|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#81
|
|||
|
|||
Sirius and us, Newtonian inseparable / FAS & Brad Guth
This one has become almost as good as my other topics of:
"The Big Idea / Geoengineering “Shading The Earth” / Brad Guth (Shading The Earth with our moon)" http://groups.google.com/group/alt.a...acac4cf?hl=en# - "The 1~10% hollow moon / Brad Guth" http://groups.google.com/group/alt.a...a50160d?hl=en# - "The Secret Radar Pixels of Venus / by Brad Guth" http://groups.google.com/group/alt.a...6b05c94?hl=en# Apparently those Newtonian and other laws of physics are conditional, as based upon the faith-based politics and special interest group mindset of the day. No wonder the deductive science of observationology remains as taboo/nondisclosure rated, and otherwise always forbid whatever revisionism. Everything from shading Earth with our moon to appreciating the other intelligent life existing/coexisting on Venus, and of course those "Cosmological Ice Ages" are each examples where those laws of physics and best available science do not count, and otherwise our public Usenet/newsgroups becomes a kosher free-for-all kind of food fight. ~ BG |
#82
|
|||
|
|||
Sirius and us, Newtonian inseparable / FAS & Brad Guth
On Oct 18, 7:28*am, BradGuth wrote:
This one has become almost as good as my other topics of: "The Big Idea / Geoengineering “Shading The Earth” / Brad Guth (Shading The Earth with our moon)" http://groups.google.com/group/alt.a.../thread/6a4353... - "The 1~10% hollow moon / Brad Guth" http://groups.google.com/group/alt.a.../thread/b88503... - "The Secret Radar Pixels of Venus / by Brad Guth" http://groups.google.com/group/alt.a.../thread/8a40c1... Apparently those Newtonian and other laws of physics are conditional, as based upon the faith-based politics and special interest group mindset of the day. * No wonder the deductive science of observationology remains as taboo/nondisclosure rated, and otherwise always forbid whatever revisionism. Everything from shading Earth with our moon to appreciating the other intelligent life existing/coexisting on Venus, and of course those "Cosmological Ice Ages" are each examples where those laws of physics and best available science do not count, and otherwise our public Usenet/newsgroups becomes a kosher free-for-all kind of food fight. Why can't the Newtonian laws of gravity be applied for how our solar system has been affected by the massive and vibrant Sirius star system that we're once again headed towards? Imagine the molecular cloud of 12.5e6 Ms that supposedly gave birth to those Sirius stars, and how that amount of nearby mass should have affected us. ~ BG |
#83
|
|||
|
|||
Sirius and us, Newtonian inseparable / FAS & Brad Guth
On Oct 15, 6:54*am, BradGuth wrote:
On Sep 21, 7:02*am, BradGuth wrote: On Aug 24, 11:07*am, BradGuth wrote: Now we have a new and improved gauntlet of a topic/author taboo and/or banishment enforced policy, or rather media infowar tactic, even if it means forcing mainstream to ignore any fix to our badly GW traumatized environment and of its unique biodiversity we call Eden/Earth, or merely on behalf of improving it’s use of government and our limited resources. The biggest forbidden topics have to do with discussing other forms of off-world intelligent life, because such isn’t supposed to exist unless it’s of a subhuman Zionist/Jewish species that we get to dominate and profit from. (isn't that special) All we seem to get nowadays is the usual Republican Zionist Nazi replies of change nothing and otherwise do nothing, because apparently nothing is bad with the way everything is, and besides nothing seriously bad is ever going to happen, and even if it should we mere humans couldn't have done anything positive or constructive for the better. In other Usenet/newsgroup words of cult/cabal wisdom; *Change nothing, revise nothing and above all do nothing about learning, exploring, researching or forbid any public sharing of whatever knowledge, because we (those in charge) supposedly like everything exactly as it is. *~ BG On Jul 6, 6:55*am, BradGuth wrote: Sirius and our solar system are clearly inseparable, at least according to the regular laws of physics, Newtonian gravity and orbital mechanics. In spite of whatever those mainstream textbooks and their puppet media has to say, we seem to have become closely associated with the Sirius star cluster, even though Sirius has only been a relatively newish and extremely vibrant stellar evolution (quite possibly contributed from our encountering another galaxy), and especially terrestrial illuminating of