|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
ASTRO: something different but not so different - M42_9March2008_crop_50p.jpg (0/1)
From my backyard 28 miles south of Wash DC. on 9 March 2008.
Taken with an NP-127 at F/5.2. Three 20 minute exposures using a Hutech modified Canon 40D at 100ASA custom balanced for daylight images. Cropped and reduced 50 percent. I set a custom white balance with my Hutech modified Canon 40D so I could take regular images. Normal images look all red because of the added red light the Hutech infrared blocking filter allows in. I used a gray card for the custom balance and regular images look well balanced, with no hint of the red hue. I decided to take an image of M42 using this custom white balance. Attached is that image. It differs little from a similar image I took on 2 amd 8 Feb. This newer image seems to have slightly more noise, but otherwise the color balance seems the same. This new image seems to have slightly bettter color intensity, but I believe that is because sky conditions were better on 9 March than whey were on 2 and 8 Feb. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
ASTRO: something different but not so different - M42_9March2008_crop_50p.jpg(0/1)
Looks Great Robert!
Robert Price wrote: From my backyard 28 miles south of Wash DC. on 9 March 2008. Taken with an NP-127 at F/5.2. Three 20 minute exposures using a Hutech modified Canon 40D at 100ASA custom balanced for daylight images. Cropped and reduced 50 percent. I set a custom white balance with my Hutech modified Canon 40D so I could take regular images. Normal images look all red because of the added red light the Hutech infrared blocking filter allows in. I used a gray card for the custom balance and regular images look well balanced, with no hint of the red hue. I decided to take an image of M42 using this custom white balance. Attached is that image. It differs little from a similar image I took on 2 amd 8 Feb. This newer image seems to have slightly more noise, but otherwise the color balance seems the same. This new image seems to have slightly bettter color intensity, but I believe that is because sky conditions were better on 9 March than whey were on 2 and 8 Feb. -- John N. Gretchen III N5JNG NCS304 http://www.tisd.net/~jng3 |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
ASTRO: something different but not so different - M42_9March2008_crop_50p.jpg(0/1)
Robert Price wrote: From my backyard 28 miles south of Wash DC. on 9 March 2008. Taken with an NP-127 at F/5.2. Three 20 minute exposures using a Hutech modified Canon 40D at 100ASA custom balanced for daylight images. Cropped and reduced 50 percent. I set a custom white balance with my Hutech modified Canon 40D so I could take regular images. Normal images look all red because of the added red light the Hutech infrared blocking filter allows in. I used a gray card for the custom balance and regular images look well balanced, with no hint of the red hue. I decided to take an image of M42 using this custom white balance. Attached is that image. It differs little from a similar image I took on 2 amd 8 Feb. This newer image seems to have slightly more noise, but otherwise the color balance seems the same. This new image seems to have slightly bettter color intensity, but I believe that is because sky conditions were better on 9 March than whey were on 2 and 8 Feb. Looks good to me! Rick -- Correct domain name is arvig and it is net not com. Prefix is correct. Third character is a zero rather than a capital "Oh". |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
ASTRO: something different but not so different - M42_9March2008_crop_50p.jpg (0/1)
Robert, I unfortunately can't see your image (there is no image in your
post, maybe because my news agent - Outlook Express) and I'd really like to see it. Please, send me some link where I could see your image, thanks. Gordan "Robert Price" wrote in message ... From my backyard 28 miles south of Wash DC. on 9 March 2008. Taken with an NP-127 at F/5.2. Three 20 minute exposures using a Hutech modified Canon 40D at 100ASA custom balanced for daylight images. Cropped and reduced 50 percent. I set a custom white balance with my Hutech modified Canon 40D so I could take regular images. Normal images look all red because of the added red light the Hutech infrared blocking filter allows in. I used a gray card for the custom balance and regular images look well balanced, with no hint of the red hue. I decided to take an image of M42 using this custom white balance. Attached is that image. It differs little from a similar image I took on 2 amd 8 Feb. This newer image seems to have slightly more noise, but otherwise the color balance seems the same. This new image seems to have slightly bettter color intensity, but I believe that is because sky conditions were better on 9 March than whey were on 2 and 8 Feb. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
ASTRO: something different but not so different - M42_9March2008_crop_50p.jpg (0/1)
Almost everything I have posted and then some can be found at:
