A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Astronomy and Astrophysics » Astronomy Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

LIGO's Gravitational Waves Are Obviously Fake



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old November 12th 19, 12:40 AM posted to sci.astro
Pentcho Valev
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 7,497
Default LIGO's Gravitational Waves Are Obviously Fake

"On 8:41 am EDT August 17, 2017, LIGO detected a new gravitational wave source, dubbed GW170817 to mark its discovery date. Just two seconds later NASA's Fermi satellite detected a weak pulse of gamma rays from the same location of the sky." https://www.cfa.harvard.edu/news/2017-30

Two obvious fakes in the above scenario:

Fake 1: Gravitational waves and optical signals came from the same location of the sky.

Fake 2: They arrived simultaneously (only two seconds apart).

Arriving from the same location is absurd. Gamma rays undergo gravitational deflection, and "same location" implies that gravitational waves are deflected in exactly the same way, which is nonsense of course. Given the 2017 "same location" fake, any subsequent neutron-star-collision scenario involves an insoluble dilemma:

If "same location" is reconfirmed, LIGO conspirators will have to explain why gravitational waves undergo exactly the same gravitational deflection as light signals. Hopeless business - the conclusion that LIGO conspirators fake gravitational waves will be self-evident.

If "same location" is abandoned and gravitational waves and optical signals start coming from different directions, LIGO conspirators will have to explain how "same location" occurred in 2017 - again, the conclusion that gravitational waves are faked will be self-evident.

The simultaneous arrival of optical signals and gravitational waves in the GW170817 scenario is another silly fake. Even if gravitational waves existed (they don't), the simultaneous arrival would be absurd, for the following two reasons:

1. "Gravitational waves travel at the speed of light" was Eddington's 1922 fabrication - nothing to do with Einstein's general relativity:

Arthur Eddington 1922: "The problem of the propagation of disturbances of the gravitational field was investigated by Einstein in 1916, and again in 1918. It has usually been inferred from his discussion that a change in the distribution of matter produces gravitational effects which are propagated with the speed of light; but I think that Einstein really left the question of the speed of propagation rather indefinite. His analysis shows how the co-ordinates must be chosen if it is desired to represent the gravitational potentials as propagated with the speed of light; but there is nothing to indicate that the speed of light appears in the problem, except as the result of this arbitrary choice. [...] Weyl has classified plane gravitational waves into three types, viz.: (1) longitudinal-longitudinal; (2)longitudinal-transverse; (3) transverse-transverse. The present investigation leads to the conclusion that transverse-transverse waves are propagated with the speed of light in all systems of co-ordinates. Waves of the first and second types have no fixed velocity - a result which rouses suspicion as to their objective existence." http://rspa.royalsocietypublishing.o...6/268.full.pdf

2. The simultaneous arrival of optical signals and gravitational waves presupposes that gravitational waves experience Shapiro delay, like optical signals, which is nonsense. Texts like the following one are obvious fraud whose only purpose is to save LIGO conspirators from jail:

"In general relativity and other metric theories of gravity, though, the Shapiro delay for gravitational waves is expected to be the same as that for light and neutrinos." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shapiro_time_delay

As can be expected, the "same location" and "simultaneous arrival" insoluble dilemmas have been carefully bypassed since the GW170817 fake:

"But one of LIGO's twin detectors was offline Thursday when the gravitational wave reached Earth, making it hard for astronomers to triangulate exactly where the signal was coming from. That sent astronomers racing to image as many galaxies as they could across a region covering one-quarter of the sky." http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/d-...n-star-merger/

"In this case, unlike many others, LIGO and Virgo were unable to significantly narrow down the direction in the sky that the waves came from. The researchers could say only that the waves were from a wide region that covers roughly one-quarter of the sky." https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-019-01377-2

"You might wonder why we haven't seen knockout detections of electromagnetic radiation accompanying gravitational waves since the August 2017 discovery. Unfortunately, we probably just got lucky that time. “It was nearby, well-localized in space, and had everything going for it,” Berger said." https://gizmodo.com/mystery-deepens-...ace-1837581646

Pentcho Valev
Ads
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
LIGO Godfathers Fake (Don't Detect) Gravitational Waves Pentcho Valev Astronomy Misc 3 April 27th 19 06:53 AM
LIGO Don't Detect Anything ; They Fake Gravitational Waves Pentcho Valev Astronomy Misc 2 February 24th 19 07:52 AM
Why LIGO Conspirators Don't Fake Neutron Star Gravitational Waves Pentcho Valev Astronomy Misc 2 June 2nd 17 11:57 PM
Why LIGO Cannot Fake Neutron Star Gravitational Waves Pentcho Valev Astronomy Misc 2 June 15th 16 07:54 PM
Did LIGO Lie About Gravitational Waves? Pentcho Valev Astronomy Misc 1 February 27th 16 02:39 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:02 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2004-2019 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.