is sci.astro still around? Errors of Dr. Chung-Pei Ma

The theme of this below post is to show how scientists can easily be
fooled
with faulty logic. The crux of the error of Dr. Chung-Pei Ma is that
she spots
a black space and then looks to see if nearby stars have odd motions,
and if
such stars exist she then claims the space has a black hole.
But to be logical, Dr Chung should then look at other odd motion
stars
that have the same motion, yet their surrounding space is white and
filled with
other stars.
Much of science, astronomy especially of the 20th century and on into
2011
was full of this error filled logic.
Newsgroups: sci.physics, sci.astro, sci.math
From: Archimedes Plutonium
Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2011 11:57:25 -0800 (PST)
Local: Thurs, Dec 8 2011 1:57 pm
Subject: PBS smarter about fictional black holes than Berkeley's
Chung-Pei Ma Chapt14 Dirac's Ocean of Positrons = Space = gravity
#121
Atom Totality theory 5th ed.
Reply | Reply to author | Forward | Print | Individual message | Show
original | Remove | Report this message | Find messages by this
author
On Dec 8, 9:58 am, Brad Guth wrote:
- Show quoted text -
The EM force is naturally much greater than any similar volume that 
 represents gravity.
Possibly both exist as individuals or as a composite force, whereas 
 some BHs are more EM worthy than others, just like some planets have a 
 magnetic force and others have little or none.

Any scientist worth their weight in salt, would know that if you see
solid-body-rotation phenomenon, then you rule out gravity and only EM
can give solid-body-rotation.
So here is how the conversation on PBS Newshour with Gwen Ifil,
Chung- 
Pei Ma, 
Jeffrey Brown should have hypothetically gone.
Gwen Ifil: How do you know it is a black-hole?
Berkeley's Chung: nearby stars have a faster motion
Gwen Ifil: But how do you know the blackness is not just 
black empty
space
Berkeley's Chung: nearby stars have a faster motion than usual
AP : Tell us Dr. Chung, are there any galaxies ever 
observed that
have a total galactic nucleus that is black?
Berkeley's Chung:
AP: Tell us Dr. Chung, there are thousands of stars that have the
same particular odd speed and odd motions as the one you refer to,
yet all of those odd speed stars have white background space around
those odd stars, so why is the space not black?
Berkeley's Chung:
Jeffrey Brown (hypothetical): Dr. Chung can you not answer any of
AP's 
questions because 
Governor Jerry Brown has gutted the Logic
Department at Berkeley and 
so 
the science faculty at Berkeley
cannot
think logically nor reason 
logically?
AP: Thanks for that question Jeffrey, but the problem is far deeper,
in that 
most scientists lack sufficient Logic training to be doing
science. 
For witness 
that the sloppy work of Dr. Chung and the
three
other telescope sites 
and the 
editors of Nature, and Science and
Scientific American never really 
dig into the 
faulty logic of
submissions.
AP: There are thousands of stars with more odd speed motions that are
surrounded 
by a white background space, and yet no-one is saying
that
there is a 
black hole there. 
And all galaxies, as far as I know of,
all of them have a whitish 
galactic nucleus, 
implying that black-
holes are kindergarten science fiction. What 
causes odd speed motion
of stars is that the Cosmos is governed and ruled by Electricity
Magnetism that causes 
solid body rotation.
AP: Almost every science journal of the 20th century up to 2011 about
astronomy is fake 
science in print. Black holes are fake science and
the Big Bang is 
fake science. And the 
Atom Totality theory has
started to clear out this fake junk science 
of black-holes and 
Big
Bang.

Archimedes Plutonium
http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies