A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Space Science » History
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Al Shepard would have approved



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old March 8th 06, 11:16 PM posted to sci.space.history
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Al Shepard would have approved

On Wed, 08 Mar 2006 20:45:08 +0000, Henry Spencer wrote:

Chuck Stewart wrote:


Give it a while and a few hundred thousand
slightly perturbed orbits


By which time it'll be in a significantly lower orbit, because it has a
much lower cross-sectional density.


Picky picky picky... alright, we can just
quietly substitute a depleted uranium ball
hidden within a regulation golf ball cover.

(Scene: the end of the stations extended
robot arm... A very surprised cosmonaut
looks down at his bent 6-iron, and then
looks at the slowly departing golf ball.)

--
Chuck Stewart
"Anime-style catgirls: Threat? Menace? Or just studying algebra?"
  #12  
Old March 9th 06, 07:54 PM posted to sci.space.history
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Al Shepard would have approved

In message , Chuck Stewart
writes
On Wed, 08 Mar 2006 20:45:08 +0000, Henry Spencer wrote:

Chuck Stewart wrote:


Give it a while and a few hundred thousand
slightly perturbed orbits


By which time it'll be in a significantly lower orbit, because it has a
much lower cross-sectional density.


Picky picky picky... alright, we can just
quietly substitute a depleted uranium ball
hidden within a regulation golf ball cover.

(Scene: the end of the stations extended
robot arm... A very surprised cosmonaut
looks down at his bent 6-iron, and then
looks at the slowly departing golf ball.)


If you want density shouldn't you use iridium? (which will really
confuse people looking for it on Heavens Above)
I wonder what hitting a two-pound golf ball would feel like.
  #13  
Old March 10th 06, 11:27 AM posted to sci.space.history
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Al Shepard would have approved

On Thu, 09 Mar 2006 19:54:23 +0000, Jonathan Silverlight wrote:

Chuck Stewart wrote:


On Henry Spencer wrote:


By which time it'll be in a significantly lower orbit, because it has a
much lower cross-sectional density.


Picky picky picky... alright, we can just
quietly substitute a depleted uranium ball
hidden within a regulation golf ball cover.


(Scene: the end of the stations extended
robot arm... A very surprised cosmonaut
looks down at his bent 6-iron, and then
looks at the slowly departing golf ball.)


If you want density shouldn't you use iridium? (which will really
confuse people looking for it on Heavens Above)


Yeah, but Iridium is expensive... just ask
the DoD

DU, however, is available cheaply and in
ton lots.

I wonder what hitting a two-pound golf ball would feel like.


I'd guess that even the 1.6 pound DU ball
would feel like you tried to tee off on a
golf cart. I keep expecting Henry to point
out that we've essentially reversed the
original problem... with the station now
sinking faster than the golf ball

--
Chuck Stewart
"Anime-style catgirls: Threat? Menace? Or just studying algebra?"
  #14  
Old March 10th 06, 08:37 PM posted to sci.space.history
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Al Shepard would have approved

In message , Chuck Stewart
writes
On Thu, 09 Mar 2006 19:54:23 +0000, Jonathan Silverlight wrote:

Chuck Stewart wrote:


On Henry Spencer wrote:


By which time it'll be in a significantly lower orbit, because it has a
much lower cross-sectional density.


Picky picky picky... alright, we can just
quietly substitute a depleted uranium ball
hidden within a regulation golf ball cover.


(Scene: the end of the stations extended
robot arm... A very surprised cosmonaut
looks down at his bent 6-iron, and then
looks at the slowly departing golf ball.)


If you want density shouldn't you use iridium? (which will really
confuse people looking for it on Heavens Above)


Yeah, but Iridium is expensive... just ask
the DoD


I knew someone would say that, but is there much difference when you've
paid for getting it into orbit?
  #15  
Old March 11th 06, 08:20 AM posted to sci.space.history
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Al Shepard would have approved

On Fri, 10 Mar 2006 20:37:40 +0000, Jonathan Silverlight wrote:

Yeah, but Iridium is expensive... just ask
the DoD


I knew someone would say that, but is there much difference when you've
paid for getting it into orbit?


Good point.

--
Chuck Stewart
"Anime-style catgirls: Threat? Menace? Or just studying algebra?"
  #16  
Old March 12th 06, 01:51 PM posted to sci.space.history
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Al Shepard would have approved



Henry Spencer wrote:


By which time it'll be in a significantly lower orbit, because it has a
much lower cross-sectional density.



I don't know- those solar arrays would make pretty good airbrakes when
they are facing toward the direction of movement like at sunrise or sunset.

Pat
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The U.S.S. Shepard Pat Flannery History 36 February 7th 06 08:51 PM
Russian Space Program 2006-2015 Approved Jacques van Oene Space Station 0 October 26th 05 02:32 PM
Secret Bidding approved on Ebay .... Huh? Amateur Astronomy 24 September 27th 05 09:04 AM
Is Hubble's successor approved and funded? Jorge R. Frank Policy 7 January 19th 04 02:16 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:57 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.