Fascists Are Cowards Copy and Paste Party // Aliens UFOs Proof Evidence // Deleted By YouTube !!!

On Fri, 18 Jun 2010 17:13:28 +1200, Sir Gilligan Horry
wrote:

On Fri, 18 Jun 2010 17:05:39 +1200, Sir Gilligan Horry
wrote:

On Fri, 18 Jun 2010 00:44:04 -0400, V wrote:

On Fri, 18 Jun 2010 16:32:48 +1200, Sir Gilligan Horry
wrote:

Not just America,

Glad you admit you're a fascist.


Know that you are
talking about the same
gallaxies colliding
stuff all day repeating over and over.

snip several hundreds of lines of your senseless drivel

And you don't like it because it's all true -- and it will eventually
kill you along with the people whom you believe are carrying your ass,
thus making your (and their) dream of a fascist world order
impossible.

You can't buck up and be a real human being -- fascists are subhuman,
living in a world of delusionary thinking -- never facing reality.
Here's the reality you can't face and you run away from like the
sniveling fascist coward that you a

On Wed, 16 Jun 2010 18:03:39 -0700 (PDT), vtcapo
wrote:

You left out the timetable for this catastrophic event.

1985 - 2084.

Some of the significant Earth-observable highlights of the Milky
Way/Andromeda collision:

1985: Ozone hole develops in Earth's atmosphe
http://www.nasa.gov/centers/langley/...LOE-Ozone.html

1990: Global cooling begins:
http://www.awitness.org/column/remna...ling_2007.html

1994: Increase in potential Earth impacting objects:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/99942_Apophis
Schumaker-Leavy:
http://www2.jpl.nasa.gov/sl9/
Hale Bop:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZPeUNb2c6ZY

1995: change in solar activity:
http://www-ssc.igpp.ucla.edu/IASTP/43/

Dec. 8, 1998, solar wind blows away part of Earth's atmosphe
http://science.nasa.gov/science-news.../ast08dec98_1/

Dec. 25 2004, Sumatra earthquake & Indian Ocean tsunami:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2004_In...ean_earthquake

Dec. 6, 2005, Earth slips on its rotational axis:
http://www.divulgence.net/axis_shift_imagery.htm

2005 to date: massive increase in Earth's volcanic and tectonics:
http://usgs.gov

The latest:
April 20, 2010, BP oil well blow out.

crickets

"V" wrote in message
...

And you don't like it because it's all true -- and it will eventually
kill you along with the people whom you believe are carrying your ass,
thus making your (and their) dream of a fascist world order
impossible.

You can't buck up and be a real human being -- fascists are subhuman,
living in a world of delusionary thinking -- never facing reality.
Here's the reality you can't face and you run away from like the
sniveling fascist coward that you a


Alexa... When was he last time you had sex?

.... With a person.





--
Some days, it's just not worth chewing through the restraints

On Fri, 18 Jun 2010 07:57:19 -0400, "HVAC" wrote:


"V" wrote in message
.. .

And you don't like it because it's all true -- and it will eventually
kill you along with the people whom you believe are carrying your ass,
thus making your (and their) dream of a fascist world order
impossible.

You can't buck up and be a real human being -- fascists are subhuman,
living in a world of delusionary thinking -- never facing reality.
Here's the reality you can't face and you run away from like the
sniveling fascist coward that you a


Alexa...

Persecuting your imaginary enemies is what got you in the trouble.


When was he last time you had sex?

... With a person.

On Fri, 18 Jun 2010 07:57:19 -0400, "HVAC" wrote:

When was he last time you had sex?

Are you being treated for you aspergers syndrome?

Dear Alexa,

It is with great regret that we feel obliged to inform you that
your Frontal Lobotomy was unsuccessful.

We cannot return the portion we removed, since our Illegal
Alien cook likes scrambled brains and eggs for breakfast.

However, since your daily screed is still as devoid of substance
and reason as it was before the operation, we can only conclude
that your brain was a wasteland from the outset.

