|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#81
|
|||
|
|||
Bye-bye NASA Progress buys.
"Rick Jones" wrote in message
... In sci.space.history Alan Erskine wrote: "Jeff Findley" wrote in message ... Zero gravity sports stadiums immediately spring to mind. ;-) Habitats; greenhouses (windows?) excercise facilities for long-stay crews (not just sports stadia); storage areas. "Drydocks" perhaps? Possible. The inside doesn't have to be kept pressurised to maintain rigidity. |
#82
|
|||
|
|||
Bye-bye NASA Progress buys.
On Mon, 21 Apr 2008 13:46:15 -0400, Jeff Findley wrote:
At least there is now competition for cargo flights. That will help some. Everyone knows that Russia will gouge you for Soyuz and Progress flights. 20 million USD / seat on Soyuz, including tourist tax. 64 million USD / seat on Shuttle, cost price. -- One way ticket from Mornington Crescent to Tannhauser Gate please. |
#83
|
|||
|
|||
Bye-bye NASA Progress buys.
Monte Davis wrote:
(Derek Lyons) wrote: Hmm... Sound like those reflections might have been interesting to hear. Not online that I know of, but here's a start http://www.spacepolitics.com/2008/03...vs-beginnings/ OK, I saw those - just didn't connect the name. D. -- Touch-twice life. Eat. Drink. Laugh. http://derekl1963.livejournal.com/ -Resolved: To be more temperate in my postings. Oct 5th, 2004 JDL |
#84
|
|||
|
|||
Bye-bye NASA Progress buys.
Fevric J Glandules wrote:
On Mon, 21 Apr 2008 13:46:15 -0400, Jeff Findley wrote: At least there is now competition for cargo flights. That will help some. Everyone knows that Russia will gouge you for Soyuz and Progress flights. 20 million USD / seat on Soyuz, including tourist tax. 64 million USD / seat on Shuttle, cost price. That isn't fair. The Shuttle has a cargo bay that Soyuz doesn't have. So dividing the cost of a Shuttle flight by the number of seats isn't fair. Alain Fournier |
#85
|
|||
|
|||
Bye-bye NASA Progress buys.
"Alain Fournier" wrote in message
... Fevric J Glandules wrote: On Mon, 21 Apr 2008 13:46:15 -0400, Jeff Findley wrote: At least there is now competition for cargo flights. That will help some. Everyone knows that Russia will gouge you for Soyuz and Progress flights. 20 million USD / seat on Soyuz, including tourist tax. 64 million USD / seat on Shuttle, cost price. That isn't fair. The Shuttle has a cargo bay that Soyuz doesn't have. So dividing the cost of a Shuttle flight by the number of seats isn't fair. It's also not fair since no one has ever been quoted a market price on the Shuttle, and never will be. Alain Fournier -- Greg Moore SQL Server DBA Consulting Remote and Onsite available! Email: sql (at) greenms.com http://www.greenms.com/sqlserver.html |
#86
|
|||
|
|||
Bye-bye NASA Progress buys.
On Thu, 24 Apr 2008 21:09:20 -0400, in a place far, far away, Alain
Fournier made the phosphor on my monitor glow in such a way as to indicate that: Fevric J Glandules wrote: On Mon, 21 Apr 2008 13:46:15 -0400, Jeff Findley wrote: At least there is now competition for cargo flights. That will help some. Everyone knows that Russia will gouge you for Soyuz and Progress flights. 20 million USD / seat on Soyuz, including tourist tax. 64 million USD / seat on Shuttle, cost price. That isn't fair. The Shuttle has a cargo bay that Soyuz doesn't have. So dividing the cost of a Shuttle flight by the number of seats isn't fair. It's not, but one of the problems of the Shuttle has always been to disaggregate the costs of the cargo versus the crew, and establish an appropriate price. |
#87
|
|||
|
|||
Bye-bye NASA Progress buys.
On Thu, 24 Apr 2008 21:15:07 -0400, Greg D. Moore \(Strider\) wrote:
"Alain Fournier" wrote in message ... Fevric J Glandules wrote: On Mon, 21 Apr 2008 13:46:15 -0400, Jeff Findley wrote: At least there is now competition for cargo flights. That will help some. Everyone knows that Russia will gouge you for Soyuz and Progress flights. 20 million USD / seat on Soyuz, including tourist tax. 64 million USD / seat on Shuttle, cost price. That isn't fair. The Shuttle has a cargo bay that Soyuz doesn't have. So dividing the cost of a Shuttle flight by the number of seats isn't fair. It's also not fair since no one has ever been quoted a market price on the Shuttle, and never will be. That's being unfair to Soyuz. I'm comparing cost price with gouge-the-tourist price (which also includes six months training, does it not?) However Alain is quite correct, so with a bit of Googling it seems that Ariane 5 gets 16 tons to LEO for 180M USD. So that would be ~270M to equal the Shuttle's 24 tons. Which brings the shuttle price down to 25M / seat. -- One way ticket from Mornington Crescent to Tannhauser Gate please. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Bye-bye NASA Progress buys. | Pat Flannery | Policy | 75 | April 25th 08 12:28 PM |
NASA buys four Russian spacecraft. | Pat Flannery | History | 8 | January 15th 07 07:02 PM |
On NASA TV - Old NASA progress report promo film in *incredible* shape! | OM | History | 5 | July 21st 04 02:39 PM |
NASA Buys Two Taurus, Two Pegasus Launches | ed kyle | Policy | 16 | November 8th 03 05:35 PM |