|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Proper explanation for the MMX null result.
Proper explanation for the MMX null result:
1. The null result of the MMX is due to that the speed of light is isotropic HORIZONTALLY. 2. If the plane of the light rays (the right angled arms of the MMX) is oriented vertically then non-null result will be observed. This means that the speed of light is not isotropic in the vertical direction. This interpretation is supported by the Pound and Rebka experiments and the predicted gravitational red shift in the vertical direction by GRT. Proposed Experiments designed to support the above interpretations is in the paper entitled "Proposed Experiments to Detect Absolute Motion" in my website: http://www.geocities.com/kn_seto/index.htm Ken Seto |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Proper explanation for the MMX null result.
kenseto wrote: Proper explanation for the MMX null result: 1. The null result of the MMX is due to that the speed of light is isotropic HORIZONTALLY. 2. If the plane of the light rays (the right angled arms of the MMX) is oriented vertically then non-null result will be observed. This means that the speed of light is not isotropic in the vertical direction. This interpretation is supported by the Pound and Rebka experiments and the predicted gravitational red shift in the vertical direction by GRT. Proposed Experiments designed to support the above interpretations is in the paper entitled "Proposed Experiments to Detect Absolute Motion" in my website: http://www.geocities.com/kn_seto/index.htm Ken Seto Did you run the experiment, wacko? Not yet? Then go away, come back when you have results (meaning never) |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Proper explanation for the MMX null result.
wrote in message oups.com... kenseto wrote: Proper explanation for the MMX null result: 1. The null result of the MMX is due to that the speed of light is isotropic HORIZONTALLY. 2. If the plane of the light rays (the right angled arms of the MMX) is oriented vertically then non-null result will be observed. This means that the speed of light is not isotropic in the vertical direction. This interpretation is supported by the Pound and Rebka experiments and the predicted gravitational red shift in the vertical direction by GRT. Proposed Experiments designed to support the above interpretations is in the paper entitled "Proposed Experiments to Detect Absolute Motion" in my website: http://www.geocities.com/kn_seto/index.htm Ken Seto Did you run the experiment, wacko? Not yet? Then go away, come back when you have results (meaning never) You are a idiot runt of the SR experts. Definition for a runt of the SR experts: A moron who thinks that SR is a religion. An idiot who doesn't know the limitations of SR. A mental midget who can't comprehend beyond what he was taught in school. An imbecile who follows the real experts around like a puppy and eats up their **** like gourmet puppy chow. An Asshole who will attack anybody who disagrees with SR Ken Seto |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Proper explanation for the MMX null result.
kenseto wrote: wrote in message oups.com... kenseto wrote: Proper explanation for the MMX null result: 1. The null result of the MMX is due to that the speed of light is isotropic HORIZONTALLY. 2. If the plane of the light rays (the right angled arms of the MMX) is oriented vertically then non-null result will be observed. This means that the speed of light is not isotropic in the vertical direction. This interpretation is supported by the Pound and Rebka experiments and the predicted gravitational red shift in the vertical direction by GRT. Proposed Experiments designed to support the above interpretations is in the paper entitled "Proposed Experiments to Detect Absolute Motion" in my website: http://www.geocities.com/kn_seto/index.htm Ken Seto Did you run the experiment, wacko? Not yet? Then go away, come back when you have results (meaning never) You are a idiot runt of the SR experts. Definition for a runt of the SR experts: A moron who thinks that SR is a religion. An idiot who doesn't know the limitations of SR. A mental midget who can't comprehend beyond what he was taught in school. An imbecile who follows the real experts around like a puppy and eats up their **** like gourmet puppy chow. An Asshole who will attack anybody who disagrees with SR Ken Seto Did you run the experiment, wacko? Not yet? Then go away, come back when you have results (meaning never) . Keep eating it. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Proper explanation for the MMX null result.
kenseto wrote: Proper explanation for the MMX null result: 1. The null result of the MMX is due to that the speed of light is isotropic HORIZONTALLY. 2. If the plane of the light rays (the right angled arms of the MMX) is oriented vertically then non-null result will be observed. This means that the speed of light is not isotropic in the vertical direction. This interpretation is supported by the Pound and Rebka experiments and the predicted gravitational red shift in the vertical direction by GRT. What is the difference in absolute speed at the two endpoints (source and detector) that you derive from the measured Pound-Rebka shift? Proposed Experiments designed to support the above interpretations is in the paper entitled "Proposed Experiments to Detect Absolute Motion" in my website: http://www.geocities.com/kn_seto/index.htm Ken Seto |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Proper explanation for the MMX null result.
kenseto wrote:
Proper explanation for the MMX null result: 1. The null result of the MMX is due to that the speed of light is isotropic HORIZONTALLY. 2. If the plane of the light rays (the right angled arms of the MMX) is oriented vertically then non-null result will be observed. This means that the speed of light is not isotropic in the vertical direction. This interpretation is supported by the Pound and Rebka experiments and the predicted gravitational red shift in the vertical direction by GRT. Proposed Experiments designed to support the above interpretations is in the paper entitled "Proposed Experiments to Detect Absolute Motion" in my website: http://www.geocities.com/kn_seto/index.htm Ken Seto Seto's immortal fumbles http://www.google.com/search?q=seto+...ers.pandora.be Seto is a registered crank at crank dot net http://www.google.com/search?q=seto+...Awww.crank.net |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Proper explanation for the MMX null result.
