If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. 


Thread Tools  Display Modes 
#1361




Finite Relativism & Special Relativity Disproof
doug wrote:
So you have stopped making up studip quotes for others and are now just doing them for yourself. You really have no clue how stupid you are looking. If you take your nonsense to your local university they will have a good laugh at you and send you on your way.. Well I deal with CEOs; you deal with Eric Gisse. 
Ads 
#1362




Finite Relativism & Special Relativity Disproof
On May 1, 2:55*pm, Phil Bouchard wrote:
doug wrote: So you have stopped making up studip quotes for others and are now just doing them for yourself. You really have no clue how stupid you are looking. If you take your nonsense to your local university they will have a good laugh at you and send you on your way.. Well I deal with CEOs; you deal with Eric Gisse. Yeah, a hack of a programmer and a failure of a crank "deals" with CEOs the say way I "deal" with congressmen. 
#1363




Finite Relativism & Special Relativity Disproof
doug wrote:
No, Einstein described the universe. You are the one who wants to define it to fit your delusions. Isn't it amazing Einstein was there to demonstrate there is a square root algorithm omnipresent in nature? [...] 
#1364




Finite Relativism & Special Relativity Disproof
Phil Bouchard wrote: doug wrote: Well, you need redefining reality to make it work. It is very funny to watch you thrash and squirm when you have no idea what relativity actually says and how it is used today. You also have no clue that QM uses relativity and will not work with FR. But that would require you to study. QM is only linked with GR with an unproven theoretical facet: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_gravity Your ignorance is on display again. Do you have any idea of what QM is? FR allows FTL, Therefore it is wrong. so it goes along better than GR. Better than what? Certainly not with the universe. [...] 
#1365




Finite Relativism & Special Relativity Disproof
Phil Bouchard wrote: doug wrote: [...] FR allows FTL, Therefore it is wrong. so it goes along better than GR. Better than what? Certainly not with the universe. We live in a free world. If you think nature is defined by square roots and has an unbreakable velocity cap then I am happy for you. It is not up to me to define the universe. Or you for that matter. You have been wrong on all your predictions and on your knowledge of science. You have no chance to be correct. Do not quit your day job. The evidence is already shown by the Hubble sphere natural FTL. Well, no. Your delusions do not count. FTL can be reproduced artificially without any doubt. Except it cannot be. 
#1366




Finite Relativism & Special Relativity Disproof
Phil Bouchard wrote: PD wrote: Oh dear. This is unfortunately the kind of thing that happens when somebody gets a little too emotionally involved in a project. Now, unfortunately, you are committed to a lifetime of preoccupation and growing despair. PD You get emotional only when the work is 2 pages, and plagiarized. So you have stopped making up studip quotes for others and are now just doing them for yourself. You really have no clue how stupid you are looking. If you take your nonsense to your local university they will have a good laugh at you and send you on your way.. 
#1367




Finite Relativism & Special Relativity Disproof
Phil Bouchard wrote: doug wrote: It is not up to me to define the universe. Or you for that matter. You have been wrong on all your predictions and on your knowledge of science. You have no chance to be correct. Do not quit your day job. So you're saying Einstein defined the Universe? No, Einstein described the universe. You are the one who wants to define it to fit your delusions. That means singularities, wormholes, length and mass contraction, velocity cap of 3e8 m/s, the Hubble sphere problem, time travel in the past and consequently an infinite amount of universes created on the fly, dark matter, an inflating breadlike space and the lightyear measurement unit must all be right. Your hatred and jealousy do not constitute a scienctific argument. [...] FTL can be reproduced artificially without any doubt. Except it cannot be. Let competent people do the job then. I'm not sure why QM people care about what Doug says. Well, phil wants to remain the laughingstock he has proved himself to be. 
Thread Tools  
Display Modes  


Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
Finite Relativism: Review Request  Phil Bouchard  Astronomy Misc  519  September 25th 12 12:26 AM 
25% OFF  Finite Relativism and Dark Matter Disproof  Phil Bouchard  Astronomy Misc  0  January 28th 09 09:54 AM 
Finite Relativism and Dark Matter Disproof  Phil Bouchard  Astronomy Misc  4  January 26th 09 09:00 PM 
GENERAL RELATIVITY WITHOUT SPECIAL RELATIVITY  Pentcho Valev  Astronomy Misc  12  January 1st 09 03:20 PM 
BLAMING SPECIAL RELATIVITY?  Pentcho Valev  Astronomy Misc  0  July 13th 08 01:05 PM 