|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Spacetime is Absolute (only Space & Time Relative)
On Dec 11, 7:43 am, Tom Roberts wrote:
Actually, GR has no aether (regardless of what some people around here think, and independent of an aberrant quote from Einstein that some idiots around here repeatedly reference, ignoring the whole body of his work). Don’t be so sure. GR capitalizes on the spacetime equation which is a concise way of writing down all four equations of the Lorentz transform. However, Larmor’s transform also converge to the exact same spacetime equation. Larmor’s transform does indicate the Aether, for it does not satisfy the principle of relativity. To play God, you need to understand more about the mathematics that leads to your model of faith --- that fat castle in the air known as GR. shrug For instance, any aspect of the GR model you attempt to identify as "aether" has no energy density, has no rest frame, and does not participate in electromagnetic phenomena. Larmor’s transform does indicate an absolute frame of reference. shrug In the FRW manifolds Why are you continually dropping the ‘L’ (Lemaitre) from LFRW metric? Do you despise religious folks that can do and understand GR better than most physicists? Are you jealous of a Catholic priest that understood the field equations inside out better than anyone else? shrug that are the basis of big-bang cosmology, But FLRW does not satisfy Newtonian law of gravity at short distances. So, it is just wrong. Excuse Him. He meant “invalid”. shrug the CMBR is related to the surface of last scattering, and is isotropic in local coordinates that are based on the cosmological time of the manifold. The CMBR is, as its name implies, RADIATION, and is also not any sort of "aether". Yes, the CMBR is detectable, but that only shows us our relationship to the surface of last scattering, not any sort of "aether". The absolute frame of reference should be just like another frame of reference except it takes the advantage of having the Aether at rest. The most important thing is that it still has to obey all laws of physics just like others. Just what do you expect out of this absolute frame of reference anyway? shrug |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Spacetime is Absolute (only Space & Time Relative)
On Dec 13, 3:40*pm, Koobee Wublee wrote:
On Dec 11, 7:43 am, Tom Roberts wrote: Actually, GR has no aether (regardless of what some people around here think, and independent of an aberrant quote from Einstein that some idiots around here repeatedly reference, ignoring the whole body of his work). Don’t be so sure. *GR capitalizes on the spacetime equation which is a concise way of writing down all four equations of the Lorentz transform. *However, Larmor’s transform also converge to the exact same spacetime equation. *Larmor’s transform does indicate the Aether, for it does not satisfy the principle of relativity. *To play God, you need to understand more about the mathematics that leads to your model of faith --- that fat castle in the air known as GR. *shrug For instance, any aspect of the GR model you attempt to identify as "aether" has no energy density, has no rest frame, and does not participate in electromagnetic phenomena. Larmor’s transform does indicate an absolute frame of reference. shrug In the FRW manifolds Why are you continually dropping the ‘L’ (Lemaitre) from LFRW metric? Do you despise religious folks that can do and understand GR better than most physicists? *Are you jealous of a Catholic priest that understood the field equations inside out better than anyone else? shrug that are the basis of big-bang cosmology, But FLRW does not satisfy Newtonian law of gravity at short distances. *So, it is just wrong. *Excuse Him. *He meant “invalid”. shrug the CMBR is related to the surface of last scattering, and is isotropic in local coordinates that are based on the cosmological time of the manifold. The CMBR is, as its name implies, RADIATION, and is also not any sort of "aether". Yes, the CMBR is detectable, but that only shows us our relationship to the surface of last scattering, not any sort of "aether". The absolute frame of reference should be just like another frame of reference except it takes the advantage of having the Aether at rest. The most important thing is that it still has to obey all laws of physics just like others. *Just what do you expect out of this absolute frame of reference anyway? *shrug There is zero evidence of an aether rest frame. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Spacetime is Absolute (only Space & Time Relative)
it's just a simple phase-space,
easily analyzed with quaternions, at minimum, which is vectors. sheesh. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Spacetime is Absolute (only Space & Time Relative)
On Dec 13, 8:10*pm, 1treePetrifiedForestLane
wrote: it's just a simple phase-space, easily analyzed with quaternions, at minimum, which is vectors. sheesh. Mathematics are used to represent what occurs physically in nature and do not actually explain what is occurring physically in nature. 'NASA's Voyager Hits New Region at Solar System Edge' http://www.nasa.gov/home/hqnews/2011...U_Voyager.html "Voyager is showing that what is outside is pushing back. ... Like cars piling up at a clogged freeway off-ramp, the increased intensity of the magnetic field shows that inward pressure from interstellar space is compacting it." Aether physically occupies three dimensional space and is physically displaced by matter. The aether displaced by the solar system is pushing back and exerting pressure inward toward the solar system. The pushing back and pressure exerted inward toward the solar system is evidence of the aether. The pushing back and pressure exerted inward toward matter by aether displaced by matter is gravity. In de Broglie wave mechanics the particle is in continuous energetic contact with a hidden medium. This energetic contact with a hidden medium is the state of displacement of the aether. A moving particle has an associated aether displacement wave. In a double slit experiment the particle has a well defined trajectory which takes it through one slit while the associated aether wave passes through both. 'Ether and the Theory of Relativity by Albert Einstein' http://www-groups.dcs.st-and.ac.uk/~...ein_ether.html "the state of the [ether] is at every place determined by connections with the matter and the state of the ether in neighbouring places, ... disregarding the causes which condition its state." The state of the aether at every place determined by connections with the matter and the state of the aether in neighboring places is the state of displacement of the aether. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Spacetime is Absolute (only Space & Time Relative) | Koobee Wublee | Astronomy Misc | 2 | December 14th 11 07:51 AM |
Spacetime is Absolute (only Space & Time Relative) | Pentcho Valev | Astronomy Misc | 2 | December 4th 11 01:36 AM |
absolute and relative launch pad | brian a m stuckless | Policy | 0 | November 18th 05 05:43 PM |
absolute and relative launch pad | brian a m stuckless | Astronomy Misc | 0 | November 18th 05 05:43 PM |
Absolute and relative time | Jonathan Silverlight | Research | 1 | June 12th 04 11:04 AM |