the first 200~250 million years worth. First off, it took a cosmic molecular cloud worth perhaps at the very least 125,000 solar masses in order to produce such a 12.5 mass worthy star system, leaving 99.99% of that molecular mass as supposedly blown away and having to fend for itself, at a place and time when our existing solar system wasn't any too far away. *Others might go so far as to suggest a more than likely molecular cloud mass of 1.25 million, while still others yet would prefer a more robust cloud worthy of 12.5 million solar masses as having emerged from encountering a smaller galaxy that merged with our Milky Way. *In any case, that must have been quite a stellar birthing process, especially if the remains of this terrific cloud of originally near 100 ly diameter is suddenly nowhere to be found. In any case, there's no way that our passive little solar system wasn't somehow directly affected by and otherwise having become tidal radius interrelated with such a nearby mass, and/or at least subsequently associated with the mutual barycenter that's primarily dominated by the Sirius star/solar system. Lo and behold, it seems that numerous mergers of galactic proportions isn’t nearly as uncommon as some of our perpetual naysayers and Big Bang of devout OT thumpers might care to suggest. Our Milky Way Galaxy and its Companions (we are not alone) *http://www.public.asu.edu/~rjansen/l...ocalgroup.html The Hipparcos Space Astrometry Mission: (mainstream media ignored) *http://sci.esa.int/science-e/www/are...cfm?fareaid=20 *http://www.spacedaily.com/news/milkyway-04m.html Local galactic motion simulation: *"The Geneva-Copenhagen survey of the Solar neighbourhood", by B. Nordström et al. *http://www.aanda.org/content/view/71/42/lang,en According to several physics and astronomy kinds of *observationology science (deductive interpretation of eye-candy plus other peer replicated research), our Milky Way is made up of at least two galactic units, with more of the same on their blue-shifted way towards encountering us (namely Andromeda). *Seems hardly fair considering that everything was supposedly created via one singular Big Bang, not to mention that hundreds to perhaps thousands of galaxies seem rather nicely headed into the Great Attractor (including us) for their final demise and/or rebirth. Don’t forget to appreciate those Hubble, KECK and multiple other archives (including those of what FAS has compiled) depicting “colliding galaxies”, as well as soon to become ESA color/hue enhanced and expanded upon via a trio of their impressive orbital observatories, not to mention whatever the renewed and improved Hubble plus our next generation of orbital observatories should further document. *It may even become hard to find galaxies as massive as ours and Andromeda that are entirely original without their having grown via mergers. Where's our TRACEe3 and the all-knowing expertise from FAS, telling us whatever they seem to know best or at least suspect is most likely? Surely these brown-nosed clowns of mostly pretend Atheists, as well as republican faith-based bigots and typically closed mindsets of our Usenet/newsgroup cabal that are enforcing their mainstream status quo (much like my personal rabbi shadow tries to do), are hopefully not representing or otherwise speaking on behalf of our FAS. *~ Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth BG / “Guth Usenet” Even though gravity is an extremely weak force, when there's enough matter associated with a given star/solar system to place an affect another nearby star/solar system, and it's especially so if such mass is as nearby as our solar system and Sirius as already heading elliptically towards one another, as is the case with us and Sirius. Cosmological Ice Ages (by Henry Kroll) The example ratio of 8.3e7:1 is how much greater our solar system remains via Newtonian force, as having been attracted to the existing Sirius star/solar system, than otherwise associated with 2005-VX3 being the item (damocloid/asteroid) of 112 km diameter that’s forever attracted to our sun. *This Sirius:XV3 ratio of 8.3e7:1 is just another Newtonian matter of objective and peer accepted fact that you and others can take to the bank (unless it’s a kosher bank, in which case you're not allowed to deposit anything that’s not of their mainstream faith-based approval, because according to their long standing policy and subsequent rules applied to everyone else, Eden/ Earth is always alone and supposedly all there is for accommodating any complex biodiversity, and everything about our environment is strictly terrestrial