Is the Moon Hollow? Sleuths?

MOONMUSE: 09-22-2004 THE JIM MARRS ARTICLE *PIC*

Posted By: Free_Speak Send E-Mail
Date: Wednesday, 22 September 2004, 3:47 p.m.

I have posted this before, but took the time to pull ou the extra
linefeeds and clean it up a bit. I am posting it here early befor the
evening begins, to give you time to read and soak in some of the facts
befor you begin any observations tonight.

THIS IS A LONG READ - about 4 chapters but wow - what a read. Did
you know the moon may be hollow? That's just for starters. It may mostly
be made of titanium and highly magnetic as heavenly bodies go,

There is much, much more. My thanks to Jim Marrs for contributing
this, some 5 years ago.

ADDITIONAL MOONMUSE AERTICLES FOR THIS DATE 09-22-2004 WILL BE
POSITIONED IN AN OUTLINE STRING UNDER THIS ONE.

Musings on the Moon"

-by Jim Marrs

Before the Apollo missions, lunar scientists longed for the time
when humans could walk on the moon's surface. By studying the make-up of
our satellite, they hoped to resolve some of the mysteries of how our
planet and solar system came into existence. Six moon landings later,
the public perception was that we had learned all we needed to about the
moon. However, those same lunar scientists were no closer to agreement
on how to answer even the most basic questions --- such as how the moon
was created.

Despite the return of some 842 pounds of rocks and soil samples,
photos and videotape and the placement of five nuclear-powered
scientific stations on the lunar surface, there are still no clear cut
solutions to the moon's mysteries. Quite the reverse, what we have
learned about the moon in the wake of the Apollo missions has only
raised more questions. Science writer Earl Ubell declared, "...the lunar
Rosetta Stone remains a mystery. The moon is more complicated than
anyone expected; it is not simply a kind of billiard ball frozen in
space and time, as many scientists had believed. Few of the fundamental
questions have been answered, but the Apollo rocks and recordings have
spawned a score of mysteries, a few truly breath-stopping.

Consider some of these "breath-stopping" mysteries or anomalies as
scientists prefer to call them: The moon is far older than previously
imagined, perhaps even much older than the Earth and sun. By examining
tracks burned into moon rocks by cosmic rays, scientists have dated them
as billions of years old. Some have been dated back 4.5 billion years,
far older than the Earth and nearly as old as the solar system. The
oldest rocks ever found on Earth only date back 3.5 billion years. It is
accepted by scientists today that the Earth is about 4.6 billion years old.
Harvard's respected astronomy journal Sky and Telescope reported
that at the Lunar Conference of 1973, it was revealed that one moon rock
was dated at 5.3 billion years old which would make it almost a billion
years older than our planet.

This puzzle was compounded by the fact that lunar dust in which the
rocks were found proved to be a billion years older than the rocks
themselves. Chemical analysis showed that the moon rocks were of a
completely different composition from the soil around them. Since dusty
soil is usually produced by the weathering and breakup of surrounding
rocks, the lunar rocks must have come from someplace other than where
they were found. But where?
---
The moon has at least three distinct layers of rocks. Contrary to
the idea that heavier objects sink, the heavier rocks are found on the
surface. These rich materials that are usually concentrated in the
interior of a world are on the outside of moon. Earl Ubell, a former
science editor for CBS television, acknowledged this mystery, saying,
"The first (layer), 20 miles deep, consists of lava like material
similar to lava flows on Earth. The second, extending down to 50 miles,
is made up of somewhat denser rock. The third, continuing to a depth of
at least 80 miles and probably below, appears to be of a heavy material
similar to the Earth's mantle..." Ubell asked, "If the Earth and moon
were created at the same time, near each other, why has one got all the
iron and the other (the moon) not much? The differences suggest that
Earth and moon came into being far from each other, an idea that
stumbles over the inability of astrophysicists to explain how exactly
the moon became a satellite of Earth."

