|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Proper explanation for the MMX null result.
kenseto wrote: "Sam Wormley" wrote in message news:9szPg.149566$FQ1.125423@attbi_s71... kenseto wrote: Proper explanation for the MMX null result: 1. The null result of the MMX is due to that the speed of light is isotropic HORIZONTALLY. 2. If the plane of the light rays (the right angled arms of the MMX) is oriented vertically then non-null result will be observed. This means that the speed of light is not isotropic in the vertical direction. This interpretation is supported by the Pound and Rebka experiments and the predicted gravitational red shift in the vertical direction by GRT. Proposed Experiments designed to support the above interpretations is in the paper entitled "Proposed Experiments to Detect Absolute Motion" in my website: http://www.geocities.com/kn_seto/index.htm Ken Seto Seto's immortal fumbles http://www.google.com/search?q=seto+...ers.pandora.be Seto is a registered crank at crank dot net http://www.google.com/search?q=seto+...Awww.crank.net Wacko, wacko |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Proper explanation for the MMX null result.
"Sam Wormley" wrote in message news:9szPg.149566$FQ1.125423@attbi_s71... kenseto wrote: Proper explanation for the MMX null result: 1. The null result of the MMX is due to that the speed of light is isotropic HORIZONTALLY. 2. If the plane of the light rays (the right angled arms of the MMX) is oriented vertically then non-null result will be observed. This means that the speed of light is not isotropic in the vertical direction. This interpretation is supported by the Pound and Rebka experiments and the predicted gravitational red shift in the vertical direction by GRT. Proposed Experiments designed to support the above interpretations is in the paper entitled "Proposed Experiments to Detect Absolute Motion" in my website: http://www.geocities.com/kn_seto/index.htm Ken Seto Seto's immortal fumbles http://www.google.com/search?q=seto+...ers.pandora.be Seto is a registered crank at crank dot net http://www.google.com/search?q=seto+...Awww.crank.net |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Proper explanation for the MMX null result.
kenseto wrote: "Sam Wormley" wrote in message news:9szPg.149566$FQ1.125423@attbi_s71... kenseto wrote: Proper explanation for the MMX null result: 1. The null result of the MMX is due to that the speed of light is isotropic HORIZONTALLY. 2. If the plane of the light rays (the right angled arms of the MMX) is oriented vertically then non-null result will be observed. This means that the speed of light is not isotropic in the vertical direction. This interpretation is supported by the Pound and Rebka experiments and the predicted gravitational red shift in the vertical direction by GRT. Proposed Experiments designed to support the above interpretations is in the paper entitled "Proposed Experiments to Detect Absolute Motion" in my website: http://www.geocities.com/kn_seto/index.htm Ken Seto Ken Seto wacko, wacko, keep eating it. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Proper explanation for the MMX null result.
"George Dishman" wrote in message ... wrote in message oups.com... kenseto wrote: Proper explanation for the MMX null result: 1. The null result of the MMX is due to that the speed of light is isotropic HORIZONTALLY. 2. If the plane of the light rays (the right angled arms of the MMX) is oriented vertically then non-null result will be observed. This means that the speed of light is not isotropic in the vertical direction. This interpretation is supported by the Pound and Rebka experiments and the predicted gravitational red shift in the vertical direction by GRT. Proposed Experiments designed to support the above interpretations is in the paper entitled "Proposed Experiments to Detect Absolute Motion" in my website: http://www.geocities.com/kn_seto/index.htm Ken Seto Did you run the experiment, wacko? Not yet? Then go away, come back when you have results (meaning never) He never will, he can't even figure out which direction is "up". George You are an idiot runt of the SRians: Definition for a runt of the SRians: A moron who thinks that SR is a religion. An idiot who doesn't know the limitations of SR. A mental midget who can't comprehend beyond what he was taught in school. An imbecile who follows the real experts around like a puppy and eats up their **** like gourmet puppy chow. An Asshole who will attack anybody who disagrees with SR Ken Seto |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Proper explanation for the MMX null result.
kenseto wrote:
Wormy is a runt of the SRians. Definition for a runt of the SRians: A moron who thinks that SR is a religion. An idiot who doesn't know the limitations of SR. A mental midget who can't comprehend beyond what he was taught in school. An imbecile who follows the real experts around like a puppy and eats up their **** like gourmet puppy chow. An Asshole who will attack anybody who disagrees with SR Ken Seto Interesting comment from a kook who claims that that SR is a subset of his own crank "theory". |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Proper explanation for the MMX null result.
