Einstein's Most Illustrious Red Herring.

On Dec 2, 3:41 am, Daryl McCullough wrote:

Now, do you understand that the resulting speed is dependent
on the choice of the three parameters: the clock rate, the
measuring standard for distances, the clock synchronization
choice?

Speed is MEANINGLESS without a synchronization convention.

Daryl McCullough does not know what he is talking about. Speed is an
observer dependent quantity, and it certainly DOES NOT depend on any
synchronizing bull****. Speed is defined as [observed] displacement
[moved] divided by the observer’s time it takes to traverse that said
displacement. Gee! This is Galilean stuff. shrug

[rest of garbage snipped]

You need to understand what speed is first. It is the basics.
shrug

"Koobee Wublee" wrote in message
...
On Dec 2, 3:41 am, Daryl McCullough wrote:

Now, do you understand that the resulting speed is dependent
on the choice of the three parameters: the clock rate, the
measuring standard for distances, the clock synchronization
choice?

Speed is MEANINGLESS without a synchronization convention.

Daryl McCullough does not know what he is talking about. Speed is an
observer dependent quantity, and it certainly DOES NOT depend on any
synchronizing bull****. Speed is defined as [observed] displacement
[moved] divided by the observer’s time

_________________________________________________
Given that the time is measured at two different places (where the object
starts, and where it finishes), how are you going to do this without
synchronising clocks at these two locations?

it takes to traverse that said
displacement. Gee! This is Galilean stuff. shrug

[rest of garbage snipped]

You need to understand what speed is first. It is the basics.
shrug
___________________________________________
No, you need to understand how it is measured. That is elementary physics.
You should learn it.

On Dec 4, 4:13*pm, "Peter Webb" wrote:
"Koobee Wublee" wrote in message

...
On Dec 2, 3:41 am, Daryl McCullough wrote:

Now, do you understand that the resulting speed is dependent
on the choice of the three parameters: the clock rate, the
measuring standard for distances, the clock synchronization
choice?

Speed is MEANINGLESS without a synchronization convention.

Daryl McCullough does not know what he is talking about. *Speed is an
observer dependent quantity, and it certainly DOES NOT depend on any
synchronizing bull****. *Speed is defined as [observed] displacement
[moved] divided by the observer’s time

_________________________________________________
Given that the time is measured at two different places (where the object
starts, and where it finishes), how are you going to do this without
synchronising clocks at these two locations?

it takes to traverse that said
displacement. *Gee! *This is Galilean stuff. *shrug

[rest of garbage snipped]

You need to understand what speed is first. *It is the basics.
shrug
___________________________________________
No, you need to understand how it is measured. That is elementary physics..
You should learn it.

velocity is one-way, speed is a two-way average.

Peter Webb, the Einstein Dingleberry, wrote:
Koobee Wublee wrote:

Daryl McCullough does not know what he is talking about. Speed is an
observer dependent quantity, and it certainly DOES NOT depend on any
synchronizing bull****. Speed is defined as [observed] displacement
[moved] divided by the observer’s time it takes to traverse that said
displacement. Gee! This is Galilean stuff. shrug

Given that the time is measured at two different places (where the object
starts, and where it finishes), how are you going to do this without
synchronising clocks at these two locations?

Just how fvcking difficult is it to start your stop watch and stop
your fvcking stop watch? shrug

[rest of garbage snipped]

You need to understand what speed is first. It is the basics.
shrug

No, you need to understand how it is measured. That is elementary physics..
You should learn it.

The only synchronization observed in this episode is between daryl
mcCullough’s gross ignorance and peter webb’s extreme stupidity.
shrug

"Koobee Wublee" wrote in message
...
Peter Webb, the Einstein Dingleberry, wrote:
Koobee Wublee wrote:

Daryl McCullough does not know what he is talking about. Speed is an
observer dependent quantity, and it certainly DOES NOT depend on any
synchronizing bull****. Speed is defined as [observed] displacement
[moved] divided by the observer’s time it takes to traverse that said
displacement. Gee! This is Galilean stuff. shrug

Given that the time is measured at two different places (where the object
starts, and where it finishes), how are you going to do this without
synchronising clocks at these two locations?

Just how fvcking difficult is it to start your stop watch and stop
your fvcking stop watch? shrug

______________________________________
You haven't answered the question.


[rest of garbage snipped]

You need to understand what speed is first. It is the basics.
shrug

No, you need to understand how it is measured. That is elementary physics.
You should learn it.

The only synchronization observed in this episode is between daryl
mcCullough’s gross ignorance and peter webb’s extreme stupidity.
shrug

______________________________________
You haven't answered the question. Typical crank behaviour, from a typical
crank.

Peter Webb, the Einstein Dingleberry, wrote:
"Koobee Wublee" wrote:

Just how fvcking difficult is it to start your stop watch and stop
your fvcking stop watch? shrug

The only synchronization observed in this episode is between daryl
mcCullough’s gross ignorance and peter webb’s extreme stupidity.
shrug

You haven't answered the question [with my Typical crank behaviour, from a typical
crank].

