#1
|
|||
|
|||
Bang or no bang.
1.
Once upon a time, 20 billions of years ago, all matter (all elementary particles and all quarks and their girlfriends- antiparticles and antiquarks, all kinds of waves: electromagnetic, gravitational, muons... gluons field ..... etc.) - was assembled in a "single point". It is interesting to think about what had surrounded the "single point". The answer is : EMPTINESS- NOTHING....!!! Ok! But why does everyone speak about EMPTINESS- NOTHING in common phrases rather than in specific, concrete terms? I wonder why nobody has written down this EMPTINESS- NOTHING in the form of a physical formula ? You see, every schoolboy knows that is possible to express the EMPTINESS- NOTHING condition by the formula T=0K. * * * Once there was a "Big Bang". But in what space had the Big Bang taken place and in what space was the matter of the Big Bang distributed? Not in T=0K? It is clear, that there is only EMPTINESS, NOTHING, in T=0K. Now consider that the Universe, as an absolute frame of reference is in a condition of T = 2,7K (rests relic radiation of the Big Bang ). But, the relic radiation is extended and in the future will change and its temperature will decrease. What temperature can this radiation reach? Not T=0K? Hence, if we go into the past or into the present or into the future, we can not escape from EMPTINESS- NOTHING T=0K. 2. Detected material mass of the matter in the Universe is so small (the average density of all substance in the Universe is approximately p=10^-30 g/sm3) that the gravitation law doesn't work. Therefore was invented " dark matter" and another abstract objects. The cosmological constant in Universe is zero. The Universe / Vacuum is endless. Our tiny minds cannot get a handle on its size, so we try to give it shapes and boundaries, all of which is folly. But to our happiness the temperature of Vacuum is concrete. Therefore it is necessary to begin to think from T=0K. 3. About the theory of the "Big Bang" is written the thick (very thick) books. But anywhere do not write about the reason of the "Big Bang". Anybody does not know it. I know. The action, when the God compresses all Universe into his palm, we have named " a singular point". And action, when the God opens his palm, we have named the "Big Bang". ============ ============ ==. So, "Bang or no bang" " To be or not to be? " that is the question. / From Shakespeare with Love./ One comment. ========.. Hello All Israel maybe right. History repeats time and time again. The First Crisis in Cosmology Conference Mon¬×c˜ao, Portugal, June 23-25 2005 http://www.american antigravity. com/documents/ Crisis-in- Cosmology- 2005-Ratcliffe. pdf In May 2004, a group of about 30 concerned scientists published an open letter to the global scientific community in New Scientist in which they protested the stranglehold of Big Bang theory on cosmological research and funding. The letter was placed on the Internet and rapidly attracted wide attention. It currently has about 300 signatories representing scientists and researchers of disparate backgrounds, and has led to a loose association now known as the Alternative Cosmology Group. ===============.... |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Bang or no bang.
"socratus" wrote in message ... 1. Once upon a time, 20 billions of years ago, all matter (all elementary particles and all quarks and their girlfriends- antiparticles and antiquarks, -------13.7 billion years, but let's not quibble ------- all kinds of waves: electromagnetic, gravitational, muons... gluons field ..... etc.) - was assembled in a "single point". It is interesting to think about what had surrounded the "single point". ... -------There were no surroundings. The single point constituted the entire universe. All of it. Nothing around it. Study some cosmology, there are plenty of minimally technical books available. ------- |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Bang or no bang.
On Feb 2, 5:33 am, socratus wrote:
1. Once upon a time, 20 billions of years ago, all matter (all elementary particles and all quarks and their girlfriends- antiparticles and antiquarks, all kinds of waves: electromagnetic, gravitational, muons... gluons field ..... etc.) - was assembled in a "single point". It is interesting to think about what had surrounded the "single point". The answer is : EMPTINESS- NOTHING....!!! Ok! No, it's not OK. Why not a great many resting photons, as surrounding any number of anti-matter black holes? Why not event horizons of "-c" (-300,000 km/s)? .. - Brad Guth |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Bang or no bang.
