![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
..
and now, Ladies and Gentlemen, the NSF's "slow motion experts" have (finally) "invented" MY "Multipurpose Orbital Rescue Vehicle"... http://forum.nasaspaceflight.com/ind...?topic=14161.0 .... just 20 months LATER my article... ![]() http://www.gaetanomarano.it/articles/017morv.html .. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Aug 28, 5:36*pm, gaetanomarano wrote:
. and now, Ladies and Gentlemen, the NSF's "slow motion experts" have (finally) "invented" MY "Multipurpose Orbital Rescue Vehicle"... http://forum.nasaspaceflight.com/ind...?topic=14161.0 ... just 20 months LATER my article... ![]() http://www.gaetanomarano.it/articles/017morv.html The NSF thread has nothing to do with your thread. Let me change that, actually there is a post on that thread that is a applicable to your MORV http://forum.nasaspaceflight.com/ind...0374#msg310374 "You are so off base on all of this I won't even go into any detail. " . |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Aug 29, 7:06*am, wrote:
On Aug 28, 5:36*pm, gaetanomarano wrote: . and now, Ladies and Gentlemen, the NSF's "slow motion experts" have (finally) "invented" MY "Multipurpose Orbital Rescue Vehicle"... http://forum.nasaspaceflight.com/ind...?topic=14161.0 ... just 20 months LATER my article... ![]() http://www.gaetanomarano.it/articles/017morv.html The NSF thread has nothing to do with your thread. Let me change that, actually there is a post on that thread that is a applicable to your MORV http://forum.nasaspaceflight.com/ind...0451#msg310451 "You are so off base on all of this I won't even go into any detail." Updated link |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Aug 28, 5:36*pm, gaetanomarano wrote:
. and now, Ladies and Gentlemen, the NSF's "slow motion experts" have (finally) "invented" MY "Multipurpose Orbital Rescue Vehicle"... http://forum.nasaspaceflight.com/ind...?topic=14161.0 ... just 20 months LATER my article... ![]() http://www.gaetanomarano.it/articles/017morv.html gaetanomarano, Why are you posting on Usenet about threads on NSF? Let me answer that. Because you are an ass and have been banned from every credible spaceflight forum. The next one you will be banned from is Space Politics. It won't be me doing it, you will do it all by yourself. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 29 Ago, 13:14, wrote:
it won't be me doing it, you will do it all by yourself. don't be angry, charlie/Me/etc... ![]() it's not my guilt if you are unable to think and propose just ONE new idea, but only to post insults against people who don't support Direct... .. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Aug 29, 11:17*am, gaetanomarano wrote:
On 29 Ago, 13:14, wrote: it won't be me doing it, you will do it all by yourself. don't be angry, charlie/Me/etc... ![]() it's not my guilt if you are unable to think and propose just ONE new idea, but only to post insults against people who don't support Direct... 1. Your "ideas" don't count because they are not viable. So it doesn't matter how many of them exist. One piece of garbage vs many pieces of garbage, it still is garbage. 2. I worked on SDLV's in the early 1980's, long before you knew about shuttle 3. Those SDLV's looked just like Direct and not your fast-slv 4. I have worked on one idea that has more of a chance of happening than any of your ideas. A manned spacecraft on EELV's 5. I don't feel the need to put my ideas on the internet. The internet is not the only place for ideas. I have better avenues to circulate my ideas. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 29 Ago, 18:09, wrote:
