A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Space Science » Policy
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

10 grams of push of PNN SUB321N !



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old April 30th 21, 12:43 PM posted to sci.space.policy
Dean Markley
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 515
Default 10 grams of push of PNN SUB321N !

On Friday, April 30, 2021 at 1:23:16 AM UTC-4, Doctor Who wrote:
On Thu, 29 Apr 2021 11:34:45 -0700 (PDT), Dean Markley
wrote:

On Thursday, April 29, 2021 at 12:14:54 AM UTC-4, Doctor Who wrote:
On Wed, 28 Apr 2021 14:20:11 -0400, Jeff Findley
wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Tue, 27 Apr 2021 15:34:46 +1000, Sylvia Else
wrote:

https://neolegesmotus.com/2021/04/17...subitam-class/

"The key point is: Subitam is capable of exceeding 4 grams of thrust. As
always, the power has been cut off quickly to avoid overheating, so this
is not the maximum thrust that it can supply."

So, it gets hot. Perhaps the thrust is from convection.

BTW, love the evidence offered - a video of a digital scale measuring
something.

If anyone's been invited to APEC over this, more fool APEC.

Sylvia.


you are not allowed to comment on our experiments as you are unable to
show evidence of your expertise in the matter.

That's just bull****. You're posting to a public forum. You're not
allowed to tell people they can't reply to you.

Jeff
except that her/your comments are totally ignored WRT the censorship
of our innovative space propulsion.

There's no censorship in a public group. There is however, disdain and no respect for what is obviously quack science.

You just don't know about what you are talking, and you show evidence
of lack of expertise in the matter.


LOL, ouch. I'm hurt.
Ads
  #22  
Old April 30th 21, 12:51 PM posted to sci.space.policy
Doctor Who[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 103
Default 10 grams of push of PNN SUB321N !

On Fri, 30 Apr 2021 04:43:05 -0700 (PDT), Dean Markley
wrote:

On Friday, April 30, 2021 at 1:23:16 AM UTC-4, Doctor Who wrote:
On Thu, 29 Apr 2021 11:34:45 -0700 (PDT), Dean Markley
wrote:

On Thursday, April 29, 2021 at 12:14:54 AM UTC-4, Doctor Who wrote:
On Wed, 28 Apr 2021 14:20:11 -0400, Jeff Findley
wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Tue, 27 Apr 2021 15:34:46 +1000, Sylvia Else
wrote:

https://neolegesmotus.com/2021/04/17...subitam-class/

"The key point is: Subitam is capable of exceeding 4 grams of thrust. As
always, the power has been cut off quickly to avoid overheating, so this
is not the maximum thrust that it can supply."

So, it gets hot. Perhaps the thrust is from convection.

BTW, love the evidence offered - a video of a digital scale measuring
something.

If anyone's been invited to APEC over this, more fool APEC.

Sylvia.


you are not allowed to comment on our experiments as you are unable to
show evidence of your expertise in the matter.

That's just bull****. You're posting to a public forum. You're not
allowed to tell people they can't reply to you.

Jeff
except that her/your comments are totally ignored WRT the censorship
of our innovative space propulsion.
There's no censorship in a public group. There is however, disdain and no respect for what is obviously quack science.

You just don't know about what you are talking, and you show evidence
of lack of expertise in the matter.


LOL, ouch. I'm hurt.



You are an clown and an idiot.
  #23  
Old April 30th 21, 01:00 PM posted to sci.space.policy
pnn calmagorod
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 54
Default 10 grams of push of PNN SUB321N !

Il giorno venerdì 30 aprile 2021 alle 13:43:06 UTC+2 ha scritto:
On Friday, April 30, 2021 at 1:23:16 AM UTC-4, Doctor Who wrote:
On Thu, 29 Apr 2021 11:34:45 -0700 (PDT), Dean Markley
wrote:

On Thursday, April 29, 2021 at 12:14:54 AM UTC-4, Doctor Who wrote:
On Wed, 28 Apr 2021 14:20:11 -0400, Jeff Findley
wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Tue, 27 Apr 2021 15:34:46 +1000, Sylvia Else
wrote:

https://neolegesmotus.com/2021/04/17...subitam-class/

"The key point is: Subitam is capable of exceeding 4 grams of thrust. As
always, the power has been cut off quickly to avoid overheating, so this
is not the maximum thrust that it can supply."

