|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Bought Senators claim 'commercial crew sucks'
http://www.spaceflightnow.com/news/n...ommercialcrew/
It once again shows that the U.S. Congress is simply filled with a bunch of corrupt CROOKS doing the bidding of Boeing and Lockeed-Martin. They have been instructed to simply KILL COTS since they themselves can't compete against a company like SpaceX. If they succeed they'll once again charge tens of billions to develop spacecraft which were developed in months instead of decades in the 1960's. SLS for example is simply a rehashed Space Shuttle, yet it will take more than a decade for it to take crew into orbit (the first 'dummy' test flight is slated for 2017; 'dummy' because it won't be using the J2X which itself has been in development for over 7 years and won't be finished by 2017, even though it's simply an upgraded version of the 1960's J2 engine). McAlister is simply being prudent when he says that 'some people in Congress are not comfortable with COTS,' he's obviously too afraid to accuse the Senators of being corrupt croonies. So now these Senators are trying to slash the COTS budget to the bone so they can later accuse comapnies like SpaceX of 'underperforming' and 'taking too long' to get results. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Bought Senators claim 'commercial crew sucks'
On Mar 13, 5:28*am, Anonymous wrote:
http://www.spaceflightnow.com/news/n...ommercialcrew/ It once again shows that the U.S. Congress is simply filled with a bunch of corrupt CROOKS doing the bidding of Boeing and Lockeed-Martin. They have been instructed to simply KILL COTS since they themselves can't compete against a company like SpaceX. If they succeed they'll once again charge tens of billions to develop spacecraft which were developed in months instead of decades in the 1960's. SLS for example is simply a rehashed Space Shuttle, yet it will take more than a decade for it to take crew into orbit (the first 'dummy' test flight is slated for 2017; 'dummy' because it won't be using the J2X which itself has been in development for over 7 years and won't be finished by 2017, even though it's simply an upgraded version of the 1960's J2 engine). McAlister is simply being prudent when he says that 'some people in Congress are not comfortable with COTS,' he's obviously too afraid to accuse the Senators of being corrupt croonies. So now these Senators are trying to slash the COTS budget to the bone so they can later accuse comapnies like SpaceX of 'underperforming' and 'taking too long' to get results. congress is BOUGHT AND PAID FOR BY HE PEOPLE CONTRIBUTING MONEY FOR THEIR CAMPAIGNS! Strict term limits, and campaign spending limits, and the end of super packs is the only thing that can makke congress effective again.......... it will likely take the total collapse of the US to fix things......... our country is screwed |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Bought Senators claim 'commercial crew sucks'
On 13/03/2012 8:28 PM, Anonymous wrote:
Just the same coward hiding behind reece yet again. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Bought Senators claim 'commercial crew sucks'
Le 13/03/12 10:28, Anonymous a écrit :
So now these Senators are trying to slash the COTS budget to the bone so they can later accuse comapnies like SpaceX of 'underperforming' and 'taking too long' to get results. Ahhh the "private entreprise" dream. It only works when they are financed by the goverment. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Bought Senators claim 'commercial crew sucks'
On Mar 13, 5:28*am, Anonymous wrote:
http://www.spaceflightnow.com/news/n...ommercialcrew/ It once again shows that the U.S. Congress is simply filled with a bunch of corrupt CROOKS doing the bidding of Boeing and Lockeed-Martin. They have been instructed to simply KILL COTS since they themselves can't compete against a company like SpaceX. If they succeed they'll once again charge tens of billions to develop spacecraft which were Unsubstatiated BS Crook? The poster is one for s Ander |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Bought Senators claim 'commercial crew sucks'
On Mar 13, 10:10*am, jacob navia wrote:
Le 13/03/12 10:28, Anonymous a écrit : So now these Senators are trying to slash the COTS budget to the bone so they can later accuse comapnies like SpaceX of 'underperforming' and 'taking too long' to get results. Ahhh the "private entreprise" dream. It only works when they are financed by the goverment. You are just as bad as the poster |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Bought Senators claim 'commercial crew sucks'
Le 13/03/12 15:21, Me a écrit :
On Mar 13, 10:10 am, jacob wrote: Le 13/03/12 10:28, Anonymous a écrit : So now these Senators are trying to slash the COTS budget to the bone so they can later accuse comapnies like SpaceX of 'underperforming' and 'taking too long' to get results. Ahhh the "private entreprise" dream. It only works when they are financed by the goverment. You are just as bad as the poster Yes, I am bad. Really bad. Not even the holy ghost of the "free entreprise" warms me up. Specially when the "free" entreprise can exist only if the taxpayer finances it. Pouring public money into private pockets is the norm nowadays. Those that protest are bad people, they are against capitalism at its best: public money into private pockets. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Bought Senators claim 'commercial crew sucks'
"Anonymous" wrote in message ... http://www.spaceflightnow.com/news/n...ommercialcrew/ What does crew socks have to do with a space ng? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Commercial Crew: The Perception Problem | Matt Wiser[_2_] | History | 9 | September 29th 10 01:06 PM |
Commercial Crew Flight by 2015? | Space Cadet[_1_] | Policy | 2 | May 14th 10 11:54 PM |
Commercial launch of cargo but not crew | [email protected] | Space Station | 1 | August 15th 09 09:40 AM |
NASA Establishes Commercial Crew/Cargo Project Office | Jacques van Oene | News | 0 | November 12th 05 03:50 PM |
NASA ESTABLISHES COMMERCIAL CREW/CARGO PROJECT OFFICE | Jacques van Oene | Space Shuttle | 4 | November 9th 05 07:58 PM |