#1
|
|||
|
|||
Chris' POD
Congratulations Chris on your APOD! That is a very fine picture thanks for
getting it posted on the APOD site. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Chris' POD
On Mon, 17 Aug 2009 21:42:00 -0400, "John Nichols"
wrote: Congratulations Chris on your APOD! That is a very fine picture thanks for getting it posted on the APOD site. Thanks. It was a pleasant surprise when they asked me if they could use it. _________________________________________________ Chris L Peterson Cloudbait Observatory http://www.cloudbait.com |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Chris' POD
On 18 Αύγ, 05:32, Chris L Peterson wrote:
On Mon, 17 Aug 2009 21:42:00 -0400, "John Nichols" wrote: Congratulations Chris on your APOD! *That is a very fine picture thanks for getting it posted on the APOD site. Thanks. It was a pleasant surprise when they asked me if they could use it. _________________________________________________ Chris L Peterson Cloudbait Observatoryhttp://www.cloudbait.com Chris, Many congrats from me as well. It was a neat synopsis and very informative and graphic. Anthony. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Chris' POD
On Aug 18, 3:32*am, Chris L Peterson wrote:
On Mon, 17 Aug 2009 21:42:00 -0400, "John Nichols" wrote: Congratulations Chris on your APOD! *That is a very fine picture thanks for getting it posted on the APOD site. Thanks. It was a pleasant surprise when they asked me if they could use it. _________________________________________________ Chris L Peterson Cloudbait Observatoryhttp://www.cloudbait.com That is right you clown,you can only give relevance to the constellations in terms of orbital dynamics so glad to see you can unlearn that stupid notion that the apparent rotation of the constellations around Polaris has some relevance in terms of planetary dynamics and daily rotation in particular - "Where are all of these meteors coming from? In terms of direction on the sky, the pointed answer is the constellation of Perseus. That is why the last week's meteor shower was known as the Perseids -- the meteors all appear to come from a radiant toward Perseus. Three dimensionally, however, sand-sized debris expelled from Comet Swift- Tuttle follows a well-defined orbit about our Sun, and the part of the orbit that approaches Earth is superposed in front of the Perseus. Therefore, when Earth crosses this orbit, the radiant point of falling debris appears in Perseus. " There you go Peterson,you get my student of the day award and good for you,the next thing you unlearn is why the motion of Persius around Polaris is a great timekeeping convenience based on the equable 365/366 day calendar system. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Chris' POD
On Aug 18, 7:23*pm, oriel36 wrote:
There you go Peterson,you get my student of the day award and good for you,the next thing you unlearn is why the motion of Persius around Polaris is a great timekeeping convenience based on the equable 365/366 day calendar system. One starts wishing for a stray meteor... Anyway, great illustration Chris! |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Chris' POD
On Aug 18, 10:23*am, oriel36 wrote:
On Aug 18, 3:32*am, Chris L Peterson wrote: On Mon, 17 Aug 2009 21:42:00 -0400, "John Nichols" wrote: Congratulations Chris on your APOD! *That is a very fine picture thanks for getting it posted on the APOD site. Thanks. It was a pleasant surprise when they asked me if they could use it. _________________________________________________ Chris L Peterson Cloudbait Observatoryhttp://www.cloudbait.com *That is right you clown,you can only give relevance to the constellations in terms of orbital dynamics *so glad to see you can unlearn that stupid notion that the apparent rotation of the constellations around Polaris has some relevance in terms of planetary dynamics and daily rotation in particular - "Where are all of these meteors coming from? In terms of direction on the sky, the pointed answer is the constellation of Perseus. That is why the last week's meteor shower was known as the Perseids -- the meteors all appear to come from a radiant toward Perseus. Three dimensionally, however, sand-sized debris expelled from Comet Swift- Tuttle follows a well-defined orbit about our Sun, and the part of the orbit that approaches Earth is superposed in front of the Perseus. Therefore, when Earth crosses this orbit, the radiant point of falling debris appears in Perseus. " There you go Peterson,you get my student of the day award and good for you,the next thing you unlearn is why the motion of Persius around Polaris is a great timekeeping convenience based on the equable 365/366 day calendar system. So many fools... so few comets... |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Chris' POD
On Aug 18, 7:05*pm, Pierre Vandevenne wrote:
On Aug 18, 7:23*pm, oriel36 wrote: There you go Peterson,you get my student of the day award and good for you,the next thing you unlearn is why the motion of Persius around Polaris is a great timekeeping convenience based on the equable 365/366 day calendar system. One starts wishing for a stray meteor... Anyway, great illustration Chris! Hey,the guy is right for a change,the relationship between a constellation and orbital dynamics is the only proper correlation there is.When I see a guy on the right road he deserves encouragement and that is said in the nicest possible way and without prejudice. If you tries to link the rotation of constellations around Polaris with daily rotation,then he gets something else - http://www.opencourse.info/astronomy...phere_anim.gif Maybe then somebody will experience a tinge of the horror I have known by 'sidereal time' reasoning and have fought tooth and nail to expunge from human reasoning. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Chris' POD
On Aug 18, 11:49*am, oriel36 wrote:
Maybe then somebody will experience a tinge of the horror I have known *by 'sidereal time' reasoning and have fought tooth and nail to expunge from human reasoning. Well, good luck with that, I think you will be living with your horror for a very long time... you are so wrong on too many fronts to even list... |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Chris' POD
On Aug 19, 4:23*am, Sam Wormley wrote:
oriel36 wrote: Maybe then somebody will experience a tinge of the horror I have known by 'sidereal time' reasoning and have fought tooth and nail to expunge from human reasoning. * *You poor soul! * *Perhaps you should consider going to university. Meet your enemy * *head on and immerse yourself in real celestial mechanics! Enemy indeed !,mediocrity can only be dealt with it one way and that is by showing that astronomy is not the mediocre magnification hobby at night that you miserable creeps would have it. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mediocrity_principle There is not the slightest sign of the great human traits in any of you,just a slavish subservience to some idiotic notion that declaring how humdrum the universe ,unexceptional the planet is,unexceptional life is,you gain some perverse satisfaction of pseudo-authority. You numbskulls can't even get the basic planetary facts and dynamics straight and that is true mediocrity. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Chris' POD
On Aug 19, 12:01*pm, oriel36 wrote:
You numbskulls can't even get the basic planetary facts and dynamics straight and that is true mediocrity. Actually, we don't care. We try to take nice pictures of objects that have been photographed a zillion times. Or we spend hours looking at horrible smudges through imperfect but expensive glass. Some of us count photons, one way or the other, then recount them over and over. We're just killing time until death. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Great work Chris P. | m-k2 | Amateur Astronomy | 1 | September 3rd 07 02:42 AM |
Goaded by Chris Peterson | Davoud | Amateur Astronomy | 24 | August 3rd 05 07:32 AM |
Chris Heapy Site | Charles Ping | UK Astronomy | 25 | January 22nd 05 05:22 PM |
Chris Heapy | Roger Hamlett | Amateur Astronomy | 4 | January 19th 05 11:37 PM |
Congrats Chris | bill | UK Astronomy | 3 | January 5th 04 11:21 PM |