If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. 


Thread Tools  Display Modes 
#1




tidal friction no longer explains much Chapt16.15 Orbital Resonance;SpinOrbitCoupling #1452 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed
Alright, I have two chapters he
Chapt16.14 mathematics of the force of gravity explaining how 220km/ sec Sun yet 29km/sec Earth Chapt16.15 Maxwell Equations with EMgravity; GravityCell; Orbital Resonance; SpinOrbitCoupling And I need to develop both of them, because I need those to explain where the galaxies of the Night Sky are positioned and their distance from Earth. What I suspect will happen with the limitations of the telescope to see only to about 90 million light years and no more, and with gravitycells for galaxies, that the galaxies are uniformly spaced as a fruit tree orchard as given by Euclid's Orchard problem. Now this morning I wrote about Orbital Resonance and SpinOrbit Coupling, but I neglected to mention another concept similar to those two, the concept called Synchronous Rotation such as the Moon of Earth resulting in having the same side facing the observer. Now the explanation that astronomers have for these three concepts: 1) Orbital Resonance 2) SpinOrbitCoupling 3) Synchronous Rotation Their explanation is vastly inferior and belying their incompetence as to the real physical means. They attribute it all to tidal friction of gravity. I am going to offer something far better of a physical explanation. But let me backtrack to when I first learned about Orbital Resonance or Spin Orbit Coupling and my first impression was "electronic gravity" for it gave as in Kaufmann on page 127 Universe, 1985, that Mercury is locked into a 3 to 2 spin orbit coupling with the Sun. In Wikipedia, the satellites of Jupiter have a Laplace Resonance of Ganymede 4::1 and Europa 2::1 and Io 1::1. Now, oldastronomy would say tidalfriction. New astronomy realizes that the Maxwell equations governs physics and would look at those resonances as meaning that when a planet is gravitationally locked with a satellite that there is more going on then just tidal friction, that the force of gravity is like a electronic clock that alters the rotation of the gravitationally bound smaller object. When we have two magnets next to one another, are we going to be obtuse observers and call it tidal friction? No, what we are going call it is the Maxwell Equations and the lines of force are perpetual, so no need of silly tidal friction, but rather, one magnet locks unto the other magnet. So to solve the Sun of 220km/sec and the Earth at 29km/sec and keep both gravitationally bound to each other, means the Sun has a axis that stretches out to the Oort Cloud and this huge axis rotates to nullify the disparity between 220km/sec and 29km/sec. Likewise, Jupiter has a axis that extends out to encompass all its gravity bound satellites and this GreaterJupiter Cell rotates so that the speed of Jupiter of 13 km/sec still keeps Callisto bound up and moving at 8 km/sec. Without the gravity cell around Jupiter, that in 10 years time, Callisto would meander out to the Kuiper belt. So, what Oldastronomy fobbed off as tidal friction causing so much Resonance, is rather, that resonance comes from a GravityCell of a planet and its small satellite.  Google seems to have stopped doing authorarchives as of 2012. Only Drexel's Math Forum has done a excellent, simple and fair author archiving of AP posts to sci.math for the past several years as seen he http://mathforum.org/kb/profile.jspa?userID=499986 Archimedes Plutonium http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium whole entire Universe is just one big atom where dots of the electrondotcloud are galaxies 
Ads 
Thread Tools  
Display Modes  


Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
Chapt16.15 Maxwell Equations with EMgravity; GravityCell; OrbitalResonance; SpinOrbitCoupling #1451 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed  Archimedes Plutonium[_2_]  Astronomy Misc  1  April 2nd 13 01:23 AM 
Brightness Chapt16.12 Limits of distance that light can travel andseen by telescopes #1450 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed  Archimedes Plutonium[_2_]  Astronomy Misc  0  April 1st 13 08:17 AM 
Chapt16.14 mathematics of the force of gravity to explain galaxydistribution #1444 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed  Archimedes Plutonium[_2_]  Astronomy Misc  0  March 30th 13 07:52 PM 
Solar Emission Pressure explains Mercury's 0.43 precession betterthan GR ; #122; 3rd ed; Atom Totality (Atom Universe) theory  Archimedes Plutonium[_2_]  Astronomy Misc  13  March 21st 12 09:26 AM 
solar radiation pressure explains Mercury precession better than GR;#107; 3rd ed. ATOM TOTALITY (Atom Universe) theory  Archimedes Plutonium[_2_]  Astronomy Misc  7  August 4th 09 07:27 AM 