The moon is extremely dry and does not appear to have ever had
water in any substantial amounts. None of the moon rocks, regardless of
location found, contained free water or even water molecules bound into
the minerals. Yet instruments left behind by Apollo missions sent a
signal to Earth on March 7, 1971, indicating a "wind" of water had
crossed the moon's surface. Since any water on the airless moon surface
vaporizes and behaves like the wind on Earth, the question became where
did this water originate? The vapor cloud eruptions lasted 14 hours and
covered an area of some 100 square miles. Some scientists claimed the
water vapor came from deep inside the moon, apparently released during a
moonquake. NASA officials offered a more mundane, and questionable,
explanation. They speculated that two tanks on Apollo descent stages
containing between 60 and 100 pounds of water became stressed and
ruptured, releasing their contents. Scientists declined to accept this
explanation, pointing out that the two tanks --- from Apollo 12 and 14
--- were some 180 kilometers apart yet the water vapor was detected with
the same flux at both sites although the instruments faced in opposite
directions. Skeptics also have understandably questioned the odds of two
separate tanks breaking simultaneously and how such a small quantity of
water could produce 100 square miles of vapor.

Additionally, Apollo 16 astronauts found moon rocks which contained
bits of rusted iron. Since oxidation requires oxygen and free hydrogen,
this rust indicates there must be water somewhere on the moon. Moon
rocks were found to be magnetized --- not strong enough to pick up a
paper clip, but magnetic nevertheless. What makes this so odd is that
there is no magnetic field on the moon itself. So where did the
magnetism come from? The argument that perhaps the moon picked up its
magnetism from close contact with the Earth collapses when one considers
that if the moon got close enough to pick up a magnetic field, it was
close enough to be ripped apart by the Earth's gravitational pull.

The presence of maria, or large seas of smooth solidified molten
rock, on the moon indicates nothing less than a vast utpouring of lava
at some distant time. It has now been confirmed that some of the moon's
craters are of internal origin. Yet there is no indication that the moon
has ever been hot enough to produce volcanic eruptions. "The relative
cool of the lunar interior (about 1,800 degree Fahrenheit as compared
with the Earth's interior temperature of between 3,600 and 9,000
degrees) suggests that the moon was pretty cool to begin with and that
the interior contains less radioactivity than the Earth or the surface
of the moon," stated Ubell. Others tried to explain this conundrum by
stating that the moon was volcanically active some billions of years ago
but, being a small world, rapidly lost its heat.

Another puzzle is that almost all --- four-fifths --- of the maria
are located on the moon's Earthside hemisphere. Few maria mark the far
side of the moon, often erroneously referred to as the "dark side". Yet
the far side contains many more craters and mountainous areas. In
comparison to the rest of the moon, the maria are relatively free of
craters suggesting that craters were covered by lava flow. Adding to
this mystery are the mascons --- large dense circular masses lying 20 to
40 miles below the center of the moon's maria. The mascons were
discovered because their denseness distorted the orbits of our
spacecraft flying over or near them. One scientist proposed that the
mascons are heavy iron meteorites which plunged deep into the moon while
it was in a soft, formiable stage.

This theory has been discounted since meteorites strike with such
high velocities, they would vaporize on contact. Another mundane
explanation is that the mascons are nothing more than lava-filled
caverns, but skeptics say there isn't enough lava present to accomplish
this. Since the maria appear to have been formed by hot lava, why did
not these heavy mascons sink to the bottom? "What they are is a major
moon mystery," wrote Don Wilson, author of Our Mysterious Spaceship Moon.

"It now appears that the mascons are broad disk-shaped objects that
could be possibly some kind of artificial construction. For huge
circular disks are not likely to be beneath each huge maria, centered
like bull-eyes in the middle of each, by coincidence or accident."

During the Apollo missions seismographic equipment was placed at
six separate sites on the moon. Between 1969 and 1977, when this
equipment ceased operating, up to 3,000 "moonquakes" were detected
during each year of operation. Most of the vibrations were quite small
and were caused by meteorite strikes or falling booster rockets. But
many other quakes were detected deep inside the moon. This internal
creaking is believed to be caused by the gravitational pull of our
planet as most moonquakes occur when the moon is closest to the Earth.
However, an event occurred in 1958 in the moon's Alphonsus crater which
shook the idea that all internal moonquake activity was simply settling
rocks. In November of that year, Soviet astronomer Nikolay A. Kozyrev of
the Crimean Astrophysical Observatory set the scientific world on its
ear by photographing the first recorded gaseous eruption on the moon
near the crater's peak. Kozyrev attributed this to escaping fluorescent
gases. He also detected a reddish glow characteristic of carbon
compounds which "seemed to move and disappeared after an hour". Some
scientists refused to accept Kozyrev's findings. However, astronomers at
the Lowell Observatory also saw reddish glows on the crests of ridges in
the Aristarchus region in 1963. Apollo Astronauts Neil Armstrong and
Edwin "Buzz" Aldrin sighted eerie lights inside a crater near the point
on the moon where their lunar lander was due to touch down in July, 1969.

