|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
[fitsbits] CRPIX clarification
On Mon 2008/06/16 07:37:27 MST, Rob Seaman wrote in a message to: Eric Greisen , Mark Calabretta mcalabre@at nf.csiro.au and copied to: FITSbits , William Pence William.Pence@nasa. gov Perhaps simply excise "(e.g. as is done for random groups data)"? The less said about random groups, the better :-) As much as you optical types would like to get rid of them, random groups are still valid FITS constructs and still widely used. But if you can think of a better contrast to the regular structure of an image then I'd be happy to consider it. Regards, Mark |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[fitsbits] CRPIX clarification | William Pence[_2_] | FITS | 0 | June 12th 08 07:13 PM |
[fitsbits] CRPIX clarification | Maren Purves | FITS | 0 | May 31st 08 12:14 AM |
[fitsbits] CRPIX clarification | Rob Seaman | FITS | 0 | May 30th 08 09:16 AM |
[fitsbits] CRPIX clarification | Steve Allen | FITS | 0 | May 30th 08 04:55 AM |
[fitsbits] CRPIX clarification | Mark Calabretta | FITS | 0 | May 30th 08 04:00 AM |