Sirius and us, Newtonian inseparable / FAS & Brad Guth

On Jan 13, 12:31*pm, BradGuth wrote:
On Dec 25 2009, 8:53*pm, "Yubiwan" wrote:

There are a number of things that can attack a star system, Saul.
We recently cut a hole in a noxious gas cloud that would have decimated
Earth and killed us all.
We frequently change the orbits of meteoroids that would harm Earth and its
life.
When comets come close we monitor them for the deadliness of the half-life
they have aboard.
And many other unimaginable deadly events are cancelled by us.
--
Yubiwan
Be well and come... be welcome!

Where's the supposed evidence that the terrific Sirius molecular cloud
of 12.5e6 Ms and its subsequent stars never had an impact/influence
upon our solar system?

What would an honest Sean Rothschild like yourself know and be willing
to share about this tidal gravity association that we must still have
with the Sirius star/solar system, that's currently only a fraction of it's
original stellar mass?

Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet

On Jan 14, 1:11*pm, BradGuth wrote:
On Jan 13, 12:31*pm, BradGuth wrote:





On Dec 25 2009, 8:53*pm, "Yubiwan" wrote:

There are a number of things that can attack a star system, Saul.
We recently cut a hole in a noxious gas cloud that would have decimated
Earth and killed us all.
We frequently change the orbits of meteoroids that would harm Earth and its
life.
When comets come close we monitor them for the deadliness of the half-life
they have aboard.
And many other unimaginable deadly events are cancelled by us.
--
Yubiwan
Be well and come... be welcome!

Where's the supposed evidence that the terrific Sirius molecular cloud
of 12.5e6 Ms and its subsequent stars never had an impact/influence
upon our solar system?

What would an honest Sean Rothschild like yourself know and be willing
to share about this tidal gravity association that we must still have
with the Sirius star/solar system, that's currently only a fraction of it's
original stellar mass?

*Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet


A blank post, Guth? How koOky!

Double-A

"Double-A" wrote in message ...
On Jan 14, 1:11 pm, BradGuth wrote:
On Jan 13, 12:31 pm, BradGuth wrote:





On Dec 25 2009, 8:53 pm, "Yubiwan" wrote:

There are a number of things that can attack a star system, Saul.
We recently cut a hole in a noxious gas cloud that would have decimated
Earth and killed us all.
We frequently change the orbits of meteoroids that would harm Earth and its
life.
When comets come close we monitor them for the deadliness of the half-life
they have aboard.
And many other unimaginable deadly events are cancelled by us.
--
Yubiwan
Be well and come... be welcome!

Where's the supposed evidence that the terrific Sirius molecular cloud
of 12.5e6 Ms and its subsequent stars never had an impact/influence
upon our solar system?

What would an honest Sean Rothschild like yourself know and be willing
to share about this tidal gravity association that we must still have
with the Sirius star/solar system, that's currently only a fraction of it's
original stellar mass?

Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet


A blank post, Guth? How koOky!

Double-A
~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Indeed !
--
HJ

On Jan 14, 2:46*pm, "\"The Great One\""
wrote:
"Double-A" wrote in ...

On Jan 14, 1:11 pm, BradGuth wrote:



On Jan 13, 12:31 pm, BradGuth wrote:

On Dec 25 2009, 8:53 pm, "Yubiwan" wrote:

There are a number of things that can attack a star system, Saul.
We recently cut a hole in a noxious gas cloud that would have decimated
Earth and killed us all.
We frequently change the orbits of meteoroids that would harm Earth and its
life.
When comets come close we monitor them for the deadliness of the half-life
they have aboard.
And many other unimaginable deadly events are cancelled by us.
--
Yubiwan
Be well and come... be welcome!

Where's the supposed evidence that the terrific Sirius molecular cloud
of 12.5e6 Ms and its subsequent stars never had an impact/influence
upon our solar system?

What would an honest Sean Rothschild like yourself know and be willing
to share about this tidal gravity association that we must still have
with the Sirius star/solar system, that's currently only a fraction of it's
original stellar mass?

Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet

A blank post, Guth? *How koOky!

Double-A
~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Indeed !
--
HJ

Sorry about that. I merely revised a couple words, and didn't think
to properly repost the context so that it shows without looking at the
previous message:

Where's the supposed evidence that the terrific Sirius molecular cloud
of 12.5e6 Ms, and of its subsequent vibrant stars never had an impact/
influence upon our solar system?

What would an honest Sean Rothschild like yourself ("Yubiwan") know
and be willing to share about this tidal gravity association that we
must still have with the remaining Sirius star/solar system, that's
currently only a fraction of it's original 12.5 stellar mass?

~ BG

On Jan 3, 1:13 pm, BradGuth wrote:
On Dec 24 2009, 6:58 pm, BradGuth wrote:



On Dec 24, 11:35 am, Nightcrawler wrote:

On 12/24/2009 1:21 PM, BradGuth wrote:

Your perpetual obfuscation and systematic policy of denial is noted.