On Feb 2, 6:32 pm, "Anthony Buckland"
wrote: "socratus" wrote in message ... 1. Once upon a time, 20 billions of years ago, all matter (all elementary particles and all quarks and their girlfriends- antiparticles and antiquarks, -------13.7 billion years, but let's not quibble ------- all kinds of waves: electromagnetic, gravitational, muons... gluons field ..... etc.) - was assembled in a "single point". It is interesting to think about what had surrounded the "single point". ... -------There were no surroundings. The single point constituted the entire universe. All of it. Nothing around it. Study some cosmology, there are plenty of minimally technical books available. ------- Right, as in one mother black hole per universe. .. - Brad Guth |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Bang or no bang.
On Feb 3, 6:00 am, BradGuth wrote:
On Feb 2, 6:32 pm, "Anthony Buckland" wrote: "socratus" wrote in message ... 1. Once upon a time, 20 billions of years ago, all matter (all elementary particles and all quarks and their girlfriends- antiparticles and antiquarks, -------13.7 billion years, but let's not quibble ------- all kinds of waves: electromagnetic, gravitational, muons... gluons field ..... etc.) - was assembled in a "single point". It is interesting to think about what had surrounded the "single point". ... -------There were no surroundings. The single point constituted the entire universe. All of it. Nothing around it. Study some cosmology, there are plenty of minimally technical books available. ------- Right, as in one mother black hole per universe. . - Brad Guth- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - ============================= 1. A black hole / Hawking's / has a temperature within a few millionths of a degree above absolute zero: T=0K. / Oxford. Dictionary./ 2. There are many-many ..." mini... black holes".......( !!! ??? ) 3. I have following questions. Which particles give shape to a " mini black hole" in a temperature within a few millionths of a degree above absolute zero: T=0K.? How from one..." mini black hole" , from local microgravity, the macro gravity , the star formation going ? What is about: " Hypoteses non fingo." ? ========== . =============== Best wishes. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Bang or no bang.
Think of BHs as having a core of antimatter that's surrounded by
resting photons. Doesn't that work? Also, think of -c (-300,000 km/s), as representing the BH photon recession velocity once past the point of no return (aka event horizon). - Brad Guth On Feb 2, 10:37 pm, socratus wrote: On Feb 3, 6:00 am, BradGuth wrote: On Feb 2, 6:32 pm, "Anthony Buckland" wrote: "socratus" wrote in message ... 1. Once upon a time, 20 billions of years ago, all matter (all elementary particles and all quarks and their girlfriends- antiparticles and antiquarks, -------13.7 billion years, but let's not quibble ------- all kinds of waves: electromagnetic, gravitational, muons... gluons field ..... etc.) - was assembled in a "single point". It is interesting to think about what had surrounded the "single point". ... -------There were no surroundings. The single point constituted the entire universe. All of it. Nothing around it. Study some cosmology, there are plenty of minimally technical books available. ------- Right, as in one mother black hole per universe. . - Brad Guth- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - ============================= 1. A black hole / Hawking's / has a temperature within a few millionths of a degree above absolute zero: T=0K. / Oxford. Dictionary./ 2. There are many-many ..." mini... black holes".......( !!! ??? ) 3. I have following questions. Which particles give shape to a " mini black hole" in a temperature within a few millionths of a degree above absolute zero: T=0K.? How from one..." mini black hole" , from local microgravity, the macro gravity , the star formation going ? What is about: " Hypoteses non fingo." ? ========== . =============== Best wishes. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Bang or no bang.
