Banking Bone Marrow, place yourself onboard ISS, headed for VL2

I've gotten some headway on truthful space-travel radiation and upon a
few other facts that I've learned along the way. Seems suspicious that
of those opposing absolutely anything and everything pertaining to
Venus are, lo and behold, these are the very same folks giving others
and myself difficulty on those radiation proof as well as thermal
stress proof Apollo issues that strangely never had a working
prototype craft that didn't crash (sounds a bit like those V22
Ospreys).

http://guthvenus.tripod.com/space-radiation.htm
http://guthvenus.tripod.com/gv-learned.htm
http://guthvenus.tripod.com/moon-sar.htm

Regards, Brad Guth / IEIS 1-253-8576061 http://guthvenus.tripod.com
alternate URL: http://www.geocities.com/bradguth

Here's something else worth knowing; Humans eat radiation every day:

According to other reputable research; we humans require a bare
minimum of 0.01 mrem/hr in order to survive and furthermore, our
bodies go about rejecting damaged DNA all the time, then within limits
go about repairing such damage, thus one generally survives short term
accumulated TBI dosages of 50 rem or less, of 200+ rem as long as
there's a stash of mone marrow standing by (preferable for that being
of a perfect match, such as your own), along with some helpful
medications I like to refer to as DNA enhancers (steroids). I've
uncovered much greater dosages (12+ Sv) have been applied to a few
patiants that managed to live through a reasonably good life
expectancy, though a higher percentage of such dosages have managed to
kill their patiant even though most often those TBI dosages were never
directly targetting their head (eyes and brain). However, in standard
TBI and especially of higher dosage, there may still have become a
sufficient number of secondary irradiated brain cells affected beyond
repair.

Since I only have three remaining brain cells, I can't afford to lose
even one.

Understanding long term radiation accumulation (275 mrem/day) as
opposed to the relatively short term dosage applied for TBI and of
subsequent bone marrow transplant is another uncertanty, though
various DNA boosters ott to be worth something over the long haul.

As with regard to space travel expeditions; since secondary radiation
is comming at you from nearly all directions, unless you outfitted
your head and neck within a leaded composite sphere of something like
relatively thick leaded plastic, from within such that preferably you
could still see through, or perhaps by aided along by utilizing an
internally visual teleprompter comprised of external cameras and
internal view screens within an entirely enclosed helmet ott to
further improve things, though of any personal interaction among other
humans, not to mention other species, is going to get a little weird
if not psychologically tough.

One of my keen interest is in learning more about what sort of
radiation is at Earth L4/L5, as I've got a fairly good idea as to what
the relatively cool zone or semi-protected pocket at Earth L2 has to
offer. In further knowing what's at Earth L4/L5, this would enable
some further understanding as to what to expect once a mission is
fully solar exposed, whereas the solar minimum (not maximum) is by far
introducing the greater risk from creating secondary radiation. Any
pointers or leads as to the radiation dosage at L4/L5 will be looked
into, subsequently applied into a couple of ongoing research papers
(along with your name as credit for whatever you'd like to
contribute).

Regards, Brad Guth / IEIS

(Hallerb) wrote in message ...

Now consider the ISS, which periodically dips into the lower-hanging
portions of the inner belt. It's in roughly a 90-minute orbit. So let's
say 15 minutes' mild exposure every 90 minutes -- *every* 90 minutes for
four months.

Which scenario represents the more dangerous exposure mode? Why?

--


Have astronauts suffered with more cancers than the general population? |

Proper diet supplements and medications greatly extend the human
endurance for long term radiation builds of the amounts being absorbed
onboard ISS.

Basically, DNA steroids are doing a sufficiently fine job, within
certain limits that pretty much eliminates any solar illuminated EVAs
unless the duration of exposure is damn little.

In article ,
(Brad Guth) wrote:

I don't need to see any doctor, especially since you're so smart, as
I'll just rely upon whatever it is that you have to say.

Please. See your doctor, Brad. And while you're at it, check with an
English teacher for help parsing that sentence. Because if, as you say
above, you'll "just rely upon whatever it is that you have to say" you'd
be making plans to see the doctor already.

--
Herb Schaltegger, Esq.
Chief Counsel, Human O-Ring Society
"I was promised flying cars! Where are the flying cars?!"
~ Avery Brooks

Herb Schaltegger wrote in message ...
In article ,
(Brad Guth) wrote:

I don't need to see any doctor, especially since you're so smart, as
I'll just rely upon whatever it is that you have to say.

