|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
And the winner is...
A little over a year ago K2 asked this group a series of questions about the future of space tourism (Rutan's Spaceship One had just made its first flight higher than 100 km). Some of the questions were about longer term predictions but the first question was about how many people would spend $100k for suborbital flight in "the first year". It isn't absolutely clear to me what "the first year" meant, was it July 26th 2004 (date of his post) to July 26th 2005 or was it October 4th 2004 (date the Xprize winning flight) to October 4th 2005. A year later it is now easier to guess that whatever was meant by the first year won't change the outcome of who had the most accurate guesstimate. So the winner is: Hum! I'm not sure, but I think it is Dave O'Neill. His reply was less than 40. But is that fair, one could of said less than 10 billion and be sure to have a right answer. The next best answer was mine which was 5. I consider that to be virtually identical to "Perplexed in Peoria" who gave the answer 6. I hope I didn't miss any answers that might be better. Alain Fournier |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
In article ,
Alain Fournier wrote: A little over a year ago K2 asked this group a series of questions about the future of space tourism (Rutan's Spaceship One had just made its first flight higher than 100 km). Some of the questions were about longer term predictions but the first question was about how many people would spend $100k for suborbital flight in "the first year". It isn't absolutely clear to me what "the first year" meant, was it July 26th 2004 (date of his post) to July 26th 2005 or was it October 4th 2004 (date the Xprize winning flight) to October 4th 2005. I would assume it meant the first year when suborbital flights were commercially available. That will probably be 2007 or 2008 (thereabouts). ,------------------------------------------------------------------. | Joseph J. Strout Check out the Mac Web Directory: | | http://www.macwebdir.com | `------------------------------------------------------------------' |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
What do you use as the correct number? So far, the number of people who have put money down for $100,000+ suborbital tickets, either the full amount or 10% deposits, is around 300 according to info released by Virgin Galactic and Space Adventures. "The company is selling $200,000 tickets for those who want to experience space flight but don't want to spend time training to be astronauts. So far, 178 people have signed contracts to fly into space, and more than 100 have paid for their tickets." - Milwaukee Journal Sentinel - July.28.05 http://www.jsonline.com/news/state/jul05/344242.asp "more than a hundred Space Adventures clients who have plunked down deposits of $10,000 or more toward the $98,000 mission cost. Twenty-six Space Adventures clients have paid in full for suborbital flights, which guarantees them a spot near the front of the line." - Forbes - May 9, 2005 http://www.forbes.com/free_forbes/2005/0509/058.html Before a single passenger has flown, there is already more than $30M in ticket reservations for suborbital tourism. Seems to me like a pretty strong sign that there is a market for it. - Clark www.hobbyspace.com Alain Fournier wrote: A little over a year ago K2 asked this group a series of questions about the future of space tourism (Rutan's Spaceship One had just made its first flight higher than 100 km). Some of the questions were about longer term predictions but the first question was about how many people would spend $100k for suborbital flight in "the first year". It isn't absolutely clear to me what "the first year" meant, was it July 26th 2004 (date of his post) to July 26th 2005 or was it October 4th 2004 (date the Xprize winning flight) to October 4th 2005. A year later it is now easier to guess that whatever was meant by the first year won't change the outcome of who had the most accurate guesstimate. So the winner is: Hum! I'm not sure, but I think it is Dave O'Neill. His reply was less than 40. But is that fair, one could of said less than 10 billion and be sure to have a right answer. The next best answer was mine which was 5. I consider that to be virtually identical to "Perplexed in Peoria" who gave the answer 6. I hope I didn't miss any answers that might be better. Alain Fournier |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
vze27b5m ) wrote:
: What do you use as the correct number? : So far, the number of people who have put money down for $100,000+ : suborbital tickets, either the full amount or 10% deposits, is : around 300 according to info released by Virgin Galactic and Space : Adventures. : "The company is selling $200,000 tickets for those who want to experience : space flight but don't want to spend time training to be astronauts. So far, : 178 people have signed contracts to fly into space, and more than 100 have : paid for their tickets." - Milwaukee Journal Sentinel - July.28.05 : http://www.jsonline.com/news/state/jul05/344242.asp : "more than a hundred Space Adventures clients who have plunked down : deposits of $10,000 or more toward the $98,000 mission cost. : Twenty-six Space Adventures clients have paid in full for suborbital : flights, which guarantees them a spot near the front of the line." - : Forbes - May 9, 2005 : http://www.forbes.com/free_forbes/2005/0509/058.html : Before a single passenger has flown, there is already more than : $30M in ticket reservations for suborbital tourism. Seems to me : like a pretty strong sign that there is a market for it. I think you confuse 'market' with 'interest', and the latter won't necessarily create the former. Eric : - Clark : www.hobbyspace.com : Alain Fournier wrote: : : A little over a year ago K2 asked this group a series of questions : about the future of space tourism (Rutan's Spaceship One had just : made its first flight higher than 100 km). Some of the questions : were about longer term predictions but the first question was about : how many people would spend $100k for suborbital flight in "the : first year". It isn't absolutely clear to me what "the first year" : meant, was it July 26th 2004 (date of his post) to July 26th 2005 : or was it October 4th 2004 (date the Xprize winning flight) to : October 4th 2005. A year later it is now easier to guess that : whatever was meant by the first year won't change the outcome of : who had the most accurate guesstimate. : : So the winner is: Hum! I'm not sure, but I think it is Dave O'Neill. : His reply was less than 40. But is that fair, one could of said : less than 10 billion and be sure to have a right answer. The next : best answer was mine which was 5. I consider that to be virtually : identical to "Perplexed in Peoria" who gave the answer 6. : : I hope I didn't miss any answers that might be better. : : : Alain Fournier : |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|