the Texas terrorism connection

Following is a synopsis of a live interview with Reverend Scott Lewis,
KTLV AM 1220 in Oklahoma City, OK on Sunday January 25th, 2003.

My guest tonight is Bill H. Clark II. He's written a scifi novel
called "Behold Leviathan."

(SL) Bill, the first thing that I'd like to know is, why I had such a
hard time getting anybody with credentials to talk with me here
tonight . . . and why is it you're willing to walk with me.

Scott, it's not that there isn't anything to talk about. The problem
is that there's a regulation by the federal government that
automatically revokes the security clearance of anybody who makes a
public comment on any aspects of UFO's. When you consider that most
research is funded by the government, any scientist with the courage
to speak up would soon be without a job. Here are UT Austin, for
example, 80% of all funding in engineering and the sciences comes from
the U.S. Navy. Kind of makes you wonder what it is the military has
been doing with, what $10 trillion of research done over the last
three decades - in total, absolute secrecy?

.. . . . My own use of the word "UFO's" is for "Unidentified Federal
Outlays" ~ pertaining to the trillions of taxpayers money spent by the
military industrial complex with absolutely no accountability.

(SL) Why is it you are here with me tonight?

For one thing, there have been hundreds of documented air traffic
control problems caused by the proximity of unidentified aircraft.
Nobody has investigated. As a Professional Engineer I have a
responsibility to the public health, and an obligation to seek
engineering answers to these engineering problems. Incidentally, it's
kind of interesting that most confirmed UFO sightings describe big
orange or amber landing lights. Makes them sound kind of man made,
doesn't it?

Other than that, I confess - I broke the law two years ago. I
published two speculative Celestial Mechanics technical papers in a
couple of the more respectable UFOlogy research journals. I didn't
know about the government tabu against this. I even submitted these
papers to my dissertation committee at the University because, after
all, they WERE solid projects on applications of Celestial Mechanics
that I have been working on for almost twenty years. Worse yet, I was
kind of persistent in getting solid comments back from my advisors, on
this material; not knowing they'd lose their jobs if they did so.
Ultimately, I was expelled. It was really the only thing they could
do, by law.

(SL) So you were dismissed for non academic reasons - your grades were
good.. ?

I had a 3.8 GPA and had passed all the courses required for a Ph.D in
Celestial Mechanics. I'd also completed all the research. My project
was an optimization of the Earth to Mars flight path. Given that five
of the last seven missions to Mars had failed, it was an important
topic, and I had important results. I found a faster, safer, more
efficient mission profile. Moreover, the computer routine I created is
for a ballistic trajectory. That's a trajectory with no thrusts except
at the very beginning at lift off. This is just the problem that the
military has spent over $1 trillion to solve in the last thirty years
as the Strategic Defense Initiative.

You may remember; President Regan called it the "Star Wars" missile
defense program. Just last week the Bush Administration announced that
they intend to implement SDI in full by 2004; and my research is
probably the best in the world on this problem. But here I am, still
unemployed, still fighting the system to get the Ph.D I deserve. It
really makes you wonder what the military is doing with the $1
trillion allocated that project. . .

This trajectory analysis project of mine is a problem I've been
associated with since the very beginning. I gave a formal presentation
of my research in 1984 to the Post Commander and Chief Scientist when
I was at White Sands; Major General Niles Fulwyler and Dr. Ralph
Davies. White Sands is just where all the Star Wars research was being
done, in particular on a chemical laser. It's still being done there,
in fact.

Anyway, I made the mistake of researching topics beyond my official
project on trajectories, and they expelled me for it. Those are the
simple facts.

(SL) Have you appealed?