On their first sweep around the moon, Armstrong described a
mysterious bright light on the inner wall of the crater Aristarchus,
located north of their flight path. "It seems to have a slight amount of
fluorescence to it. The area in the crater is quite bright," he
reported. "That area is definitely brighter than anything else I can
see. There doesn't appear to be any color involved in it.It looks like
an eerie sight," confirmed Aldrin.

Something is going on inside the volcanically dead moon. And
whatever it is, it occurs the same way at the same time. As the moon
moves closer to the Earth, seismic signals from different stations on
the lunar surface detect identical vibrations. Could internal shifting
inside the moon always occur the exact same way? Hardly likely. New York
Times writer Walter Sullivan wrote, "It is as though the ups and downs
of the stock market repeated themselves precisely for each period of
fluctuation." The question of identical vibrations made it hard to
understand how this could be a natural phenomenon. However, something
artificially constructed could produce the same identical seismic
result, which could occur over and over. For example, a broken hull
plate could shift exactly the same way each time the moon passed near
the Earth.

There are many indications that the moon may be hollow. The moon's
mean density --- about 3.34 grams per cubic centimeter or 3.34 times as
much as an equal volume of water --- is significantly different from the
5.5 gram density of the Earth's mantle. Studies of moon rocks indicate
that the moon's interior differs from the Earth's mantle in ways
suggesting a very small, or even no, core. As far back as 1962, NASA
scientist Dr. Gordon MacDonald stated, "If the astronomical data are
reduced, it is found that the data require that the interior of the moon
be less dense than the outer parts. Indeed, it would seem that the moon
is more like a hollow than a homogeneous sphere."

Unwilling to believe the moon hollow, MacDonald believed his data
may have been faulty. However, other studies tended to confirm his
findings. M.I.T.'s Dr. Sean C. Solomon wrote, "The Lunar Orbiter
experiments vastly improved our knowledge of the moon's gravitational
field...indicating the frightening possibility that the moon might be
hollow."

Why frightening? The significance was stated by astronomer Carl
Sagan way back in his 1966 work Intelligent Life in the Universe, "A
natural satellite cannot be a hollow object." The most startling
evidence that the moon could be hollow came on November 20, 1969, when
the Apollo 12 crew, after returning to their command ship, sent the
lunar module (LM) ascent stage crashing back onto the moon creating an
artificial moonquake. The LM struck the surface about 40 miles from the
Apollo 12 landing site where ultra-sensitive seismic equipment recorded
something both unexpected and astounding ---- the moon reverberated like
a bell for more than an hour. The vibration wave took almost t eight
minutes to reach a peak, then decreased in intensity.

At a news conference that day, one of the co-directors of the
seismic experiment, Maurice Ewing, told reporters scientists were at a
loss to explain the ringing. "As for the meaning of it, I'd rather not
make an interpretation right now. But it is as though someone had struck
a bell, say, in the bellfry of a church a single blow and found that the
reverberation from it continued for 30 minutes." Dr. Frank Press of
M.I.T. added, "...none of us have seen anything like this on Earth. In
all our experience, it is quite an extraordinary event. That this rather
small impact...produced a signal which lasted 30 minutes is quite beyond
the range of our experience."

The phenomenon was repeated when the Apollo 13's third stage was
sent crashing onto the moon by radio command, striking with the
equivalent of 11 tons of TNT. According to NASA, this time the moon
"reacted like a gong". Although seismic equipment was more than 108
miles from the crash site, recordings showed reverberations lasted for
three hours and 20 minutes and traveled to a depth of 22 to 25 miles.
Subsequent studies of man-made crashes on the moon yielded similar
results. After one impact the moon reverberated for four hours. This
ringing coupled with the density problem on the moon led some to
conclude the moon may have an unusually light --- or even no --- core.
They hoped to record the impact of a meteor large enough to send shock
waves to the moon's core and back and settle the issue. That opportunity
came on May 13, 1972, when a large meteor stuck the moon with the
equivalent force of 200 tons of TNT.

