|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
We *did* NOT land on THE moon
Steve Dufour wrote:
Also explain the geosync satellites I uplink video to every day in my work as a television engineer. They could be suspended from balloons in the atmosphere. Balloons that travel at hundreds of kilometres per hour? Yet more 'black tech'? -- Odysseus |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
We *did* NOT land on THE moon
Also explain the geosync
satellites I uplink video to every day in my work as a television engineer. They could be suspended from balloons in the atmosphere. Balloons that travel at hundreds of kilometres per hour? Yet more 'black tech'? Do you think that the government reveals every technology they have? |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
We *did* NOT land on THE moon
On 2 Aug 2003 20:47:35 -0700, (Steve Dufour)
wrote: Also explain the geosync satellites I uplink video to every day in my work as a television engineer. They could be suspended from balloons in the atmosphere. Balloons that travel at hundreds of kilometres per hour? Yet more 'black tech'? Do you think that the government reveals every technology they have? Even black projects have to obey basic laws of physics and aerodynamics. -- Find out about Australia's most dangerous Doomsday Cult: http://users.bigpond.net.au/wanglese/pebble.htm "You can't fool me, it's turtles all the way down." |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
We *did* NOT land on THE moon
Someone should throw all these conspiracy nuts off the edge of the Earth!
"Wally AngleseaT" wrote in message ... On 2 Aug 2003 20:47:35 -0700, (Steve Dufour) wrote: Also explain the geosync satellites I uplink video to every day in my work as a television engineer. They could be suspended from balloons in the atmosphere. Balloons that travel at hundreds of kilometres per hour? Yet more 'black tech'? Do you think that the government reveals every technology they have? Even black projects have to obey basic laws of physics and aerodynamics. -- Find out about Australia's most dangerous Doomsday Cult: http://users.bigpond.net.au/wanglese/pebble.htm "You can't fool me, it's turtles all the way down." |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
We *did* NOT land on THE moon
"markpeeters666" wrote in message
om... nonsense mercifully snipped They just don't make trolls like they used to. for more information: http://www.geocities.com/markpeeters96/r0.html How about http://www.Iamatroll.com/markpeeters96/r0.html? Clear Skies Chuck Taylor Do you observe the moon? Try the Lunar Observing Group http://groups.yahoo.com/group/lunar-observing/ |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
We *did* NOT land on THE moon
Try this one: go to www.heavens-above.com - it lists 100s of satellites that
are claimed to exist, and many countries got to claim to send them. US and USSR get to claim loads, china and european countries a few, but North Korea's [1] isn't in there. (note - site run at a german university) At locations throughout the world people look up satellites and go to their back yards and see them. Thanks. Great site. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
We *did* NOT land on THE moon
"Steve Dufour" wrote in message om... Also explain the geosync satellites I uplink video to every day in my work as a television engineer. They could be suspended from balloons in the atmosphere. I don't believe that you exist. You're a fabrication. It must be so because I haven't seen you. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
We *did* NOT land on THE moon
Hit1Hard wrote in message ...
You sh/could check the camera lens and enhance it a little for the reflection you can see in it. I see the reflection of the astronaut taking the picture, similar to the reflection in the helmet. What do =you= see? -- Stefano |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
We *did* NOT land on THE moon
"markpeeters666" wrote in message om... "W K" wrote in message ... "Steve Dufour" wrote in message om... Also explain the geosync satellites I uplink video to every day in my work as a television engineer. They could be suspended from balloons in the atmosphere. Balloons that travel at hundreds of kilometres per hour? Yet more 'black tech'? Do you think that the government reveals every technology they have? So, you need extra fast black baloons for satellites to be fake. Try this one: go to www.heavens-above.com - it lists 100s of satellites that are claimed to exist, and many countries got to claim to send them. US and USSR get to claim loads, china and european countries a few, but North Korea's [1] isn't in there. (note - site run at a german university) At locations throughout the world people look up satellites and go to their back yards and see them. Another thing you could try- is to find a satellite from that web site that goes almost directly overhead and a friend who you can trust is not part of the worldwide government conspiracy, that lives 60-100 miles away. If you talk to each other on the phone as the satellites go overhead, and use a bit of trigonometry you will find that these "black balloons" are at an altitude of 300-1000 miles and going at 17,000 miles per hour. You are right, but the thing you see.... is just an "Extra-Terrestrial" ROCK.... the so-called ET-ROCK, mostly known under the name ROCK-ET.... DID YOU VERIFY THAT IT WAS NOT A ROCK? This would mean that there are hundreds of these rocks going round the world. New ones appear whenever people "claim" to put satellites up into space. Old ones disappear when they "claim" to have been lost (I saw one of the last passes of MIR and others used to watch skylab). the "rock" they "claim" to be ISS is brighter after they "claimed" to have sent up the extra components such as the solar panels. Interestingly you have one of these "rocks" splitting into 2 and separating (or indeed two joining together) when you have trips to the ISS from the shuttle or russian ones. Perhaps they grounded the shuttle because too many people were watching it and they didn't trust the billion-billion to one luck they had of these magic rocks coinciding precisely with all the missions that they gave precise details to, months in advance. Also, shuttle flights - seen by people taking off and going off over the atlantic, were seen by people in europe 20 minutes later. Did they see the shuttle? Or did they only think it was a shuttle? Did they do some trigonometry? Or was it just a new ET-rock, or ROCK-ET in a new orbit? Ah, so precisely at the correct time, enthusiasts in diverse locations saw exactly what they should have seen, including things like the fuel tank separation. Again, magic rocks that coincide exactly with pre-planned flight times, that are cancelled and re-scheduled, but each time its possible to see the take off from web cams? And while we are at it, what about the disaster? All those people didn't see the shuttle come in over many US states, see bits dropping off along its flightpath at what you would claim to be an impossible speed? |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
"M Cynth" wrote in message
... "Steve Dufour" wrote in message om... Also explain the geosync satellites I uplink video to every day in my work as a television engineer. They could be suspended from balloons in the atmosphere. I don't believe that you exist. You're a fabrication. It must be so because I haven't seen you. One ACTOR in the moon sequences doesn't seem to want to act OUTSIDE the laws of physics...I've looked at all the footages of the moon walks...and one thing keeps bugging me about the MOON DUST...its dispersal patterns and how high it kicks up. Take into account there is NO atmosphere on the moon...the gravity is 1/6 of earth gravity. Therefore, the disperal pattern would be different, and the height of the dust raising should be over the astronauts' heads by quite a distance. Conclusion...since the dust behaves EXACTLY the same as earth atmosphere and gravity...we can safely assume that lot of sequences was NEVER near the moon Dust can't lie. -- http://home.iprimus.com.au/georgehall George Hall's E-Serial Corner |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
NASA begins moon return effort | Steve Dufour | Policy | 24 | August 13th 04 10:39 PM |
The Apollo Hoax FAQ (is not spam) :-) | Nathan Jones | Astronomy Misc | 5 | July 29th 04 06:14 AM |
Back to the Moon on what? Saturn V, Magnum, Ares launcher, Shuttle Z | TKalbfus | Policy | 179 | January 16th 04 02:11 AM |
SMART-1 leaves Earth on a long journey to the Moon (Forwarded) | Andrew Yee | Astronomy Misc | 5 | October 1st 03 09:07 PM |