Yes, it's gone all the way through the University system ~ and quite a
ways beyond. Let's see, I appealed to the Texas Board of Professional
Engineers, accusing the Department of misrepresentation because they
advertise a block of ten graduate courses in Celesital Mechanics in
the Graduate Catalog and teach only one; and no longer offer a major
in that area even though it's specified in the Catalog. I've
petitioned the U.S. Department of Education Office of Civil Rights
because I was expelled for participating in a protected activity -
i.e. whistle blowing; and I even contacted ABET, the licensing
authority for university engineering programs. My advisor stated in
writing on University letter head that he quit as my advisor because I
wrote to ABET ~ such retaliation is a violation of my civil rights.
When all is said and done, even though most of my research has been
accepted at major conferences; even though I have submitted dozens of
letters from scientists supporting my work; all of this evidence is
ignored. It's gotta be the federal gag rule against public comment on
UFO's to blame... and I assume the penalties have been beefed up since
9/11. (I was expelled weeks after 9/11.)

(SL) I guess that means you won't get a job yourself with your new
degree, then - especially now that you're talking with me on the air?

Yes, I'm sure you're right. But don't think I'm doing this for spite
or to make an ugly scene. I'm in a corner. I can't get a job because
nobody at the University will give me a reference; I can't get
published because I have offended so many people in my field trying to
get to the bottom of this whole UFO thing, so I don't have any choice
left but to come out swinging with both fists. (Keep reminding your
self that UFO means "Unidentified Federal Outlays ~ nothing more.)

However ~ it's a fight I'm well prepared for. I've spent the last ten
years fighting what seems the whole world trying to promote energy
conservation. I probably have the strongest credentials in that field
of anybody in America - so I'm pretty tough. And, when this fiasco
with UFO's tied my shoe laces together a couple of years ago, I wasn't
about to do what they expected - to sit on my hands like some cowering
graduate student, and meekly accept their killing my career. I've not
stopped fighting since.

(SL) Bill, it's pretty clear the government is serious about keeping
silent about this whole issue - is there any reason for them to
enforce this rule of silence? I'm NOT a believer; tell me something
that will get me some reasonable doubt - not hearsay, but solid
scientific facts. How about starting with the movie "Signs," and crop
circles - the huge, intricate patterns that have been found in fields
all over the world. Are they made by aliens?

No, my best guess is that Crop Circles are caused by gravity waves.
The latest theory in astrophysics is that the universe is held
together by strands of intense gravity. It's called "String Theory"
and that is a good, literal description. I believe these strings get
severed now and then, and when that happens they whip around and
sometimes impact the Earth. I believe the parting of the Red Sea for
Moses was caused by such an event. Does THAT help you to believe? And,
I think crop circles are caused by these gravity strings . . . . for
the most part.

(SL) What do you mean, for the most part?

Well, I could generate most of the patterns you see in the crop
circles using simple computer models of fundamental problems in
Celestial Mechanics associated with what we call the Three Body
Problem. Anything within a circle is possible to construct this way.
It's the little elaborate designs around the perimeter that are the
mystery to me. Like in the movie - the arrowheads, the little hats,
all that stuff. I don't think they're natural, but man made to
obfuscate the truth from the general public.

(SL) Why are there so many of these crop circles lately, all over the
world?

I believe they're caused by significant changes in the Earth itself in
recent years that have changed our position in this gravitational
matrix. For example, the GPS - the Global Positioning System - depends
upon atomic clocks to keep an extremely exact time, and they've added
1 extra second to the Earth's rotation rate about every year since the
1950's. Now, in just the last few years, no more "leap seconds" are
having to be added. The Earth's rotation is speeding up. That may not
seem like a big deal. But when you consider the mass of the Earth a
change in rotation rate on that order is huge.

Clearly, the Earth's dynamic stability is changing. My theory is that
it is caused by all the oil we're sucking out of the Earth. Oil is
typically found in faults between rock formations. So, in effect we
are taking the oil out of the hinges that make the planet flexible. I
suspect this is what's causing the change in rotation rate. Sooner or
later the earthquake victims are going to figure that out and sue the
oil companies and probably the United States government for damages.

(SL) So these crop circles are made by huge gravity strings ~ kind of
like what they show in the Star Gate TV show? Is there any connection?

(SL) Well, we're out of time for today. We'll have to talk again -
real soon.

P.S. Actually, it should be the scientific community who the
earthquake victims should sue. As you can see from my "forum" I have
been talking about these issues for years on the web, in the news
groups, and elsewhere. You would blush to see some of the horrific
things scientists say about my ideas and my research. Read Mitch
Battros' entry "earthquakes and oil production" in my old discussion
forum and you'll hear an expert witness testify that scientists have
known about these issues for many years, and have never done anything
about it.