So, it gets hot. Perhaps the thrust is from convection.

BTW, love the evidence offered - a video of a digital scale measuring
something.

If anyone's been invited to APEC over this, more fool APEC.

Sylvia.


you are not allowed to comment on our experiments as you are unable to
show evidence of your expertise in the matter.

That's just bull****. You're posting to a public forum. You're not
allowed to tell people they can't reply to you.

Jeff
except that her/your comments are totally ignored WRT the censorship
of our innovative space propulsion.
There's no censorship in a public group. There is however, disdain and no respect for what is obviously quack science.

You just don't know about what you are talking, and you show evidence
of lack of expertise in the matter.

LOL, ouch. I'm hurt.


but you don't answer ... who knows why :-)))))
  #24  
Old April 30th 21, 03:13 PM posted to sci.space.policy
David Spain
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,901
Default 10 grams of push of PNN SUB321N !

"Greg (Strider) Moore" writes:

"Jeff Findley" wrote in message
...

In article ,
says...

On Thursday, April 29, 2021 at 12:14:54 AM UTC-4, Doctor Who wrote:
On Wed, 28 Apr 2021 14:20:11 -0400, Jeff Findley
wrote:
That's just bull****. You're posting to a public forum. You're not
allowed to tell people they can't reply to you.

Jeff
except that her/your comments are totally ignored WRT the censorship
of our innovative space propulsion.
There's no censorship in a public group. There is however, disdain and no
respect for what is obviously quack science.


Agreed.

True. If it were truly being censored we wouldn't be able to publicly laugh at
it!

Jeff


.....aaand my filters are working. Greg and Jeff you got filtered out on this
simply based on the subject line, normally you'd come through my
filters, so thanks for the test.

Dave
  #25  
Old April 30th 21, 08:24 PM posted to sci.space.policy
pnn calmagorod
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 54
Default 10 grams of push of PNN SUB321N !

Il giorno venerdì 30 aprile 2021 alle 13:51:49 UTC+2 Doctor Who ha scritto:
On Fri, 30 Apr 2021 04:43:05 -0700 (PDT), Dean Markley
wrote:

On Friday, April 30, 2021 at 1:23:16 AM UTC-4, Doctor Who wrote:
On Thu, 29 Apr 2021 11:34:45 -0700 (PDT), Dean Markley
wrote:

On Thursday, April 29, 2021 at 12:14:54 AM UTC-4, Doctor Who wrote:
On Wed, 28 Apr 2021 14:20:11 -0400, Jeff Findley
wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Tue, 27 Apr 2021 15:34:46 +1000, Sylvia Else
wrote:

https://neolegesmotus.com/2021/04/17...subitam-class/

"The key point is: Subitam is capable of exceeding 4 grams of thrust. As
always, the power has been cut off quickly to avoid overheating, so this
is not the maximum thrust that it can supply."

So, it gets hot. Perhaps the thrust is from convection.

BTW, love the evidence offered - a video of a digital scale measuring
something.

If anyone's been invited to APEC over this, more fool APEC.

Sylvia.


you are not allowed to comment on our experiments as you are unable to
show evidence of your expertise in the matter.

That's just bull****. You're posting to a public forum. You're not
allowed to tell people they can't reply to you.

Jeff
except that her/your comments are totally ignored WRT the censorship
of our innovative space propulsion.
There's no censorship in a public group. There is however, disdain and no respect for what is obviously quack science.
You just don't know about what you are talking, and you show evidence
of lack of expertise in the matter.


LOL, ouch. I'm hurt.

You are an clown and an idiot.


pure imbecilli senza elicottero :-)
https://www.ansa.it/canale_scienza_t...d36cef9ef.html

and LOL !


  #26  
Old April 30th 21, 08:24 PM posted to sci.space.policy
pnn calmagorod
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 54
Default 10 grams of push of PNN SUB321N !

