|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
I don't understand why you frequent this newsgroup
You are not physicians , nor mathematicians, nor engineers.
You just like to fight who is against your ideas. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
I don't understand why you frequent this newsgroup
On Tuesday, February 25, 2020 at 8:59:52 AM UTC-5, Doctor Who wrote:
You are not physicians , nor mathematicians, nor engineers. You just like to fight who is against your ideas. I'm not sure who you are talking to. You seem to be making replies as new topics. But I for one, am a professional chemical engineer so your statement above is wrong right from the beginning. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
I don't understand why you frequent this newsgroup
On 2/25/20 6:58 PM, Dean Markley wrote:
On Tuesday, February 25, 2020 at 8:59:52 AM UTC-5, Doctor Who wrote: You are not physicians , nor mathematicians, nor engineers. You just like to fight who is against your ideas. I'm not sure who you are talking to. You seem to be making replies as new topics. But I for one, am a professional chemical engineer so your statement above is wrong right from the beginning. you are not Sylvia. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
I don't understand why you frequent this newsgroup
On 2/25/20 6:58 PM, Dean Markley wrote:
On Tuesday, February 25, 2020 at 8:59:52 AM UTC-5, Doctor Who wrote: You are not physicians , nor mathematicians, nor engineers. You just like to fight who is against your ideas. I'm not sure who you are talking to. You seem to be making replies as new topics. But I for one, am a professional chemical engineer so your statement above is wrong right from the beginning. prove it. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
I don't understand why you frequent this newsgroup
On Tuesday, February 25, 2020 at 1:30:22 PM UTC-5, Doctor Who wrote:
On 2/25/20 6:58 PM, Dean Markley wrote: On Tuesday, February 25, 2020 at 8:59:52 AM UTC-5, Doctor Who wrote: You are not physicians , nor mathematicians, nor engineers. You just like to fight who is against your ideas. I'm not sure who you are talking to. You seem to be making replies as new topics. But I for one, am a professional chemical engineer so your statement above is wrong right from the beginning. prove it. Troll |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
I don't understand why you frequent this newsgroup
On 2/25/20 8:59 PM, Dean Markley wrote:
On Tuesday, February 25, 2020 at 1:30:22 PM UTC-5, Doctor Who wrote: On 2/25/20 6:58 PM, Dean Markley wrote: On Tuesday, February 25, 2020 at 8:59:52 AM UTC-5, Doctor Who wrote: You are not physicians , nor mathematicians, nor engineers. You just like to fight who is against your ideas. I'm not sure who you are talking to. You seem to be making replies as new topics. But I for one, am a professional chemical engineer so your statement above is wrong right from the beginning. prove it. Troll Oh my god I am all suffering for that ! |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
I don't understand why you frequent this newsgroup
Nor do I. PNN has nothing to do with space or space policy.
I suggest you try sci.physics. If you want a fair hearing from knowledgeable people I suggest you submit your papers to a peer-reviewed physics journal. Barring that, an established professor at a university or maybe one of your own college instructors, who might sponsor your paper to the peer reviewed journal. This is the way science and engineering is done. Hopefully I'll read about your breakthrough in a journal. Until then. *plonk* |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
I don't understand why you frequent this newsgroup
On 2/26/20 2:16 PM, David Spain wrote:
If you want a fair hearing from knowledgeable people I suggest you submit your papers to a peer-reviewed physics journal. ah, the classical bankruptcy procedure. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
I don't understand why you frequent this newsgroup
Il giorno mercoledì 26 febbraio 2020 14:16:39 UTC+1, David Spain ha scritto:
Nor do I. PNN has nothing to do with space or space policy. I suggest you try sci.physics. If you want a fair hearing from knowledgeable people I suggest you submit your papers to a peer-reviewed physics journal. Barring that, an established professor at a university or maybe one of your own college instructors, who might sponsor your paper to the peer reviewed journal. This is the way science and engineering is done. Hopefully I'll read about your breakthrough in a journal. Until then. *plonk* Mr. Spain It is comical that you say to Doctor Who that the pnn has nothing to do with space when it has been 50 years since missiles have even managed to put a permanent base on the moon. A propulsion system that loses more than 99% of the mass to get to and from the moon is at least a comic propulsion system. However, I don't mind publishing the developments of the PNN in a peer reviewed journal that will subject to censorship or to time delays, since we at ASPS have had called Nova Astronautica where our research has been published since 1981 www.asps.it/ novafiorenza.htm even without the consent of the clever and useless trumpet astronautics. Now a patent of the new pnn will be filed and experimental demonstrations of the know-how of the F432 pnn will be given to a certain public. The demonstrations will also be in our urls. So the situation will evolve in this way. Someone curious will start to reproduce what will be said of a pnn that is not that of 1998. Those who will not do it or will delay because of imbecility to verify what the ASPS will say, will be astronautically dead. Rockets will become museum stuff and those who don't change their mental paradigm will self-destruct.. But everything will happen without warning because in war, surprise is a great advantage. E.Laureti |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
I don't understand why you frequent this newsgroup
Il giorno mercoledì 26 febbraio 2020 23:55:24 UTC+1, ha scritto:
Il giorno mercoledì 26 febbraio 2020 14:16:39 UTC+1, David Spain ha scritto: Nor do I. PNN has nothing to do with space or space policy. I suggest you try sci.physics. If you want a fair hearing from knowledgeable people I suggest you submit your papers to a peer-reviewed physics journal. Barring that, an established professor at a university or maybe one of your own college instructors, who might sponsor your paper to the peer reviewed journal. This is the way science and engineering is done. Hopefully I'll read about your breakthrough in a journal. Until then. *plonk* Mr. Spain It is comical that you say to Doctor Who that the pnn has nothing to do with space when it has been 50 years since missiles have even managed to put a permanent base on the moon. A propulsion system that loses more than 99% of the mass to get to and from the moon is at least a comic propulsion system. However, I don't mind publishing the developments of the PNN in a peer reviewed journal that will subject to censorship or to time delays, since we at ASPS have had called Nova Astronautica where our research has been published since 1981 www.asps.it/novafiorenza.htm even without the consent of the clever and useless trumpet astronautics. Now a patent of the new pnn will be filed and experimental demonstrations of the know-how of the F432 pnn will be given to a certain public. The demonstrations will also be in our urls. So the situation will evolve in this way. Someone curious will start to reproduce what will be said of a pnn that is not that of 1998. Those who will not do it or will delay because of imbecility to verify what the ASPS will say, will be astronautically dead. Rockets will become museum stuff and those who don't change their mental paradigm will self-destruct. But everything will happen without warning because in war, surprise is a great advantage. E.Laureti |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
where Jimmy's frequent democrat spoils, Candy puts instead of teenage, conservative oceans | [email protected] | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | August 14th 07 08:51 AM |
Frequent moon impacts | Martin 53N 1W | SETI | 37 | September 17th 06 01:41 AM |
Help me understand | ZRexRider | SETI | 12 | March 15th 05 02:47 AM |
How frequent do you o | JOHN PAZMINO | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | December 22nd 03 02:35 AM |
How frequent do you observe in your own backyard | [email protected] | Amateur Astronomy | 33 | December 12th 03 02:48 PM |