|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Riedt’s constant Y = 5022635
Dne 19/01/2018 v 04:57 Peter Riedt napsal(a):
What's the point with restating my formula? He is pointing out that it is a boring numerical identity with a value that depends only on the measurement units used and nothing else. What else could there be to make it more exciting? What is exciting on the exact formula v = 2 . pi . r / T, respective on your inaccurate formula replacing r by a ? -- Poutnik ( The Pilgrim, Der Wanderer ) A wise man guards words he says, as they say about him more, than he says about the subject. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Riedt’s constant Y = 5022635
On Friday, January 19, 2018 at 2:56:15 PM UTC+8, Libor 'Poutnik' StÅ™Ã*ž wrote:
Dne 19/01/2018 v 04:57 Peter Riedt napsal(a): What's the point with restating my formula? He is pointing out that it is a boring numerical identity with a value that depends only on the measurement units used and nothing else. What else could there be to make it more exciting? What is exciting on the exact formula v = 2 . pi . r / T, respective on your inaccurate formula replacing r by a ? -- Poutnik ( The Pilgrim, Der Wanderer ) A wise man guards words he says, as they say about him more, than he says about the subject. I am using the semi major axis and called it rm. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Riedt’s constant Y = 5022635
Dne 19/01/2018 v 09:52 Peter Riedt napsal(a):
On Friday, January 19, 2018 at 2:56:15 PM UTC+8, Libor 'Poutnik' StÅ™Ã*ž wrote: Dne 19/01/2018 v 04:57 Peter Riedt napsal(a): What's the point with restating my formula? He is pointing out that it is a boring numerical identity with a value that depends only on the measurement units used and nothing else. What else could there be to make it more exciting? What is exciting on the exact formula v = 2 . pi . r / T, respective on your inaccurate formula replacing r by a ? I am using the semi major axis and called it rm. It does not make the equation right. The given value of rm determined the value of T. The given values of rm and T do not determine speed, as the mean speed, apogee speed and perigee speed depend on the eccentricity. -- Poutnik ( The Pilgrim, Der Wanderer ) A wise man guards words he says, as they say about him more, than he says about the subject. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Riedt’s constant Y = 5022635
On Saturday, January 20, 2018 at 5:25:11 AM UTC+8, Libor 'Poutnik' StÅ™Ã*ž wrote:
Dne 19/01/2018 v 09:52 Peter Riedt napsal(a): On Friday, January 19, 2018 at 2:56:15 PM UTC+8, Libor 'Poutnik' StÅ™Ã*ž wrote: Dne 19/01/2018 v 04:57 Peter Riedt napsal(a): What's the point with restating my formula? He is pointing out that it is a boring numerical identity with a value that depends only on the measurement units used and nothing else. What else could there be to make it more exciting? What is exciting on the exact formula v = 2 . pi . r / T, respective on your inaccurate formula replacing r by a ? I am using the semi major axis and called it rm. It does not make the equation right. The given value of rm determined the value of T. The given values of rm and T do not determine speed, as the mean speed, apogee speed and perigee speed depend on the eccentricity. -- Poutnik ( The Pilgrim, Der Wanderer ) A wise man guards words he says, as they say about him more, than he says about the subject. Yes but irrelevant. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Riedt’s constant Y = 5022635
Dne 20/01/2018 v 08:43 Peter Riedt napsal(a):
On Saturday, January 20, 2018 at 5:25:11 AM UTC+8, Libor 'Poutnik' StÅ™Ã*ž wrote: Dne 19/01/2018 v 09:52 Peter Riedt napsal(a): On Friday, January 19, 2018 at 2:56:15 PM UTC+8, Libor 'Poutnik' StÅ™Ã*ž wrote: Dne 19/01/2018 v 04:57 Peter Riedt napsal(a): What's the point with restating my formula? He is pointing out that it is a boring numerical identity with a value that depends only on the measurement units used and nothing else. What else could there be to make it more exciting? What is exciting on the exact formula v = 2 . pi . r / T, respective on your inaccurate formula replacing r by a ? I am using the semi major axis and called it rm. It does not make the equation right. The given value of rm determined the value of T. The given values of rm and T do not determine speed, as the mean speed, apogee speed and perigee speed depend on the eccentricity. Yes but irrelevant. Validity of your formulas and calculations is usually irrelevant to you, Peter. You give higher priority to your fixed ideas. -- Poutnik ( The Pilgrim, Der Wanderer ) A wise man guards words he says, as they say about him more, than he says about the subject. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
The Fine Structure Constant is Probably Constant | Yousuf Khan[_2_] | Astronomy Misc | 0 | October 19th 10 12:02 AM |
m*a=m*g, g CONSTANT. | brian a m stuckless | Policy | 0 | May 6th 06 02:22 AM |
Is Einstein's "Cosmological Constant" Really a Constant? (Forwarded) | Andrew Yee | Astronomy Misc | 0 | January 13th 06 07:10 AM |
Is Einstein's "Cosmological Constant" Really a Constant? (Forwarded) | Andrew Yee | News | 0 | January 13th 06 06:41 AM |
New Quasar Studies Keep Fundamental Physical Constant Constant (Forwarded) | Andrew Yee | Astronomy Misc | 0 | April 28th 04 07:46 PM |