"kenseto" wrote in message ... Proper explanation for the MMX null result: 1. The null result of the MMX is due to that the speed of light is isotropic HORIZONTALLY. 2. If the plane of the light rays (the right angled arms of the MMX) is oriented vertically then non-null result will be observed. This means that the speed of light is not isotropic in the vertical direction. This interpretation is supported by the Pound and Rebka experiments and the predicted gravitational red shift in the vertical direction by GRT. Proposed Experiments designed to support the above interpretations is in the paper entitled "Proposed Experiments to Detect Absolute Motion" in my website: http://www.geocities.com/kn_seto/index.htm Ken Seto ROTFLOL......the runts of the SRians got no relevant comments so they came out in force attacking me.....shrug. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Proper explanation for the MMX null result.
wrote in message ups.com... George Dishman wrote: wrote in message oups.com... kenseto wrote: Proper explanation for the MMX null result: 1. The null result of the MMX is due to that the speed of light is isotropic HORIZONTALLY. 2. If the plane of the light rays (the right angled arms of the MMX) is oriented vertically then non-null result will be observed. This means that the speed of light is not isotropic in the vertical direction. This interpretation is supported by the Pound and Rebka experiments and the predicted gravitational red shift in the vertical direction by GRT. Proposed Experiments designed to support the above interpretations is in the paper entitled "Proposed Experiments to Detect Absolute Motion" in my website: http://www.geocities.com/kn_seto/index.htm Ken Seto Did you run the experiment, wacko? Not yet? Then go away, come back when you have results (meaning never) He never will, he can't even figure out which direction is "up". George Ha,ha,ha. The best! I can even prove it - read this and if still in doubt look back over the somewhat rambling thread, messages 9 through 20. http://tinyurl.com/odf8b George |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Proper explanation for the MMX null result.
"George Dishman" wrote in message ... wrote in message ups.com... George Dishman wrote: wrote in message oups.com... kenseto wrote: Proper explanation for the MMX null result: 1. The null result of the MMX is due to that the speed of light is isotropic HORIZONTALLY. 2. If the plane of the light rays (the right angled arms of the MMX) is oriented vertically then non-null result will be observed. This means that the speed of light is not isotropic in the vertical direction. This interpretation is supported by the Pound and Rebka experiments and the predicted gravitational red shift in the vertical direction by GRT. Proposed Experiments designed to support the above interpretations is in the paper entitled "Proposed Experiments to Detect Absolute Motion" in my website: http://www.geocities.com/kn_seto/index.htm Ken Seto Did you run the experiment, wacko? Not yet? Then go away, come back when you have results (meaning never) He never will, he can't even figure out which direction is "up". George Ha,ha,ha. The best! I can even prove it - read this and if still in doubt look back over the somewhat rambling thread, messages 9 through 20. http://tinyurl.com/odf8b It proved that you are an idiot. That's all... |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Ken Seto - King Moron
kenseto wrote: if I have the resources to do the experiments I wouldn't be wasting my time talking to idiot like you. Then you have nothing, so shut up and continue eating what you have been eating all along. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Proper explanation for the MMX null result.
kenseto wrote:
Proper explanation for the MMX null result: Not really. 1. The null result of the MMX is due to that the speed of light is isotropic HORIZONTALLY. A "proper explanation" would tell us why it is isotropic horizontally. After all, this came as a rather big surprise when their paper first came out. 2. If the plane of the light rays (the right angled arms of the MMX) is oriented vertically then non-null result will be observed. This means that the speed of light is not isotropic in the vertical direction. This interpretation is supported by the Pound and Rebka experiments and the predicted gravitational red shift in the vertical direction by GRT. Yes. But a computation in GR shows this is not detectable even for an instrument a million times more sensitive than Brillet and Hall. And, of course, experimentally it is completely impossible to construct an interferometer that is sufficiently rigid while rotating in a vertical plane. Indeed, Brillet and Hall ascribed their ~few parts in 10^15 systematic error primarily to a rotation axis off vertical by a few MICROradians. So while this effect is indeed predicted by GR, it is not feasible to measure it experimentally, by many orders of magnitude. Tom Roberts |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
MAN'S EVOLUTION -- BUT IT'S REALLY POLLUTION | Ed Conrad | Astronomy Misc | 1 | June 14th 06 05:45 PM |
The SRians Said: Time is What the Clock Measures | kenseto | Astronomy Misc | 238 | June 12th 05 01:29 PM |
High proper motion. Q's | justbeats | Amateur Astronomy | 4 | November 22nd 04 09:51 AM |
!!! Black Hole Gravity - speed of gravity | Aunt Buffy | Misc | 366 | August 7th 04 03:02 AM |
Nature of Gravity: was Vector Gravitational Equations | CC | Astronomy Misc | 2 | September 10th 03 01:31 AM |