Il giorno venerdì 30 aprile 2021 alle 16:13:04 UTC+2 David Spain ha scritto:
"Greg (Strider) Moore" writes:

"Jeff Findley" wrote in message
...

In article ,
says...

On Thursday, April 29, 2021 at 12:14:54 AM UTC-4, Doctor Who wrote:
On Wed, 28 Apr 2021 14:20:11 -0400, Jeff Findley
wrote:
That's just bull****. You're posting to a public forum. You're not
allowed to tell people they can't reply to you.

Jeff
except that her/your comments are totally ignored WRT the censorship
of our innovative space propulsion.
There's no censorship in a public group. There is however, disdain and no
respect for what is obviously quack science.

Agreed.

True. If it were truly being censored we wouldn't be able to publicly laugh at
it!

Jeff

....aaand my filters are working. Greg and Jeff you got filtered out on this
simply based on the subject line, normally you'd come through my
filters, so thanks for the test.

Dave

  #27  
Old May 1st 21, 12:25 AM posted to sci.space.policy
Sylvia Else[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 87
Default 10 grams of push of PNN SUB321N !

On 30-Apr-21 8:40 pm, pnn calmagorod wrote:
Il giorno martedì 27 aprile 2021 alle 07:35:51 UTC+2 Sylvia Else ha scritto:
On 24-Apr-21 3:34 pm, pnn calmagorod wrote:

Dal nostro agente americano sperimentatore Michael:
“Congrats on being invited to APEC! I heard from Gabriel. I'll be around to help explain the concept. I've made some improvements (F432 ndr) which I will be testing in the fall. “

-Da Gabriel Socio Asps
“Aspetto che mi contatti lui come gli hai scritto tu di fare; se ritarda mi faccio vivo io.
Quando gli hai scritto dei 10 gr (di spinta di SUB321N ndr) ci sar* rimasto male Precedente mi ha scritto che era riuscito a potenziare F432 ma non so di quanto o altri dettagli.
Ti aggiorno “

-Dal fronte gotha italico fankazzista idrofobo , “no no no no la pnn non esiste , le solite ciarle , la PNN non voler* mai “ :-)
E bbuuuuuuahhhhhhhaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

Botoli italici del Mar Morto attaccatevi agli alettoni e ai cojoni di Musk ! 😊

E sballo

https://neolegesmotus.com/2021/04/17...subitam-class/

"The key point is: Subitam is capable of exceeding 4 grams of thrust. As
always, the power has been cut off quickly to avoid overheating, so this
is not the maximum thrust that it can supply."

So, it gets hot. Perhaps the thrust is from convection.

BTW, love the evidence offered - a video of a digital scale measuring
something.

If anyone's been invited to APEC over this, more fool APEC.

Sylvia.


Sylvia don't run away you just have to say if this event of electrodynamic forces between open circuits:
www.asps.it/impnn2.jpg
from https://neolegesmotus.com/2020/11/02...etic-thruster/

that is, i.e. if the two Lorentz elementary electrodynamic forces have or do not have a resultant NOT Null!
Which everyone has also seen in:
www.asps.it/PNN488.mp4
Did you understand? Or should you NOT understand? 😊


That experimental setup is worthless. At the very least, the experiment
needs to be done in a vacuum.

Sylvia.
  #28  
Old May 1st 21, 06:55 AM posted to sci.space.policy
pnn calmagorod
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 54
Default 10 grams of push of PNN SUB321N !

Il giorno sabato 1 maggio 2021 alle 01:26:00 UTC+2 Sylvia Else ha scritto:
On 30-Apr-21 8:40 pm, pnn calmagorod wrote:
Il giorno martedì 27 aprile 2021 alle 07:35:51 UTC+2 Sylvia Else ha scritto:
On 24-Apr-21 3:34 pm, pnn calmagorod wrote:

Dal nostro agente americano sperimentatore Michael:
“Congrats on being invited to APEC! I heard from Gabriel. I'll be around to help explain the concept. I've made some improvements (F432 ndr) which I will be testing in the fall. “

