LHC: What pilots will save the world, Russian or American?

What pilots will save the world, Russian or American?

Quete from
http://delong.typepad.com/sdj/2010/0...2876c9bbb0970c
--------
....Kevin "Dow 36000" Hassett of the American Enterprise Institute
calls for the USAF to bomb both France and Switzerland, hoping to get
the scientists in their tunnels before they can destroy the earth...
-------

Quete from http://darkenergy.narod.ru/index.html
----------
This is not my picture. Perhaps its author is my good friend,
supporter.
(Titled: Bomb LHC) http://darkenergy.narod.ru/bomblhc.jpg
Citizens! Do not think that some good Uncle Ivan would come and
destroy the CERN and its doomsday machine, LHC. Think yourself for
your salvation. And not just think, but act. I have no flight
experience, no money for the fighter and for a nuclear warhead to bomb
the LHC. If you will not stop the CERN now, the CERN will kill all of
you in the first quarter of this year, with the probability of about
50%.

I am a physicist. I always respected physicists. Now I hate most of
them. They are rogues, cowards, killers, psychic freaks. Damn you, you
*******s, academicians, and candidates with the doctors, except for
units, my supporters, active supporters of the ban of the experiment
at the Large Hadron Collider.
--------
Proton-proton collision, which leads to creation of stable excitation
of physical vacuum, can look like this inelastic collision.
http://darkenergy.narod.ru/mh4.gif

Directions of both protons were changed. Moments and kinetic energies
of both protons were diminished. Formula of collision can look like
one of these formulae:
p + p -- p + p + M;
p + p -- e+ + e+ + M;
p + p -- ì+ + ì+ + M -- ...;
....

Created magnetic hole captures protons; destroy them onto positron and
x-boson (or onto ì+ and x-boson, or onto pi+ and x-boson); ejects
positron (or ì+, or pi+) and captures x-boson and grow. Note: x-boson
does not consist from two up-quarks, but is rather a leptoquark in
Kalusa-Klein space.
http://darkenergy.narod.ru/mh5.gif
----------

Read mo http://darkenergy.narod.ru/

Best wishes, Ivan.

"Magnetic" wrote in message
...
What pilots will save the world, Russian or American?

Quete from
http://delong.typepad.com/sdj/2010/0...2876c9bbb0970c
--------
....Kevin "Dow 36000" Hassett of the American Enterprise Institute
calls for the USAF to bomb both France and Switzerland, hoping to get
the scientists in their tunnels before they can destroy the earth...
-------

Quete from http://darkenergy.narod.ru/index.html
----------
This is not my picture. Perhaps its author is my good friend,
supporter.
(Titled: Bomb LHC) http://darkenergy.narod.ru/bomblhc.jpg
Citizens! Do not think that some good Uncle Ivan would come and
destroy the CERN and its doomsday machine, LHC. Think yourself for
your salvation. And not just think, but act. I have no flight
experience, no money for the fighter and for a nuclear warhead to bomb
the LHC. If you will not stop the CERN now, the CERN will kill all of
you in the first quarter of this year, with the probability of about
50%.

I am a physicist.

======================
You are a ****in' lunatic.

*plonk*

Do not reply to this generic message, it was automatically generated;
you have been kill-filed, either for being boringly stupid, repetitive,
unfunny, ineducable, repeatedly posting politics, religion or off-topic
subjects to a sci. newsgroup, attempting cheapskate free advertising
for profit, because you are a troll, because you responded to George
Hammond the complete fruit cake, simply insane or any combination
or permutation of the aforementioned reasons; any reply will go unread.

Boringly stupid is the most common cause of kill-filing, but because
this message is generic the other reasons have been included. You are
left to decide which is most applicable to you.

There is no appeal, I have despotic power over whom I will electronically
admit into my home and you do not qualify as a reasonable person I would
wish to converse with or even poke fun at. Some weirdoes are not kill-
filed, they amuse me and I retain them for their entertainment value
as I would any chicken with two heads, either one of which enables the
dumb bird to scratch dirt, step back, look down, step forward to the
same spot and repeat the process eternally.