After sending shock waves deep into the interior of the moon,
scientists were baffled to find that none returned, confirming that
there is something unusual about the moon's core. According to author
Wilson, one NASA scientist has admitted that the U.S. Government has
conducted experiments "which were not publicly announced" to determine
if the moon is hollow or contains large cavities. Dr. Farouk El Baz was
quoted as saying, "There are many undiscovered caverns suspected to
exist beneath the surface of the moon. Several experiments have been
flown to the moon to see if there actually were such caverns."
The results of these experiments have not been made public. It
seems apparent that the moon has a tough, hard outer shell and a light
or nonexistent interior. The moon's shell contains dark minerals such as
titanium, used on Earth in the construction of aircraft and space
vehicles. Many people still recall watching our astronauts on TV as they
vainly tried to drill through the crust of a moon maria. Their specially
designed drills could only penetrate a few inches.

The puzzle of the moon's hard surface was compounded by the
discovery of what appeared to be processed metals. Experts were
surprised to find lunar rocks bearing brass, mica and amphibole in
addition to the near-pure titanium. They conclude it is the large amount
of titanium in the black mineral illeminite which gives the dark tone to
the lunar seas . Uranium 236 and neptunium 237 --- elements not
previously found in nature --- were discovered in moon rocks, according
to the Argone National Laboratory.

While still trying to explain the presence of these materials,
scientists were further startled to learn of rust-proof iron particles
in a soil sample from the Sea of Crisis. In 1976, the Associated Press
reported that the Soviets had announced the discovery of iron particles
that "do not rust" in samples brought back by an unmanned moon mission
in 1970. Iron which does not rust is unknown in nature and well beyond
present Earth technology.

Undoubtedly the greatest mystery concerning our moon is how it came
to be there in the first place. Prior to the Apollo missions, one
serious theory as to the moon's origin was that it broke off of the
Earth eons ago, although no one could positively locate where on Earth
it originated. This idea was discarded when it was found that there is
little similarity between the composition of our world and the moon. A
more recent theory had the moon created out of space debris left over
from the creation of the Earth. This concept proved untenable in light
of current gravitational theory which indicates that one large object
will accumulate all loose material, leaving none for the formation of
another large body.

It is now generally accepted that the moon originated elsewhere and
entered the Earth's gravitational field at some point in the distant
past. Here theories diverge --- one stating that the moon was originally
a planet which collided with the Earth creating debris which combined
forming the moon while another states the moon, while wandering through
our solar system, was captured and pulled into orbit by Earth's gravity.
Neither of these theories are especially compelling because of the lack
of evidence that either the Earth or the moon has been physically
disrupted by a past close encounter. There is no debris in space
indicating a past collision and it does not appear that the Earth and
the moon developed during the same time period. A current encyclopedia
stated, "...there seems to be a record of lunar magmatic (molten rock)
processes in operation long before any processes that can be deduced
directly by terrestrial geological studies." As for the "capture"
theory, even scientist Isaac Asimov, so well known for his works of
fiction, has written, "It's too big to have been captured by the Earth.
The chances of such a capture having been effected and the moon then
having taken up nearly circular orbit around our Earth are too small to
make such an eventuality credible."

Asimov was right to consider the moon's orbit --- it is not only
nearly a perfect circle but stationary, one side always facing the Earth
with only the slightest variation. As far as we know, it's the only
natural satellite with such an orbit. This circular orbit is especially
odd considering that the moon's center of mass lies more than a mile
closer to the Earth than its geometric center. This fact alone should
produce an unstable, wobbly orbit, much as a ball with its mass off
center will not roll in a straight line. Additionally, almost all of the
other satellites in our solar system orbit in the plane of their
planet's equator. Not so the moon, whose orbit lies strangely nearer the
Earth's orbit around the sun or inclined to the Earth's ecliptic by more
than five degrees. Add to this the fact that the moon's bulge ---
located on the side facing away from Earth --- thus negating the idea
that it was caused by the Earth's gravitational pull --- makes for an
off-balanced world. It seems impossible t hat such an oddity could
naturally fall into such a precise and circular orbit. It is a
fascinating conundrum as articulated by science writer William Roy
Shelton, who wrote, "It is important to remember that something had to
put the moon at or near its present circular pattern around the Earth.
Just as an Apollo spacecraft circling the Earth every 90 minutes while
100 miles high has to have a velocity of roughly 18,000 miles per hour
to stay in orbit, so something had to give the moon the precisely
required velocity for its weight and ltitude....The point --- and it is
one seldom noted in considering the origin of the moon --- is that it is
extremely unlikely that any object would just stumble into that orbit.
`Something' had to put the moon at its altitude, on its course and at
its speed. The question is: what was that `something'?" If the precise
and stationary orbit of the moon is seen as sheer coincidence, is it
also coincidence that the moon is at just the right distance from the
Earth to completely cover the sun during an eclipse? While the diameter
of the moon is a mere 2,160 miles against the sun's gigantic 864,000
miles, it is nevertheless in just the proper position to blockout all
but the sun's flaming corona when it moves between the sun and the
Earth. Asimov explains, "There is no astronomical reason why the moon
and the sun should fit so well. It is the sheerest of coincidences, and
only the Earth among all the planets is blessed in this fashion."