and somehow having nothing whatsoever to do with human or external factors because, apparently their Eden/Earth has been given unlimited and renewable resources of everything we need as is, except for an inflated price). Gravity Force of Attraction (orbital tidal radius) *http://www.1728.com/gravity.htm *http://www.wsanford.com/~wsanford/ca...alculator.html Individual mass and velocity are of course significant and the most dominate of trajectory factors, and then it gets especially complex whenever there's more than two given bodies of mass to consider that are each in proper motion to one another. *This however doesn't exclude our interacting with the Sirius star system, or otherwise obfuscate/exclude what the weak force of gravity and the subsequent laws of Newtonian orbital mechanics has to say. Would anyone care to explain why our solar system has not been attracted or otherwise influence by the relatively nearby Sirius star system? It seems once an elliptical trek is established, that it's pretty hard to break that orbital habit, especially if the other mass was so much more substantial to begin with. ~ BG |
#84
|
|||
|
|||
Sirius and us, Newtonian inseparable / FAS & Brad Guth
On Oct 24, 5:33*am, BradGuth wrote:
On Oct 15, 6:54*am, BradGuth wrote: On Sep 21, 7:02*am, BradGuth wrote: On Aug 24, 11:07*am, BradGuth wrote: Now we have a new and improved gauntlet of a topic/author taboo and/or banishment enforced policy, or rather media infowar tactic, even if it means forcing mainstream to ignore any fix to our badly GW traumatized environment and of its unique biodiversity we call Eden/Earth, or merely on behalf of improving it’s use of government and our limited resources. The biggest forbidden topics have to do with discussing other forms of off-world intelligent life, because such isn’t supposed to exist unless it’s of a subhuman Zionist/Jewish species that we get to dominate and profit from. (isn't that special) All we seem to get nowadays is the usual Republican Zionist Nazi replies of change nothing and otherwise do nothing, because apparently nothing is bad with the way everything is, and besides nothing seriously bad is ever going to happen, and even if it should we mere humans couldn't have done anything positive or constructive for the better. In other Usenet/newsgroup words of cult/cabal wisdom; *Change nothing, revise nothing and above all do nothing about learning, exploring, researching or forbid any public sharing of whatever knowledge, because we (those in charge) supposedly like everything exactly as it is. *~ BG On Jul 6, 6:55*am, BradGuth wrote: Sirius and our solar system are clearly inseparable, at least according to the regular laws of physics, Newtonian gravity and orbital mechanics. In spite of whatever those mainstream textbooks and their puppet media has to say, we seem to have become closely associated with the Sirius star cluster, even though Sirius has only been a relatively newish and extremely vibrant stellar evolution (quite possibly contributed from our encountering another galaxy), and especially terrestrial illuminating of the first 200~250 million years worth. First off, it took a cosmic molecular cloud worth perhaps at the very least 125,000 solar masses in order to produce such a 12.5 mass worthy star system, leaving 99.99% of that molecular mass as supposedly blown away and having to fend for itself, at a place and time when our existing solar system wasn't any too far away. *Others might go so far as to suggest a more than likely molecular cloud mass of 1.25 million, while still others yet would prefer a more robust cloud worthy of 12.5 million solar masses as having emerged from encountering a smaller galaxy that merged with our Milky Way. *In any case, that must have been quite a stellar birthing process, especially if the remains of this terrific cloud of originally near 100 ly diameter is suddenly nowhere to be found. In any case, there's no way that our passive little solar system wasn't somehow directly affected by and otherwise having become tidal radius interrelated with such a nearby mass, and/or at least subsequently associated with the mutual barycenter that's primarily dominated by the Sirius star/solar system. Lo and behold, it seems that numerous mergers of galactic proportions isn’t nearly as uncommon as some of our perpetual naysayers and Big Bang of devout OT thumpers might care to suggest. Our Milky Way Galaxy and its Companions (we are not alone) *http://www.public.asu.edu/~rjansen/l...ocalgroup.html The Hipparcos Space Astrometry Mission: (mainstream media ignored) *http://sci.esa.int/science-e/www/are...cfm?fareaid=20 *http://www.spacedaily.com/news/milkyway-04m.html Local galactic motion simulation: *"The Geneva-Copenhagen survey of the Solar neighbourhood", by B. |