Save your money and perhaps in the near future we can perfom
a colonoscopy in an attempt to locate the remainder of your
brain.

Sincerely,

The "Ass 'n Brain" Team

On Fri, 18 Jun 2010 12:24:47 -0700, "Hagar" wrote:

Dear Alexa,

Obyasnete vashu oderzhemost.


It is with great regret that we feel obliged to inform you that
your Frontal Lobotomy was unsuccessful.

We cannot return the portion we removed, since our Illegal
Alien cook likes scrambled brains and eggs for breakfast.

However, since your daily screed is still as devoid of substance
and reason as it was before the operation, we can only conclude
that your brain was a wasteland from the outset.

Save your money and perhaps in the near future we can perfom
a colonoscopy in an attempt to locate the remainder of your
brain.

Sincerely,

The "Ass 'n Brain" Team




--- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: ---

On Fri, 18 Jun 2010 07:57:19 -0400, "HVAC" wrote:

Path: aioe.org!eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "HVAC"
Newsgroups: alt.alien.research,alt.alien.visitors,sci.astro
Subject: Fascists Are Cowards Copy and Paste Party // Aliens UFOs Proof Evidence // Deleted By YouTube !!!
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2010 07:57:19 -0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 27
Message-ID:
References:
Injection-Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2010 11:57:15 +0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: hvac.motzarella.org; posting-host="q9Nqtd5lBOlnxkGP/KXkeQ";
logging-data="30800"; "; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19zllk7tYpRjHKCEHkHasgp"
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5579
X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5843
Cancel-Lock: sha1:b/g3WpLQWfhxdFLbR2Pj1UJu5NM=
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
Xref: aioe.org alt.alien.research:21230 alt.alien.visitors:23761 sci.astro:23662
X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 100618-1, 06/18/2010), Inbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean


"V" wrote in message
.. .

And you don't like it because it's all true -- and it will eventually
kill you along with the people whom you believe are carrying your ass,
thus making your (and their) dream of a fascist world order
impossible.

You can't buck up and be a real human being -- fascists are subhuman,
living in a world of delusionary thinking -- never facing reality.
Here's the reality you can't face and you run away from like the
sniveling fascist coward that you a


Alexa...

Obyasnete vashu oderzhemost



--- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: ---

"V" wrote in message
...

Alexa...

Persecuting your imaginary enemies is what got you in the trouble.


When was he last time you had sex?

... With a person.


Why is asking you a question, 'persecution'?

Stop being afraid.





--
"You can't enslave a truly free man. The most you can do is kill him" -RAH

On Sat, 19 Jun 2010 11:05:33 -0400, "HVAC" wrote:


"V" wrote in message
.. .

Alexa...

Persecuting your imaginary enemies is what got you in the trouble.


When was he last time you had sex?

... With a person.


Why is asking you a question, 'persecution'?

That's not my name.

Stop being afraid.

Stop being stupid.

On Sat, 19 Jun 2010 11:05:33 -0400, "HVAC" wrote:


"V" wrote in message
.. .

Alexa...

Persecuting your imaginary enemies is what got you in the trouble.


When was he last time you had sex?

... With a person.


Why is asking you a question, 'persecution'?

Stop being afraid.

You're the one who is projecting, dummy.

What's wrong with the sun?
http://www.newscientist.com/article/...html?full=true

SUNSPOTS come and go, but recently they have mostly gone. For
centuries, astronomers have recorded when these dark blemishes on the
solar surface emerge, only for them to fade away again after a few
days, weeks or months. Thanks to their efforts, we know that sunspot
numbers ebb and flow in cycles lasting about 11 years.

But for the past two years, the sunspots have mostly been missing.
Their absence, the most prolonged for nearly a hundred years, has
taken even seasoned sun watchers by surprise. "This is solar behaviour
we haven't seen in living memory," says David Hathaway, a physicist at
NASA's Marshall Space Flight Center in Huntsville, Alabama.