Please. See your doctor, Brad. And while you're at it, check with an
English teacher for help parsing that sentence. Because if, as you say
above, you'll "just rely upon whatever it is that you have to say" you'd
be making plans to see the doctor already.

Instead of critiquing for the purely unadulterated sake of your always
be right criteria, just try for once to suppose someone other needed
your apparently better ideas along with a little further information
or consideration on the "what if" aspects of a relatively tiny
percentage of a certain location on Venus that's otherwise loaded with
purely natural formations as surrounding what is otherwise far more
likely artificial than not, be these of patterns entirely unusual and
otherwise entirely unrecorded as of existing anywhere other as being
so natural (including Earth).

In which case, how would you and of your superior intellect undertake
to share your ideas and to review upon the options at hand, the Darwin
double-twist at hand, the entirely unexpected surprise that's become
way more than apparent, or how about just pondering the extremely
remote possibility that you really don't know absolutely everything
there is to know about the following;

1) Other life need not be human like

2) Other life need not require nearly as much O2

3) Other life need not be as pathetically stupid as humans

4) There's actually all the O2 you could possibly want (CO2--CO/O2)

5) There actually all the H2O you could want, if you had a rigid
airship

6) Available energy is abundant, as natural and as green as you can
imagine

7) Notable structures and community infrastructure is not anything so
natural

8) If something is not natural, then what other explanation is there
but life?

http://guthvenus.tripod.com/gv-town
http://guthvenus.tripod.com/positive.htm
http://guthvenus.tripod.com/venus-air.htm
http://guthvenus.tripod.com/gv-learned.htm
http://guthvenus.tripod.com/venus-bridge.htm
http://guthvenus.tripod.com/space-radiation.htm
http://guthvenus.tripod.com/significant-life.htm
http://guthvenus.tripod.com/venus-nocturnals.htm

There's a few dozen other papers that'll probably rub you the wrong
way if you're inclined to remain in staunch opposition to other life
NOT as we know of, or other intelligence NOT as we know of, or even
the pretext that's I'm just a little bit more right about the
observationology of what's existing on Venus in spite of it being so
hot and nasty, in spite of all the status quo god-like communities of
astronomy, astrophysics and even of astro/exobiology purest that can't
foresee any other habitat that's not capable of sustaining our humanly
existence, at our pathetic level of intelligence, not to mention
vastly superior arrogance to whatever ET there is.

Regards, Brad Guth / IEIS discovery of LIFE on Venus
http://guthvenus.tripod.com

I realize that you can spell and even type a whole lot better, that
you never run on a sentence and, that you're not even dyslexic but,
I'll have to ask; Have you no shame, no moral responsibility, no worth
as a human?

Sorry about that, I couldn't resist because, you're all speaking of
Venus as though there has never been nor will there ever be life as
you know it existing on Venus. Otherwise, I do like very much your
inference that, where there's a will there's a way of doing just about
anything, especially if it's one of your ideas.

I already stipulated that "there's other life NOT as we know it on
Venus", or at least the biggest ever discovery of their being
substantial structural remains from a pre-greenhouse life:
http://guthvenus.tripod.com/gv-town.htm

I've recently indicated upon the notion of our establishing
interplanetary communications, along with lots of numbers and
alternate ideas that should work:
http://guthvenus.tripod.laser-call-01.htm

I've just introduced the notion of establishing the lunar/moon L1.1
space elevator, thereby a moon-dirt depot and possibly even a new ISS
outpost within the massive CM:
http://guthvenus.tripod.com/moon-L1-elevator.htm

There now, I've offered three perfectly good sentences, posting three
perfectly good discoveries and/or village idiot ideas that are
moon-dirt cheap and a whole lot safer and way more affordable than
just about anything most others are having to offer, unless flak has
become valuable, as in that case I'm broke, as in flat out of warm and
fuzzy ammo, though I'll gladly gather up whatever flak comes my way
and subsequently return the favor.

BTW; there's lots of natural (green renewable) energy already existing
on Venus, as within the pressure differentials of 4+bar/km of mostly
CO2 and of the likely 10 degrees K/km of the near surface nighttime
season, especially of elevated territories.

Regards, Brad Guth / IEIS discovery of LIFE on Venus
http://guthvenus.tripod.com