#85
|
|||
|
|||
Sirius and us, Newtonian inseparable / FAS & Brad Guth
On Oct 15, 5:54*am, BradGuth wrote:
On Sep 21, 7:02*am, BradGuth wrote: On Aug 24, 11:07*am, BradGuth wrote: Now we have a new and improved gauntlet of a topic/author taboo and/or banishment enforced policy, or rather media infowar tactic, even if it means forcing mainstream to ignore any fix to our badly GW traumatized environment and of its unique biodiversity we call Eden/Earth, or merely on behalf of improving it’s use of government and our limited resources. The biggest forbidden topics have to do with discussing other forms of off-world intelligent life, because such isn’t supposed to exist unless it’s of a subhuman Zionist/Jewish species that we get to dominate and profit from. (isn't that special) All we seem to get nowadays is the usual Republican Zionist Nazi replies of change nothing and otherwise do nothing, because apparently nothing is bad with the way everything is, and besides nothing seriously bad is ever going to happen, and even if it should we mere humans couldn't have done anything positive or constructive for the better. In other Usenet/newsgroup words of cult/cabal wisdom; *Change nothing, revise nothing and above all do nothing about learning, exploring, researching or forbid any public sharing of whatever knowledge, because we (those in charge) supposedly like everything exactly as it is. *~ BG On Jul 6, 6:55*am, BradGuth wrote: Sirius and our solar system are clearly inseparable, at least according to the regular laws of physics, Newtonian gravity and orbital mechanics. In spite of whatever those mainstream textbooks and their puppet media has to say, we seem to have become closely associated with the Sirius star cluster, even though Sirius has only been a relatively newish and extremely vibrant stellar evolution (quite possibly contributed from our encountering another galaxy), and especially terrestrial illuminating of the first 200~250 million years worth. First off, it took a cosmic molecular cloud worth perhaps at the very least 125,000 solar masses in order to produce such a 12.5 mass worthy star system, leaving 99.99% of that molecular mass as supposedly blown away and having to fend for itself, at a place and time when our existing solar system wasn't any too far away. *Others might go so far as to suggest a more than likely molecular cloud mass of 1.25 million, while still others yet would prefer a more robust cloud worthy of 12.5 million solar masses as having emerged from encountering a smaller galaxy that merged with our Milky Way. *In any case, that must have been quite a stellar birthing process, especially if the remains of this terrific cloud of originally near 100 ly diameter is suddenly nowhere to be found. In any case, there's no way that our passive little solar system wasn't somehow directly affected by and otherwise having become tidal radius interrelated with such a nearby mass, and/or at least subsequently associated with the mutual barycenter that's primarily dominated by the Sirius star/solar system. Lo and behold, it seems that numerous mergers of galactic proportions isn’t nearly as uncommon as some of our perpetual naysayers and Big Bang of devout OT thumpers might care to suggest. Our Milky Way Galaxy and its Companions (we are not alone) *http://www.public.asu.edu/~rjansen/l...ocalgroup.html The Hipparcos Space Astrometry Mission: (mainstream media ignored) *http://sci.esa.int/science-e/www/are...cfm?fareaid=20 *http://www.spacedaily.com/news/milkyway-04m.html Local galactic motion simulation: *"The Geneva-Copenhagen survey of the Solar neighbourhood", by B. Nordström et al. *http://www.aanda.org/content/view/71/42/lang,en According to several physics and astronomy kinds of *observationology science (deductive interpretation of eye-candy plus other peer replicated research), our Milky Way is made up of at least two galactic units, with more of the same on their blue-shifted way towards encountering us (namely Andromeda). *Seems hardly fair considering that everything was supposedly created via one singular Big Bang, not to mention that hundreds to perhaps thousands of galaxies seem rather nicely headed into the Great Attractor (including us) for their final demise and/or rebirth. Don’t forget to appreciate those Hubble, KECK and multiple other archives (including those of what FAS has compiled) depicting “colliding galaxies”, as