|If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.|
||Thread Tools||Display Modes|
tidal friction no longer explains much Chapt16.15 Orbital Resonance;Spin-Orbit-Coupling #1452 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed
Alright, I have two chapters he
Chapt16.14 mathematics of the force of gravity explaining how 220km/
sec Sun yet 29km/sec Earth
Chapt16.15 Maxwell Equations with EM-gravity;
Gravity-Cell; Orbital Resonance; Spin-Orbit-Coupling
And I need to develop both of them, because I need those to explain
where the galaxies of the Night Sky are positioned and their distance
from Earth. What I suspect will happen with the limitations of the
telescope to see only to about 90 million light years and no more, and
with gravity-cells for galaxies, that the galaxies are uniformly
spaced as a fruit tree orchard as given by Euclid's Orchard problem.
Now this morning I wrote about Orbital Resonance and Spin-Orbit-
Coupling, but I neglected to mention another concept similar to those
two, the concept called Synchronous Rotation such as the Moon of Earth
resulting in having the same side facing the observer.
Now the explanation that astronomers have for these three concepts:
1) Orbital Resonance
3) Synchronous Rotation
Their explanation is vastly inferior and belying their incompetence as
to the real physical means. They attribute it all to tidal friction of
I am going to offer something far better of a physical explanation.
But let me back-track to when I first learned about Orbital Resonance
or Spin Orbit Coupling and my first impression was "electronic
gravity" for it gave as in Kaufmann on page 127 Universe, 1985, that
Mercury is locked into a 3 to 2 spin orbit coupling with the Sun. In
Wikipedia, the satellites of Jupiter have a Laplace Resonance of
Ganymede 4::1 and Europa 2::1 and Io 1::1.
Now, old-astronomy would say tidal-friction.
New astronomy realizes that the Maxwell equations governs physics and
would look at those resonances as meaning that when a planet is
gravitationally locked with a satellite that there is more going on
then just tidal friction, that the force of gravity is like a
electronic clock that alters the rotation of the gravitationally bound
When we have two magnets next to one another, are we going to be
obtuse observers and call it tidal friction? No, what we are going
call it is the Maxwell Equations and the lines of force are perpetual,
so no need of silly tidal friction, but rather, one magnet locks unto
the other magnet.
So to solve the Sun of 220km/sec and the Earth at 29km/sec and keep
both gravitationally bound to each other, means the Sun has a axis
that stretches out to the Oort Cloud and this huge axis rotates to
nullify the disparity between 220km/sec and 29km/sec.
Likewise, Jupiter has a axis that extends out to encompass all its
gravity bound satellites and this Greater-Jupiter Cell rotates so that
the speed of Jupiter of 13 km/sec still keeps Callisto bound up and
moving at 8 km/sec. Without the gravity cell around Jupiter, that in
10 years time, Callisto would meander out to the Kuiper belt.
So, what Old-astronomy fobbed off as tidal friction causing so much
Resonance, is rather, that resonance comes from a Gravity-Cell of a
planet and its small satellite.
Google seems to have stopped doing author-archives as of 2012.
Only Drexel's Math Forum has done a excellent, simple and fair author-
archiving of AP posts to sci.math for the past several years as seen
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies
|Thread||Thread Starter||Forum||Replies||Last Post|
|Chapt16.15 Maxwell Equations with EM-gravity; Gravity-Cell; OrbitalResonance; Spin-Orbit-Coupling #1451 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed||Archimedes Plutonium[_2_]||Astronomy Misc||1||April 2nd 13 01:23 AM|
|Brightness Chapt16.12 Limits of distance that light can travel andseen by telescopes #1450 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed||Archimedes Plutonium[_2_]||Astronomy Misc||0||April 1st 13 08:17 AM|
|Chapt16.14 mathematics of the force of gravity to explain galaxydistribution #1444 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed||Archimedes Plutonium[_2_]||Astronomy Misc||0||March 30th 13 06:52 PM|
|Solar Emission Pressure explains Mercury's 0.43 precession betterthan GR ; #122; 3rd ed; Atom Totality (Atom Universe) theory||Archimedes Plutonium[_2_]||Astronomy Misc||13||March 21st 12 08:26 AM|
|solar radiation pressure explains Mercury precession better than GR;#107; 3rd ed. ATOM TOTALITY (Atom Universe) theory||Archimedes Plutonium[_2_]||Astronomy Misc||7||August 4th 09 07:27 AM|