This should not trouble you, many of those plonked find it a blessing
that they are not required to think and can persist in their bigotry
or crackpot theories without challenge.

You have the right to free speech, I have the right not to listen. The
kill-file will be cleared annually with spring cleaning or whenever I
purchase a new computer or hard drive.
Update: the last clearance was 25/12/09. Some individuals have been
restored to the list.

I'm fully aware that you may be so stupid as to reply, but the purpose
of this message is to encourage others to kill-file ****wits like you.

I hope you find this explanation is satisfactory but even if you don't,
damnly my frank, I don't give a dear. Have a nice day and **** off.

Magnetic wrote:

You can not know all that I know. So as I do not know all that you
know.
The equation pФ/S = mc^2 is achievable at LHC. That will switch the
magnetic collapse. That will start the transformation of Solar System
into a supernova.

Overdue in my opinion.
I have long worked to destroy not only Earth, but the entire universe.

All Hail Cthulhu!

--
Dirk

http://www.transcendence.me.uk/ - Transcendence UK
http://www.theconsensus.org/ - A UK political party
http://www.blogtalkradio.com/onetribe - Occult Talk Show

On Jan 14, 6:12*am, Magnetic wrote:
What pilots will save the world, Russian or American?


Jamaican. Provided they're able to lay off the ganga.

Again to deadly error with cosmic rays.

Let’s see at Analogy and at Example.


Analogy.
1. What will happen, if a neutron with kinetic energy of several eV
would collide with a nucleus? The following answer will be valid for
most nuclei of periodic system: “Nucleus will capture the neutron and
its mass number will grow per one unit”.
2. What will happen, if a neutron with kinetic energy of several TeV
would collide with a nucleus? The nucleus will be ruined.
The case 1 corresponds to “collider hole”, and we can see there the
matter’s capture and the growth of “nuclear quasi-hole”, (nucleus).
The case 2 corresponds to “cosmic hole”, and we can see there the
destruction of “nuclear quasi-hole” by high energy neutron.


Example.
Let two protons collide with 1 TeV energies. Rest energy of proton is
about 1GeV (0.001TeV), i.e. 1000 times smaller. Consequently,
relativistic coefficient gamma is 1000. Let in this double-TeV
collision a magnetic hole was created. Let it has 1000 x-bosons. Then
the rest mass of a hole can be 4/3 TeV. The rest, 2/3 TeV of
collision
energy, goes into radiation. That means that the total binding energy
of magnetic hole is also 2/3 TeV, and the binding energy of every x-
boson in hole is 2/3000 TeV.


Let’s suppose that exactly the same magnetic hole was created at a
collision of a cosmic proton with atmospheric proton. This “cosmic
magnetic hole” will have exactly the same velocity as a collider
proton. Consequently, in a reference system of this cosmic hole, all
atmospheric protons will have kinetic energies about 1 TeV. This
energy is bigger than the binding energy of a hole (2/3 TeV).
Consequently, the cosmic hole will be ruined almost immediately after
the first collision of a hole with atmospheric particle. A shower of
secondary particle will be formed and it can be registered as “a
cosmic rays shower”.


Conclusions.
1. Collision of 1-TeV protons at collider corresponds to collision of
almost 0-TeV atmospheric proton with 2000-TeV cosmic proton.
2. “Cosmic magnetic hole” are ruined almost immediately. “Collider
magnetic hole” can capture the ordinary matter and grow.


The 20-th of February CERN begins the “work” with 3.5 TeV energies
per
particle. I give 50% that the Earth will be exploded in the nearest
weeks. This probability is grounded on two independent math proves,
giving almost the same result, and on a dozen of additional
arguments.
Several scientific articles, which give some conclusions analogues to
mine, except catastrophic predictions, were found.


