|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Apollo Tapes are not missing
robert casey writes:
It makes a lot of difference. NASA's originals are much higher quality than what was broadcast live, due to the low-tech NTSC conversion method used (literally, point a TV camera at a monitor playing the original). And the whole world was fed via that converter. So the higher quality signal only existed at the receive point (Parks dish antenna?) and nobody else got to see anything other than the converted signal. In fact no. There where two versions of the signal, a PAL one that was fed from OTC in Sydney and from there to the rest of OZ, and the feed from Houston via the Pacific com sats. Parkes and Tidbinbilla both fed Honeysuckle, and from there to OTC. Almost all of the A11 video came from Parkes. There was a few min of siganl from Goldstone, but OZ never saw that. OTC was swallowed up by Telecom/Telstra so any tapes from there would have been `efficiented' long ago. -- Paul Repacholi 1 Crescent Rd., +61 (08) 9257-1001 Kalamunda. West Australia 6076 comp.os.vms,- The Older, Grumpier Slashdot Raw, Cooked or Well-done, it's all half baked. EPIC, The Architecture of the future, always has been, always will be. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
what was Apollo 1's mission to be? | PowerPost2000 | History | 16 | July 1st 06 03:16 PM |
The Apollo Hoax FAQ (is not spam) :-) | Nathan Jones | Misc | 6 | July 29th 04 06:14 AM |
Apollo | Buzz alDredge | Misc | 5 | July 28th 04 10:05 AM |
The Apollo Hoax FAQ | darla | Astronomy Misc | 15 | July 25th 04 02:57 PM |
The Apollo FAQ (moon landings were faked) | Nathan Jones | Astronomy Misc | 8 | February 4th 04 06:48 PM |