Your inability to follow a thought and abject refusal to accept
reality is noted.

At least I believe in those regular laws of physics that are not
conditional, politically correct nor faith-based approved.

Can you explain how the Newtonian laws of gravity do not apply in this
case?

Are you suggesting that something other than gravity has those Kuiper
belt and TNO asteroids, plus scads of Oort zone Items hanging around
(including Sedna and at least a few thousand others)?

Tell us how we're supposedly not the least bit tidal associated with
Sirius.

Do you have some new and improved formula for gravity?

~ BG

There was once upon a time a great deal of gravitational tidal
association between our wussy little passive solar system of 2e30 kg,
and that of the nearby original 25e30 kg Sirius star/solar system.

~ BG

Why are the stealth moderators of our public Google/NOVA Groups that's
hosting these Usenet/newsgroups along with our topic ratings via "Gold
Stars" being continually taken away?

In other words, why is the "gold star" rating such a threat to their
insider cabal?

I thought Seans and other ZNR Rothschilds weren't afraid of anything,
but I guess that's not the case.

~ BG

On Jan 14, 1:11*pm, BradGuth wrote:
On Jan 13, 12:31*pm, BradGuth wrote:



On Dec 25 2009, 8:53*pm, "Yubiwan" wrote:

There are a number of things that can attack a star system, Saul.
We recently cut a hole in a noxious gas cloud that would have decimated
Earth and killed us all.
We frequently change the orbits of meteoroids that would harm Earth and its
life.
When comets come close we monitor them for the deadliness of the half-life
they have aboard.
And many other unimaginable deadly events are cancelled by us.
--
Yubiwan
Be well and come... be welcome!

Where's the supposed evidence that the terrific Sirius molecular cloud
of 12.5e6 Ms and its subsequent stars never had an impact/influence
upon our solar system?

What would an honest Sean Rothschild like yourself know and be willing
to share about this tidal gravity association that we must still have
with the Sirius star/solar system, that's currently only a fraction of it's
original stellar mass?

*BradGuth, Brad_Guth,Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “GuthUsenet

Have the Newtonian laws of gravity been revoked?

Where's the supposed evidence or even subjective conditional physics
that the terrific Sirius molecular cloud of 12.5e6 Ms, and that of
its subsequent vibrant stars never had an impact/influence upon our
solar system?

What would an honest Sean Rothschild like "Yubiwan" or "Darla" know
and/or be willing to share about this tidal gravity association that
we must still have with the remaining Sirius star/solar system, that's
currently only a fraction of it's original 12.5 stellar mass?

~ BG

On Jan 28, 3:43*pm, BradGuth wrote:
On Jan 14, 1:11*pm, BradGuth wrote:





On Jan 13, 12:31*pm, BradGuth wrote:

On Dec 25 2009, 8:53*pm, "Yubiwan" wrote:

There are a number of things that can attack a star system, Saul.
We recently cut a hole in a noxious gas cloud that would have decimated
Earth and killed us all.
We frequently change the orbits of meteoroids that would harm Earth and its
life.
When comets come close we monitor them for the deadliness of the half-life
they have aboard.
And many other unimaginable deadly events are cancelled by us.
--
Yubiwan
Be well and come... be welcome!

Where's the supposed evidence that the terrific Sirius molecular cloud
of 12.5e6 Ms and its subsequent stars never had an impact/influence
upon our solar system?

What would an honest Sean Rothschild like yourself know and be willing
to share about this tidal gravity association that we must still have
with the Sirius star/solar system, that's currently only a fraction of it's
original stellar mass?

*BradGuth, Brad_Guth,Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “GuthUsenet

Have the Newtonian laws of gravity been revoked?


Are you asking yourself? See GTR.


Where's the supposed evidence or even subjective conditional physics
that the terrific Sirius molecular cloud of 12.5e6 Ms, and that of
its subsequent vibrant stars never had an impact/influence upon our
solar system?


It may have been nowhere near us.


What would an honest Sean Rothschild like "Yubiwan" or "Darla" know
and/or be willing to share about this tidal gravity association that
we must still have with the remaining Sirius star/solar system, that's
currently only a fraction of it's original 12.5 stellar mass?

*~ BG


Nothing probably.

Double-A

On Jan 28, 4:09*pm, Double-A wrote:
On Jan 28, 3:43*pm, BradGuth wrote:



On Jan 14, 1:11*pm, BradGuth wrote:

On Jan 13, 12:31*pm, BradGuth wrote:

On Dec 25 2009, 8:53*pm, "Yubiwan" wrote:

There are a number of things that can attack a star system, Saul.
We recently cut a hole in a noxious gas cloud that would have decimated
Earth and killed us all.
We frequently change the orbits of meteoroids that would harm Earth and its
life.
When comets come close we monitor them for the deadliness of the half-life
they have aboard.
And many other unimaginable deadly events are cancelled by us.
--
Yubiwan
Be well and come... be welcome!