How does one explain these and many other moon mysteries?
Scientists are a conservative lot who all too often tend to ignore any
data not pertaining to their own particular area of expertise. They are
as lost at explaining our nearest satellite as they are at explaining
tektites --- small glassy extraterrestrial blobs found only at a few
sites on Earth.
For years scientists believed tektites were blown to Earth by
meteorite strikes on the moon. However, this theory was overturned when
the Apollo missions failed to find anything comparable on the moon. In
July, 1970, two Russian scientists offered a bizarre theory of the
origin of the moon --- but one which provided an answer to all the
mysteries. Little notice was taken when Michael Vasin and Alexander
Shcherbakov published an article in the Soviet journal Sputnik entitled
"Is the Moon the Creation of Alien Intelligence?" After all, who could
take seriously such an outrageous concept?

They advanced the theory that the moon is not a completely natural
world, but a planetoid which was hollowed out eons ago in the far
reaches of space by intelligence beings possessing a technology far
superior to ours. Huge machines were used to melt rock and form large
cavities within the moon, spewing the molten refuse onto the surface.
Protected by a hull-like inner shell plus a reconstructed outer shell of
metallic rocky junk, this gigantic craft was steered through the cosmos
and finally parked in orbit around the Earth.

Absurd? Perhaps, but it answers the many questions raised by the
moon better than the constantly revised theories of science.

-End-
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Some points I want to make, lest they be missed;

When you extrapolate the facts that Jim has presented, I don't
think we can ignore the possibility that THE MOON may actually be the
first ARK, bringing mankind and animal life to this world. It is hanging
out there in orbit in a VERY unnatural fashion, after all, double-parked
in time and space, older, much older than the hills.

STOP for a second and consider the work of Graham Hancock who has
pointed out that the Egyptians had NO EVOLUTIONARY HISTORY of their
society. They simply ARRIVED with a fully developed society including
math, writing, language, science, philosophy, medicine, religion,
architecture, and so on.. There is no way to trace their DEVELOPMENT
into what was a magnificent civilization. They were just suddenly HERE.

Hancock has pointed out also time and again that we seem to be
surrounded by clues to something very IMPORTANT that we have somehow
forgotten. Like maybe where we came from? Who we are? Consider the
incredibly intuitive "Star Wars" and "The Empire Strikes Back" Where
George Lucas and Stephen Spielberg presented the Death Star in an
undeniably familiar fashion.

What if the moon is Atlantis? What if the moon is actually an
extremely OLD spacecraft with a coating of pulverized meteors and space
junk collected over eons of time or that it possibly has been
CAMOUFLAGED in this way, for its own protection?

WHAT IF WE CAME FROM LUNA?

Then all of us after all, - are Lunatics.

Free_Speak
http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin...cgi?read=56087

"Imperishable Stars" wrote in message
...

forgotten. Like maybe where we came from? Who we are? Consider the
incredibly intuitive "Star Wars" and "The Empire Strikes Back" Where
George Lucas and Stephen Spielberg presented the Death Star in an
undeniably familiar fashion.

What if the moon is Atlantis? What if the moon is actually an
extremely OLD spacecraft with a coating of pulverized meteors and space
junk collected over eons of time or that it possibly has been
CAMOUFLAGED in this way, for its own protection?

Then all of us after all, - are Lunatics.

Why does a crackpot keep posting crackpot messages? Sleuths?

Can I start #1 of 101 things pathetic about that drivel is that the guy
can't even get his non-science facts straight; Speilberg had nothing to do
with STAR WARS.

The author of that bit of nonsense certainly has described himself
(Lunatic).

Algomeysa2 wrote:

"Imperishable Stars" wrote in message
...


forgotten. Like maybe where we came from? Who we are? Consider the

incredibly intuitive "Star Wars" and "The Empire Strikes Back" Where
George Lucas and Stephen Spielberg presented the Death Star in an
undeniably familiar fashion.

What if the moon is Atlantis? What if the moon is actually an
extremely OLD spacecraft with a coating of pulverized meteors and space
junk collected over eons of time or that it possibly has been
CAMOUFLAGED in this way, for its own protection?


