A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Others » Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

STS-107 Columbia top secret spy mission, and even our moon is still taboo.



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old April 18th 14, 12:46 PM posted to alt.astronomy
Brad Guth[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 15,175
Default STS-107 Columbia top secret spy mission, and even our moon is still taboo.

We're still very much on a need-to-know basis with our government agencies (besides our MIC run Pentagon, NSA and GCHQ that each get to screw with us because whatever rules and policy such as our Constitution or whomever we elect and/or appoint ever gets in their way), and otherwise we're given the usual nondisclosure and/or obfuscation treatment by the likes of our public-funded JPL and ASU.

As of well enough before the Columbia reentry overheating issues, STS107 had already been thermally and structurally ravaged, at least according to the official audio and bogy issues that were caught on NASA STS107 video. The following video is highly questionable but certainly not out of story context. Our NASA has been known to create infomercials (aka PR damage control), both good, bad and even the most outrageous or ridiculous in order to help divert attention away from the true issues. NASA also allows for private and/or intentionally fake images and videos to circulate as unpoliced, because that method always helps to disqualify any honestly deductive investigative research that might be offering a bit more honest context than they can afford to deal with.

NASA WTF Did You Do To **** Off E.T - STS107 I Want ANSWERS On This One
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b3hEUfRq-vg
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AaZW75jJjnw

What else is orbiting and even multiple hitting or soft-impacting our moon? (not of anything officially NASA, and it's not of exactly small stuff either). These substantial items were going way too fast to be orbiting, So what exactly are they if not some part of those Sirius asteroids and the truly enormous Oort cloud of considerable debris (conceivably a millionfold more than our Oort cloud has to offer) that we're passing through.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ce0FljPKh14#t=270
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-rPUhZSnlUI

It's like we're seeing a shallow glancing blow after blow after blow, by something truly tough and large, and as per usual our JPL, ASU and NASA are remaining dead silent on this one, as they consistently do with all independent research and interpretations by outsiders.

Our moon is by far the most imaged and video recorded item, and those cameras of our NASA, JPL, ASU, USAF and more than a few other public funded agencies have imaging technology that is always at least tenfold and even some thousandfold better than anything accomplished by outsiders/civilians.

Of course our physically dark moon is bound to be extremely dusty, as in places it should offer several km depth of mostly its own crystal dry, uncompacted and highly electrostatic charged material of microfine basalt and carbonado that's offering mostly paramagnetic kinds of physically dark dust as providing very little surface tension. Of course, lots of truly interesting stuff about our moon is not getting mainstream published nor much less reviewed and interpreted by way of getting any official NASA, JPL or ASU attention that we know of. Perhaps that lack of attention is because they always have those better things to be doing with our hard earned loot (namely job security related).

Perhaps this mainstream obfuscation policy of denial and banishment is why my topics of exploiting the innards of our moon, the relocating of our moon as to being station kept within the halo orbit of Earth L1, much less as for dealing with anything Venus related, have always been mainstream taboo and otherwise avoided by those which usually claim as knowing all there is to know (second only to Einstein none the less). Go figure, as to who if anyone of our public funded agencies can be trusted to ever do the right thing.
  #2  
Old April 18th 14, 04:09 PM posted to alt.astronomy
Brad Guth[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 15,175
Default STS-107 Columbia top secret spy mission, and even our moon isstill taboo.

Seems we're still very much on a need-to-know basis with our government agencies (besides our MIC run Pentagon, NSA and GCHQ that each get to screw with us because whatever rules and policy such as our Constitution or whomever we elect and/or appoint ever gets in their way doesn't even slow them down), at least decades have to pass and otherwise we're given the usual nondisclosure and/or obfuscation treatment by the likes of our public-funded JPL and ASU.

As of well enough before those Columbia reentry overheating issues, STS107 had already been thermally and structurally ravaged, at least according to the official audio and bogy issues that were caught on NASA STS107 video. The following video is highly questionable but certainly not out of story context. Our NASA has been known to create infomercials (aka PR damage control), both good, bad and even the most outrageous or ridiculous in order to help divert attention away from the true issues. NASA also allows for private and/or intentionally fake images and videos to circulate as unpoliced, because that method always helps to disqualify any honestly deductive investigative research that might be offering a bit more honest context than they can afford to deal with.

NASA WTF Did You Do To **** Off E.T - STS107 I Want ANSWERS On This One
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b3hEUfRq-vg
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AaZW75jJjnw

What else is orbiting and even multiple hitting or soft-impacting our moon? (not of anything officially NASA, and it's not of exactly small stuff either). These substantial items were going way too fast to be orbiting, So what exactly are they if not some part of those Sirius asteroids and the truly enormous Oort cloud of considerable debris (conceivably a millionfold more than our Oort cloud has to offer) that we're passing through.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ce0FljPKh14#t=270
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-rPUhZSnlUI

It's like we're seeing a shallow glancing blow after blow after blow, by something truly tough and large, and as per usual our JPL, ASU and NASA are remaining dead silent on this one, as they consistently do with all independent research and interpretations by outsiders.

Our moon is by far the most imaged and video recorded item, and those cameras of our NASA, JPL, ASU, USAF and more than a few other public funded agencies have imaging technology that is always at least tenfold and even some thousandfold better than anything accomplished by outsiders/civilians.

Of course our physically dark moon is bound to be extremely dusty, as in places it should offer several km depth of mostly its own crystal dry, uncompacted and highly electrostatic charged material of microfine basalt and carbonado that's offering mostly paramagnetic kinds of physically dark dust as providing very little surface tension. Of course, lots of truly interesting stuff about our moon is not getting mainstream published nor much less reviewed and interpreted by way of getting any official NASA, JPL or ASU attention that we know of. Perhaps that lack of attention is because they always have those better things to be doing with our hard earned loot (namely job security related).