The sun is under scrutiny as never before thanks to an armada of space
telescopes. The results they beam back are portraying our nearest
star, and its influence on Earth, in a new light. Sunspots and other
clues indicate that the sun's magnetic activity is diminishing, and
that the sun may even be shrinking. Together the results hint that
something profound is happening inside the sun. The big question is
what?

The stakes have never been higher. Groups of sunspots forewarn of
gigantic solar storms that can unleash a billion times more energy
than an atomic bomb. Fears that these giant solar eruptions could
create havoc on EarthMovie Camera, and disputes over the sun's role in
climate change, are adding urgency to these studies. When NASA and the
European Space Agency launched the Solar and Heliospheric Observatory
almost 15 years ago, "understanding the solar cycle was not one of its
scientific objectives", says Bernhard Fleck, the mission's project
scientist. "Now it is one of the key questions."
Sun behaving badly

Sunspots are windows into the sun's magnetic soul. They form where
giant loops of magnetism, generated deep inside the sun, well up and
burst through the surface, leading to a localised drop in temperature
which we see as a dark patch. Any changes in sunspot numbers reflect
changes inside the sun. "During this transition, the sun is giving us
a real glimpse into its interior," says Hathaway.

When sunspot numbers drop at the end of each 11-year cycle, solar
storms die down and all becomes much calmer. This "solar minimum"
doesn't last long. Within a year, the spots and storms begin to build
towards a new crescendo, the next solar maximum.

What's special about this latest dip is that the sun is having trouble
starting the next solar cycle. The sun began to calm down in late
2007, so no one expected many sunspots in 2008. But computer models
predicted that when the spots did return, they would do so in force.
Hathaway was reported as thinking the next solar cycle would be a
"doozy": more sunspots, more solar storms and more energy blasted into
space. Others predicted that it would be the most active solar cycle
on record. The trouble was, no one told the sun.
The latest solar cycle was supposed to be the most active on record.
The trouble was, no one told the sun

The first sign that the prediction was wrong came when 2008 turned out
to be even calmer than expected. That year, the sun was spot-free 73
per cent of the time, an extreme dip even for a solar minimum. Only
the minimum of 1913 was more pronounced, with 85 per cent of that year
clear.

As 2009 arrived, solar physicists looked for some action. They didn't
get it. The sun continued to languish until mid-December, when the
largest group of sunspots to emerge for several years appeared.
Finally, a return to normal? Not really.

Even with the solar cycle finally under way again, the number of
sunspots has so far been well below expectations. Something appears to
have changed inside the sun, something the models did not predict. But
what?

The flood of observations from space and ground-based telescopes
suggests that the answer lies in the behaviour of two vast conveyor
belts of gas that endlessly cycle material and magnetism through the
sun's interior and out across the surface. On average it takes 40
years for the conveyor belts to complete a circuit (see diagram).

When Hathaway's team looked over the observations to find out where
their models had gone wrong, they noticed that the conveyor-belt flows
of gas across the sun's surface have been speeding up since 2004.

The circulation deep within the sun tells a different story. Rachel
Howe and Frank Hill of the National Solar Observatory in Tucson,
Arizona, have used observations of surface disturbances, caused by the
solar equivalent of seismic waves, to infer what conditions are like
within the sun. Analysing data from 2009, they found that while the
surface flows had sped up, the internal ones had slowed to a crawl.

These findings have thrown our best computer models of the sun into
disarray. "It is certainly challenging our theories," says Hathaway,
"but that's kinda nice."

It is not just our understanding of the sun that stands to benefit
from this work. The extent to which changes in the sun's activity can
affect our climate is of paramount concern. It is also highly
controversial. There are those who seek to prove that the solar
variability is the major cause of climate change, an idea that would
let humans and their greenhouse gases off the hook. Others are equally
evangelical in their assertions that the sun plays only a minuscule
role in climate change.

