A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Others » Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Empty Space ????? Again More Thinking On



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old October 17th 11, 03:10 PM posted to alt.astronomy
G=EMC^2[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,655
Default Empty Space ????? Again More Thinking On

Space is tricky stuff. I have always visioned it as a place that can't
ever be thought of as empty. I have always had it the most dynamic
part of the universe. I see it as a great cosmic force field. I see
it where actions can take place instantaneously. I go against the 8
minute time laps for Earth to feel gravity from the Sun to stop it the
Sun vanished I say a trillion times faster. Space to me is a web of
quantum interacting fields. I can see photons as trillions and
trillions of dots making up the electromagnetic field.(waves rather
than dots fit too) Reality is if we know the field,we know the
particle. Reality is we just do not with our bodies feel most fields.
They can go right through out bodies. We don't perceive 94% of the
universe. Reality is we feel jolts,and not the smooth uniformity of
fields that we are immersed in. Sum this post up with. When two
electrons try to come together its their mutual photons that does the
work to push them away. TreBert
  #2  
Old October 19th 11, 02:31 PM posted to alt.astronomy
G=EMC^2[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,655
Default Empty Space ????? Again More Thinking On

On Oct 17, 10:10*am, "G=EMC^2" wrote:
Space is tricky stuff. I have always visioned it as a place that can't
ever be thought of as empty. I have always had it the most dynamic
part of the universe. *I see it as a great cosmic force field. I see
it where actions can take place instantaneously. I go against the 8
minute time laps for Earth to feel gravity from the Sun to stop it the
Sun vanished I say a trillion times faster. *Space to me is a web of
quantum interacting fields. I can see photons as trillions and
trillions of dots making up the electromagnetic field.(waves rather
than dots fit too) *Reality is if we know the field,we know the
particle. *Reality is we just do not with our bodies feel most fields.
They can go right through out bodies. *We don't perceive 94% of the
universe. * *Reality is we feel jolts,and not the smooth uniformity of
fields that we are immersed in. * Sum this post up with. When two
electrons try to come together its their mutual photons that does the
work to push them away. *TreBert


We call the substance(stuff) that fills space "aether".Faraday was big
on aether. He told us its structure was vibrations. Was he thinking
about the string theory way back in the 1840s? Faraday thinking would
fit well with a today's quantum field theorist. It is also close to
the way I see the universe. TreBert
  #3  
Old October 19th 11, 07:02 PM posted to alt.astronomy
David Staup
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 358
Default Empty Space ????? Again More Thinking On


"G=EMC^2" wrote in message
...
On Oct 17, 10:10 am, "G=EMC^2" wrote:
Space is tricky stuff. I have always visioned it as a place that can't
ever be thought of as empty. I have always had it the most dynamic
part of the universe. I see it as a great cosmic force field. I see
it where actions can take place instantaneously. I go against the 8
minute time laps for Earth to feel gravity from the Sun to stop it the
Sun vanished I say a trillion times faster. Space to me is a web of
quantum interacting fields. I can see photons as trillions and
trillions of dots making up the electromagnetic field.(waves rather
than dots fit too) Reality is if we know the field,we know the
particle. Reality is we just do not with our bodies feel most fields.
They can go right through out bodies. We don't perceive 94% of the
universe. Reality is we feel jolts,and not the smooth uniformity of
fields that we are immersed in. Sum this post up with. When two
electrons try to come together its their mutual photons that does the
work to push them away. TreBert


We call the substance(stuff) that fills space "aether".Faraday was big
on aether. He told us its structure was vibrations. Was he thinking
about the string theory way back in the 1840s? Faraday thinking would
fit well with a today's quantum field theorist. It is also close to
the way I see the universe. TreBert

Mickleson - Morley
no aether.... as for empty space...check between your ears!



  #4  
Old October 19th 11, 09:46 PM posted to alt.astronomy
G=EMC^2[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,655
Default Empty Space ????? Again More Thinking On

On Oct 19, 2:02*pm, "David Staup" wrote:
"G=EMC^2" wrote in message

...
On Oct 17, 10:10 am, "G=EMC^2" wrote:

Space is tricky stuff. I have always visioned it as a place that can't
ever be thought of as empty. I have always had it the most dynamic
part of the universe. I see it as a great cosmic force field. I see
it where actions can take place instantaneously. I go against the 8
minute time laps for Earth to feel gravity from the Sun to stop it the
Sun vanished I say a trillion times faster. Space to me is a web of
quantum interacting fields. I can see photons as trillions and
trillions of dots making up the electromagnetic field.(waves rather
than dots fit too) Reality is if we know the field,we know the
particle. Reality is we just do not with our bodies feel most fields.
They can go right through out bodies. We don't perceive 94% of the
universe. Reality is we feel jolts,and not the smooth uniformity of
fields that we are immersed in. Sum this post up with. When two
electrons try to come together its their mutual photons that does the
work to push them away. TreBert


We call the substance(stuff) that fills space "aether".Faraday was big
on aether. He told us its structure was vibrations. Was he thinking
about the string theory way back in the 1840s? *Faraday thinking would
fit well with a today's quantum field theorist. It is also close to
the way I see the universe. *TreBert

Mickleson - Morley
no aether.... as for empty space...check between your ears!


Your a dim wit wonder of the universe. TreBert
  #5  
Old October 20th 11, 05:58 PM posted to alt.astronomy
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 15,245
Default Empty Space ????? Again More Thinking On

BULL****!

Saul Levy


On Thu, 20 Oct 2011 05:52:32 -0700 (PDT), "G=EMC^2"
wrote:

Painius that 1999 gamma explosion told us we needed lots of space.
TreBert

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
No Empty Space =Universes G=EMC^2 Glazier[_1_] Misc 3 April 18th 09 04:16 PM
Space and Why it Seems Empty ??? G=EMC^2 Glazier Misc 3 January 28th 07 03:46 PM
Density of empty space Hagar Misc 2 July 28th 06 07:33 PM
Any SPACE where a particle is, is NOT empty.!! brian a m stuckless Policy 0 January 18th 06 10:09 AM
Any SPACE where a particle is, is NOT empty.!! brian a m stuckless Astronomy Misc 0 January 18th 06 10:09 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:05 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.