|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Dynamics of an Earth Ring
Before anybody gives me that look...this question is totally in the
context of a "what if" kind of hypothetical scenario. Suppose an asteroid somehow, through some super, far future engineering achievement has been captured into orbit around the Earth. Now suppose we want to carve it out by detonating a series of missiles that incrementally hollow their way into the body of such an asteroid. The material excavated out of the body would create a thin ring system around the Earth, as I try to illustrate he- http://uk.geocities.com/aa_spaceagen...arth-ring.html My main concern with such a project is one of SAFETY. I'd like to know what a *safe* perigee (minimum) altitude would be necessary to prevent orbital decay of ring material. I don't want any material from my hypothetical ring system coming down toward the Earth under any circumstances. Would the ring material be contained in a narrow plane of fixed orbital incline, or would it scatter over time? What about interactivity with particles trapped in the Van Allen radiation belts? Is there any learnings from the Voyager studies (and now Cassini studies) of Saturnian rings that could be used to predict the long term stability of such a *hypothetical* ring system around the Earth in the future? Abdul Ahad |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
"AA Institute" wrote in message om... Before anybody gives me that look...this question is totally in the context of a "what if" kind of hypothetical scenario. Suppose an asteroid somehow, through some super, far future engineering achievement has been captured into orbit around the Earth. Now suppose we want to carve it out by detonating a series of missiles that incrementally hollow their way into the body of such an asteroid. The material excavated out of the body would create a thin ring system around the Earth, as I try to illustrate he- http://uk.geocities.com/aa_spaceagen...arth-ring.html My main concern with such a project is one of SAFETY. I'd like to know what a *safe* perigee (minimum) altitude would be necessary to prevent orbital decay of ring material. I don't want any material from my hypothetical ring system coming down toward the Earth under any circumstances. Would the ring material be contained in a narrow plane of fixed orbital incline, or would it scatter over time? What about interactivity with particles trapped in the Van Allen radiation belts? Is there any learnings from the Voyager studies (and now Cassini studies) of Saturnian rings that could be used to predict the long term stability of such a *hypothetical* ring system around the Earth in the future? Abdul Ahad I think the moon would prevent the ring from forming properly Alasdair -- erect featherless biped www.digitalmystic.co.uk |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
"AA Institute" wrote in message om... Before anybody gives me that look...this question is totally in the context of a "what if" kind of hypothetical scenario. Suppose an asteroid somehow, through some super, far future engineering achievement has been captured into orbit around the Earth. Now suppose we want to carve it out by detonating a series of missiles that incrementally hollow their way into the body of such an asteroid. The material excavated out of the body would create a thin ring system around the Earth, as I try to illustrate he- http://uk.geocities.com/aa_spaceagen...arth-ring.html My main concern with such a project is one of SAFETY. I'd like to know what a *safe* perigee (minimum) altitude would be necessary to prevent orbital decay of ring material. I don't want any material from my hypothetical ring system coming down toward the Earth under any circumstances. Would the ring material be contained in a narrow plane of fixed orbital incline, or would it scatter over time? What about interactivity with particles trapped in the Van Allen radiation belts? Is there any learnings from the Voyager studies (and now Cassini studies) of Saturnian rings that could be used to predict the long term stability of such a *hypothetical* ring system around the Earth in the future? Why do you want to use missiles to hollow it out? I suspect that smaller scale engineering would be better in order to preserve the structure since an asteroid isn't usually large enough for gravity to glue it together. And then I would be inclined to glue the debris onto the outside or stuff it into string bags so that I could use it later if I wanted to move the asteroid. Stephen |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Alasdair ) wrote:
: "AA Institute" wrote in message : om... : Before anybody gives me that look...this question is totally in the : context of a "what if" kind of hypothetical scenario. : : Suppose an asteroid somehow, through some super, far future : engineering achievement has been captured into orbit around the Earth. : Now suppose we want to carve it out by detonating a series of missiles : that incrementally hollow their way into the body of such an asteroid. : The material excavated out of the body would create a thin ring system : around the Earth, as I try to illustrate he- : : http://uk.geocities.com/aa_spaceagen...arth-ring.html : : My main concern with such a project is one of SAFETY. I'd like to know : what a *safe* perigee (minimum) altitude would be necessary to prevent : orbital decay of ring material. I don't want any material from my : hypothetical ring system coming down toward the Earth under any : circumstances. Would the ring material be contained in a narrow plane : of fixed orbital incline, or would it scatter over time? What about : interactivity with particles trapped in the Van Allen radiation belts? : Is there any learnings from the Voyager studies (and now Cassini : studies) of Saturnian rings that could be used to predict the long : term stability of such a *hypothetical* ring system around the Earth : in the future? : : Abdul Ahad : I think the moon would prevent the ring from forming properly Saturn has several moons and its rings don't seem to mind. I don't doubt that the moon would have an effect but prevent the forming? No, I don't believe that. Eric : Alasdair : -- : erect featherless biped : www.digitalmystic.co.uk |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
"Alasdair" . uk wrote in news:cjgn48
: "AA Institute" wrote in message om... Before anybody gives me that look...this question is totally in the context of a "what if" kind of hypothetical scenario. Suppose an asteroid somehow, through some super, far future engineering achievement has been captured into orbit around the Earth. Now suppose we want to carve it out by detonating a series of missiles that incrementally hollow their way into the body of such an asteroid. The material excavated out of the body would create a thin ring system around the Earth, as I try to illustrate he- http://uk.geocities.com/aa_spaceagen...arth-ring.html My main concern with such a project is one of SAFETY. I'd like to know what a *safe* perigee (minimum) altitude would be necessary to prevent orbital decay of ring material. I don't want any material from my hypothetical ring system coming down toward the Earth under any circumstances. Would the ring material be contained in a narrow plane of fixed orbital incline, or would it scatter over time? What about interactivity with particles trapped in the Van Allen radiation belts? Is there any learnings from the Voyager studies (and now Cassini studies) of Saturnian rings that could be used to predict the long term stability of such a *hypothetical* ring system around the Earth in the future? Abdul Ahad I think the moon would prevent the ring from forming properly Alasdair There is currently a ring around earth. If you ever look at a 3-D type map of satelites, (like J-Track 3D http://science.nasa.gov/RealTime/JTr.../JTrack3D.html) you'll see that the satellites in geostationary orbit make a nice ring around earth :-) There's a couple gotchas to this statement...first J-Track blows up the relative size of the dot of light relative to the earth to many, many, many times the actual size of the spacecraft, so it appears more populated than it is (true...real rings aren't solid, but this is pushing it). I heard once jupiter had a very small ring that we only discovered when we sent probes in close to it...anyone know more info about this? Also, all these man made satellites have position keeping thrusters, to compensate for things like the moon. I have no idea as to what would happen to this "ring" if they suddenly just turned them all off, but I don't think anything major would happen very fast. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
"AA Institute" wrote in message om... Before anybody gives me that look...this question is totally in the context of a "what if" kind of hypothetical scenario. Suppose an asteroid somehow, through some super, far future engineering achievement has been captured into orbit around the Earth. Now suppose we want to carve it out by detonating a series of missiles that incrementally hollow their way into the body of such an asteroid. The material excavated out of the body would create a thin ring system around the Earth, as I try to illustrate he- http://uk.geocities.com/aa_spaceagen...arth-ring.html My main concern with such a project is one of SAFETY. I'd like to know what a *safe* perigee (minimum) altitude would be necessary to prevent orbital decay of ring material. I don't want any material from my hypothetical ring system coming down toward the Earth under any circumstances. Would the ring material be contained in a narrow plane of fixed orbital incline, or would it scatter over time? What about interactivity with particles trapped in the Van Allen radiation belts? Is there any learnings from the Voyager studies (and now Cassini studies) of Saturnian rings that could be used to predict the long term stability of such a *hypothetical* ring system around the Earth in the future? Abdul Ahad I don't need to know any science to suggest you do not do this if you positively don't want any bits to rain down at all! Why? Ever heard of Martian meteorites? Well, the mere fact that we have them suggests that whenever you start knocking chunks off of celestial bodies, the things eventually go far and wide. If you have the tech to capture it, and orbit it, then you probably have the technology to land it, relatively softly, on the moon, so take it there, and cut it up at your leisure, whatever you want it for. Brian -- Brian Gaff....Note, this account does not accept Bcc: email. graphics are great, but the blind can't hear them Email: __________________________________________________ __________________________ __________________________________ --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.771 / Virus Database: 518 - Release Date: 28/09/2004 |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
"Tom Kent" wrote in message . 30.42... "Alasdair" . uk wrote in news:cjgn48 : "AA Institute" wrote in message om... Before anybody gives me that look...this question is totally in the context of a "what if" kind of hypothetical scenario. Suppose an asteroid somehow, through some super, far future engineering achievement has been captured into orbit around the Earth. Now suppose we want to carve it out by detonating a series of missiles that incrementally hollow their way into the body of such an asteroid. The material excavated out of the body would create a thin ring system around the Earth, as I try to illustrate he- http://uk.geocities.com/aa_spaceagen...arth-ring.html My main concern with such a project is one of SAFETY. I'd like to know what a *safe* perigee (minimum) altitude would be necessary to prevent orbital decay of ring material. I don't want any material from my hypothetical ring system coming down toward the Earth under any circumstances. Would the ring material be contained in a narrow plane of fixed orbital incline, or would it scatter over time? What about interactivity with particles trapped in the Van Allen radiation belts? Is there any learnings from the Voyager studies (and now Cassini studies) of Saturnian rings that could be used to predict the long term stability of such a *hypothetical* ring system around the Earth in the future? Abdul Ahad I think the moon would prevent the ring from forming properly Alasdair There is currently a ring around earth. If you ever look at a 3-D type map of satelites, (like J-Track 3D http://science.nasa.gov/RealTime/JTr.../JTrack3D.html) you'll see that the satellites in geostationary orbit make a nice ring around earth :-) There's a couple gotchas to this statement...first J-Track blows up the relative size of the dot of light relative to the earth to many, many, many times the actual size of the spacecraft, so it appears more populated than it is (true...real rings aren't solid, but this is pushing it). I heard once jupiter had a very small ring that we only discovered when we sent probes in close to it...anyone know more info about this? Also, all these man made satellites have position keeping thrusters, to compensate for things like the moon. I have no idea as to what would happen to this "ring" if they suddenly just turned them all off, but I don't think anything major would happen very fast. I had no idea that there were that many satellites up there, that is amazing! I agree with brian gaff don't blow em up - land and mine them Alasdair -- erect featherless biped www.digitalmystic.co.uk |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Tom Kent wrote:
Also, all these man made satellites have position keeping thrusters, to compensate for things like the moon. I have no idea as to what would happen to this "ring" if they suddenly just turned them all off, but I don't think anything major would happen very fast. There's a natural tendency for things in geosynchronous orbit to collect at one specific spot, due to the moon's influence. I don't know how quickly that effect would act, though. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
"Steve Maudsley" wrote in message
Why do you want to use missiles to hollow it out? Bearing in mind that most asteroids are quite dense, often with some metallic composition, then some heavy blasting will be necessary to get fairly rapid results. I just realised there is a problem with this idea, missile impacts would leave the hole radioactive. But if post detonation radioactivity only affects the asteroid's inner walls down to a few inches in depth, then small scale robotic diggers which excavate a few inches of rock all the way around the interior of the hole and then blowing them out of the hole with perhaps compressed air, could eliminate the radioactiveness. RATs (rock abrasion tools) on the Mars rovers do something similar today. I suspect that smaller scale engineering would be better in order to preserve the structure since an asteroid isn't usually large enough for gravity to glue it together. And then I would be inclined to glue the debris onto the outside or stuff it into string bags so that I could use it later if I wanted to move the asteroid. Good idea, but this calls for another level of robotic articulation. Perhaps a fly around robot with a vacuum cleaner style of suction mechanism, pulling stuff into heavy duty plastic bags could do the trick. So there is a way round the ring problem... AAI |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Space Calendar - August 27, 2004 | Ron | Astronomy Misc | 14 | August 30th 04 11:09 PM |
Space Calendar - June 25, 2004 | Ron | Astronomy Misc | 0 | June 25th 04 04:37 PM |
Space Calendar - October 24, 2003 | Ron Baalke | Astronomy Misc | 0 | October 24th 03 04:38 PM |
Space Calendar - June 27, 2003 | Ron Baalke | Astronomy Misc | 3 | June 28th 03 05:36 PM |