On Feb 3, 5:26 pm, BradGuth wrote:
Think of BHs as having a core of antimatter that's surrounded by resting photons. Doesn't that work? Also, think of -c (-300,000 km/s), as representing the BH photon recession velocity once past the point of no return (aka event horizon). - Brad Guth On Feb 2, 10:37 pm, socratus wrote: On Feb 3, 6:00 am, BradGuth wrote: On Feb 2, 6:32 pm, "Anthony Buckland" wrote: "socratus" wrote in message ... 1. Once upon a time, 20 billions of years ago, all matter (all elementary particles and all quarks and their girlfriends- antiparticles and antiquarks, -------13.7 billion years, but let's not quibble ------- all kinds of waves: electromagnetic, gravitational, muons... gluons field ..... etc.) - was assembled in a "single point". It is interesting to think about what had surrounded the "single point". ... -------There were no surroundings. The single point constituted the entire universe. All of it. Nothing around it. Study some cosmology, there are plenty of minimally technical books available. ------- Right, as in one mother black hole per universe. . - Brad Guth- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - ============================= 1. A black hole / Hawking's / has a temperature within a few millionths of a degree above absolute zero: T=0K. / Oxford. Dictionary./ 2. There are many-many ..." mini... black holes".......( !!! ??? ) 3. I have following questions. Which particles give shape to a " mini black hole" in a temperature within a few millionths of a degree above absolute zero: T=0K.? How from one..." mini black hole" , from local microgravity, the macro gravity , the star formation going ? What is about: " Hypoteses non fingo." ? ========== . =============== Best wishes.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - =================================. Think of BHs as having a core of antimatter that's surrounded by resting photons. Doesn't that work? =================. Resting photon ( !!!???) What is formula of it? ==========.. Can Light quata to stop its moving? ======== ...========== Quantum Theory says mass increases with speed increase and becomes infinite when a mass reaches speed of light: c=1. Which is against the "Law of conservation and transformation energy/mass". But we know the quantum of light is real particle and its mass is particular and not infinite. How to understand this contradiction? And the scientists invented an artful way: the quantum does not possess the mass of rest and it is always in motion. ======= ..======= The quantum of light has not mass of rest equal to zero. But....... ============= The Soviet/Russian academic S. Vavilov suggested an interesting idea. In his book ' Isaac Newton' he wrote. The force, according to the Newton's Second Law, is equal to : F= ma. This force is possible to consider as absolute independent quantity - impulse. When in case with light quanta the impulse is equal to: mc. He continued. Let us now imagine that light quanta falls on a black body, and it absolutely absorbs this light quanta ( it means light quanta stops). Then, according to the Lebedev,s law, light quanta renders pressure on the black body: E/c. Therefore it is possible to write: mc=E/c. It means that light quanta has not mass of rest equal to zero, but it has potential energy/mass: M=E/c^2. (E=Mc^2). ========== ..=============== Of course the potential energy/mass of light quanta can transform in its kinetic energy. ===== ...======== Also, think of -c (-300,000 km/s), as representing the BH photon recession velocity once past the point of no return (aka event horizon). Brad Guth . =====================.. Think of c=1. ( !!!) ===== .. The secret of words 'God', 'soul ', 'religion', ' Existence', 'dualism of consciousness', 'human being' hide in the "Theory of Light quanta". ==============.. Best wishes. http://www.socratus.com http://www.wbabin.net/ |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Bang or no bang.
To Ya All (Florida talk) Lots of evidence that every galaxy has a black
hole. They become more realistic every year. Bert |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Bang or no bang.
Big bang or just a whimper,for it makes no difference. Humankind was not
there to witness it. (forest tree falling) Bert |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Before the Big Bang? | Radium | Amateur Astronomy | 260 | October 10th 06 06:35 AM |
Before the Big Bang? | honestjohn | Misc | 2 | September 20th 06 11:47 PM |
big bang ? | M2414 | Misc | 10 | April 3rd 05 07:26 AM |
B, Big, Big Bang, Big Bang Books... | socalsw | Amateur Astronomy | 6 | June 7th 04 09:17 AM |
BIG BANG really a Big Bang BUST | Ed Conrad | Astronomy Misc | 27 | November 7th 03 11:38 AM |