![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Using Faraday's law as the template geometry of the evolution of astro
bodies, with Space=ocean positrons. Keep in mind that gravity no longer exists in physics as Newtonian gravity nor as General Relativity. There is no gravity holding together the astro bodies, but instead it is a EM force and it follows Faraday's law. We picture it as the Sun a bar magnet, and Earth's orbit as a closed loop and the flow of electricity in that loop is the planet Earth. The charges are matter mass of Sun and Earth and the antimatter of the positron-space. The conception of gravity by Newton was that mass attracts other mass, and the conception by General Relativity was that mass bends space and other mass follows the curvature of that bent space. The new conception, call it AP-gravity, is that the Cosmos is composed of two dual parts of electron mass of an Atom Totality and the space between electron mass is an ocean of positrons. In this conception mass of the electrons of the Atom Totality are attracted by the positron space between those electron-masses. Tonight I was trying to research whether Faraday's law as gravity would have a evolution of form such that the Solar System has its largest amount of mass further out from the Sun. And likewise the same question for Saturn and its rings, and finally if spiral galaxies have the same mass density distributions. What I found was that Saturn's rings do follow a pattern similar to the Solar System in that the rings of A and B have more mass than the innermost rings of C and D. That pattern follows that the gas giant planets are more massive than the inner planets. I was not able to confirm mass distribution in spiral galaxies but I found nothing to contradict that pattern in spiral galaxies. Also I learned a lesson in galaxy evolution, in that Elliptical galaxies seem to be the oldest galaxies (which I had called spherical galaxies) and that Spiral galaxies seem to have newer stars appearing in the arms, and where the spiral galaxy has a central bulge which I had called the galactic nucleus. In my questions to Dr. Chung of Berkeley about her alleged black holes, my question was that there are no galaxies that have a bulge that is just black. But there appears to be galaxies classified as Irregular galaxies which may or may not have a bulge. And some people think Irregular galaxies were either spiral or elliptical galaxies in which much of their content was stolen from them by a nearby neighbor. If that is true, then gravity itself cannot explain that stolen mass, nor can collisions of galaxies explain that, but what can explain that is a cosmic EM force, since EM is 10^39 stronger of a force than is gravity. So that if we witness an irregular galaxy nearby another galaxy and in which much of the mass content is being stolen, yet there appears to be no collision involved, would be direct proof that EM is the cosmic force at work. Now I am trying to reconcile galaxy evolution with the Faraday Law as gravity, and to see if the mass density in a spiral galaxy follows the same pattern as seen in the Solar System pattern and the Saturn ring pattern, that the largest mass are further out and smaller masses in close. Now the history of discovery of exoplanets is different from our Solar System pattern in that we see huge Jupiter type planets in close to the exostar. Now it maybe the case that in the advanced evolution of solar systems ends up with huge planets near the Sun, or there is another explanation, in that our observance of exoplanets is confusing two or more planets the size of Earth that are revolving in a solid body rotation around the exostar. I do not know, for the idea that gravity is Faraday's law is brand new to science and only a few days old. Archimedes Plutonium http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium whole entire Universe is just one big atom where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Dec 8, 10:22*pm, Archimedes Plutonium
wrote: Using Faraday's law as the template geometry of the evolution of astro bodies, with Space=ocean positrons. Keep in mind that gravity no longer exists in physics as Newtonian gravity nor as General Relativity. There is no gravity holding together the astro bodies, but instead it is a EM force and it follows Faraday's law. We picture it as the Sun a bar magnet, and Earth's orbit as a closed loop and the flow of electricity in that loop is the planet Earth. The charges are matter mass of Sun and Earth and the antimatter of the positron-space. The conception of gravity by Newton was that mass attracts other mass, and the conception by General Relativity was that mass bends space and other mass follows the curvature of that bent space. The new conception, call it AP-gravity, is that the Cosmos is composed of two dual parts of electron mass of an Atom Totality and the space between electron mass is an ocean of positrons. In this conception mass of the electrons of the Atom Totality are attracted by the positron space between those electron-masses. Tonight I was trying to research whether Faraday's law as gravity would have a evolution of form such that the Solar System has its largest amount of mass further out from the Sun. And likewise the same question for Saturn and its rings, and finally if spiral galaxies have the same mass density distributions. What I found was that Saturn's rings do follow a pattern similar to the Solar System in that the rings of A and B have more mass than the innermost rings of C and D. That pattern follows that the gas giant planets are more massive than the inner planets. I was not able to confirm mass distribution in spiral galaxies but I found nothing to contradict that pattern in spiral galaxies. Also I learned a lesson in galaxy evolution, in that Elliptical galaxies seem to be the oldest galaxies (which I had called spherical galaxies) and that Spiral galaxies seem to have newer stars appearing in the arms, and where the spiral galaxy has a central bulge which I had called the galactic nucleus. In my questions to Dr. Chung of Berkeley about her alleged black holes, my question was that there are no galaxies that have a bulge that is just black. But there appears to be galaxies classified as Irregular galaxies which may or may not have a bulge. And some people think Irregular galaxies were either spiral or elliptical galaxies in which much of their content was stolen from them by a nearby neighbor. If that is true, then gravity itself cannot explain that stolen mass, nor can collisions of galaxies explain that, but what can explain that is a cosmic EM force, since EM is 10^39 stronger of a force than is gravity. So that if we witness an irregular galaxy nearby another galaxy and in which much of the mass content is being stolen, yet there appears to be no collision involved, would be direct proof that EM is the cosmic force at work. Now I am trying to reconcile galaxy evolution with the Faraday Law as gravity, and to see if the mass density in a spiral galaxy follows the same pattern as seen in the Solar System pattern and the Saturn ring pattern, that the largest mass are further out and smaller masses in close. Now the history of discovery of exoplanets is different from our Solar System pattern in that we see huge Jupiter type planets in close to the exostar. Now it maybe the case that in the advanced evolution of solar systems ends up with huge planets near the Sun, or there is another explanation, in that our observance of exoplanets is confusing two or more planets the size of Earth that are revolving in a solid body rotation around the exostar. I do not know, for the idea that gravity is Faraday's law is brand new to science and only a few days old. Also looked up the Jovian moons to see if they follow this density pattern seen in the Solar System and Saturn ring. It is true that the moons of Jupiter have the most massive moons further out from Jupiter and the smaller masses closer in. The Jovian moons are Io, then Europa, then Ganymede and finally Callisto, wherein a comparison that Ganymede would be the Jupiter of the Solar System and Callisto the Saturn. So apparently there is a template of evolution wherein Faraday's Law is the force that makes that geometry of astro bodies. Also, can we have clusters and superclusters and finally Walls of galaxies, if gravity were Newton's or gravity was General Relativity? Apparently not, because you need a force that is 10^39 greater in strength to make galaxies come together in superclusters and walls. And the voids is because EM is so strong that it would leave vast stretches of Space pretty much empty save for positron-space. We easily are convinced of this when we spread out iron filings evenly on a sheet of paper and the put a bar magnet underneath that we end up with voids and clustering. Archimedes Plutonium http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium whole entire Universe is just one big atom where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|