|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
"Paul Lawler" wrote in message ... "Dave" wrote in message ... Barry Schwarz wrote: On Thu, 1 Jul 2004 18:02:58 +1000, "Whisper" wrote: I assume it would appear 4 times bigger than the moon does in our sky...? You know, or can find, the distance from the Earth to the Moon. Same for Earth's diameter. All you need is a spreadsheet or calculator with an arctan function. Just the multiply and divide keys should be sufficient for most purposes. Since the angle subtended by the moon is about 30 arcmin, which is pretty small, we can get away with small angle approximations. The moon's diameter is ~3476km, the earth's 12756km (equatorial). So the earth should appear ~30*12756/3476 arcmin or 1.8 degrees across in the sky to someone on the moon. That's about the same angle the width of your thumb subtends at the eye when held at arms length. And so to answer his original question, since the moon appears about 1/2 a degree across in our sky, yes, that's about 4 times bigger. Thank you. That's quite a big object isn't it.........? I guess you could discern certain landmarks? Maybe great wall of China with a telescope for eg...? |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
That's quite a big object isn't it.........? I guess you could discern certain landmarks? Maybe great wall of China with a telescope for eg...? Of course you could see landmarks - you would be able to easily recognise the continents with the naked eye (is the Pacific Ocean a landmark?). If you mean man made landmarks, certainly with a telescope. The easiest would be city lights at night; I would imagine that these would be visible with only a very modest telescope. For daytime recognition, you need a large object with a high contrast to its surroundings - perhaps some large city in a desert (LA?). You wouldn't be able to see the great wall of China, even with a very powerful telescope. Whilst I haven't been there, my understanding is that it is only about 30 metres wide. I do not believe any existing telescope on earth can resolve a line that narrow at that distance - indeed, the house I am sitting in right now is probably wider than the Great Wall of China, so if you could see the Great Wall of China from the moon you would also be able to see my house ... I don't think so! |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
That's quite a big object isn't it.........? I guess you could discern certain landmarks? Maybe great wall of China with a telescope for eg...? Of course you could see landmarks - you would be able to easily recognise the continents with the naked eye (is the Pacific Ocean a landmark?). If you mean man made landmarks, certainly with a telescope. The easiest would be city lights at night; I would imagine that these would be visible with only a very modest telescope. For daytime recognition, you need a large object with a high contrast to its surroundings - perhaps some large city in a desert (LA?). You wouldn't be able to see the great wall of China, even with a very powerful telescope. Whilst I haven't been there, my understanding is that it is only about 30 metres wide. I do not believe any existing telescope on earth can resolve a line that narrow at that distance - indeed, the house I am sitting in right now is probably wider than the Great Wall of China, so if you could see the Great Wall of China from the moon you would also be able to see my house ... I don't think so! |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Hi Odysseus The greatest picture of the Earth is the one taken as it
came up over the moon's horizon. It is hanging in my den,and I blew it up to 3 by 5 feet. That picture reminds me that there was a time NASA had the right stuff. Bert |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Hi Odysseus The greatest picture of the Earth is the one taken as it
came up over the moon's horizon. It is hanging in my den,and I blew it up to 3 by 5 feet. That picture reminds me that there was a time NASA had the right stuff. Bert |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
I take fast pictures,and they take up my time,and aggravation of my wife
opening my dark room door; However i did not have to blow up that great Apollo picture taken by NASA.,and have it destroyed? NASA is OK ,but they went with the Shuttle,and that was a Rube Goldberg cartoon Bert |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
I take fast pictures,and they take up my time,and aggravation of my wife
opening my dark room door; However i did not have to blow up that great Apollo picture taken by NASA.,and have it destroyed? NASA is OK ,but they went with the Shuttle,and that was a Rube Goldberg cartoon Bert |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
The Apollo FAQ (moon landings were faked) | Nathan Jones | Astronomy Misc | 8 | February 4th 04 06:48 PM |
Space Calendar - January 27, 2004 | Ron | Astronomy Misc | 7 | January 29th 04 09:29 PM |
Space Calendar - October 24, 2003 | Ron Baalke | Misc | 0 | October 24th 03 04:38 PM |
Space Calendar - September 28, 2003 | Ron Baalke | History | 0 | September 28th 03 08:00 AM |
Space Calendar - August 28, 2003 | Ron Baalke | History | 0 | August 28th 03 05:32 PM |