well as soon to become ESA color/hue enhanced and expanded upon via a trio of their impressive orbital observatories, not to mention whatever the renewed and improved Hubble plus our next generation of orbital observatories should further document. *It may even become hard to find galaxies as massive as ours and Andromeda that are entirely original without their having grown via mergers. Where's our TRACEe3 and the all-knowing expertise from FAS, telling us whatever they seem to know best or at least suspect is most likely? Surely these brown-nosed clowns of mostly pretend Atheists, as well as republican faith-based bigots and typically closed mindsets of our Usenet/newsgroup cabal that are enforcing their mainstream status quo (much like my personal rabbi shadow tries to do), are hopefully not representing or otherwise speaking on behalf of our FAS. *~BradGuthBrad_GuthBrad.GuthBradGuth BG / “GuthUsenet” Even though gravity is an extremely weak force, when there's enough matter associated with a given star/solar system to place an affect another nearby star/solar system, and it's especially so if such mass is as nearby as our solar system and Sirius as already heading elliptically towards one another, as is the case with us and Sirius. Cosmological Ice Ages (by Henry Kroll) The example ratio of 8.3e7:1 is how much greater our solar system remains via Newtonian force, as having been attracted to the existing Sirius star/solar system, than otherwise associated with 2005-VX3 being the item (damocloid/asteroid) of 112 km diameter that’s forever attracted to our sun. *This Sirius:XV3 ratio of 8.3e7:1 is just another Newtonian matter of objective and peer accepted fact that you and others can take to the bank (unless it’s a kosher bank, in which case you're not allowed to deposit anything that’s not of their mainstream faith-based approval, because according to their long standing policy and subsequent rules applied to everyone else, Eden/ Earth is always alone and supposedly all there is for accommodating any complex biodiversity, and everything about our environment is strictly terrestrial and somehow having nothing whatsoever to do with human or external factors because, apparently their Eden/Earth has been given unlimited and renewable resources of everything we need as is, except for an inflated price). Gravity Force of Attraction (orbital tidal radius) *http://www.1728.com/gravity.htm *http://www.wsanford.com/~wsanford/ca...alculator.html Individual mass and velocity are of course significant and the most dominate of trajectory factors, and then it gets especially complex whenever there's more than two given bodies of mass to consider that are each in proper motion to one another. *This however doesn't exclude our interacting with the Sirius star system, or otherwise obfuscate/exclude what the weak force of gravity and the subsequent laws of Newtonian orbital mechanics has to say. *~ BG So, why is the Newtonian law of gravity not apply to Sol and Sirius? (but of course it does) ~ BG |
#86
|
|||
|
|||
Sirius and us, Newtonian inseparable / FAS & Brad Guth
Why is it so unusually dark and quiet in here?
On Nov 5, 11:09*pm, BradGuth wrote: On Oct 15, 5:54*am, BradGuth wrote: On Sep 21, 7:02*am, BradGuth wrote: On Aug 24, 11:07*am, BradGuth wrote: Now we have a new and improved gauntlet of a topic/author taboo and/or banishment enforced policy, or rather media infowar tactic, even if it means forcing mainstream to ignore any fix to our badly GW traumatized environment and of its unique biodiversity we call Eden/Earth, or merely on behalf of improving it’s use of government and our limited resources. The biggest forbidden topics have to do with discussing other forms of off-world intelligent life, because such isn’t supposed to exist unless it’s of a subhuman Zionist/Jewish species that we get to dominate and profit from. (isn't that special) All we seem to get nowadays is the usual Republican Zionist Nazi replies of change nothing and otherwise do nothing, because apparently nothing is bad with the way everything is, and besides nothing seriously bad is ever going to happen, and even if it should we mere humans couldn't have done anything positive or constructive for the better. In other Usenet/newsgroup words of cult/cabal wisdom; *Change nothing, revise nothing and above all do nothing about learning, exploring, researching or forbid any public sharing of whatever knowledge, because we (those in charge) supposedly like everything exactly as it is. *~ BG On Jul 6, 6:55*am, BradGuth wrote: Sirius and our solar system are clearly inseparable, at