Perhaps this mainstream obfuscation policy of denial and banishment is why my topics of exploiting the innards of our moon, the relocating of our moon as to being station kept within the halo orbit of Earth L1, much less as for dealing with anything Venus related, have always been mainstream taboo and otherwise avoided by those which usually claim as knowing all there is to know (second only to Einstein none the less). Go figure, as to who if anyone of our public funded agencies can be trusted to ever do the right thing.

  #3  
Old April 18th 14, 05:05 PM posted to alt.astronomy
Hägar
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,511
Default STS-107 Columbia top secret spy mission, and even our moon is still taboo.

Brad Goth wrote :
Seems we're still very much on a need-to-know basis with our government



snip usual GuthBallian drivel

Say Goth ... did the doctor ever apologize for dropping you on your
head ??? The linoleum covered floors in hospitals are not very
pliable, are they ... talk to "Wocky" ... he seems to have a similar
experience ...
  #4  
Old April 18th 14, 05:39 PM posted to alt.astronomy
Brad Guth[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 15,175
Default STS-107 Columbia top secret spy mission, and even our moon isstill taboo.

On Friday, April 18, 2014 9:05:58 AM UTC-7, Hägar wrote:
Brad Goth wrote :

Seems we're still very much on a need-to-know basis with our government






snip usual GuthBallian drivel



Say Goth ... did the doctor ever apologize for dropping you on your

head ??? The linoleum covered floors in hospitals are not very

pliable, are they ... talk to "Wocky" ... he seems to have a similar

experience ...


To a born again Zionist Nazi Republican and certified redneck like yourself, what should it matter?
  #5  
Old April 20th 14, 01:58 PM posted to alt.astronomy
Brad Guth[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 15,175
Default STS-107 Columbia top secret spy mission, and even our moon isstill taboo.

On Friday, April 18, 2014 4:46:13 AM UTC-7, Brad Guth wrote:
We're still very much on a need-to-know basis with our government agencies (besides our MIC run Pentagon, NSA and GCHQ that each get to screw with us because whatever rules and policy such as our Constitution or whomever we elect and/or appoint ever gets in their way), and otherwise we're given the usual nondisclosure and/or obfuscation treatment by the likes of our public-funded JPL and ASU.



As of well enough before the Columbia reentry overheating issues, STS107 had already been thermally and structurally ravaged, at least according to the official audio and bogy issues that were caught on NASA STS107 video. The following video is highly questionable but certainly not out of story context. Our NASA has been known to create infomercials (aka PR damage control), both good, bad and even the most outrageous or ridiculous in order to help divert attention away from the true issues. NASA also allows for private and/or intentionally fake images and videos to circulate as unpoliced, because that method always helps to disqualify any honestly deductive investigative research that might be offering a bit more honest context than they can afford to deal with.



NASA WTF Did You Do To **** Off E.T - STS107 I Want ANSWERS On This One

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b3hEUfRq-vg

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AaZW75jJjnw



What else is orbiting and even multiple hitting or soft-impacting our moon? (not of anything officially NASA, and it's not of exactly small stuff either). These substantial items were going way too fast to be orbiting, So what exactly are they if not some part of those Sirius asteroids and the truly enormous Oort cloud of considerable debris (conceivably a millionfold more than our Oort cloud has to offer) that we're passing through.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ce0FljPKh14#t=270

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-rPUhZSnlUI



It's like we're seeing a shallow glancing blow after blow after blow, by something truly tough and large, and as per usual our JPL, ASU and NASA are remaining dead silent on this one, as they consistently do with all independent research and interpretations by outsiders.



Our moon is by far the most imaged and video recorded item, and those cameras of our NASA, JPL, ASU, USAF and more than a few other public funded agencies have imaging technology that is always at least tenfold and even some thousandfold better than anything accomplished by outsiders/civilians.



Of course our physically dark moon is bound to be extremely dusty, as in places it should offer several km depth of mostly its own crystal dry, uncompacted and highly electrostatic charged material of microfine basalt and carbonado that's offering mostly paramagnetic kinds of physically dark dust as providing very little surface tension. Of course, lots of truly interesting stuff about our moon is not getting mainstream published nor much less reviewed and interpreted by way of getting any official NASA, JPL or ASU attention that we know of. Perhaps that lack of attention is because they always have those better things to be doing with our hard earned loot (namely job security related).



Perhaps this mainstream obfuscation policy of denial and banishment is why my topics of exploiting the innards of our moon, the relocating of our moon as to being station kept within the halo orbit of Earth L1, much less as for dealing with anything Venus related, have always been mainstream taboo and otherwise avoided by those which usually claim as knowing all there is to know (second only to Einstein none the less). Go figure, as to who if anyone of our public funded agencies can be trusted to ever do the right thing.


Here's more than one image of Columbia with that extra NASA logo:
http://www.cybermodeler.com/hobby/bu...-02pd-1763.jpg
https://www.flickr.com/photos/ddyate...n/photostream/
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Our Taboo/Nondisclosure Moon Brad Guth UK Astronomy 93 March 19th 07 06:08 PM
Our Taboo/Nondisclosure Moon [email protected] UK Astronomy 1 December 1st 06 03:47 PM
TV REVIEW: 'COLUMBIA: FINAL MISSION'- Unheeded Concerns and the Columbia Disaster Lynndel Humphreys Space Shuttle 0 July 7th 03 01:50 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:13 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.