|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Inverted Aerobraking - a suggestion for a different way of propulsion for CATS in medium to far future
Some months ago I reconsidered an old idea of mine about a different
way to go to space. I still believe it might work. But feel free to tell me why you reckon it won't. Or maybe you have an idea how to use this concept better/simpler/more economical? The concept is described at http://www.walthelm.net/inverted-aerobraking.html Since I read news very sporadically, please respond by email or at least send a copy by email. And please be patient with me and allow me some time to respond. This is just a part-time hobby :*) Axel |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Inverted Aerobraking - a suggestion for a different way ofpropulsion for CATS in medium to far future
Axel Walthelm wrote:
Some months ago I reconsidered an old idea of mine about a different way to go to space. I still believe it might work. But feel free to tell me why you reckon it won't. Or maybe you have an idea how to use this concept better/simpler/more economical? The concept is described at http://www.walthelm.net/inverted-aerobraking.html Since I read news very sporadically, please respond by email or at least send a copy by email. And please be patient with me and allow me some time to respond. This is just a part-time hobby :*) A system like this was part of story that I'm almost certain was by Donald Kingsbury. Oxygen from the moon was released as vapour from many points along a rail, and the vessel needing to be boosted to orbital speed came in along this rail and hit the oxygen. It was called an "imp", short for impact-something. --- Graham Cowan http://www.eagle.ca/~gcowan/Paper_for_11th_CHC.doc -- How individual mobility gains nuclear cachet. Link if you want it to happen |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Inverted Aerobraking - a suggestion for a different way of
"G. R. L. Cowan" :
Axel Walthelm wrote: Some months ago I reconsidered an old idea of mine about a different way to go to space. I still believe it might work. But feel free to tell me why you reckon it won't. Or maybe you have an idea how to use this concept better/simpler/more economical? The concept is described at http://www.walthelm.net/inverted-aerobraking.html Since I read news very sporadically, please respond by email or at least send a copy by email. And please be patient with me and allow me some time to respond. This is just a part-time hobby :*) A system like this was part of story that I'm almost certain was by Donald Kingsbury. Oxygen from the moon was released as vapour from many points along a rail, and the vessel needing to be boosted to orbital speed came in along this rail and hit the oxygen. It was called an "imp", short for impact-something. See: THE SPACEPORT (article background for The Moon Goddess and the Son) Analog SF, New York, Nov & Dec 1979. http://www.islandone.org/LEOBiblio/SPBI128.HTM Earl Colby Pottinger -- I make public email sent to me! Hydrogen Peroxide Rockets, OpenBeos, SerialTransfer 3.0, RAMDISK, BoatBuilding, DIY TabletPC. What happened to the time? http://webhome.idirect.com/~earlcp |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Inverted Aerobraking - a suggestion for a different way ofpropulsion for CATS in medium to far future
I have just conceived a new kind of the inverted
aerobraking, which I call Moon dust propulsion. Here is its description: Large number of small robots are launched into elliptic orbits linking the Earth and the Moon. Their orbits are corrected by on-board ion thrusters. The robots transport Moon dust (lunar regolith) from a Moon orbit to the Earth's ionosphere. The spacecraft is lifted above the atmosphere by a sounding rocket. As soon as it is above the atmosphere, it unfurls a large loop which generates magnetic field of about 1 mT. At the same time the robots release the dust in the ionosphere above the magnetic equator of the Earth. The initial trajectory of the dust is similar to a polar orbit. When the dust turns into ions, the ions follow the lines of force of the Earth magnetic field. Ion trajectories are helixes parallel to the lines of force of the magnetic field. Diameter of the helixes is on the order of one millimeter, so the plasma cloud is very streamlined. Shortly before the moving plasma cloud hits the loop of the spacecraft, the electric current in the loop is moderate. The moving plasma intensifies the electric current in the loop and it exerts magnetic force on the loop. There are two options: - The moving plasma bounces off the magnetic force of the loop. This option generates high specific impulse but the plasma cloud may swell too much and it may be unstable. - The moving plasma is constrained by the magnetic force of the loop, but it leaks through the loop. I have no idea if this system of space transportation is feasible. Experimental data produced by stellarators and tokamaks would be very helpful. Studying the solar wind trapped by the Earth's magnetic field would also help -- the ionized wind follows the lines of force of the Earth's magnetic field and it bounces off the magnetic poles. We can see it as the auroras. The northern aurora is the mirror reflection of the southern aurora. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|