A scientific approach to proving whether man landed on the moon - photogrammetric rectification

On Sun, 23 Jul 2006 18:59:55 GMT, Phil Wheeler
wrote:

Same drivel repeated. To Brad goes the honor of the first newsgroup
filter on this MacBook: Plonk!

....About. ****ing . Time.


OM
--
]=====================================[
] OMBlog - http://www.io.com/~o_m/omworld [
] Let's face it: Sometimes you *need* [
] an obnoxious opinion in your day! [
]=====================================[

"Brad Guth" wrote in message
oups.com...

While "Snookums Snookums" and "Phil Wheeler" are each being silly

It's a shame you think I'm being "silly", Brad. It is, in fact, more proof that you
are a bigoted buttologist that simultaneously sucks and blows. In spite of yourself
and those of your incest-cloned reptilian kind, the truth is out there. The moon
is made of cheese, just as surely as the moon landing was faked, and just as
surely as your sphincter tingles whenever you see pictures of George Michael!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reptilians

Na-Nu Na-Nu!

"Brad Guth" wrote in message
ps.com...

Since for all the right reasons that proves we haven't accomplished the
moon, why not accomplish the somewhat testy but otherwise nearby and
technically doable LSE-CM/ISS within LL-1?

Or, would you rather talk about the other intelligent life that's
existing/coexisting on Venus?

So, in other words, you admit you're a liar. HA. Liar Liar Pants On Fire!

p.s. All life on Venus perished during the Great Peanut Butter Mudslide of 10,313 VCE.

Wrap your dyslexic rabies-infected reptilian-cloned brain around THAT, lizard boy!

Snookums Snookums wrote:
"Brad Guth" wrote in message
ps.com...

Since for all the right reasons that proves we haven't accomplished the
moon, why not accomplish the somewhat testy but otherwise nearby and
technically doable LSE-CM/ISS within LL-1?

Or, would you rather talk about the other intelligent life that's
existing/coexisting on Venus?

So, in other words, you admit you're a liar. HA. Liar Liar Pants On Fire!

p.s. All life on Venus perished during the Great Peanut Butter Mudslide of 10,313 VCE.

Wrap your dyslexic rabies-infected reptilian-cloned brain around THAT, lizard boy!

Snookums Snookums (now there's a Usenet name we can all trust),
As per incest cloned usual, you're taking this argument off topic, as
representing your one and only remaining option of status quo
damage-control, and otherwise remaining in denial and without remorse
to boot.

Good grief, admit that you're one of them, or at least admit that
you've been snookered. Of course, if you're sufficiently Jewish is
obviously why you can't admit to anything, just like our resident LLPOF
warlord(GW Bush).
-
Brad Guth

"Brad Guth" wrote in message
ups.com...

As per incest cloned usual, you're taking this argument off topic, as
representing your one and only remaining option of status quo
damage-control, and otherwise remaining in denial and without remorse

Changing the subject again, per your usual Modus Operandi.

Your remorseless, kitten-eating, dyslexic, rabies-infected, reptilian-cloned brain
has obviously suffered radiation damage under that hard X-ray and gin-soaked
inebriation tank.

And still you deny that your involuntary incarceration is closer than you think.....

They're coming to take you away, Ha - Ha!

"Brad Guth" wrote in message
oups.com...

Your "usual Modus Operandi" is the truth and nothing but the truth.

So, you admit you're a liar, and a buffoon to boot.

That's about what I expected, from the naysaying king of the incest-cloned
reptilian new world order and chief buttcheek-kissing skull & bones buttologist.

Brad Guth wrote:
My "usual Modus Operandi" is the truth and nothing but the truth.
How
about yourself?

OMG hold me back.

"Brad Guth" wrote in message
oups.com...

OOPS!, I've broken GOOGLE's Usenet again.

No, Usenet doesn't belong to Google. And it's not broken.

In other words, you have once again proven your stupidity.

Snookums Snookums wrote:
: No, Usenet doesn't belong to Google. And it's not broken.
:
: In other words, you have once again proven your stupidity.

Come by and I'll gladly prove that you're not only wrong, but a liar to
boot.

Why the heck isn't your "soc.culture.jewish" involved in this nifty
topic?

Was it something that I'd said? (such as the truth and nothing but the
truth)

What's anti-Islam or anti-Jewish about there being other intelligent
life on Venus, especially since they too could be Islamic or perhaps
Jewish, or at least Cathar for all we know.

Apparently most Jews are not actually smart enough to realize that
technically it only takes one such Kodak moment as proven as being
phony. How many hundreds of those easily proven as phony (AKA
hocus-pocus) Kodak moments of our NASA/Apollo fiasco would you folks
like to review?

Obviously if you're reading this, you're either one of them or you're
just as snookered and otherwise as dumbfounded as I was 7+ years ago.

