|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
asteroids, meteors, meteorites (was Brad Guth's Credentials)
Pat Flannery wrote: Chris L Peterson wrote: I saw a television show once where a professional meteorite collector and salesman flies over the desert at low altitude in a ultralight aircraft with a magnetic anomaly detector mounted on it. Any blip on the detector has a good chance of being a nickel-iron meteorite, and he has found a lot of them this way. I've heard this sort of thing before, but I'm not aware of any meteorites that have been found this way. The magnetic anomaly of a typical iron meteorite is unlikely to be detectable from more than a few meters away. He was flying at around 20 feet altitude, basically terrain following to find them in a grid flight pattern; he stated he had had very good luck with the technique. Some hunters use metal detectors, and it's a miserable business: outside of rich, mapped strewn fields you can expect thousands of false positives, each of which must be dug up. Even if you could make a magnetic map from the air (which I doubt) I don't know how you could really use it to find anything. Key to this technique was where he did it- in the middle of a desert with no nearby roads, so that metallic objects would be few and far between, vastly upping the chances of the object being a meteorite. Try this just about anywhere else than a pretty desolate area and you are going to be locating nuts, bolts, and nails, old chains, and the occasional car engine block. Now that I think about this more I wonder if he wasn't flying over the Australian outback? I thought the best place to find meteorites was on an ice field in the spring. The dark spots are either dung left there by an animal or a meteorite. If it smells its dung if not it is a meteorite :-). In Greenland, Canadian extreme north, northern Siberia and Antarctica animals are far between, therefore so is dung and a significant fraction of it is meteorites. I'm not saying that the metal detector trick doesn't work but I don't think it is the best way to find meteorites. Alain Fournier |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
asteroids, meteors, meteorites (was Brad Guth's Credentials)
On Sat, 28 Jan 2006 10:53:38 -0500, Alain Fournier
wrote: I'm not saying that the metal detector trick doesn't work but I don't think it is the best way to find meteorites. Depends where you are looking, and what you are looking for. Most meteorites are stony, and don't give a very strong response to a metal detector. Ice fields are very good places to look- literally to look, since the eyes are the best detectors there. But if you are looking for iron meteorites, a metal detector is the best tool- even though it is still very inefficient. Many meteorites have been found that way. _________________________________________________ Chris L Peterson Cloudbait Observatory http://www.cloudbait.com |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
asteroids, meteors, meteorites (was Brad Guth's Credentials)
Alain Fournier wrote: I'm not saying that the metal detector trick doesn't work but I don't think it is the best way to find meteorites. The MAD or metal detector has the advantage of finding ones that have become buried. The frozen surface of lakes is also supposed to be good. Pat |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Brad Guth's Credentials | Robert Juliano | Policy | 0 | January 27th 06 02:17 PM |
Brad Guth's Credentials | Robert Juliano | History | 0 | January 27th 06 02:17 PM |
Brad Guth's Credentials | Dave Grayvis | Amateur Astronomy | 4 | January 13th 06 08:40 PM |
Brad Guth's Credentials | Tom Randy | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | January 7th 06 10:37 AM |
Brad Guth's Credentials | Fred Garvin | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | January 7th 06 02:02 AM |