1. *Your "ideas" don't count because they are not viable. just the time it was/are/will be adopted by NASA or ESA or (at least) some space forums' "experts"... 2. I worked on SDLV's in the early 1980's, long before you knew about shuttle words, words. words, words, words... (and no one evidence, as usual...) 3. *Those SDLV's looked just like Direct and not your fast-slv I've already written an article and (posted everywhere) with clear and strong evidences of the exact DAY and HOUR where the Direct concept and name was born 4. *I have worked on one idea that has more of a chance of happening than any of your ideas. *A manned spacecraft on EELV's assuming it's true, you're just one of several thousands peoples that have "worked" about manned EELV spacecrafts from '50s to today 5. *I don't feel the need to put my ideas on the internet. The internet is not the only place for ideas. * I have better avenues to circulate my ideas. internet is not a "bad place" but (simply) the modern version of books and magazines (as Wikipedia clearly shows) and it's not the ORIGIN of the idea but (simply) the "mirror" of the real world, so, an idea is available on the web, not because you put it here, but (simply) because this idea was BORN (someday) then EXISTS (somwhere) if your "avenues" have not a "mirror" on the web (or on a paper book or magazine or university lecture, etc.) they (simply) don't exist! rockets, spacecrafts, engines, etc. are NOT "secret weapons" but (simply) TECHNOLOGIES that must be revelaled and built to be useful all technologies become OLD in a few years... so, it NOT credible that you, a space company, a lab, a space agency, an industry or anyone else "invent" something new and useful in the '80s but NEVER REVEAL IT in the next 20-30 years!!!!!!!! it's not credible that a concept developed in '80s was NEVER PUBLISHED in a book or a study or a document that now could be an evidence of them!!! just words, words, words, words, words you haven't invented NOTHING, you haven't worked on NOTHING, you have NO evidence of NOTHING... ALL peoples that have REALLY worked on "something" in '80s or before or later, are well known, they have a name, their name is on the web, on wikipedia, on NASA and aerospace companies' public documents, on books, etc. you (simply) don't exist! you're just a Direct's PR-man (or part of a Direct's PR-"crew") that posts hidden under several nicknames everywhere on the web to support the Direct-lobby and insults everybody else you contradict yourself and your own words!!! ...WHY should one that worked on rocket projects HIDES these projects (that could have some real interests for many peoples on the web) because "has better avenue than the web" but, in the same time (lireally) SUBMERGE the web (he "don't like") with a flow of words, words, words, words all peoples that actually HAVE "ideas" want their ideas to be known everywhere, developed and built, they don't HIDE an idea for 20+ years, just to post on a forum to say "I've invented it in '80s but I've no evidence of that since I've some special "avenues" to run it" ![]() ![]() ![]() you have NOT just ONE idea! all peoples that HAVE ideas are HAPPY to talk of them with other and always want to demonstrate to be the first that have had it (and give evidence of that) NOT saying just words, words, words, words... ![]() .. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Aug 29, 1:55*pm, gaetanomarano wrote:
assuming it's true, you're just one of several thousands peoples that have "worked" about manned EELV spacecrafts from '50s to today Wrong. EELV's are specific ELV's. They are the Atlas V and Delta-IV, which have only been around in the 2000's internet is not a "bad place" but (simply) the modern version of books and magazines (as Wikipedia clearly shows) and it's not the ORIGIN of the idea but (simply) the "mirror" of the real world, so, an idea is available on the web, not because you put it here, but (simply) because this idea was BORN (someday) then EXISTS (somwhere) Not on the open web. if your "avenues" have not a "mirror" on the web (or on a paper book or magazine or university lecture, etc.) they (simply) don't exist! Wrong again. I have many documents that aren't on the web. NASA and aerospace contractors do not use the open web. Less than 1% of the information of current or future spaceflight missions is on the web. I have written documents that are not releasable to the public rockets, spacecrafts, engines, etc. are NOT "secret weapons" but (simply) TECHNOLOGIES that must be revelaled and built to be useful Wrong. Most of the information is ITAR or SBU all technologies become OLD in a few years... so, it NOT credible that you, a space company, a lab, a space agency, an industry or anyone else "invent" something new and useful in the '80s but NEVER REVEAL IT in the next 20-30 years!!!!!!!! Wrong. They