If this dispute could be resolved by an experiment, the obvious
strategy would be to see what happens when you switch off one
potential cause of climate change and leave the other alone. The
extended collapse in solar activity these past two years may be
precisely the right sort of test, in that it has significantly changed
the amount of solar radiation bombarding our planet. "As a natural
experiment, this is the very best thing to happen," says Joanna Haigh,
a climatologist at Imperial College London. "Now we have to see how
the Earth responds."
The climate link

Mike Lockwood at the University of Reading, UK, may already have
identified one response - the unusually frigid European winter of
2009/10. He has studied records covering data stretching back to 1650,
and found that severe European winters are much more likely during
periods of low solar activity (New Scientist, 17 April, p 6). This
fits an emerging picture of solar activity giving rise to a small
change in the global climate overall, yet large regional effects.

Another example is the Maunder minimum, the period from 1645 to 1715
during which sunspots virtually disappeared and solar activity
plummeted. If a similar spell of solar inactivity were to begin now
and continue until 2100, it would mitigate any temperature rise
through global warming by 0.3 °C on average, according to calculations
by Georg Feulner and Stefan Rahmstorf of the Potsdam Institute for
Climate Impact Research in Germany. However, something amplified the
impact of the Maunder minimum on northern Europe, ushering in a period
known as the Little Ice Age, when colder than average winters became
more prevalent and the average temperature in Europe appeared to drop
by between 1 and 2 °C.

A corresponding boost appears to be associated with peaks in solar
output. In 2008, Judith Lean of the Naval Research Laboratory in
Washington DC published a study showing that high solar activity has a
disproportionate warming influence on northern Europe (Geophysical
Research Letters, vol 35, p L18701).

So why does solar activity have these effects? Modellers may already
be onto the answer. Since 2003, spaceborne instruments have been
measuring the intensity of the sun's output at various wavelengths and
looking for correlations with solar activity. The results point to the
sun's emissions of ultraviolet light. "The ultraviolet is varying
much, much, much more than we expected," says Lockwood.

Ultraviolet light is strongly linked to solar activity: solar flares
shine brightly in the ultraviolet, and it helps carry the explosive
energy of the flares away into space. It could be particularly
significant for the Earth's climate as ultraviolet light is absorbed
by the ozone layer in the stratosphere, the region of atmosphere that
sits directly above the weather-bearing troposphere.

More ultraviolet light reaching the stratosphere means more ozone is
formed. And more ozone leads to the stratosphere absorbing more
ultraviolet light. So in times of heightened solar activity, the
stratosphere heats up and this influences the winds in that layer.
"The heat input into the stratosphere is much more variable than we
thought," says Lockwood.

Enhanced heating of the stratosphere could be behind the heightened
effects felt by Europe of changes in solar activity. Back in 1996,
Haigh showed that the temperature of the stratosphere influences the
passage of the jet stream, the high-altitude river of air passing from
west to east across Europe.

Lockwood's latest study shows that when solar activity is low, the jet
stream becomes liable to break up into giant meanders that block warm
westerly winds from reaching Europe, allowing Arctic winds from
Siberia to dominate Europe's weather.

The lesson for climate research is clear. "There are so many weather
stations in Europe that, if we are not careful, these solar effects
could influence our global averages," says Lockwood. In other words,
our understanding of global climate change could be skewed by not
taking into account solar effects on European weather.

Just as one mystery begins to clear, another beckons. Since its launch
15 years ago, the SOHO spacecraft has watched two solar minimums, one
complete solar cycle, and parts of two other cycles - the one that
ended in 1996 and the one that is just stirring. For all that time its
VIRGO instrument has been measuring the total solar irradiance (TSI),
the energy emitted by the sun. Its measurements can be stitched
together with results from earlier missions to provide a 30-year
record of the sun's energy output. What this shows is that during the
latest solar minimum, the sun's output was 0.015 per cent lower than
during the previous lull. It might not sound like much, but it is a
hugely significant result.

