|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#101
|
|||
|
|||
What Empirical Evidence Supports the Ballistic Emission of Light(I.e. C*=C+or-v)
On Dec 15, 9:18*pm, d w wrote:
it's pretty clear that you won't do any math, to make your little handwavings somewhat plausible; by that I mean, the four subjects of mathematica, not algebra, although you can use that, if you can try. just to try, is to succeed, but it's probably a lot of work, compared to this joke of gabbing on Usenet. When a nuclear bomb explodes matter evaporates into aether. The evaporation is energy. Mass is conserved. have a nice _____. It's pretty clear that you won't be able to understand what occurs physically in nature. Aether has mass. Aether is physically displaced by matter. Aether displaced by matter pushes back toward the matter. Gravity is displaced aether pushing back toward matter. A moving particle has an associated aether displacement wave. Matter is condensations of aether. Matter evaporates into aether. When a nuclear bomb explodes matter evaporates into aether. The evaporation is energy. Mass is conserved. |
#102
|
|||
|
|||
What Empirical Evidence Supports the Ballistic Emission of Light(I.e. C*=C+or-v)
so, water, then, is a cool *distilllate* of aether, and
A=mcc ... didn't you set that in stone, a long time, ago?... so, thereby, A=mcc=E, and A/E = 1, and AE = AA = EE = EA, a commutative identiy. I mean, yeah -- you're better than Feynman on bongos, *and* throatsinging. Grok what occurs physically in nature. Gravity is displaced aether pushing back toward matter. Matter is condensations of aether. Matter evaporates into aether. The evaporation is energy. Mass is conserved. Have spacesuit, will travel, plus aether. |
#103
|
|||
|
|||
What Empirical Evidence Supports the Ballistic Emission of Light(I.e. C*=C+or-v)
well, you're not quite as far out there, as Neinstien999;
his formularum seems to be, F = ma = mv = KE = mvv - exp(i*pi) -- cool -- he destroyed Liebniz *and* Coriolis, not to mention Fig Newton and herr doktor-professor E.! |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Why is Light NOT Ballistic? | Rabbo | Research | 0 | March 10th 11 08:24 AM |
X-ray Evidence Supports Possible New Class Of Supernova (Forwarded) | Andrew Yee | Astronomy Misc | 0 | January 4th 07 09:02 PM |
X-ray Evidence Supports Possible New Class Of Supernova (Forwarded) | Andrew Yee | News | 0 | January 4th 07 09:02 PM |
New Evidence Supports President Bush on Intelligent Design | Nick | Astronomy Misc | 5 | August 7th 05 12:10 AM |
Evidence supports idea of living organisms on Mars | Dawn Baird-Chleborad | Amateur Astronomy | 2 | April 2nd 05 10:07 PM |