Then all of us after all, - are Lunatics.


Why does a crackpot keep posting crackpot messages? Sleuths?

Can I start #1 of 101 things pathetic about that drivel is that the guy
can't even get his non-science facts straight; Speilberg had nothing to do
with STAR WARS.

The author of that bit of nonsense certainly has described himself
(Lunatic).

You are an idiot.

On Wed, 22 Sep 2004 18:47:35 -0400, Imperishable Stars wrote:

MOONMUSE: 09-22-2004 THE JIM MARRS ARTICLE *PIC*

Posted By: Free_Speak Send E-Mail
Date: Wednesday, 22 September 2004, 3:47 p.m.

I have posted this before, but took the time to pull ou the extra
linefeeds and clean it up a bit. I am posting it here early befor the
evening begins, to give you time to read and soak in some of the facts
befor you begin any observations tonight.

THIS IS A LONG READ - about 4 chapters but wow - what a read. Did
you know the moon may be hollow?


Your ****ing head is hollow, that I know for sure.

I'd like to thank the parents and teachers of the world for doing such a
great job with the children.....

Fredrick Garvin wrote:

On Wed, 22 Sep 2004 18:47:35 -0400, Imperishable Stars wrote:


MOONMUSE: 09-22-2004 THE JIM MARRS ARTICLE *PIC*

Posted By: Free_Speak Send E-Mail
Date: Wednesday, 22 September 2004, 3:47 p.m.

I have posted this before, but took the time to pull ou the extra
linefeeds and clean it up a bit. I am posting it here early befor the
evening begins, to give you time to read and soak in some of the facts
befor you begin any observations tonight.

THIS IS A LONG READ - about 4 chapters but wow - what a read. Did
you know the moon may be hollow?



Your ****ing head is hollow, that I know for sure.

I'd like to thank the parents and teachers of the world for doing such a
great job with the children.....

Idiot number 2 steps up to the plate.

"Imperishable Stars" wrote in message
...

(Lunatic).

And you're the one seriously suggesting that the DeathStar in STAR WARS is
incredibly intuitive that the Moon is actually a big spaceship.

Two clues for you:

THE DEMON-HAUNTED WORLD by Carl Sagan

WHY PEOPLE BELIEVE IN WEIRD THINGS by Michael Shermer.

Algomeysa2 wrote:

"Imperishable Stars" wrote in message
...


(Lunatic).


And you're the one seriously suggesting that the DeathStar in STAR WARS is
incredibly intuitive that the Moon is actually a big spaceship.

Hardly moron. Speilberg and Lucas were partners in their special
effects efforts dumbass.


Two clues for you:

THE DEMON-HAUNTED WORLD by Carl Sagan

WHY PEOPLE BELIEVE IN WEIRD THINGS by Michael Shermer.


Clue for you: sociopath get some help. Try discussing the scientific
points raised in the original thread, other than that you are useless.

"Imperishable Stars" wrote in message
...

Hardly moron. Speilberg and Lucas were partners in their special
effects efforts dumbass.

Nope. Spielberg had nothing to do with STAR WARS.

Try discussing the scientific points raised in the original thread,
other than that you are useless.

Ok: A 4 billion year old Moon is not a spaceship.

Alas, there were no scientific points raised in your thread.

"Imperishable Stars" wrote in message
...


Fredrick Garvin wrote:

On Wed, 22 Sep 2004 18:47:35 -0400, Imperishable Stars wrote:


MOONMUSE: 09-22-2004 THE JIM MARRS ARTICLE *PIC*

Posted By: Free_Speak Send E-Mail
Date: Wednesday, 22 September 2004, 3:47 p.m.

I have posted this before, but took the time to pull ou the extra
linefeeds and clean it up a bit. I am posting it here early befor the
evening begins, to give you time to read and soak in some of the facts
befor you begin any observations tonight.

THIS IS A LONG READ - about 4 chapters but wow - what a read. Did
you know the moon may be hollow?



Your ****ing head is hollow, that I know for sure.

I'd like to thank the parents and teachers of the world for doing such a
great job with the children.....

Idiot number 2 steps up to the plate.

knock it off you moron.
you're a pathethic retard with an iq of no more than 2 points. go back to
flipping those burgers at Mcdonald's

Imperishable Stars wrote in

Clue for you: sociopath get some help. Try discussing the scientific
points raised in the original thread, other than that you are useless.

We would love to... unfortunately there aren't any.