Isn't what I've discovered and/or uncovered the least bit NOBEL PRIZE
worthy?

Why the heck can't I be the first Mennonite to win a Nobel?

From: Amanda Angelika
:But I don't think that proves they didn't do it. It just means it
:was difficult to fully document what they did with the photographic
:and video technology of 1969 and the 1970s. And of course these days
ractically everyone has some sort of Video Camera or video technology

:and are more aware of how such things work, so fakery becomes more
bvious to the public as time goes on.

In other words, yourself and others that 100+% support all that's
NASA/Apollo have an acceptable level of LLPOF physics and of
hocus-pocus science, as long as it lets yourself and of your kind
pretend that we've been walking on that physically dark and otherwise
extremely nasty moon of ours.

Please list all the laws of physics that you do not believe in.

Please list all of the replicated hard-science that doesn't count.

I guess this means you folks also have an acceptable level of
collateral damage and carnage of the innocent, that's obviously on
behalf of supporting your perpetrated cold-war(s) and of whatever else
your mainstream status quo requires of it's little brown nosed minions.

There was nothing new about Kodak film back then or now that would
explain away those images that look as though so entirely phony as all
get out, and that's even as based upon their very own robotic obtained
images that were developed while on the fly and having been scanned and
digital/microwave transferred back to Earth, as for their having shown
us an entirely different and otherwise perfectly believable moon from
orbit than from the actual surface. Thus far, there is no actual
original film that we can review as derived back from being within the
Van Allen belts, or much less from whatever's beyond because, such well
shielded film (especially of being nearby that terribly gamma and
hard-X-ray moon of ours) simply had to be developed right then and
there, or else.

The Van Allen expanse is perhaps at most worth 10 db of radiation
moderation from what our moon has to offer, or possibly it represents
something slightly less than 7 DB. Either way, it's what's primarily
saving us from being radiated to death by our moon. Oddly, the
hard-science that pertains to our moon and of those Van Allen belts
from team ACE and of every other available robotic mission is moderated
to death and/or sequestered, remaining as though taboo/nondisclosure if
such science could have any impact upon the truthful knowledge that's
pertaining to our moon. Even team KECK and of more recently team
MESSENGER had avoided our moon, and so forth.

OOPS!, it seems at times I've broken GOOGLE's Usenet. Sorry about
that. Now it's as though whenever I've contributed my dyslexic
encrypted truth is when the entire access to this anti-think-tank of
this disinformation Usenet from hell comes to a near halt (I have
pigeons that are a whole lot faster at transferring packets, and
certainly as otherwise more trustworthy).

In spite of these all-know wizards, rusemasters and those members of
their Third Reich collaborating kind that can't seem to honestly
address their own Kodak documented issues of "photogrammetric
rectification", of a greater than half illuminated Earth while being
days past sunrise on the moon, of the extremely slight crescent of
Earth as supposedly obtained from the lunar deck of what's extensively
xenon lamp spectrum illuminated, nor as to any of those oops!
blue-screen images, or for that matter anything as having to do with
those fly-by-rocket landers or even the impressive task that can't be
replicated of getting nearly 50t into orbiting our moon so quickly,
along with those spare tonnes of reaction thrusting fuel (especially
fuel intensive since not having any momentum reaction wheels to work
with), plus loads of their essential retrothrust and other fuel tonnage
for returning home as entirely unscaved along with all of that Kodak
film that supposedly hadn't yet been developed, whereas I'm doing the
very best that I can to fix my words and to improve upon the syntax and
math.

Obviously the regular laws of physics and of the replicated science
truth is what's bothering these folks the most (unfortunately, knowing
an fo sharing the truth and having supposed friends of your own kind in
high places didn't do much good for Jesus Christ, nor had any of those
nice Cathars been spared that were simply being good folks that had
been extremely well educated and subsequently making the Pope look as
though a little greedy and arrogant). Sorry about that (go suck
another dozen rotten eggs), because once you're dead and gone is when
it really doesn't matter, does it.

Instead of having a few good religions on Earth (assuming that being
Jewish qualifies), it seems we have dozens of extremely touchy if not a
few too many bad ones that are going postal from time to time, by way
of their having under/over reacted on just about anything you can think
of. I guess my having a Mennonite background of our folks being those
of a somewhat moderate and considerate group of souls doesn't even
count, especially these days when having the most oil, coal and natural
gas is the one and only pagan God of politics on steroids that matters,
whereas being a born-again liar and Skull and Bones member in good
standing is what makes you president.
-
Brad Guth

"Brad Guth" wrote in message
oups.com...

Why the heck isn't your "soc.culture.mennonite" involved in this nifty
topic?

Why don't you go hang out in "soc.inbred.half-witted-children-of-alcoholic-trailer-trash",
where you might find others like yourself to ask?