-Da Gabriel Socio Asps
“Aspetto che mi contatti lui come gli hai scritto tu di fare; se ritarda mi faccio vivo io.
Quando gli hai scritto dei 10 gr (di spinta di SUB321N ndr) ci sar* rimasto male Precedente mi ha scritto che era riuscito a potenziare F432 ma non so di quanto o altri dettagli.
Ti aggiorno “

-Dal fronte gotha italico fankazzista idrofobo , “no no no no la pnn non esiste , le solite ciarle , la PNN non voler* mai “ :-)
E bbuuuuuuahhhhhhhaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

Botoli italici del Mar Morto attaccatevi agli alettoni e ai cojoni di Musk ! 😊

E sballo

https://neolegesmotus.com/2021/04/17...subitam-class/

"The key point is: Subitam is capable of exceeding 4 grams of thrust. As
always, the power has been cut off quickly to avoid overheating, so this
is not the maximum thrust that it can supply."

So, it gets hot. Perhaps the thrust is from convection.

BTW, love the evidence offered - a video of a digital scale measuring
something.

If anyone's been invited to APEC over this, more fool APEC.

Sylvia.


Sylvia don't run away you just have to say if this event of electrodynamic forces between open circuits:
www.asps.it/impnn2.jpg
from https://neolegesmotus.com/2020/11/02...etic-thruster/

that is, i.e. if the two Lorentz elementary electrodynamic forces have or do not have a resultant NOT Null!
Which everyone has also seen in:
www.asps.it/PNN488.mp4
Did you understand? Or should you NOT understand? 😊

That experimental setup is worthless.


At now we don't offer the setup of a PNN that can fly :-) ... be patient :if you want humans reach Mars , WE ASPS ( www.asps.it ) MUST DO ALL BY YOURSELF | while Musk play with comic rockets and Nasa with helicopters :-)

At the very least, the experiment
needs to be done in a vacuum.


this www.asps.it/impnn2.png needn't vacuum ... are Lorentz forces and sum of Lorentz forces :-)


Sylvia.


To reach Mars we need of a propulsion system that have NO MASS LOSS! ..... and powered by nuclear reactors

E.Laureti
  #29  
Old May 1st 21, 07:16 AM posted to sci.space.policy
Doctor Who[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 103
Default 10 grams of push of PNN SUB321N !

On Sat, 1 May 2021 09:25:56 +1000, Sylvia Else
wrote:

On 30-Apr-21 8:40 pm, pnn calmagorod wrote:
Il giorno marted 27 aprile 2021 alle 07:35:51 UTC+2 Sylvia Else ha scritto:
On 24-Apr-21 3:34 pm, pnn calmagorod wrote:

Dal nostro agente americano sperimentatore Michael:
Congrats on being invited to APEC! I heard from Gabriel. I'll be around to help explain the concept. I've made some improvements (F432 ndr) which I will be testing in the fall.

-Da Gabriel Socio Asps
Aspetto che mi contatti lui come gli hai scritto tu di fare; se ritarda mi faccio vivo io.
Quando gli hai scritto dei 10 gr (di spinta di SUB321N ndr) ci sar rimasto male Precedente mi ha scritto che era riuscito a potenziare F432 ma non so di quanto o altri dettagli.
Ti aggiorno

-Dal fronte gotha italico fankazzista idrofobo , no no no no la pnn non esiste , le solite ciarle , la PNN non voler mai :-)
E bbuuuuuuahhhhhhhaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

Botoli italici del Mar Morto attaccatevi agli alettoni e ai cojoni di Musk ! ?

E sballo

https://neolegesmotus.com/2021/04/17...subitam-class/

"The key point is: Subitam is capable of exceeding 4 grams of thrust. As
always, the power has been cut off quickly to avoid overheating, so this
is not the maximum thrust that it can supply."

So, it gets hot. Perhaps the thrust is from convection.

BTW, love the evidence offered - a video of a digital scale measuring
something.

If anyone's been invited to APEC over this, more fool APEC.

Sylvia.


Sylvia don't run away you just have to say if this event of electrodynamic forces between open circuits:
www.asps.it/impnn2.jpg
from https://neolegesmotus.com/2020/11/02...etic-thruster/

that is, i.e. if the two Lorentz elementary electrodynamic forces have or do not have a resultant NOT Null!
Which everyone has also seen in:
www.asps.it/PNN488.mp4
Did you understand? Or should you NOT understand? ?


