A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Astronomy and Astrophysics » Satellites
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

SL-16 (26076)



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old November 14th 03, 12:06 AM
J. Thomas Jeffrey
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default SL-16 (26076)

Has anyone seen SL-16 (listed as bebris)? Catalog number 26076.
Heavens-Above has the magnitude listed as 4.4 but I have never been
able to see it using my 7x50 binoculars or with the naked eye. I have
looked for it several times using the Heavens-Above star charts to get
an accurate location to look.
  #2  
Old November 14th 03, 06:16 AM
William R. Thompson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default SL-16 (26076)

J. Thomas Jeffrey wrote:

Has anyone seen SL-16 (listed as debris)? Catalog number 26076.


I've seen it. It's a chunk of the Zenit-2 upper stage which launched
Kosmos 2369; this piece of space junk is also identified as 2000-006-F

Heavens-Above has the magnitude listed as 4.4 but I have never been
able to see it using my 7x50 binoculars or with the naked eye. I have
looked for it several times using the Heavens-Above star charts to get
an accurate location to look.


Satellite debris can have highly irregular shapes and sizes. You
may just have had the bad luck to look for it when it was at an
angle that didn't catch the sun properly for your position. I don't
know how H-A calculates magnitudes, but sometimes their forecasts
are off by a magnitude or more.

--Bill Thompson
  #3  
Old November 14th 03, 06:16 AM
William R. Thompson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default SL-16 (26076)

J. Thomas Jeffrey wrote:

Has anyone seen SL-16 (listed as debris)? Catalog number 26076.


I've seen it. It's a chunk of the Zenit-2 upper stage which launched
Kosmos 2369; this piece of space junk is also identified as 2000-006-F

Heavens-Above has the magnitude listed as 4.4 but I have never been
able to see it using my 7x50 binoculars or with the naked eye. I have
looked for it several times using the Heavens-Above star charts to get
an accurate location to look.


Satellite debris can have highly irregular shapes and sizes. You
may just have had the bad luck to look for it when it was at an
angle that didn't catch the sun properly for your position. I don't
know how H-A calculates magnitudes, but sometimes their forecasts
are off by a magnitude or more.

--Bill Thompson
  #4  
Old November 14th 03, 08:26 AM
Ed Cannon
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default SL-16 (26076)

Has anyone seen SL-16 (listed as bebris)? Catalog number 26076.
Heavens-Above has the magnitude listed as 4.4 but I have never
been able to see it using my 7x50 binoculars or with the naked
eye. I have looked for it several times using the Heavens-Above
star charts to get an accurate location to look.


Mike McCants' RCS file, which averages USSTRATCOM's measurements
of radar cross-sections of objects, lists 26076 as .1 square
meter -- a very small object. As Bill said, it could be an odd
shape that sometimes reflects much more brightly than others.

Magnitude estimates have to be well understood. They are
estimates based on available information. Some objects are
consistently observable near estimated magnitudes, but others
vary much more. Quite a few payloads can vary wildly from
estimates if flat surfaces are nicely aligned for bright
specular reflections. Some big launch vehicle stages are
badly aligned, say pointing directly at the Earth's surface,
and may be invisible when they should be +3.5 magnitude.

Here's the link to that RCS file:

http://users2.ev1.net/~mmccants/catalogs/rcs.zip

Ed Cannon - - Austin, Texas, USA

  #5  
Old November 14th 03, 08:26 AM
Ed Cannon
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default SL-16 (26076)

Has anyone seen SL-16 (listed as bebris)? Catalog number 26076.
Heavens-Above has the magnitude listed as 4.4 but I have never
been able to see it using my 7x50 binoculars or with the naked
eye. I have looked for it several times using the Heavens-Above
star charts to get an accurate location to look.


Mike McCants' RCS file, which averages USSTRATCOM's measurements
of radar cross-sections of objects, lists 26076 as .1 square
meter -- a very small object. As Bill said, it could be an odd
shape that sometimes reflects much more brightly than others.

Magnitude estimates have to be well understood. They are
estimates based on available information. Some objects are
consistently observable near estimated magnitudes, but others
vary much more. Quite a few payloads can vary wildly from
estimates if flat surfaces are nicely aligned for bright
specular reflections. Some big launch vehicle stages are
badly aligned, say pointing directly at the Earth's surface,
and may be invisible when they should be +3.5 magnitude.

Here's the link to that RCS file:

http://users2.ev1.net/~mmccants/catalogs/rcs.zip

Ed Cannon - - Austin, Texas, USA

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:52 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.