A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Astronomy and Astrophysics » Astronomy Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Simplified Twin Paradox Resolution.



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old January 4th 13, 10:49 PM posted to sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,sci.math,sci.astro
Koobee Wublee
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 815
Default Simplified Twin Paradox Resolution.

On Jan 4, 10:03 am, "Paul B. Andersen" wrote:
On 04.01.2013 14:36, Pentcho Valev wrote:

Clever Draper,


Special relativity predicts both - that the travelling twin proves younger
and that the sedentary twin proves younger


Can you prove that the Lorentz transform predicts this?

We all know that you can't, which I am sure you will demonstrate
by failing to do so.


On the other hand, the little professor from Trondheim has
demonstrated that he has failed miserably at understand the Lorentz
transform. shrug

- but Einsteiniana's scenarios demonstrate only the former
prediction and conceal the latter.


Here you can see the twin scenario from both twins' point of view:

http://www.gethome.no/paulba/twins.html


Good job, paul. You have handed over the material that proves you
have no understanding of what the Lorentz transform is all about.
shrug

When B is not accelerating, the Lorentz transform says there is no way
to tell absolutely who is traveling and who is not. Time dilation
should be building up when A observes B as well as when B observes A.
The JAVA applet does not reflect what the Lorentz transform says. You
may want to decrease the acceleration distance to just 1 and increase
acceleration to 2 for a better dramatic effect. shrug

paulís gross blunder: The mutual time dilation is building up when B
is not accelerating. The applet violates the principle of
relativity. shrug

Hopefully, paul remains ignorant on this one since else he would
remove the material just like he did with the rest of his blunders.
shrug
Ads
  #2  
Old January 5th 13, 02:14 PM posted to sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,sci.math,sci.astro
Paul B. Andersen[_7_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 70
Default Simplified Twin Paradox Resolution.

On 04.01.2013 22:49, Koobee Wublee wrote:
On Jan 4, 10:03 am, "Paul B. Andersen" wrote:
On 04.01.2013 14:36, Pentcho Valev wrote:

Clever Draper,


Special relativity predicts both - that the travelling twin proves younger
and that the sedentary twin proves younger


Can you prove that the Lorentz transform predicts this?

We all know that you can't, which I am sure you will demonstrate
by failing to do so.


On the other hand, the little professor from Trondheim has
demonstrated that he has failed miserably at understand the Lorentz
transform. shrug

- but Einsteiniana's scenarios demonstrate only the former
prediction and conceal the latter.


Here you can see the twin scenario from both twins' point of view:

http://www.gethome.no/paulba/twins.html


Good job, paul. You have handed over the material that proves you
have no understanding of what the Lorentz transform is all about.
shrug

When B is not accelerating, the Lorentz transform says there is no way
to tell absolutely who is traveling and who is not. Time dilation
should be building up when A observes B as well as when B observes A.
The JAVA applet does not reflect what the Lorentz transform says. You
may want to decrease the acceleration distance to just 1 and increase
acceleration to 2 for a better dramatic effect. shrug

paulís gross blunder: The mutual time dilation is building up when B
is not accelerating. The applet violates the principle of
relativity. shrug


I won't bother to quibble about your nonsense.
Nobody cares about your babble anyway.


Hopefully, paul remains ignorant on this one since else he would
remove the material just like he did with the rest of his blunders.
shrug


I have deleted nothing.
I have however changed the host for my homepage, so the pointers
in old postings in the Google archive won't work.
My current homepage is at the bottom of the page.

However, many of the papers are of an "ad hoc" character
an is not found on that homepage, but you will find them
he
http://www.gethome.no/paulba/pdf/index.htm

I am sure you will find the rest of my blunders there.
Was it any particular you had in mind?

I look forward to yet another request for a reminder
of one of your blunders.


--
Paul

http://www.gethome.no/paulba/
  #3  
Old January 6th 13, 12:43 AM posted to sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,sci.math,sci.astro
Koobee Wublee
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 815
Default Simplified Twin Paradox Resolution.

On Jan 5, 5:14 am, "Paul B. Andersen" wrote:
On 04.01.2013 22:49, Koobee Wublee wrote:
paul wrote:


Boo! Scare you paul. Koobee Wublee knows you are greatly haunted by
Koobee Wublee. Please relax. shrug

http://www.gethome.no/paulba/twins.html


Good job, paul. You have handed over the material that proves you
have no understanding of what the Lorentz transform is all about.
shrug


When B is not accelerating, the Lorentz transform says there is no way
to tell absolutely who is traveling and who is not. Time dilation
should be building up when A observes B as well as when B observes A.
The JAVA applet does not reflect what the Lorentz transform says. You
may want to decrease the acceleration distance to just 1 and increase
acceleration to 2 for a better dramatic effect. shrug


paulís gross blunder: The mutual time dilation is building up when B
is not accelerating. The applet violates the principle of
relativity. shrug


I won't bother to quibble about your nonsense.
[rest of whining nonsense snipped]


OK, paul. Koobee Wublee will make you a deal. Why donít you modify
your JAVA applet and allow both twins to travel with the same
acceleration profile. Please also allow time when both are not
accelerating but with mutual time dilation building up due to relative
speed. With the same acceleration profiles, the effect of that should
cancel out, no? please
  #4  
Old January 6th 13, 10:47 AM posted to sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,sci.math,sci.astro
Paul B. Andersen[_7_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 70
Default Simplified Twin Paradox Resolution.

On 06.01.2013 00:43, Koobee Wublee wrote:
On Jan 5, 5:14 am, "Paul B. Andersen" wrote:

http://www.gethome.no/paulba/twins.html


OK, paul. Koobee Wublee will make you a deal. Why donít you modify
your JAVA applet and allow both twins to travel with the same
acceleration profile.


That's a request.

What's the deal?

--
Paul

http://www.gethome.no/paulba/
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Simplified Twin Paradox Resolution. Koobee Wublee Astronomy Misc 24 January 8th 13 07:51 AM
The twin paradox Koobee Wublee Astronomy Misc 22 May 11th 12 02:35 AM
TWIN PARADOX OR TWIN ABSURDITY? Pentcho Valev Astronomy Misc 111 November 25th 10 01:41 PM
TWIN PARADOX OR TWIN ABSURDITY? Androcles[_33_] Amateur Astronomy 5 November 2nd 10 05:12 PM
The twin paradox revisited Pentcho Valev Astronomy Misc 6 July 11th 07 01:47 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:52 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2019 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.