That experimental setup is worthless. At the very least, the experiment
needs to be done in a vacuum.


Can we put the pnn setup inside your skull ?
there we find absolute vacuum :-)

and lol
  #30  
Old May 1st 21, 07:53 AM posted to sci.space.policy
Sylvia Else[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 87
Default 10 grams of push of PNN SUB321N !

On 01-May-21 3:55 pm, pnn calmagorod wrote:
Il giorno sabato 1 maggio 2021 alle 01:26:00 UTC+2 Sylvia Else ha scritto:
On 30-Apr-21 8:40 pm, pnn calmagorod wrote:
Il giorno martedì 27 aprile 2021 alle 07:35:51 UTC+2 Sylvia Else ha scritto:
On 24-Apr-21 3:34 pm, pnn calmagorod wrote:

Dal nostro agente americano sperimentatore Michael:
“Congrats on being invited to APEC! I heard from Gabriel. I'll be around to help explain the concept. I've made some improvements (F432 ndr) which I will be testing in the fall. “

-Da Gabriel Socio Asps
“Aspetto che mi contatti lui come gli hai scritto tu di fare; se ritarda mi faccio vivo io.
Quando gli hai scritto dei 10 gr (di spinta di SUB321N ndr) ci sar* rimasto male Precedente mi ha scritto che era riuscito a potenziare F432 ma non so di quanto o altri dettagli.
Ti aggiorno “

-Dal fronte gotha italico fankazzista idrofobo , “no no no no la pnn non esiste , le solite ciarle , la PNN non voler* mai “ :-)
E bbuuuuuuahhhhhhhaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

Botoli italici del Mar Morto attaccatevi agli alettoni e ai cojoni di Musk ! 😊

E sballo

https://neolegesmotus.com/2021/04/17...subitam-class/

"The key point is: Subitam is capable of exceeding 4 grams of thrust. As
always, the power has been cut off quickly to avoid overheating, so this
is not the maximum thrust that it can supply."

So, it gets hot. Perhaps the thrust is from convection.

BTW, love the evidence offered - a video of a digital scale measuring
something.

If anyone's been invited to APEC over this, more fool APEC.

Sylvia.

Sylvia don't run away you just have to say if this event of electrodynamic forces between open circuits:
www.asps.it/impnn2.jpg
from https://neolegesmotus.com/2020/11/02...etic-thruster/

that is, i.e. if the two Lorentz elementary electrodynamic forces have or do not have a resultant NOT Null!
Which everyone has also seen in:
www.asps.it/PNN488.mp4
Did you understand? Or should you NOT understand? 😊

That experimental setup is worthless.


At now we don't offer the setup of a PNN that can fly :-) ... be patient :if you want humans reach Mars , WE ASPS ( www.asps.it ) MUST DO ALL BY YOURSELF | while Musk play with comic rockets and Nasa with helicopters :-)

At the very least, the experiment
needs to be done in a vacuum.


this www.asps.it/impnn2.png needn't vacuum ... are Lorentz forces and sum of Lorentz forces :-)


Sylvia.


To reach Mars we need of a propulsion system that have NO MASS LOSS! ..... and powered by nuclear reactors

E.Laureti


You've been promising much, and delivering lit... er, I mean nothing,
for a long time now. I don't expect that to change.

Sylvia.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
What if(on Push) G=EMC^2 Glazier[_1_] Misc 21 October 21st 08 03:27 PM
28 New Exoplanets & 4 Multi-Planet Systems and Gliese 436 w/2 grams/cc Indicates Water Jason H. Amateur Astronomy 0 May 30th 07 04:39 AM
Further proof gravity is a push... Rick Sobie Astronomy Misc 11 March 18th 04 07:27 AM
Further proof gravity is a push... Rick Sobie Astronomy Misc 1 March 16th 04 06:20 AM
The push for men on Mars. . .What's really going on here? Starstuffed Amateur Astronomy 68 January 17th 04 05:59 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:17 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2022, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2004-2022 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.