If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. 


Thread Tools  Display Modes 
#1




110 days for a complete Solar gravity cell rotation Chapt16.15Gravity Cells #1469 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed
I believe a Antikythera Mechanism can be built that represents the
220km/sec Sun speed and the 29km/sec Earth speed along with the other planets in orbit in heliocentric model. What has to happen is that a overall mastertoothed wheel spins the planets around so as to keep them locked to the Sun. I should have gone to bed, but now that my mind is rested, it should be 5/4 = 1.25 x 88 days = 110 days and not the 70 days. Now my mind is rested, let me weave into the discussion General Relativity for it would better explain why both Newtonian gravity and General Relativity fail as theories. In General Relativity, the Sun would warp the Space around it and thus the planets would follow the curvature of that warped space. On TV shows they show this as a heavy ball bending the fabric of space and then they roll a small ball representing Earth and show how the smaller ball moves in that bent space fabric. The trouble with General Relativity is that the Sun ball is the fastest moving ball of all the balls that make up the planets. So that Newtonian gravity and GR could not possibly be true theories but fake theories. The solution or remedy is that the Sun forms a EMgravity field, a warped Space, but that Space has an intrinsic spin or rotation. The rotation or spin of the warped space captures the planets and locks them into a perpetual motion around the Sun. What I am trying to figure out is what is the minimum spin needed to capture the planets even though they are moving at slow speeds compared to the Sun's 220km/sec (Earth 29km/sec and Jupiter 13km/sec). What is the minimum rotation needed? My best guess at the moment is that of 110 days since Mercury at 47km/sec is revolving at 88 days.  An author archive search for AP reveals massive vandalism starting May 2012 where only one or two posts per month are saved, whereas another poster David Bernier, all his posts continue to be archived. A Google search of just Archimedes Plutonium reveals massive search enginebombing, and likely the reason for wanting to destroy the authorarchive of AP. If we listen to the fool Jeff Relf: Jeff Relf Google Groups is 100% uncensored, so it isn't fully indexed. Were Google Groups fully indexed, it'd be used to game the system; We would think all posters have most of their posts missing in the author archive, but apparently only AP is targetted for massive deletions of his author archive posts. Only Drexel's Math Forum has done a excellent, simple and fair author archiving of AP posts for the past several years as seen he http://mathforum.org/kb/profile.jspa?userID=499986 Archimedes Plutonium http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium whole entire Universe is just one big atom where dots of the electrondotcloud are galaxies 
Ads 
Thread Tools  
Display Modes  


Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
Table of Resonances Chapt16.15 Gravity Cells #1455 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed  Archimedes Plutonium[_2_]  Astronomy Misc  1  April 3rd 13 08:10 PM 
Chapt16.15 Maxwell Equations with EMgravity; GravityCell; OrbitalResonance; SpinOrbitCoupling #1451 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed  Archimedes Plutonium[_2_]  Astronomy Misc  1  April 2nd 13 01:23 AM 
Gravity cells to patch up the Sun's 220km/sec Chapt16.14 mathematicsof the force of gravity #1446 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed  Archimedes Plutonium[_2_]  Astronomy Misc  1  March 31st 13 08:19 AM 
Chapt16.14 mathematics of the force of gravity to explain galaxydistribution #1444 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed  Archimedes Plutonium[_2_]  Astronomy Misc  0  March 30th 13 06:52 PM 