PS. Some results of December collisions were published recently by
CMS
group. It was found that the quantities of ejected mesons were
unpredictably high. I think that these high transverse mesons
currents
prove the theory of magnetic hole. Any of next collider collision can
create a stable exited magnetized region of vacuum, which was named
“magnetic hole”. Magnetic hole can ruin the Earth in the period from
1000 seconds to 1000 days.


http://darkenergy.narod.ru/ru.html

On Feb 12, 9:34*am, Magnetic wrote:
Again to deadly error with cosmic rays.

Let’s see at Analogy and at Example.

Analogy.
1. What will happen, if a neutron with kinetic energy of several eV
would collide with a nucleus? The following answer will be valid for
most nuclei of periodic system: “Nucleus will capture the neutron and
its mass number will grow per one unit”.
2. What will happen, if a neutron with kinetic energy of several TeV
would collide with a nucleus? The nucleus will be ruined.
The case 1 corresponds to “collider hole”, and we can see there the
matter’s capture and the growth of “nuclear quasi-hole”, (nucleus).
The case 2 corresponds to “cosmic hole”, and we can see there the
destruction of “nuclear quasi-hole” by high energy neutron.

Example.
Let two protons collide with 1 TeV energies. Rest energy of proton is
about 1GeV (0.001TeV), i.e. 1000 times smaller. Consequently,
relativistic coefficient gamma is 1000. Let in this double-TeV
collision a magnetic hole was created. Let it has 1000 x-bosons. Then
the rest mass of a hole can be 4/3 TeV. The rest, 2/3 TeV of
collision
energy, goes into radiation. That means that the total binding energy
of magnetic hole is also 2/3 TeV, and the binding energy of every x-
boson in hole is 2/3000 TeV.

Let’s suppose that exactly the same magnetic hole was created at a
collision of a cosmic proton with atmospheric proton. This “cosmic
magnetic hole” will have exactly the same velocity as a collider
proton. Consequently, in a reference system of this cosmic hole, all
atmospheric protons will have kinetic energies about 1 TeV. This
energy is bigger than the binding energy of a hole (2/3 TeV).
Consequently, the cosmic hole will be ruined almost immediately after
the first collision of a hole with atmospheric particle. A shower of
secondary particle will be formed and it can be registered as “a
cosmic rays shower”.

Conclusions.
1. Collision of 1-TeV protons at collider corresponds to collision of
almost 0-TeV atmospheric proton with 2000-TeV cosmic proton.
2. “Cosmic magnetic hole” are ruined almost immediately. “Collider
magnetic hole” can capture the ordinary matter and grow.

The 20-th of February CERN begins the “work” with 3.5 TeV energies
per
particle. I give 50% that the Earth will be exploded in the nearest
weeks. This probability is grounded on two independent math proves,
giving almost the same result, and on a dozen of additional
arguments.
Several scientific articles, which give some conclusions analogues to
mine, except catastrophic predictions, were found.

PS. Some results of December collisions were published recently by
CMS
group. It was found that the quantities of ejected mesons were
unpredictably high. I think that these high transverse mesons
currents
prove the theory of magnetic hole. Any of next collider collision can
create a stable exited magnetized region of vacuum, which was named
“magnetic hole”. Magnetic hole can ruin the Earth in the period from
1000 seconds to 1000 days.

http://darkenergy.narod.ru/ru.html

Idiots, make something, you have only a week or couple days more.

From another forum:
-----------

Here (arXiv:0711.2845v1 [hep-lat] 19 Nov 2007) we can read about gluon
condensate, or so called “color ferromagnetic vacuum state”, firstly
proposed by Savvidy about thirty years ago.

Here is also ferromagnetic exited vacuum.

I think that such magnetized regions can be created at proton-proton
collisions. Do you see the lattice?

Here is also “Lattice QCD in strong magnetic fields”
http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/...909.1808v2.pdf

Here (arXiv:0710.1084v2 [hep-ph] 23 Jan 2008) you can read that such
magnetic domains are stable. And I will add: “They can grow if there
is an ordinary matter in vicinity”.

Here (arXiv:hep-ph/0508219v1 20 Aug 2005) you can find that some
neutron stars (magnetars) do not consist from neutrons (baryons), but
are color ferromagnetic, - di-quark condensate, where magnetic dipoles
are formed from monopoles.