http://www.robertprice10.com/astrophotography.html the latest are at: http://www.robertprice10.com/Canon_40DH_NP127IS.html On Wed, 12 Mar 2008 09:02:12 +0100, "Gordan" wrote: Robert, I unfortunately can't see your image (there is no image in your post, maybe because my news agent - Outlook Express) and I'd really like to see it. Please, send me some link where I could see your image, thanks. Gordan "Robert Price" wrote in message .. . From my backyard 28 miles south of Wash DC. on 9 March 2008. Taken with an NP-127 at F/5.2. Three 20 minute exposures using a Hutech modified Canon 40D at 100ASA custom balanced for daylight images. Cropped and reduced 50 percent. I set a custom white balance with my Hutech modified Canon 40D so I could take regular images. Normal images look all red because of the added red light the Hutech infrared blocking filter allows in. I used a gray card for the custom balance and regular images look well balanced, with no hint of the red hue. I decided to take an image of M42 using this custom white balance. Attached is that image. It differs little from a similar image I took on 2 amd 8 Feb. This newer image seems to have slightly more noise, but otherwise the color balance seems the same. This new image seems to have slightly bettter color intensity, but I believe that is because sky conditions were better on 9 March than whey were on 2 and 8 Feb. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
ASTRO: something different but not so different - M42_9March2008_crop_50p.jpg(0/1)
Gordan wrote: Robert, I unfortunately can't see your image (there is no image in your post, maybe because my news agent - Outlook Express) and I'd really like to see it. Please, send me some link where I could see your image, thanks. Gordan Note his posts come in two parts. Part (0/1) (found at the very end of his subject line) is the text (1/1) is the image. Subject lines are identical but for those last 5 characters. There is no image in the text message. If you aren't getting part (1/1) then it is your news service that is at fault not your reader. Yell at them. You likely are missing other posts as well if that's the case. May be a size thing. Some servers have a size limit so small images are carried. Those over some limit aren't. Mine cuts off at 1 megabyte for instance. When that happens I go to http://www.spacebanter.com/forumdisplay.php?f=25 This webpage often picks up posts to this news group before my news server does. Sometimes its a day late. Not sure why the difference. But it picks up all of Bob's images to date. Rick -- Correct domain name is arvig and it is net not com. Prefix is correct. Third character is a zero rather than a capital "Oh". |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
ASTRO: something different but not so different - M42_9March2008_crop_50p.jpg (0/1)
Wonderful!
Thank you! G. "Robert Price" wrote in message ... Almost everything I have posted and then some can be found at: http://www.robertprice10.com/astrophotography.html the latest are at: http://www.robertprice10.com/Canon_40DH_NP127IS.html On Wed, 12 Mar 2008 09:02:12 +0100, "Gordan" wrote: Robert, I unfortunately can't see your image (there is no image in your post, maybe because my news agent - Outlook Express) and I'd really like to see it. Please, send me some link where I could see your image, thanks. Gordan "Robert Price" wrote in message . .. From my backyard 28 miles south of Wash DC. on 9 March 2008. Taken with an NP-127 at F/5.2. Three 20 minute exposures using a Hutech modified Canon 40D at 100ASA custom balanced for daylight images. Cropped and reduced 50 percent. I set a custom white balance with my Hutech modified Canon 40D so I could take regular images. Normal images look all red because of the added red light the Hutech infrared blocking filter allows in. I used a gray card for the custom balance and regular images look well balanced, with no hint of the red hue. I decided to take an image of M42 using this custom white balance. Attached is that image. It differs little from a similar image I took on 2 amd 8 Feb. This newer image seems to have slightly more noise, but otherwise the color balance seems the same. This new image seems to have slightly bettter color intensity, but I believe that is because sky conditions were better on 9 March than whey were on 2 and 8 Feb. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[sci.astro,sci.astro.seti] Contents (Astronomy Frequently Asked Questions) (0/9) | [email protected] | SETI | 0 | August 15th 07 09:36 PM |
[sci.astro,sci.astro.seti] Contents (Astronomy Frequently Asked Questions) (0/9) | [email protected] | SETI | 0 | April 12th 07 01:05 AM |
[sci.astro,sci.astro.seti] Contents (Astronomy Frequently Asked Questions) (0/9) | [email protected] | Astronomy Misc | 0 | May 3rd 06 12:33 PM |
[sci.astro,sci.astro.seti] Contents (Astronomy Frequently Asked Questions) (0/9) | [email protected] | Astronomy Misc | 0 | September 30th 04 02:23 AM |
[sci.astro,sci.astro.seti] Contents (Astronomy Frequently Asked Questions) (0/9) | [email protected] | SETI | 0 | September 30th 04 02:23 AM |