 -0600 Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
(most snipped)


So there is a proof to the above, but whether modern physics is refined
enough to carry out the task is a different matter. The test is that
there is no force of gravity in the level of the inside of atoms and no
force of gravity for small objects. Because gravity is simply the
bending of space due to the 94 electrons and 94 protons of the 231Pu
Atom Totality. The only reason mass plays a role in gravity is because
every mass we check out is a piece of the 94th electron of 5f6.


Let me outline several other proofs:

Gravity is about 10^40 weaker than Coulomb force. That would mean the mass
in the Cosmos is no more than the mass of 10^40 protons. So there would be
a direct correlation of observable mass density to the mass density of
electrons inside a plutonium atom. That means if the electrons inside a
plutonium atom were shattered and turned into tiny particles of "electron
fragments" it would match the density of mass of our observable Universe.
So the mathematics of mass of electrons inside a plutonium atom would

match
the mathematics of mass density of galaxies and stars and planets.

Thirdly, because the lobes of the 5f6 are highly curved with distance

would
bring an illusion, an optical illusion, of an acceleration. But it is not
an acceleration it is simply that the lobes are too curved with greater
distance and so we would think it was a spot of acceleration or
"antigravity".

Fourthly, the shape of electrons in orbit is mostly caused by the 94
protons coulombic force on the 94 electrons. However, there should be
evidence of electron coulomb force of repel on other electrons.

Fifthly, the insides of atoms often have nodes and 231Pu has alot of

nodes,
point nodes, planar nodes and should we observe a region of the night sky
devoid of everything implies we are looking at a node of the 231Pu
Universe.

Sixthly, perhaps the easiest proof of the AtomTotality is that of variable
increase of mass to astro bodies. Example is Jupiter which is increasing
faster every day than any other body in our Solar System. That is because
in an Atom Totality the growth of a body is caused mainly by the daily
accretion of cosmic-rays of great energy such as 10^9 MeV and as high as
10^14 MeV. These particles come from the Nucleus of the AtomTotality. It
means that at some antipodal point of the AtomTotality is a Jupiter
look-alike planet that is growing in mass to become a twin star of an
anti-Sun and atoms have to hold their symmetry so that our Jupiter has to
increase in tandem. So once we get science projects focused on how fast
Jupiter is increasing its mass relative to all the other bodies of our
Solar System is a proof of the Atom Totality theory.

Archimedes Plutonium
www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom where dots
of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Can't get out of the universe "My crew will blow it up"!!!!!!!!!!! zetasum History 0 February 4th 05 11:06 PM
GRAVITATION AND QUANTUM MECHANICS GRAVITYMECHANIC2 Astronomy Misc 0 December 13th 04 03:17 AM
Gravity as Falling Space Henry Haapalainen Science 1 September 4th 04 04:08 PM
Newton's Gravity G=EMC^2 Glazier Misc 2 October 29th 03 12:33 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:42 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2004-2020 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.