wrote in message oups.com... kenseto wrote: Proper explanation for the MMX null result: 1. The null result of the MMX is due to that the speed of light is isotropic HORIZONTALLY. 2. If the plane of the light rays (the right angled arms of the MMX) is oriented vertically then non-null result will be observed. This means that the speed of light is not isotropic in the vertical direction. This interpretation is supported by the Pound and Rebka experiments and the predicted gravitational red shift in the vertical direction by GRT. Proposed Experiments designed to support the above interpretations is in the paper entitled "Proposed Experiments to Detect Absolute Motion" in my website: http://www.geocities.com/kn_seto/index.htm Ken Seto Did you run the experiment, wacko? Not yet? Then go away, come back when you have results (meaning never) He never will, he can't even figure out which direction is "up". George |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Proper explanation for the MMX null result.
"Sam Wormley" wrote in message news:9szPg.149566$FQ1.125423@attbi_s71... kenseto wrote: Proper explanation for the MMX null result: 1. The null result of the MMX is due to that the speed of light is isotropic HORIZONTALLY. 2. If the plane of the light rays (the right angled arms of the MMX) is oriented vertically then non-null result will be observed. This means that the speed of light is not isotropic in the vertical direction. This interpretation is supported by the Pound and Rebka experiments and the predicted gravitational red shift in the vertical direction by GRT. Proposed Experiments designed to support the above interpretations is in the paper entitled "Proposed Experiments to Detect Absolute Motion" in my website: http://www.geocities.com/kn_seto/index.htm Ken Seto Wormy is a runt of the SRians. Definition for a runt of the SRians: A moron who thinks that SR is a religion. An idiot who doesn't know the limitations of SR. A mental midget who can't comprehend beyond what he was taught in school. An imbecile who follows the real experts around like a puppy and eats up their **** like gourmet puppy chow. An Asshole who will attack anybody who disagrees with SR Ken Seto |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Proper explanation for the MMX null result.
George Dishman wrote: wrote in message oups.com... kenseto wrote: Proper explanation for the MMX null result: 1. The null result of the MMX is due to that the speed of light is isotropic HORIZONTALLY. 2. If the plane of the light rays (the right angled arms of the MMX) is oriented vertically then non-null result will be observed. This means that the speed of light is not isotropic in the vertical direction. This interpretation is supported by the Pound and Rebka experiments and the predicted gravitational red shift in the vertical direction by GRT. Proposed Experiments designed to support the above interpretations is in the paper entitled "Proposed Experiments to Detect Absolute Motion" in my website: http://www.geocities.com/kn_seto/index.htm Ken Seto Did you run the experiment, wacko? Not yet? Then go away, come back when you have results (meaning never) He never will, he can't even figure out which direction is "up". George Ha,ha,ha. The best! |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Proper explanation for the MMX null result.
wrote in message ups.com... kenseto wrote: wrote in message oups.com... kenseto wrote: Proper explanation for the MMX null result: 1. The null result of the MMX is due to that the speed of light is isotropic HORIZONTALLY. 2. If the plane of the light rays (the right angled arms of the MMX) is oriented vertically then non-null result will be observed. This means that the speed of light is not isotropic in the vertical direction. This interpretation is supported by the Pound and Rebka experiments and the predicted gravitational red shift in the vertical direction by GRT. Proposed Experiments designed to support the above interpretations is in the paper entitled "Proposed Experiments to Detect Absolute Motion" in my website: http://www.geocities.com/kn_seto/index.htm Ken Seto Did you run the experiment, wacko? Not yet? Then go away, come back when you have results (meaning never) You are a idiot runt of the SR experts. Definition for a runt of the SR experts: A moron who thinks that SR is a religion. An idiot who doesn't know the limitations of SR. A mental midget who can't comprehend beyond what he was taught in school. An imbecile who follows the real experts around like a puppy and eats up their **** like gourmet puppy chow. An Asshole who will attack anybody who disagrees with SR Ken Seto Did you run the experiment, wacko? Not yet? Then go away, come back when you have results (meaning never) . Keep eating it. Hey **** head if I have the resources to do the experiments I wouldn't be wasting my time talking to idiot like you. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
MAN'S EVOLUTION -- BUT IT'S REALLY POLLUTION | Ed Conrad | Astronomy Misc | 1 | June 14th 06 05:45 PM |
The SRians Said: Time is What the Clock Measures | kenseto | Astronomy Misc | 238 | June 12th 05 01:29 PM |
High proper motion. Q's | justbeats | Amateur Astronomy | 4 | November 22nd 04 09:51 AM |
!!! Black Hole Gravity - speed of gravity | Aunt Buffy | Misc | 366 | August 7th 04 03:02 AM |
Nature of Gravity: was Vector Gravitational Equations | CC | Astronomy Misc | 2 | September 10th 03 01:31 AM |