To think we've doled out $10 trillion to scientists to fund their
every last whim over the last thirty years, given them job security
and privacy to follow their every inclination; and they don't even
have the decency to investigate things that really matter. Indeed,
they lobby the government to give them even MORE secrecy; so that MORE
things can go wrong, and they will never EVER be held accountable.
They were probably quite glad that 9/11 happened because of all the
beefed up security....

Actually, I would even go so far as to say the scientists helped plan
and execute the attacks. Nobody has ever explained how the homing
becons and black boxes in all the aircraft were disabled. The
president of an international pilot's union told me that those devices
could NOT be disabled from within the cabin, so it's a given that the
hijackers could not have done it. Who did then?

The other significant engineering fact about 9/11 is how the impact of
both jets in each of the Towers caused a perfect implosion of the
structure. You may have seen the show about how a team of experts
spent a year analyzing a ten story high casino in Las Vegas,
determining how to place their explosive charges to cause the
structure to implode - rather that careen to the side, when
collapsing. Doing the same thing with the Twin Towers is infinitely
more difficult ~ especially because the substructure of one of them
had been severely damaged by a previous terrorist bomb. This kind of
analysis would require the kind of technical expertise and analytical
skill that exists at only half a dozen universities in the world -
Texas among them. Moreover, I doubt very seriously an human pilot
could fly the aircraft with the requisite accuracy. . . . Remember the
X-Files show when a jet was being flown by auto pilot right at the
Twin Towers . . .

I wrote of my suspicions to the FBI right after 9/11 and when they
didn't do anything, I posted the issues on the web. A few days later I
was expelled from graduate school . . .without an ounce of warning.
Kind of makes you wonder, doesn't it; especially since I was so far
along in my studies, and my project was so significant and high
profile. That would seem to narrow down the list of possible
universities from six, to one.

Bill Clark
http://home.austin.rr.com/whcii/

... a team of experts
spent a year analyzing a ten story high casino in Las Vegas,
determining how to place their explosive charges to cause the
structure to implode - rather that careen to the side, when
collapsing. Doing the same thing with the Twin Towers is infinitely
more difficult ...

I understand that the World Trade towers were purposely designed to
collapse downward, rather than fall over, in the event of a
catastrophe.

-paul-
--
Paul E. Black )

In article , Paul E. Black
wrote:

... a team of experts
spent a year analyzing a ten story high casino in Las Vegas,
determining how to place their explosive charges to cause the
structure to implode - rather that careen to the side, when
collapsing. Doing the same thing with the Twin Towers is infinitely
more difficult ...

I understand that the World Trade towers were purposely designed to
collapse downward, rather than fall over, in the event of a
catastrophe.

The World Trade Center towers were built unlike any other tall
buildings. They used a central core and a structural exterior
skeleton, with the floors hung between the two structures.
Buildings like a 10 story casino are built with interior columns
to support the building. Comparing the two is meaningless.

-john-

--
================================================== ==================
John A. Weeks III 952-432-2708
Newave Communications http://www.johnweeks.com
================================================== ==================

"Paul E. Black" wrote:
I understand that the World Trade towers were purposely designed to
collapse downward, rather than fall over, in the event of a
catastrophe.

PBS had an interview with some of the engineers who designed the towers. They
were not "purposely" designed to do this. However, laws of physics, centre of
gravity make is such that the towers would fall downwards instead of topling sideways.

At the time support on one side buckles, the pressure on the remaining side
would cause the remaining supports to also buckle, after which, everything
falls downwards.

(Paul E. Black) wrote in message ...
I understand that the World Trade towers were purposely designed to
collapse downward, rather than fall over, in the event of a
catastrophe.

I don't know, the World Trade Center towers were designed like a tree
(interior columns) with branches (floors), if it had any structural
failure, it should acted very much like a tree. Never saw before a
tree that collapse downward.

We should always consider the possibility that the World Trade Center
towers were designed to self destruct from the very beginning.

-paul-