ozone damage from telescope lazer and rockets

Is there any study done on the subject?

It seems to me logical that holes created by powerful lazer causes damages
which are repaired naturally. However, similar to smoking in humans, it
might increase the damage and risk over time?

"onegod" wrote in
:

Is there any study done on the subject?

It seems to me logical that holes created by powerful lazer causes
damages which are repaired naturally. However, similar to smoking in
humans, it might increase the damage and risk over time?




No it's stupid posts to usenet that cause that.

Llanzlan.

"onegod" wrote in
:

Is there any study done on the subject?

It seems to me logical that holes created by powerful lazer causes
damages which are repaired naturally. However, similar to smoking in
humans, it might increase the damage and risk over time?




No it's stupid posts to usenet that cause that.

Llanzlan.

On Tue, 23 Sep 2003 02:22:33 GMT, "onegod" wrote:

Is there any study done on the subject?

It seems to me logical that holes created by powerful lazer causes damages
which are repaired naturally. However, similar to smoking in humans, it
might increase the damage and risk over time?


I think you need to read a bit of science first, before you post
again. Please do so.


--

Find out about Australia's most dangerous Doomsday Cult:
http://users.bigpond.net.au/wanglese/pebble.htm

"You can't fool me, it's turtles all the way down."

On Tue, 23 Sep 2003 02:22:33 GMT, "onegod" wrote:

Is there any study done on the subject?

It seems to me logical that holes created by powerful lazer causes damages
which are repaired naturally. However, similar to smoking in humans, it
might increase the damage and risk over time?


I think you need to read a bit of science first, before you post
again. Please do so.


--

Find out about Australia's most dangerous Doomsday Cult:
http://users.bigpond.net.au/wanglese/pebble.htm

"You can't fool me, it's turtles all the way down."

"Wally AngleseaT" wrote in
message ...
On Tue, 23 Sep 2003 02:22:33 GMT, "onegod" wrote:

Is there any study done on the subject?

It seems to me logical that holes created by powerful lazer causes
damages
which are repaired naturally. However, similar to smoking in humans, it
might increase the damage and risk over time?


I think you need to read a bit of science first, before you post
again. Please do so.

He should at least learn how to spell "laser".

R

"Wally AngleseaT" wrote in
message ...
On Tue, 23 Sep 2003 02:22:33 GMT, "onegod" wrote:

Is there any study done on the subject?

It seems to me logical that holes created by powerful lazer causes
damages
which are repaired naturally. However, similar to smoking in humans, it
might increase the damage and risk over time?


I think you need to read a bit of science first, before you post
again. Please do so.

He should at least learn how to spell "laser".

R

Ron Miller wrote:

He should at least learn how to spell "laser".

It's an acronym, you see: Light Amplification for Zapping Earthlings
with Radiation.

--
Odysseus

Ron Miller wrote:

He should at least learn how to spell "laser".

It's an acronym, you see: Light Amplification for Zapping Earthlings
with Radiation.

--
Odysseus

I guess either no study has been done OR only grammar police and idiot
wannabe know it all want to reply.

"onegod" wrote in message
...
Is there any study done on the subject?

It seems to me logical that holes created by powerful lazer causes damages
which are repaired naturally. However, similar to smoking in humans, it
might increase the damage and risk over time?