Where's the supposed evidence that the terrific Sirius molecular cloud
of 12.5e6 Ms and its subsequent stars never had an impact/influence
upon our solar system?

What would an honest Sean Rothschild like yourself know and be willing
to share about this tidal gravity association that we must still have
with the Sirius star/solar system, that's currently only a fraction of it's
original stellar mass?

*BradGuth, Brad_Guth,Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “GuthUsenet

Have the Newtonian laws of gravity been revoked?

Are you asking yourself? *See GTR.

So, you've plotted those GTR gravity curves for us?


Where's the supposed evidence or even subjective conditional physics
that the terrific Sirius molecular cloud of 12.5e6 Ms, and that of
its subsequent vibrant stars never had an impact/influence upon our
solar system?

It may have been nowhere near us.

More than likely we were within its molecular cloud as it moved slowly
through our galactic realm.


What would an honest Sean Rothschild like "Yubiwan" or "Darla" know
and/or be willing to share about this tidal gravity association that
we must still have with the remaining Sirius star/solar system, that's
currently only a fraction of it's original 12.5 stellar mass?

*~ BG

Nothing probably.

Double-A

Is your "nothing probably" part of some new kind of conditional law of
physics, so that these seans never have to share?

My math and all the other Newtonian math seems to suggest that our
resident seans are basically an insane lot, and obviously bipolar to
boot.

~ BG

On Jan 28, 4:28*pm, BradGuth wrote:
On Jan 28, 4:09*pm, Double-A wrote:



On Jan 28, 3:43*pm, BradGuth wrote:

On Jan 14, 1:11*pm, BradGuth wrote:

On Jan 13, 12:31*pm, BradGuth wrote:

On Dec 25 2009, 8:53*pm, "Yubiwan" wrote:

There are a number of things that can attack a star system, Saul.
We recently cut a hole in a noxious gas cloud that would have decimated
Earth and killed us all.
We frequently change the orbits of meteoroids that would harm Earth and its
life.
When comets come close we monitor them for the deadliness of the half-life
they have aboard.
And many other unimaginable deadly events are cancelled by us.
--
Yubiwan
Be well and come... be welcome!

Where's the supposed evidence that the terrific Sirius molecular cloud
of 12.5e6 Ms and its subsequent stars never had an impact/influence
upon our solar system?

What would an honest Sean Rothschild like yourself know and be willing
to share about this tidal gravity association that we must still have
with the Sirius star/solar system, that's currently only a fraction of it's
original stellar mass?

*BradGuth, Brad_Guth,Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “GuthUsenet

Have the Newtonian laws of gravity been revoked?

Are you asking yourself? *See GTR.

So, you've plotted those GTR gravity curves for us?


Where's the supposed evidence or even subjective conditional physics
that the terrific Sirius molecular cloud of 12.5e6 Ms, and that of
its subsequent vibrant stars never had an impact/influence upon our
solar system?

It may have been nowhere near us.

More than likely we were within its molecular cloud as it moved slowly
through our galactic realm.


What would an honest Sean Rothschild like "Yubiwan" or "Darla" know
and/or be willing to share about this tidal gravity association that
we must still have with the remaining Sirius star/solar system, that's
currently only a fraction of it's original 12.5 stellar mass?

*~ BG

Nothing probably.

Double-A

Is your "nothing probably" part of some new kind of conditional law of
physics, so that these seans never have to share?

My math and all the other Newtonian math seems to suggest that our
resident seans are basically an insane lot, and obviously bipolar to
boot.

I wonder why our resident Zionists/Jews are always so naysay about our
moon, the planet Venus and especially peeved about anything related to
the relatively nearby Sirius star/solar system that our solar system
is still clearly tidal linked. If I didn't know any better, I'd say
they have something dark and scary to hide.

~ BG

On Dec 30 2009, 4:52*am, BradGuth wrote:
On Dec 24, 6:58*pm, BradGuth wrote:

On Dec 24, 11:35*am, Nightcrawler wrote:

On 12/24/2009 1:21 PM, BradGuth wrote:

Your perpetual obfuscation and systematic policy of denial is noted..

Your inability to follow a thought and abject refusal to accept
reality is noted.

At least I believe in those regular laws of physics that are not
conditional, politically correct nor faith-based approved.

Can you explain how the Newtonian laws of gravity do not apply in this
case?

Are you suggesting that something other than gravity has those Kuiper
belt and TNO asteroids, plus scads of Oort zone Items hanging around
(including Sedna and at least a few thousand others)?

Tell us how we're supposedly not the least bit tidal associated with
Sirius.

Do you have some new and improved formula for gravity?

Apparently there's no further reply to this one, perhaps it's because
I'm right.

I still wonder why our resident Zionists/Jews are always so steadfast
naysay about our moon, the planet Venus and especially peeved about
anything related to the relatively nearby Sirius star/solar system,
that which our solar system is clearly tidal linked. If I didn't know
any better, I'd say they have something at risk or simply dark and
scary to hide.

~ BG