The Gravitational Instability Cosmological Theory on the Formation of the Universe

The Gravitational Instability Cosmological Theory,
( on the formation of the universe) by Rev Izzo


"When The Universe Started to Fall"

(a cosmological formation theory, complimenting the
STEADY STATE THEORY)

The Gravitational Instability Cosmological Theory on the Formation of
the Universe:

( Yin-Yang Sign here) (~)

The Theory:




(1) The Exspansion of the universe is a result of the "Heat" contained
therein;

(2) The source of the "Heat" is the cosmic microwave radiation
backround ( at 3 kelvin )

(3) The microwave ( EMF; N ) energy was formed a a result of the
interaction of two different "Gravitational Vacuum Fields" causing
gravitational instabiolity and motion-void of matter at this time,
wherein; gravitational fiel (1) began to go into "motion",

(4) Therefore; only (2) Gravitational fields "alone' ( void of E=MC2)
could create E=MC2; and then the matter of the Universe.

Question: When did this "motion" start?

Answer: A mere photon, going back in time,( a virtual photon pops in
an out of existence) entering one of the two static/motionless gravity
vacuum fields, would cause an unbalance of the "static" state of the
gravity vacuum fields, thereby causing motion, interaction.and
formiong protons, electrons and dust, as the atomic particles remained
near absolute zero tempature for billiobns of years as Einstien Bose
experiments show, concerning frozen helium gas atoms.


Note: The 4 forces of the universe a (1)the force of Gravity; (2)
Electro-Magnetic Force (3) Strong Nuclear Force and (4) Weak Nuclear
Force.....at one time Einstien in General relativity and in his Steady
stae theory, claimed the universe once needed to be "static or
motionless.at some point..and I believe this theory complements this
thought.)
( vacuum energy....and Einstien Bose theory is not included, but
vacuum energy is important, in what caused gravity vacuum energy..my
best guess is something 100,000x weaker than gravity somehow decayed,
causing gravitational vacuum energy, though static and absolute zero.
in tempature, only nothing can be absolute zero....static nothing that
is.)
May God Bless
this infinite cosmic mess
Theory by Rev Dan Izzo 7-17-2002



Reply




Search for articles like this


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Replies: The Gravitational Instability Cosmological theory, (
on the formation of the universe) by Rev Izzo
6 Replies b: Abraham3 on 06/08/03 at 07:55 AM

When did Motion Start ?...was the universe ever in a "static
state " ?
5 Replies b: brother dan izzo on 06/08/03 at 07:32 AM

When did Motion Start ?...was the universe ever in a
4 Replies b: Abraham3 on 06/11/03 at 12:16 PM

When did Motion Start ?...was the universe ever in a
0 Replies b: brother dan izzo on 06/11/03 at 07:54 PM

When did Motion Start ?...was the universe ever in a
1 Replies b: brother dan izzo on 06/12/03 at 07:47 AM

A detailed reply
0 Replies b: Abraham3 on 06/12/03 at 02:06 PM

When did Motion Start ?...was the universe ever in a
0 Replies b: brother dan izzo on 06/12/03 at 05:15 PM

Min? Is that you?

--
If you have had problems with Illinois Student Assistance Commission (ISAC),
please contact shredder at bellsouth dot net. There may be a class-action
lawsuit
in the works.

From rev dan izzo:

Note: The 4 forces of the universe a (1)the force of Gravity; (2)
Electro-Magnetic Force (3) Strong Nuclear Force and (4) Weak Nuclear
Force.....
snip

Note to the note: Please take care when listing these forces in
order. Some people are not aware that gravity is much weaker than any
of the other forces. The reason that gravity predominates over vast
distances is that the other forces experience cancellation. Kind of
like a tortoise/hare thing.

May God Bless

Now that's playing both sides of the fence!


~ CT

From Alan Erskine:
Off-topic BS and post ID deleted - X-Complaints-To:

Now that wasn't very friendly. I saw nothing abusive in Reverend
Dan's contribution.


~ CT

rev dan izzo wrote:
[snip]

Note: The 4 forces of the universe a (1)the force of Gravity; (2)
Electro-Magnetic Force (3) Strong Nuclear Force and (4) Weak Nuclear
Force.....
[snip]

Note also there are only 3 forces, the Weak Nuclear having been unified
with the EM force.

In article ,
stmx3 wrote:
Note: The 4 forces of the universe a (1)the force of Gravity; (2)
Electro-Magnetic Force (3) Strong Nuclear Force and (4) Weak Nuclear
Force.....

Note also there are only 3 forces, the Weak Nuclear having been unified
with the EM force.

They are still often spoken of as being separate forces. Despite their
underlying equivalence, they behave very differently under even vaguely
normal conditions.
--
MOST launched 1015 EDT 30 June, separated 1046, | Henry Spencer
first ground-station pass 1651, all nominal! |

Henry Spencer wrote:
In article ,
stmx3 wrote:

Note: The 4 forces of the universe a (1)the force of Gravity; (2)
Electro-Magnetic Force (3) Strong Nuclear Force and (4) Weak Nuclear
Force.....

Note also there are only 3 forces, the Weak Nuclear having been unified
with the EM force.


They are still often spoken of as being separate forces. Despite their
underlying equivalence, they behave very differently under even vaguely
normal conditions.

Yep, that's true. I'm still smarting from getting points taken off in
an exam many years ago by answering "4" as the number of fundamental
forces. Extra credit was given to those who wrote "1" and were able to
prove it.

From stmx3:
snip
Yep, that's true. I'm still smarting from getting points taken off in
an exam many years ago by answering "4" as the number of fundamental
forces. Extra credit was given to those who wrote "1" and were able to
prove it.

....or *demonstrate it* by producing a nice hot bowl of primordial soup.


~ CT

Stuf4 wrote:
From stmx3:
snip

Yep, that's true. I'm still smarting from getting points taken off in
an exam many years ago by answering "4" as the number of fundamental
forces. Extra credit was given to those who wrote "1" and were able to
prove it.


...or *demonstrate it* by producing a nice hot bowl of primordial soup.


~ CT

Hey...maybe there's a market for "Primordial Alphabet Soup"!