are called spy satellites it's not credible that a concept developed in '80s was NEVER PUBLISHED in a book or a study or a document that now could be an evidence of them!!! Wrong. I have documents of a vehicle called the ULV. Show me it on the web. you haven't invented NOTHING, you haven't worked on NOTHING, you have NO evidence of NOTHING... ALL peoples that have REALLY worked on "something" in '80s or before or later, are well known, they have a name, their name is on the web, on wikipedia, on NASA and aerospace companies' public documents, on books, etc. Wrong again. You won't find any evidence of me, in the 1980's, yet my wall is covered with awards for working on many projects. I am on the web now for work in the 1990's and 2000 you (simply) don't exist! you're just a Direct's PR-man (or part of a Direct's PR-"crew") that posts hidden under several nicknames everywhere on the web to support the Direct-lobby and insults everybody else I don't insult everyone else. I just reveal your lies. you contradict yourself and your own words!!! ...WHY should one that worked on rocket projects HIDES these projects (that could have some real interests for many peoples on the web) because "has better avenue than the web" Because the web is not where the real work is down. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 29 Ago, 23:43, wrote:
They are the Atlas V and Delta-IV, which have only been around in the 2000's an option thousands NASA engineers have evaluated before the Ares-1 choice Not on the open web. yes, they're in the Mulder & Scully X-Files' drawers... ![]() *I have many documents that aren't on the web. NASA has revealed (and is revealing daily) everything about the ESAS hardware including the most minute details... you can't have any further document, or, if you have it, it's a completely useless garbage I have written documents that are not releasable to the public you're only a young boy (or girl) that, hidden behind several nicknames, plays the role of "NASA engineer", "aerospace contractor", "astronaut" and (maybe, in other forums) "Spiderman", "Batman", "Harry Potter", "Paris Hilton", etc. ![]() Most of the information is ITAR or SBU the shuttle-derived rockets are not "secret weapons", everything is known about them (including some internal issues like the vibrations problems) there are no secrets and you are not James Bond... ![]() *They are called spy satellites the Ares rockets are NOT "spy satellites" (and, also the latter, was not secrets hidden 20, 30 years or more!) I have documents of a vehicle called the ULV. it's not enough to beat me... I've secret documents about vehicles called GBrN, UTcYo, OOu3T, VNxyz, ZZ4g, LMNop7, etc. ...but I can't reveal them... sorry... ![]() You won't find any evidence of me, in the 1980's, yet my wall is covered with awards for working on many projects. your college room's wall is covered with several posters of Britney Spears, Cameron Diaz, Justin Timberlake, Bruce Willis, etc. ![]() *I am on the web now for work in the 1990's and 2000 but STILL you can't say/we can't know WHO you are! I just reveal your lies. well, then, now start reveal us YOUR lies... like the LOTS of claims on yourself and your "rocket projects" (without post just ONE evidence!) you write in your posts... ![]() Because the web is not where the real work is down. the ONLY "real work" you have is "crew member of Direct's Web Supporters' Team" ![]() .. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
the (NSF's Direct-like) new-uplink.forum's "experts" STRIKE BACK(now with "their" ARES-H) | gaetanomarano | Policy | 11 | August 27th 08 03:11 AM |
15 answers to nonsense being spread by "creation science,""intelligent design," and "Expelled" | Kickin' Ass and Takin' Names[_1_] | Amateur Astronomy | 1 | April 29th 08 02:29 PM |
"Constant failure"; "The greatest equations ever"; "The Coming Revolutions in Particle Physics" | fishfry | Astronomy Misc | 0 | February 13th 08 03:38 AM |
FOUND TO-DAY: finally, the "experts" have "invented" the upgraded J-2X | gaetanomarano | Policy | 3 | November 15th 07 07:32 AM |
The "experts" strike again... :) :) :) "Direct" version of my "open Service Module" on NSF | gaetanomarano | Policy | 0 | August 17th 07 03:19 PM |