least according to the regular laws of physics, Newtonian gravity and orbital mechanics. In spite of whatever those mainstream textbooks and their puppet media has to say, we seem to have become closely associated with the Sirius star cluster, even though Sirius has only been a relatively newish and extremely vibrant stellar evolution (quite possibly contributed from our encountering another galaxy), and especially terrestrial illuminating of the first 200~250 million years worth. First off, it took a cosmic molecular cloud worth perhaps at the very least 125,000 solar masses in order to produce such a 12.5 mass worthy star system, leaving 99.99% of that molecular mass as supposedly blown away and having to fend for itself, at a place and time when our existing solar system wasn't any too far away. *Others might go so far as to suggest a more than likely molecular cloud mass of 1.25 million, while still others yet would prefer a more robust cloud worthy of 12.5 million solar masses as having emerged from encountering a smaller galaxy that merged with our Milky Way. *In any case, that must have been quite a stellar birthing process, especially if the remains of this terrific cloud of originally near 100 ly diameter is suddenly nowhere to be found. In any case, there's no way that our passive little solar system wasn't somehow directly affected by and otherwise having become tidal radius interrelated with such a nearby mass, and/or at least subsequently associated with the mutual barycenter that's primarily dominated by the Sirius star/solar system. Lo and behold, it seems that numerous mergers of galactic proportions isn’t nearly as uncommon as some of our perpetual naysayers and Big Bang of devout OT thumpers might care to suggest. Our Milky Way Galaxy and its Companions (we are not alone) *http://www.public.asu.edu/~rjansen/l...ocalgroup.html The Hipparcos Space Astrometry Mission: (mainstream media ignored) *http://sci.esa.int/science-e/www/are...cfm?fareaid=20 *http://www.spacedaily.com/news/milkyway-04m.html Local galactic motion simulation: *"The Geneva-Copenhagen survey of the Solar neighbourhood", by B. |
#87
|
|||
|
|||
Sirius and us, Newtonian inseparable / FAS & Brad Guth
"BradGuth" wrote in message ... Why is it so unusually dark and quiet in here? Because we're discussing the extent of your stupidity, you loon. The Sirius Star System is 8.6 LY distant. Sirius A is about twice as massive as our Sun, extending its gravitational field outwards to about 4LYs. Sirius B became a White Dwarf 120 million years ago. The Sun's gravitational influence extends about 2 LY. There is speculation of a third companion to the system but it has as yet eluded astronomers. So, GuthBall, explain one more time how Sirius exerts any influence on our Solar System, and/or the process by which our Moon was ejected from the Sirius Star System and successfully captured by Earth in its present almost perfectly circular orbit (and how did it not become another planet around the Sun. Waiting with bated breath ... and please, provide links to substantiate any replies ... a lunatic's rantings and wet dreams are not considered evidence. |
#88
|
|||
|
|||
Sirius and us, Newtonian inseparable / FAS & Brad Guth
"Hagar" wrote in message ... Waiting with bated breath ... and please, provide links to substantiate any replies ... a lunatic's rantings and wet dreams are not considered evidence. Great, you really want more meandering gibberish? Hey, Guthie, provide current vectors and back-plots for the Sirius and Sol star systems. Plot the courses and provide an image for us to gander at. |
#89
|
|||
|
|||
Sirius and us, Newtonian inseparable / FAS & Brad Guth
On Nov 13, 8:26*am, "Nightcrawler" wrote:
"Hagar" wrote in messagenews:ILWdnVNXF_cj42DXnZ2dnUVZ_vKdnZ2d@gigan ews.com... Waiting with bated breath ... and please, provide links to substantiate any replies ... a lunatic's rantings and wet dreams are not considered evidence. Great, you really want more meandering gibberish? Hey, Guthie, provide current vectors and back-plots for the Sirius and Sol star systems. Plot the courses and provide an image for us to gander at. I'll need some help with that. Care to offer your services, and to share in the credits? ~ BG |
#90
|
|||
|
|||
Sirius and us, Newtonian inseparable / FAS & Brad Guth
"BradGuth" wrote in message ... I'll need some help with that. Care to offer your services, and to share in the credits? Do you really want your bubble burst that bad? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Brad Guth is...... | OM | History | 0 | December 26th 03 11:34 PM |