Just how fvcking difficult is it to start your stop watch and stop
your fvcking stop watch? shrug

When playing with your stop watch, there is no synchronizations
involved. Just press start and then stop. Most of the cases, the
start and stop are the same button. When measuring speed, there
is no synchronization of any sorts involved. So, just how fvcking
difficult can this be? peter webb is a malicious troll. peter webb
needs to go to hell and stay there, and enjoy the cesspool of the
fermented diarrhea of Einstein the nitwit, the plagiarist, and the
liar --- peter webb’s god. shrug

"Koobee Wublee" wrote in message
...
Peter Webb, the Einstein Dingleberry, wrote:
"Koobee Wublee" wrote:

Just how fvcking difficult is it to start your stop watch and stop
your fvcking stop watch? shrug

The only synchronization observed in this episode is between daryl
mcCullough’s gross ignorance and peter webb’s extreme stupidity.
shrug

You haven't answered the question [with my Typical crank behaviour, from a
typical
crank].

Just how fvcking difficult is it to start your stop watch and stop
your fvcking stop watch? shrug

When playing with your stop watch, there is no synchronizations
involved. Just press start and then stop. Most of the cases, the
start and stop are the same button. When measuring speed, there
is no synchronization of any sorts involved. So, just how fvcking
difficult can this be? peter webb is a malicious troll. peter webb
needs to go to hell and stay there, and enjoy the cesspool of the
fermented diarrhea of Einstein the nitwit, the plagiarist, and the
liar --- peter webb’s god. shrug

______________________________________
Perhaps you would like to provide a worked example of how you measure the
one way speed of light without synchronising clocks at each end?

On Sun, 4 Dec 2011 14:07:59 -0800 (PST), Koobee Wublee
wrote:

On Dec 2, 3:41 am, Daryl McCullough wrote:

Now, do you understand that the resulting speed is dependent
on the choice of the three parameters: the clock rate, the
measuring standard for distances, the clock synchronization
choice?

Speed is MEANINGLESS without a synchronization convention.

Daryl McCullough does not know what he is talking about.

I'm rapidly coming to that conclusion.

Speed is an
observer dependent quantity, and it certainly DOES NOT depend on any
synchronizing bull****. Speed is defined as [observed] displacement
[moved] divided by the observer’s time it takes to traverse that said
displacement. Gee! This is Galilean stuff. shrug

[rest of garbage snipped]

You need to understand what speed is first. It is the basics.
shrug

On Mon, 5 Dec 2011 19:38:27 +1100, "Peter Webb"
wrote:


"Koobee Wublee" wrote in message
...
Peter Webb, the Einstein Dingleberry, wrote:
"Koobee Wublee" wrote:

Just how fvcking difficult is it to start your stop watch and stop
your fvcking stop watch? shrug

The only synchronization observed in this episode is between daryl
mcCullough’s gross ignorance and peter webb’s extreme stupidity.
shrug

You haven't answered the question [with my Typical crank behaviour, from a
typical
crank].

Just how fvcking difficult is it to start your stop watch and stop
your fvcking stop watch? shrug

When playing with your stop watch, there is no synchronizations
involved. Just press start and then stop. Most of the cases, the
start and stop are the same button. When measuring speed, there
is no synchronization of any sorts involved. So, just how fvcking
difficult can this be? peter webb is a malicious troll. peter webb
needs to go to hell and stay there, and enjoy the cesspool of the
fermented diarrhea of Einstein the nitwit, the plagiarist, and the
liar --- peter webb’s god. shrug

______________________________________
Perhaps you would like to provide a worked example of how you measure the
one way speed of light without synchronising clocks at each end?

My experiment does not MEASURE any speeds. It COMPARES TWO light speeds and
finds they are different. Only one clock needed.....

Goodbye Einstein!!!

On 05.12.2011 09:05, Koobee Wublee wrote:
Peter Webb, the Einstein Dingleberry, wrote:
"Koobee Wublee" wrote:

Just how fvcking difficult is it to start your stop watch and stop
your fvcking stop watch?shrug

The only synchronization observed in this episode is between daryl
mcCullough’s gross ignorance and peter webb’s extreme stupidity.
shrug

You haven't answered the question [with my Typical crank behaviour, from a typical
crank].

Just how fvcking difficult is it to start your stop watch and stop
your fvcking stop watch?shrug

When playing with your stop watch, there is no synchronizations
involved. Just pressstart and thenstop. Most of the cases, the
start andstop are the same button. When measuring speed, there
is no synchronization of any sorts involved. So, just how fvcking
difficult can this be? peter webb is a malicious troll. peter webb
needs to go to hell and stay there, and enjoy the cesspool of the
fermented diarrhea of Einstein the nitwit, the plagiarist, and the
liar --- peter webb’s god.shrug

Can you please explain how you would measure the speed of light,
according to your definition of speed?

--
Paul

http://www.gethome.no/paulba/