We used to think that the sun's output was unwavering. That view began
to change following the launch in 1980 of NASA's Solar Maximum
Mission. Its observations show that the amount of energy the sun puts
out varies by around 0.1 per cent over a period of days or weeks over
a solar cycle.
Shrinking star

Despite this variation, the TSI has dipped to the same level during
the three previous solar minima. Not so during this recent elongated
minimum. Although the observed drop is small, the fact that it has
happened at all is unprecedented. "This is the first time we have
measured a long-term trend in the total solar irradiance," says Claus
Fröhlich of the World Radiation Centre in Davos, Switzerland, and lead
investigator for the VIRGO instrument.

If the sun's energy output is changing, then its temperature must be
fluctuating too. While solar flares can heat up the gas at the
surface, changes in the sun's core would have a more important
influence on temperature, though calculations show it can take
hundreds of thousands of years for the effects to percolate out to the
surface. Whatever the mechanism, the cooler the surface, the less
energy there is to "puff up" the sun. The upshot of any dip in the
sun's output is that the sun should also be shrinking.

Observations suggest that it is - though we needn't fear a catastrophe
like that depicted in the movie Sunshine just yet. Back in the 17th
century French astronomer Jean Picard made his mark by measuring the
sun's diameter. His observations were carried out during the Maunder
minimum, and he obtained a result larger than modern measurements. Was
this simply because of an error on Picard's part, or could the sun
genuinely have shrunk since then? "There has been a lot of animated
discussion, and the problem is not yet solved," says Gérard Thuillier
of the Pierre and Marie Curie University in Paris, France.
Any dip in the sun's output means that the sun is shrinking.
Observations suggest that it is, though they are controversial

Observations with ground-based telescopes are not precise enough to
resolve the question, due to the distorting effect of Earth's
atmosphere. So the French space agency has designed a mission, aptly
named Picard, to return precise measurements of the sun's diameter and
look for changes.

Frustratingly the launch, on a Russian Dnepr rocket, is mired in a
political disagreement between Russia and neighbouring Kazakhstan.
Until the dispute is resolved, the spacecraft must wait. Every day of
delay means valuable data being missed as the sun takes steps, however
faltering, into the next cycle of activity. "We need to launch now,"
says Thuillier.

What the sun will do next is beyond our ability to predict. Most
astronomers think that the solar cycle will proceed, but at
significantly depressed levels of activity similar to those last seen
in the 19th century. However, there is also evidence that the sun is
inexorably losing its ability to produce sunspots (see "The sunspot
forecast"). By 2015, they could be gone altogether, plunging us into a
new Maunder minimum - and perhaps a new Little Ice Age.

Of course, solar activity is just one natural source of climate
variability. Volcanic eruptions are another, spewing gas and dust into
the atmosphere. Nevertheless, it remains crucial to understand the
precise changeability of the sun, and the way it influences the
various regional patterns of weather on Earth. Climate scientists will
then be able to correct for these effects, not just in interpreting
modern measurements but also when attempting to reconstruct the
climate stretching back centuries. It is only by doing so that we can
reach an unassailable consensus about the sun's true level of
influence on the Earth and its climate.
266 days without sunspots in 2008
18 billion tonnes of matter thrown into space by a coronal mass
ejection
The sunspot forecast

Although sunspots are making a belated comeback after the protracted
solar minimum, the signs are that all is not well. For decades,
William Livingston at the National Solar Observatory in Tucson,
Arizona, has been measuring the strength of the magnetic fields which
puncture the sun's surface and cause the spots to develop. Last year,
he and colleague Matt Penn pointed out that the average strength of
sunspot magnetic fields has been sliding dramatically since 1995.

If the trend continues, in just five years the field will have slipped
below the threshold magnetic field needed for sunspots to form.

How likely is this to happen? Mike Lockwood at the University of
Reading, UK, has scoured historical data to look for similar periods
of solar inactivity, which show up as increases in the occurrence of
certain isotopes in ice cores and tree rings. He found 24 such
instances in the last few thousand years. On two of those occasions,
sunspots all but disappeared for decades. Lockwood puts the chance of
this happening now at just 8 per cent.

Only on one occasion did the sunspot number bounce back to record
levels. In the majority of cases, the sun continued producing spots
albeit at significantly depressed levels. It seems that the sunspot
bonanza of last century is over.