In all these articles you can find approximately the same value of
critical magnetic field (10^16 T, or 10^20 G).

The microscopic embryo of such abnormal magnetized matter will be
created soon at LHC and our Solar system will go to the stars
cemetery.

Somebody wrote: Maybe he'll be more relaxed if you checked his
calculations and point out exactly why he's wrong.

My computed value of critical magnetic field approximately coincides
with results in all these and others articles. It can be achieved
somewhere about 1-TeV collisions.

…but could someone once and for all explain me the situation
regarding heavy ion collisions?

At RHIC there were already received progenitors of a dangerous matter,
so called fireballs. In some articles one can find the observed value
of magnetic field in the RHIC collisions (10^15T), which is slightly
less than my computed value of critical field, when anti ferromagnetic
vacuum transforms into a stable ferromagnetic state.

Wait a couple of weeks. It is possible we will survive. I give 50% on
our survival.

Magnetic wrote:
From another forum:
-----------

Here (arXiv:0711.2845v1 [hep-lat] 19 Nov 2007) we can read about gluon
condensate, or so called “color ferromagnetic vacuum state”, firstly
proposed by Savvidy about thirty years ago.

Here is also ferromagnetic exited vacuum.

I think that such magnetized regions can be created at proton-proton
collisions. Do you see the lattice?

Here is also “Lattice QCD in strong magnetic fields”
http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/...909.1808v2.pdf

Here (arXiv:0710.1084v2 [hep-ph] 23 Jan 2008) you can read that such
magnetic domains are stable. And I will add: “They can grow if there
is an ordinary matter in vicinity”.

Here (arXiv:hep-ph/0508219v1 20 Aug 2005) you can find that some
neutron stars (magnetars) do not consist from neutrons (baryons), but
are color ferromagnetic, - di-quark condensate, where magnetic dipoles
are formed from monopoles.

In all these articles you can find approximately the same value of
critical magnetic field (10^16 T, or 10^20 G).

The microscopic embryo of such abnormal magnetized matter will be
created soon at LHC and our Solar system will go to the stars
cemetery.

Somebody wrote: Maybe he'll be more relaxed if you checked his
calculations and point out exactly why he's wrong.

My computed value of critical magnetic field approximately coincides
with results in all these and others articles. It can be achieved
somewhere about 1-TeV collisions.

…but could someone once and for all explain me the situation
regarding heavy ion collisions?

At RHIC there were already received progenitors of a dangerous matter,
so called fireballs. In some articles one can find the observed value
of magnetic field in the RHIC collisions (10^15T), which is slightly
less than my computed value of critical field, when anti ferromagnetic
vacuum transforms into a stable ferromagnetic state.

Wait a couple of weeks. It is possible we will survive. I give 50% on
our survival.

I give it around 100%
Are you still going to be spewing this BS when CERN is working at full
energy?

--
Dirk

http://www.transcendence.me.uk/ - Transcendence UK
http://www.theconsensus.org/ - A UK political party
http://www.blogtalkradio.com/onetribe - Occult Talk Show

Dirk Bruere at NeoPax wrote:

Magnetic wrote:

Wait a couple of weeks. It is possible we will survive. I give 50% on
our survival.

I give it around 100%
Are you still going to be spewing this BS when CERN is working at full
energy?

Yes, but he will post under another pseudonym so he
won't have to take responsibility for his earlier
rantings.

On Feb 13, 11:38*am, Mark Thorson wrote:
Dirk Bruere at NeoPax wrote:



Magnetic wrote:

Wait a couple of weeks. It is possible we will survive. I give 50% on
our survival.

I give it around 100%
Are you still going to be spewing this BS when CERN is working at full
energy?

Yes, but he will post under another pseudonym so he
won't have to take responsibility for his earlier
rantings.

If I unloaded a full AK47 magazine of ammo at you, say from 10 yards
and somehow missed; would that count as zero risk for each additional
time I tried to hit my target?

What's a double mass proton worth these days?

~ BG