A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Astronomy and Astrophysics » Astronomy Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Finite Relativism & Special Relativity Disproof



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1361  
Old May 1st 09, 11:55 PM posted to alt.sci.physics,alt.sci.physics.new-theories,sci.astro,sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity
Phil Bouchard
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,402
Default Finite Relativism & Special Relativity Disproof

doug wrote:

So you have stopped making up studip quotes for others and are now
just doing them for yourself. You really have no clue how stupid
you are looking. If you take your nonsense to your local university
they will have a good laugh at you and send you on your way..


Well I deal with CEOs; you deal with Eric Gisse.
Ads
  #1362  
Old May 2nd 09, 12:00 AM posted to alt.sci.physics,alt.sci.physics.new-theories,sci.astro,sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity
Eric Gisse
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,465
Default Finite Relativism & Special Relativity Disproof

On May 1, 2:55*pm, Phil Bouchard wrote:
doug wrote:

So you have stopped making up studip quotes for others and are now
just doing them for yourself. You really have no clue how stupid
you are looking. If you take your nonsense to your local university
they will have a good laugh at you and send you on your way..


Well I deal with CEOs; you deal with Eric Gisse.


Yeah, a hack of a programmer and a failure of a crank "deals" with
CEOs the say way I "deal" with congressmen.
  #1363  
Old May 2nd 09, 12:04 AM posted to alt.sci.physics,alt.sci.physics.new-theories,sci.astro,sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity
Phil Bouchard
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,402
Default Finite Relativism & Special Relativity Disproof

doug wrote:

No, Einstein described the universe. You are the one who wants to
define it to fit your delusions.


Isn't it amazing Einstein was there to demonstrate there is a square
root algorithm omnipresent in nature?

[...]
  #1364  
Old May 2nd 09, 12:20 AM posted to alt.sci.physics,alt.sci.physics.new-theories,sci.astro,sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity
doug
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,129
Default Finite Relativism & Special Relativity Disproof



Phil Bouchard wrote:

doug wrote:


Well, you need redefining reality to make it work. It is very funny
to watch you thrash and squirm when you have no idea what relativity
actually says and how it is used today. You also have no clue that
QM uses relativity and will not work with FR. But that would require
you to study.



QM is only linked with GR with an unproven theoretical facet:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_gravity


Your ignorance is on display again. Do you have any idea
of what QM is?

FR allows FTL,


Therefore it is wrong.

so it goes along better than GR.

Better than what? Certainly not with the universe.

[...]

  #1365  
Old May 2nd 09, 12:35 AM posted to alt.sci.physics,alt.sci.physics.new-theories,sci.astro,sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity
doug
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,129
Default Finite Relativism & Special Relativity Disproof



Phil Bouchard wrote:

doug wrote:

[...]

FR allows FTL,



Therefore it is wrong.

so it goes along better than GR.

Better than what? Certainly not with the universe.



We live in a free world. If you think nature is defined by square roots
and has an unbreakable velocity cap then I am happy for you.


It is not up to me to define the universe. Or you for that matter. You
have been wrong on all your predictions and on your knowledge of
science. You have no chance to be correct. Do not quit your day job.

The evidence is already shown by the Hubble sphere natural FTL.


Well, no. Your delusions do not count.

FTL can
be reproduced artificially without any doubt.


Except it cannot be.
  #1366  
Old May 2nd 09, 12:36 AM posted to alt.sci.physics,alt.sci.physics.new-theories,sci.astro,sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity
doug
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,129
Default Finite Relativism & Special Relativity Disproof



Phil Bouchard wrote:

PD wrote:


Oh dear.
This is unfortunately the kind of thing that happens when somebody
gets a little too emotionally involved in a project.
Now, unfortunately, you are committed to a lifetime of preoccupation
and growing despair.

PD



You get emotional only when the work is 2 pages, and plagiarized.


So you have stopped making up studip quotes for others and are now
just doing them for yourself. You really have no clue how stupid
you are looking. If you take your nonsense to your local university
they will have a good laugh at you and send you on your way..
  #1367  
Old May 2nd 09, 12:54 AM posted to alt.sci.physics,alt.sci.physics.new-theories,sci.astro,sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity
doug
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,129
Default Finite Relativism & Special Relativity Disproof



Phil Bouchard wrote:

doug wrote:


It is not up to me to define the universe. Or you for that matter. You
have been wrong on all your predictions and on your knowledge of
science. You have no chance to be correct. Do not quit your day job.



So you're saying Einstein defined the Universe?


No, Einstein described the universe. You are the one who wants to
define it to fit your delusions.

That means
singularities, wormholes, length and mass contraction, velocity cap of
3e8 m/s, the Hubble sphere problem, time travel in the past and
consequently an infinite amount of universes created on the fly, dark
matter, an inflating bread-like space and the light-year measurement
unit must all be right.


Your hatred and jealousy do not constitute a scienctific argument.

[...]

FTL can

be reproduced artificially without any doubt.



Except it cannot be.



Let competent people do the job then. I'm not sure why QM people care
about what Doug says.


Well, phil wants to remain the laughingstock he has proved himself to be.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Finite Relativism: Review Request Phil Bouchard Astronomy Misc 519 September 25th 12 12:26 AM
25% OFF -- Finite Relativism and Dark Matter Disproof Phil Bouchard Astronomy Misc 0 January 28th 09 09:54 AM
Finite Relativism and Dark Matter Disproof Phil Bouchard Astronomy Misc 4 January 26th 09 09:00 PM
GENERAL RELATIVITY WITHOUT SPECIAL RELATIVITY Pentcho Valev Astronomy Misc 12 January 1st 09 03:20 PM
BLAMING SPECIAL RELATIVITY? Pentcho Valev Astronomy Misc 0 July 13th 08 01:05 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:57 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2022, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2004-2022 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.